Category: Behavioral science and human development

PSYC 710 THINKING DEEPER: PART 4 – TRANSFORMATION VIEW ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW The purpose of these Thinking Deeper Assignments is to encourage you to think critically and theoretically about issues you will cover in this course. You are expected to seek out biblical, philosophical, and scientific sources to answer the question presented and are expected to demonstrate depth of thought. In the video, Christianity and Psychology Eric Johnson, Dr. Johnson mentions that he puts the Transformation view under a Christian psychology view. These views were just recently separated out for your text. Do you think the Transformation view should stand as its own viewpoint on the relationship between Christianity and psychology, or should it be contained within the Christian psychology view? Please explain your thoughts on this and present a strong argument for your answer. INSTRUCTIONS The Thinking Deeper: Part 4 Transformation View Assignment requires you to answer this question: Should the Transformation View stand as its own viewpoint in a study of the relationship between Christianity and psychology, or should it be contained within the Christian psychology view? Please include the following components in the Thinking Deeper: Part 4 Transformation View Assignment paper: A clear introductory paragraph that introduces the reader to the issue being discussed. A discussion of the issue with relevant scriptural, philosophical, or scientific resources to support the points being made. A clear conclusion that summarizes the information that was presented. Please adhere to these standards: Length is 57 pages of text; the APA-formatted title page and reference page are in addition to this requirement. Current APA guidelines must be implemented (Professional Standards). All sources used must be appropriately cited. Scholarly sources are required. Be sure to review the criteria on the Thinking Deeper Grading Rubric before beginning this Thinking Deeper: Part 4 Transformation View Assignment. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. Read chapters 4, 5, and 6. Watch The following Videos: Watch: How Others are doing It PT2 https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/925942/modules/items/98429107 Watch: Larry Crabb–The Root to Freedom from Gender Confusion is Relational Holinesshttps://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/925942/modules/items/98429114 Watch: David Powlison – How does Biblical Counseling theory differ from psychotherapy?https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/925942/modules/items/98429119

PSYC& 200 Lifespan Psychology Final – Autobiography Due Mar 12 by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload Available until Mar 20 at 12:30pm For this last assignment you will be the focus. Using material presented in the course (e.g., theories of or research on human development), reflect on and write about the characteristics, events, and circumstances that in your own opinion have had an important impact on your life. You may choose to walk through your life from your earliest memories to the present day, focusing on relevant theories and research to discuss the characteristics, events, and circumstances that are most meaningful to you. For example, you may wish write about how your family and peer interactions in childhood shape your adulthood or how you have created your identity (e.g., career choice or spirituality). As we learn and read about the different topics and periods of development, I recommend noticing/locating you and your story in these topics and periods of development and work on your autobiography study over the course of the quarter. Be as specific and rich in your autobiography as possible. Guiding prompt: How has your environment and or culture influenced your development? Foremost: This is not an essay or a paper. You are required to step away from the standardized college essay. Instead, the body of work you produce can be and not limited to: Power Point, Canva (or similar platform) (minimum 10 slides; okay to be more than 10 slides). Poster (electronic or hand-crafted) Zine Video (15 – 20 min.) Audio (15 – 20 min.) Newsletter/magazine format This is the grading criteria: Work that merits 90 -100% is truly distinctive is evident of: Creative (moved away from a standard essay) understanding of developmental key terms, perspectives, by applying and or explaining theories, frameworks, and or models synthesis through meaningful connections and appropriate sources, citations, and references. presents research, and personal experience in a reflective manner. It evidences revision, evaluation, and personal investment. It demonstrates awareness and through critical thinking the impact of the material upon the individuals and systems involved. Bold developmental key terms, concepts, theoretical perspectives, used in your autobiography. You will also be submitting a Reference page (separately). See link, Final – References page & Academic Integrity for details and rubric. Academic Integrity: AI use is not allowed in this class. Material submitted with AI use will automatically receive 0 points. Writing, thinking and creating are skills that you learn through practice which require time and effort. Shortcuts like AI will not serve you. In addition, AI generation uses significant energy and threatens Mother Earth and sustainability goals. In-text citation throughout Three (3) sources are required to meet basic requirement (see rubric). Required sources include: 1) either or both textbooks 2) class material from weekly schedules (lecture notes, PowerPoints, handouts, etc.), and 3) additional academic scholarly sources In addition, in-text citation throughout and References page, in APA format Examples of academic/scholarly sources include .org, .gov, some .coms American Psychological Association – apa.orgLinks to an external site. Peer reviewed articleLinks to an external site.; consider TCC library database Pew Research CenterLinks to an external site. Washington State Department of Health – Links to an external site.doh.wa.gov Additional textbooks (Google, Bing search) John Hopkins Mayo Clinic Simple Psychology Wikipedia, wiki who, how, what are not academic sources. Siri and Alexa are also not scholarly sources. Cite and Reference any graphs, charts, maps, and artist work; you may cite random google images, from the internet but do not need to be Referenced. Rubric Final – Autobiography Final – Autobiography Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreative Evident of engagement, divergence, and creativity. 30 pts Meets 100% 25.5 pts Good 85% 22.5 pts Attempts 75% 19.5 pts Below 65% 0 pts No Evidence 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAutobiography Understanding of developmental key terms, perspectives, by applying and or explaining theories, frameworks, and or models synthesis through meaningful connections and appropriate sources, citations, and references. presents research, and personal experience in a reflective manner. It evidences revision, evaluation, and personal investment. It demonstrates awareness and through critical thinking the impact of the material upon the individuals and systems involved. 60 pts Distinctive 100% 51 pts Good 85% – Is well presented and evidences both knowledge and understanding of the subject at hand. It is reflective and makes some connections with prior knowledge and experience. Autobiography starts to integrate theory and research. Work is evident of use of sources, citation and engagement. 45 pts Meets 75% – meets basic requirements. It meets the guidelines for the assignment but shows little engagement, demonstrated by answering only the prompts, with little to no synthesis, and demonstrates a surface of understanding of the material. The work lacks depth or evidence of reflective thought. It lacks, cohesiveness or transitions and fails to make appropriate connections, use of sources and time management, and or citations. 39 pts Below 65% – does not meet from one or more of the following guidelines: does not reflect on the assignment at all, no evidence of basic understanding, incoherent thoughts, missing connections, key terms and concepts and lack of appropriate examples. Lacks citation and synthesis with additional material. 30 pts Attempts 50% 60 pts Total Points: 90

Use everything from my annotated bibliography, that’s what everything is based on but there is 2 or 3 articles that doesn’t qualify with the rubric and doesn’t have participants. In order to get the articles the only source that can be used is Kean university Library database. If theres any other questions please messages me. Thanks!

For the kins251 firearm safety research project Assignment: As part of your research you will need to find statistics supporting your topic you have selected. In your research paper you must give statistics and include a reference page. Write a short paper (APA or MLA format required) that includes 20 statistics to support its significance, such as: numbers / percentages of people injured / emergency room stats/ individuals killed annually; monetary costs incurred individually, or on the societal level; number of people who visit hospital emergency rooms, etc.). Must be in sentence form and a minimum word count of 500 words. Submit as a Word file. Remember this – when putting together your research paper make a good argument in the introduction why your topic of injury is so important.

To assess your understanding of the material in Chapters 9 and 10, you will complete a case analysis and reflection. This assignment will allow you to demonstrate your ability to identify, analyze, and respond to ethical issues in supervision (Chapter 9) and counseling practice (Chapter 10). You will be provided with a case scenario and a set of guiding questions to frame your analysis. Your response should reflect the principles and concepts from the chapters.

Scenario 2

A counselor is supervising a trainee who consistently submits late progress notes for their sessions with clients. During supervision, the trainee admits feeling overwhelmed with time management but expresses no willingness to adjust their workflow. Meanwhile, the supervisor learns that a client has filed a complaint about the trainee not following through on agreed-upon treatment plans. The supervisor must address both the ethical implications of the trainees documentation practices and their impact on client care.

Write a Case Analysis:

In your analysis, address the following:

• Identify the ethical issues related to supervision in this scenario.
• Propose an appropriate response to help the trainee improve their boundaries and clinical competence. Reference Chapter 9 concepts, such as the supervisor’s responsibilities and gatekeeping role.
• Discuss the counselors ethical obligations when working with the client requesting alternative methods. Reference Chapter 10 concepts, such as evidence-based practice, cultural competence, and respecting client autonomy.

Reflect on Ethical Principles:

After analyzing the case, write a reflection (1-2 paragraphs) addressing:

• How your personal values and professional ethics align or conflict in addressing the issues presented.
• Strategies you would use to maintain ethical practice and promote growth as a supervisor or counselor.

Format and Submit:

• Your response should be 500-750 words.
• Format your work in a Word document or PDF.
• Submit your assignment via the Canvas portal by the due date.

: Write a 57 page paper following the sections below and supported by the information reviewed. Your paper must be in current APA format using professional guidelines (including running head, a title page, abstract, headings, and a reference page). The abstract must provide a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the paper in 150250 words. Note: the title page, abstract, and reference page do not contribute toward the page requirement. Due date March 8

Use source from introduction to counseling integration of faith professional identity and clinical 2nd addition

Please use attachment below as a guide and reference. Topics , methology ext will will be used in this assignment.

Overview

This assignment focuses on creating a detailed plan for analyzing qualitative data in your study. You will outline the strategies and processes you will use to analyze the data collected for your research, ensuring that they align with your chosen methodological approach.

Instructions

• Compare multiple qualitative data-analysis methods for your selected methodological approach and explain why your selected data analysis choice is most appropriate for your research question. Use generative AI, for instance Bing CoPilot, Claude, or ChatGPT, to search for the various methods of analysis that might be applied to your approach. Then search the Capella Library to find scholarly sources to reference in your assignment.
• Provide a step-by-step outline of how you will analyze your data, from initial coding to identifying themes and drawing conclusions. Give clear examples of what you might find and how you would proceed to the next step until the analysis is complete.
• Clearly identify your methodological approach (generic qualitative inquiry, case study, or phenomenology) near the beginning of your paper. The data analysis process must align with this methodological approach, so it’s essential to name it explicitly. Briefly restate your research question near the beginning of your paper, so your analysis plan is grounded in your overall study design.
• Explain how your data analysis plan aligns with the qualitative methodological approach youve selected. Ensure that your analysis strategy is consistent with the research question and data collection methods.
• Explain how you will ensure the credibility, dependability, and transferability of your findings. Include strategies such as member checking, triangulation, or peer debriefing.
• Identify potential challenges in your data analysis process and how you plan to address them.
• Use at least five scholarly references to support your discussion of data analysis and its application to your research. Ensure that the references are relevant to your data analysis plan and the selected methodological approach.

Deliverable: Submit a 5-7 page data analysis plan that outlines the strategies, processes, and credibility measures, and scholarly support for your qualitative research.

Requirements

Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

• Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• Length of paper: 57 pages.
• Resources: At least five scholarly resources. Include a reference page at the end of the paper.
• APA guidelines: Double-spaced paragraph formatting in the body of the paper. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings. Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and format. Use the
• as the primary reference for formatting and writing. See the
• for helpful APA resources.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

• Competency 1: Evaluate the characteristics, purposes, benefits, strengths, and weaknesses of qualitative research methods.
• Compare multiple data-analysis methods.
• Competency 3: Assess the scientific merit of research.
• Explains how one will ensure the credibility, dependability, and transferability of one’s findings.
• Competency 4: Describe methods for data collection and analysis.
• Provide a step-by-step outline of how one will analyze one’s data, from initial coding to identifying themes and drawing conclusions.
• Identify potential challenges in one’s data analysis process.
• Competency 5: Apply qualitative research methodology.
• Explains how a data analysis plan aligns with the qualitative methodology selected.
• Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for members in the identified field of study.
• Convey purpose in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating sufficient supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Comprehensive Data Analysis Plan

Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Comprehensive Data Analysis PlanCriteriaRatingsPtsCompare multiple qualitative data-analysis methods.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Compares multiple qualitative data-analysis methods and explains why a selected data analysis choice is most appropriate for a specific research question.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Compares multiple qualitative data-analysis methods.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes multiple qualitative data-analysis methods, but without comparing them.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not compare multiple qualitative data-analysis methods.

/ 27.2 pts

Provide a step-by-step outline of how one will analyze one’s data, from initial coding to identifying themes and drawing conclusions.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Provides a step-by-step outline of how one will analyze one’s data, from initial coding to identifying themes and drawing conclusions, giving specifics and examples of how one will analyze the data.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Provides a step-by-step outline of how one will analyze one’s data, from initial coding to identifying themes and drawing conclusions.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Provides an outline of how one will analyze one’s data, but the outline misses steps or is otherwise incomplete.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not provide a step-by-step outline of how one will analyze one’s data, from initial coding to identifying themes and drawing conclusions.

/ 27.2 pts

Explain how a data analysis plan aligns with the qualitative methodology selected.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Explains how a data analysis plan aligns with the qualitative methodology selected. Ensures that one’s analysis strategy is consistent with the selected research question and data collection methods.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Explains how a data analysis plan aligns with the qualitative methodology selected.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies a data analysis plan aligned with the qualitative methodology selected.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not explain how a data analysis plan aligns with the qualitative methodology selected.

/ 27.2 pts

Explain how one will ensure the credibility, dependability, and transferability of one’s findings.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Explains how one will ensure the credibility, dependability, and transferability of one’s findings. Includes strategies such as member checking, triangulation, or peer debriefing.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Explains how one will ensure the credibility, dependability, and transferability of one’s findings.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies, but does not explain how one will ensure the credibility, dependability, and transferability of one’s findings.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not explain how one will ensure the credibility, dependability, and transferability of one’s findings.

/ 27.2 pts

Identify potential challenges in one’s data analysis process.

27.2 to >23.12 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Identifies potential challenges in one’s data analysis process and how one plans to address them.

23.12 to >19.04 pts

PROFICIENT

Identifies potential challenges in one’s data analysis process.

19.04 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies potential challenges to data analysis, though it’s unclear how they relate to one’s specific data analysis process.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not identify potential challenges in one’s data analysis process.

/ 27.2 pts

Convey purpose in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating sufficient supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

34 to >28.9 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Conveys clear purpose in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.

28.9 to >23.8 pts

PROFICIENT

Conveys purpose in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating sufficient supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

23.8 to >0 pts

BASIC

Conveys purpose in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not convey purpose in an appropriate tone and style, incorporate sufficient supporting evidence or adhere to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.

/ 34 pts

Total Points: 0

Please rewrite the attached without grammar errors or plagarism. Do not edit citations or references.

Please rewrite each response for weeks 6-8. See the theories doc for context. Do not edit citations or references.

DETAILS:

For this assignment, you will submit the second half of the Theories of Counseling Chart [DOC] covering theories studied in Weeks 68. You will add to your Personal Model of Counseling statement from u05a1 identifying a counseling theory explored during Weeks 68 of clinical interest. Continue the statement of how the counseling theory aligns with your worldview and current view of the nature of people, and also how the counseling theory can support the client in working through challenges.

Please rewrite the attached free from grammar errors or plagiarism. Do not edit the citations or references. Thank you.