Category: American history

  • Document Analysis Worksheet

    Directions: For your Unit I assignment, you will complete the following worksheet using the

    archival online database Immigration Records for the INS [Immigration Naturalization Service],

    1880-1930. Below you will find a document from that collection that you will use to answer

    the worksheet questions. First, read the entire document. Then copy and paste the worksheet

    questions to a new document where you will type your answers. Please use full sentences, be

    detailed and specific, and expand upon your analysis whenever possible. When completed, this

    worksheet should be at least 3 pages, single-spaced, size 12 font. Be sure to proof and edit your

    work.

    For the last question on the worksheet, you will be asked to describe one of the

    documents that you found on your own while exploring the INS database. Be sure to include

    the title of the document and a brief description of the document and what you found

    interesting about it. For instructions on how to access and search the database see the How to

    search the Immigration and Naturalization Services Archival Database activity in this weeks

    module on Canvas.

    Upload your final worksheet to Canvas by 11:59 pm on Sunday, February 22. You can

    earn up to 20 points for this activity.

    ANSWER THE QUESTIONS IN THE FILE SENT LABELED ” document analysis worksheet”. the rest of the files is the rubric please follow that and take a look. Single spaced, 12 point font, and times new roman. at least three pages. Please make it sound like a college student is writing it.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Document Analysis Worksheet-d25ee9e0-5501-4261-a1d8-249212027d3e.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Capital and Labor and Life in Industrial America

    Response to the Prompt

    • Use the provided textbox to submit your answer the questions below in a minimum of 250 words.
    • Students response should be unique, original, grammatically correct and free of spelling errors, and should answer all parts of the prompt.
    • The response should contain each question number along with the question. When answering the question, students should provide a statement (your answer) in a complete sentence.
    • If a quote is requested for support, 1 or 2 complete sentence quotes should be provided below the answer.
    • No ellipsis “…” is allowed on these assignments. Students should only use the sources provided and citations are not need to complete the assignment.
    • Once the initial post has been submitted, students will be able to review their classmate’s responses.
    • Response to the prompt must be on the initial post. Answers on the secondary posts or replies will not be accepted.

    Module Content Questions

    • Post two questions about anything related to the material in the module. Students can create questions about something they are interested in or confused about. The questions should be clear and concise.
    • Content questions must be on the initial post. Questions on the secondary posts or replies will not be accepted.

    Replies to Other Student’s Questions

    • Respond to a minimum of two classmate’s questions on the module’s content. Responses should be a minimum of 100 words each. Each response should attempt to address or answer at least 1 of the questions they’ve asked about the chapter’s material. Students should cite evidence in their response to the question (draw from the textbook, assigned videos, readings, lectures, etc.).

    Grading and Feedback

    All discussions are graded using a rubric which can be viewed by choosing “rubric” from the drop-down menu on the right. Grading is usually completed within two weeks from the due date. Students can view my feedback on graded assignments by going to the Grades tab and clicking on the dialog box at the far right on he assignment or by re-opening the assignment.

    After reading the excerpts from Homestead, “Fort Frick” or the Siege of Homestead, and viewing “Andrew Carnegie Plays a Double Role,” compose a thoughtful post using the questions below. After making the initial post, students should make multiple substantial posts to students in significant ways.

    1. Who is to blame for the violence at the Homestead Strike of 1892? Provide a quote to support your answer.
    2. Could the violence between the Pinkertons and the mill workers been avoided? If so how? If not, why?
    3. Based off all the information provided, how would you view Andrew Carnegie in 1893? What drew you to this conclusion?
    4. Provide a current example of a public figure who has done some type of amazing work but also did something bad. What is the general public’s viewpoint of this public figure?

    READING FOR ASSIGNMENT BELOW :

    Excerpts from Homestead: Chapter 4

    by Arthur Bourgoyne

    The agency was founded in 1850 by Allan Pinkerton, a young Scotchman, who had been

    brought into public notice at Elgin, Ill., by his success in ferreting out a counterfeiter. Allan

    Pinkerton’s fame as a detective became national. He organized a war secret service, was

    trusted by Lincoln, whose life he once saved; by Grant and other national leaders in war times,

    and aroused continual interest by his strokes of skill and daring. The enterprise from which

    sprang the Pinkerton “standing army” of to-day was set on foot in a shabby little office in La

    Salle Street, Chicago, and there the headquarters of the agency still remain.

    Pinkerton detectives came into great request and were soon engaged in the unraveling of

    crimes and the hunting down of criminals all over the continent. Allan Pinkerton meanwhile

    discerned a fresh source of profit and turned it to account by hiring out his men as watchmen

    for banks and great commercial houses. The “Pinkerton Preventive Watch,” composed of

    trained men, uniformed and armed, and acting independently of the municipal police, was

    established.

    The emblem adopted by the agency was a suggestive one. It consisted of an eye and the motto,

    “We never sleep.”

    As old age came on Allan Pinkerton and his business kept growing, he turned over the work of

    supervision to his sons, William A. and Robert A. Robert was placed in charge of a branch

    bureau in New York and William remained in Chicago. Agencies with regular forces of men were

    established in Philadelphia, Boston, St. Paul, Kansas City and Denver. By communication with

    these centres, the chiefs could control, at a few days’ notice, a force of 2,000 drilled men, and

    this could be expanded by drawing on the reserves registered on the books of the agency for

    service on demand, to 30,000, if necessary,more men than are enrolled in the standing army

    of the United States.

    When a large number of recruits is needed, the Pinkertons usually advertise in the newspapers

    asking for able-bodied men of courage, but without stating for whose service. In New York,

    prospective recruits are brought to a building on lower Broadway where the44 Pinkertons have

    an armory, stocked with Winchester rifles, revolvers, policemen’s clubs and uniforms. After the

    number of men needed is secured, the addresses of the eligible applicants for whom there are

    no places are taken and they are notified to hold themselves in readiness for a future call. Men

    who have served in the army or as policemen receive the preference.

    Pinkerton detectives have no real authority to make arrests. They are rarely sworn in as special

    constables or as deputy sheriffs and the uniform which they wear is merely for show.

    Of late years they have been employed very frequently to protect the property of great

    manufacturing corporations during strikes or lock-outs. This is, without exception, the most

    trying and perilous service which they have to undergo. The pay is good, however, the rate

    agreed upon for duty at Homestead, for example, being $5 a day for each man.

    In the great strike on the New York Central railroad, which cost the Vanderbilt corporation

    $2,000,000, the item for Pinkerton service was about $15,000. The guards were posted at

    danger points all along the line. Conflicts with the strikers were frequent, and, in many cases,

    the guards used their rifles with deadly effect. On August 17, 1890, they killed five persons, one

    a woman. So freely were the Pinkerton rifles brought into play during this trouble that the

    people of New York state became thoroughly aroused and forced the legislature to pass an anti-

    Pinkerton bill.

    The agency was responsible for the killing of a boy during a longshoremen’s strike in Jersey and

    at Chicago during the Lake Shore railroad strike a man named Bagley fell a victim to Pinkerton

    lead. The guard who shot Bagley was spirited away and never brought to justice.

    Pinkerton guards have done duty in the miners’ strikes in the Hocking Valley, at the H. C. Frick

    Company’s mines in the Connellsville region and at Braidwood, Ill., as well as in all the great

    railroad strikes since 1877.

    In recent years, the conversion of the guards into an irresponsible military organization, with

    self-constituted authority to overawe striking workmen has provoked a feeling of intense

    hatred on the part of organized labor towards these soldier-policemen. Attempts to abolish the

    Pinkerton system by legislation have succeeded in only a few states, New York and New Jersey

    among the number, for the reason that the corporations which find use for armed mercenaries

    have sufficient wealth and influence to control legislative action.

    Congressman Thomas Watson, of Alabama, a representative of the Farmers’ Alliance,

    introduced a bill in Congress making it illegal for private persons to maintain a “standing army”

    to usurp the police powers of the states, and made a strong plea for its passage, but the

    measure failed. The great industrial corporations have a hold upon the federal legislature too

    strong to be broken by the insistence of common people.

    As has already been told, the men of Homestead entertained a profound abhorrence of the

    Pinkertons and were resolved to push resistance to any extreme rather than permit themselves

    to be whipped into submission by armed hirelings. They had no knowledge of Mr. Frick’s

    dealings with the agency, although their familiarity46 with the Frick policy in the coke regions,

    coupled with the equipment of the mill property for occupation by a garrison excited a well-

    defined suspicion of what was coming.

    Mr. Frick gave the final order for a supply of guards in a letter written to Robert A. Pinkerton, of

    New York, on June 25, the day after his meeting with the wage committee from the Amalgamated convention. The order was given in as matter-of-fact a manner as if the Carnegie

    chairman were bespeaking a supply of coke or pig-iron.

    “We will want 300 guards,” he wrote, “for service at our Homestead mills as a measure of

    precaution against interference with our plan to start the operation of the works again on July

    6, 1892.”

    “These guards,” Mr. Frick went on to direct, “should be assembled at Ashtabula, O., not later

    than the morning of July 5, when they may be taken by train to McKees Rocks, or some other

    point on the Ohio River below Pittsburgh, where they can be transferred to boats and landed

    within the enclosures of our premises at Homestead. We think absolute secresy essential in the

    movement of these men, so that no demonstration can be made while they are en route.”

    As Mr. Frick acknowledged in his letter the receipt of “your favor of the 22d,” it was evident

    that the negotiations with the Pinkerton agency had been pending for some time.

    Immediately after having despatched his order for a Pinkerton battalion, Mr. Frick sent for

    Captain Rodgers, of the towboat Little Bill, and directed him to fit up two barges with sleeping

    accommodations and47 provisions for 300 men, who were to be taken on board at some point

    not then determined, brought to the works at Homestead, and subsequently lodged and

    boarded on the barges.

    He also notified the sheriff of Allegheny county, William H. McCleary, through Messrs. Knox &

    Reed, attorneys for the Carnegie Company, that there would be a strike at Homestead and that

    300 Pinkerton watchmen had been engaged, and requested the sheriff to deputize the entire

    force; that is to say, to appoint them police agents of the county. The sheriff maintained

    afterwards that, on the advice of his attorney, he had declined to deputize the Pinkerton men

    until they should be installed in the mill and had reserved the right to act at his discretion when

    that time came. Mr. Frick, on the other hand, declared on the witness stand that the sheriff

    consented to deputize the men and assigned his chief deputy to swear them in.

    The train was now laid; the fuse was lit, and all that remained to be done in the Carnegie camp

    was to wait for the explosion.

    To disarm suspicion on the other side, however, Mr. Frick, as the crisis approached, gave out

    information leading the public in general and the locked-out men in particular to believe that

    he meant to rely on the ordinary processes of law to protect him in the non-unionizing of his

    works. On the evening of July 4, after a conference with the other chief officers of the firm, he

    furnished a statement to the newspapers alleging that there was no trouble to be feared, that

    the men were weakening, a large number of them being anxious to get back to work, and that

    the plant would be48 placed in the hands of the county, the sheriff being requested to furnish

    enough deputies to ensure adequate protection.

    With all his firmness, the doughty chairman of the Carnegie Company dared not make a clean

    breast of his program. The way for the coup de grace had to be cleared by strategy and dissimulation.

    The locked-out men celebrated Independence Day with due patriotic fervor. The force of

    guards was increased from 350 to 1,000, the picket system being expanded so as to form an

    outline five miles in extent, covering both sides of the river.

    In the afternoon an alarm was sent in to headquarters. Two men had been seen landing from a

    boat near the works and were taken for spies. Quick as a flash a thousand men rushed to the

    river bank and inclosed within a semi-circle of stalwart forms the place where the suspects had

    landed. It proved that the latter were merely honest citizens of the town returning from a picnic

    across the river, but the incident showed how effectually the men kept themselves on the qui

    vive, precluding the entry of an enemy at any point.

    When Sheriff McCleary reached his office in the Allegheny County court-house, on the morning

    of July 5, he found awaiting him a formal application from the Carnegie Company for the

    services of one hundred deputies at Homestead. The Sheriff was discomfited by the demand.

    His predecessor in office, Dr. McCandless, had been forced to engage in a long and irksome

    legal battle in order to recover from the Carnegie Company the money due for the service of

    deputies at Homestead in 1889, and the prospect of a fresh dispute over the pay of special

    officers was not inviting. So Mr. McCleary, who was gifted by nature with a strong tendency to

    evasiveness, returned an evasive answer, and conceived the idea of going to Homestead with

    his own office force of twelve men and making some sort of dignified showing pending the

    arrival of that army of Pinkertons, which he already knew to be moving on the devoted town.

    Source: Bourgoyne, Arthur. Homestead: A Complete History of the Struggle of July, 1892,

    between the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, and the Amalgamated Association of Iron and

    Steel Workers. Chapter 4. Pittsburgh, PA. 189.

    Excerpts from “Fort Frick” or the Siege of Homestead: Chapter 4

    by Myron Stowell

    Then came a conference between the leaders on the shore and a stout, middle-aged man on

    the boat, who seemed to be a leader. Said the millworker, who had stepped down to the

    water’s edge:

    “On behalf of 5,000 men I beg of you to leave here at once. I don’t know who you are nor from

    whence you came, but I do know that you have no business here, and if you remain there will

    be more bloodshed. We, the workers in these mills, are peaceably inclined. We have not

    damaged any property and we do not intend to. If you will send a committee with us we will

    take them through the works, carefully explain to them all the details of this trouble, and

    promise them a safe return to their boats. But in the name of God and humanity don’t attempt

    to land! Don’t attempt to enter these works by force!”

    The leader on the boat, resting his rifle across his left arm, stepped to the front, and, in a voice

    that could be heard by those on the bank, said:

    ” Men, we are Pinkerton detectives. We were sent here to take possession of this property and

    to guard it for the company. We don’t wish to shed blood, but we are determined to go up

    there and shall do so. If you men don’t withdraw, we will mow every one of you down and

    enter in spite of you. You had better disperse, for land we will!”

    A deathly silence followed this speech, and then the leader of the millworkers spoke again.

    Every man within the sound of his voice listened with breathless attention. He said:

    I have no more to say. What you do here is at the risk of many lives. Before you enter those

    mills you will trample over the dead bodies of 3,000 honest workingmen.”

    The next two hours were passed in ominous silence. The leader of the Pinkertons at 6 o’clock

    stepped out and commanded the strikers to disperse, as at 7 o’clock he would take his men into

    the mills against all obstacles. But before that hour arrived the mill workers had erected

    substantial breastworks of structural steel, behind which they crouched with loaded guns.

    At 7:45 o’clock the Pinkertons stepped out on the forward deck preparatory to landing. The

    leader swinging an oar was the first to emerge, but before he or the men behind him could

    make a jump, a rattling volley from the mill yard caused them to retreat hastily, and four men

    dropped in their tracks. The Pinkertons returned the fire from the port-holes and from the ends

    of the boat, wounding a number of workers who were in exposed positions. The firing from the

    boat was kept up thereafter at intervals until 10 o’clock.

    At 9 o’clock the fusil[l]ade became strong and heavy. The millworkers had secured a small

    cannon and planted it on the hillside, concealed by shrubbery on the opposite side of the river,

    from which position they were firing at the boat. The men behind the steel barricade and a

    number of sharpshooters who had been distributed along the river front, at the same time were doing lively work. The Little Bill, with her dead and injured Pinkertons, had withdrawn

    early in the second skirmish to Port Perry, leaving the barges moored, but just when the

    exchange of shots was the heaviest, she returned and steamed in for the barges. A derisive yell

    from the 150 men behind the barricade and the 2,000 unarmed who were back in the mill on

    the trestles and other points out of range, greeted the little steamer. A hot volley from the

    sharpshooters and the millworkers raked the steamer fore and aft as she turned her broad- side

    toward the shore.

    A dozen bullets struck the pilot house, and the occupant thereof dropped so suddenly that it

    was supposed he had met death, while the crowd of workers broke into cheers. Men on the

    boat returned the fire, but instead of landing, the Little Bill floated on down past the works,

    running the fiercest blockade that has been witnessed on this continent since the days of 1865.

    There was a perfect shower of lead from the boat, but it was returned with an energy to which

    her perforated sides attested for weeks, and this attack was kept up as long as the craft was in

    range.

    During this fusil[l]ade the cannon across the river was busily engaged. Scrap iron, nails and slugs

    were being fired. Suddenly Silas Wain, sitting on a pile of beams in the mill yard out of range of

    the guns of the boats, was seen to keel over. A dozen men ran to him. A piece of scrap from the

    cannon had struck him in the neck, severing the jugular vein and almost tearing off his head. He

    was instantly killed.

    This stopped the cannonading from the north side of the river, and by a code of signals known

    to themselves, the workers signaled and the cannon was removed to the mill. It was planted

    behind a big armor plate, and… [Content truncated to 3000 words]

  • 1920s culture war and individual responses to social change

    From among the list provided below, choose three individuals who either sought to break away from the past and forge new freedoms, even if controversial, or who resisted such change, whether peacefully or violently. You may not choose all three topics from only one side of the 1920s culture war (see list of options for more details). The goal is not to agree or disagree with a particular person or movement, but rather to understand what or why they did as they did in historical context. While you may choose any three options you like from the list provided, they may not all represent just one side or the other of the culture war that characterized this decade. Use the primary sources provided to include minimally two (2) direct quotes from each associated primary document (in quotation marks and with intext citations). Essays that ignore the documents and quotes will not be accepted and must be rewritten and resubmitted, subject to late penalties. In your essay, answer the following question: How did your three individuals embody the changes in the 1920s after the Great War, and how did they push the limits of freedom or resist change? Writing your essay: In your introduction, provide some background history related to the 1920s, and that may include the influence of WWI. You must have a thesis statement (one single sentence that captures your entire papers subject matter in the introduction). In a conclusion, reflect on the impact your subjects had on this time period, how they represented the era or ideas of freedom, or perhaps the influence they have had on the country to this day. You may not use any independent outside information or research in your paper, or such work will be considered academic dishonesty. Rely on the primary documents, first and foremost. A brief introduction to each individual is provided in the list, along with the mandatory primary documents as well as optional supplemental content. You may view and draw from the supplemental videos and documents for more information if you like, as those are permitted; however, be sure to add quotation marks around any pasted content and have intext citations for any facts shared from those sources — direct quotes or just general information. You may also gather very general facts about the time period from our unit reading as well. Any source outside of the content provided in this unit is off limits. 1. W.E.B. Du Bois 2. Margaret Sanger 3. “Sister” Aimee Semple McPhearson

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): margaret sanger.docx, Aimee McPherson.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Essay for religion in american history

    I will send you the files after I hire you

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 6-InClassReadings.pdf, Varieties_of_Southern_Religious_History_Essays_in__—-_( Taking_Up _Quaker_Slaves_The_Origins_of_America s_Slavery_Imperative).pdf, Christian_Imperialism_Converting_the_World_in_the__—-_(CHRISTIAN_IMPERIALISM).pdf, Muslims_in_America_A_Short_History_—-_(CHAPTER_ONE_Across_the_Black_Atlantic_The_First_Muslims_in_North_Ameri).pdf, Wilson-LongShadowofPuritans.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • US history after 1877

    10-15 pages, double spaced, not counting title page and bibliography/references pages. The essay is due noon Friday 27 Feb. The paper can be on any topic in US history after 1877. It must make an argument (have a clear thesis statement) and must be researched from a sufficient number of scholarly/peer reviewed sources to cover the topic (probably 10-20 for a paper of this size)
  • Module Discussion Board Question 3

    After the U.S.-Mexican War, did Mexicans and Mexican-Americans residing in the new U.S. territories/states resist Euro-American (Anglo) discrimination? How? Support your response with specific examples (quotations) from the Mexican American Voices documents. *I attached the documents*

    When quoting, along with the source, provide the page number(s) where your quotations are found.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MexicanAmericanVoicesADocumentaryReaderPrefaceIntroandCh1.pdf, MexicanAmericanVoicesADocumentaryReaderCh2.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Clash of Cultures

    Analyze the initial interactions between European colonizers ( English) and Native American societies. How did differences in worldview, religion, and concepts of land ownership lead to conflict and shape the development of the “New World”?

    Also use the American Yawp textbook

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Annotated Bib-2.pdf, Thesis.pdf, Annotated Bib.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • American History Essay

    everything to know about the directions and the prompt is on the document

  • Personal immigration history paper/ interview

    For this you will have to interview someone whether you choose a family or a friend or a made up interview just have to interview someone to complete this if you need more information reach out all details will be on the file provided

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Interview.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • World War I propaganda posters

    Find a propaganda poster produced by the United States from WWI. Provide a link or copy the image in a document and analyze what you see and what the message of the image is. Write at least two paragraphs. Notes Rosie the Riveter IS NOT an image from World War I. Here are some helpful websites for this assignment about propaganda from World War I: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/wwipos/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/posters-sold-world-war-i-american-public-180952179/ Note: Be sure to use examples, specifics, and direct quotes from the sources provided as well as from the textbook in your submission. Sources should be cited. https://openstax.org/books/us-history/pages/23-2-the-united-states-prepares-for-war chapter 2 & 3