Category: Business and management

  • Understanding Business Past and Present

    Prompt

    Using the assigned article and your own thinking, respond to the following with a 500 – 700-word response:

    Past vs. Present

    • Identify one major business issue from the past (e.g., labor practices, regulation, technology adoption, market consolidation, globalization, ethics).
    • Explain how this issue has evolved or reappeared in todays business environment.

    Context & Change

    • What forces (economic, technological, political, social) have driven changes in how this issue is understood or managed?
    • Are businesses responding more effectively today than in the past? Why or why not?

    Research Connection

    • How might understanding this issue help inform a future research project in this course?
    • Does this topic align with any areas you are currently interested in exploring?

    Reflection

    • Why do you think business students and professionals often underestimate the importance of historical context?
    • How might historical awareness strengthen decision-making and leadership?
  • Data-Driven Decision Making I (ORGL-3321) M4

    This is a 2 part assignment: please read instructions and attachments for rubric and requirements.

    Part ONE: Discussion post and response to 2 classmates (500 words total)

    -Discussion post: 200 words

    • Detailed responses are appropriate, (4-5 sentence minimum.)

    -Response to 2 classmates 150 words each (300 total)

    • Please send over the initial post first.
    • I will provide the 2 classmates post after the Initial post is done.

    -Part One Attachments:

    • Module 4 Discussion (Use for instructions and rubric)
    • Module 4 PowerPoint

    PART TWO: Module 4 – Assignment: Data Analysis

    (600 words / APA Format). Write a minimum of 200-word page paper on your response to the assignment questions. (INSTRUCTIONS ARE TO BE ADDED LATER)

    Part Two Attachments:

    • Module 4 Assignment (Use for instructions, rubric, textbook)
    • Module 4 PowerPoint

    External Links: (Use for Resources)

    • https://www.storytellingwithdata.com/blog/2014/07/lead-with-story
    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgCNTuLBMK4
    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfYhwy3wN14

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Module 4 Discussion.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • 3 piece solution for formalizing performance review and revi…

    Assessment Deliverable

    Using the scenario above, create a 3-piece solution to communicate and build support for this organizational change. All 3 parts should be written in one document.

    Part 1: Outline of Company-Wide Webinar

    Write a 1- to 2-page outline of items to discuss during the monthly meeting.

    • Include the following in your outline:
    • Introduce the plan for reviewing job descriptions and formalizing the performance review process.
    • Justify why the change is needed.
    • Reassure employees of the benefits of this change which includes additional business opportunities.
    • Refer to regional managers to implement the plan.

    Part 2: Email to All Employees

    Compose a 175- to 350-word email in which you do the following:

    • Summarize the plan for reviewing job descriptions and formalizing the performance review process.
    • Reassure employees of the benefits of this change which includes additional business opportunities.
    • Encourage employees to reach out to regional managers with questions.

    Part 3: Email to Regional Managers for Follow-Up

    Compose a 175- to 350-word email in which you do the following:

    • Solicit feedback on employee opinions.
    • Ensure support to regional managers by supplying ideas on preparation for using the new process.
    • Express gratitude to regional managers.

    Assemble the outline and both emails in one document.

    Cite all sources according to APA guidelines at the bottom of the document.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): assignment.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Writing Assignment #3: Report to Supervisor

    The assignment instructions, and a description of the situation at the Charleston Hotel, can be accessed at the following links. You will need to access both links and read them in order to successfully complete the assignment.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Writing Assignment 3_ Report to Supervisor – WRTG 393 3925 Advanced Technical Writing (2262) -rubric.pdf, WRTG393_WA3_Report_to_the_Supervisor_2026_.pdf, Situation_at_Charleston_Hotel_u.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Becoming an effective values based leader

    There are links associated with this task. They are the following:

    https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/523806204 (List of Values)

    https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/202901832 (VIA Character Strenghts Survey)

    There are also docs uploaded to this that you will need to use.

    Competencies

    3109.1.1 : Develops Self-Awareness and Personal Values

    The learner identifies their personal values, including honesty, integrity, respect, emotional intelligence, and ethical responsibility, to develop self-awareness through self-assessment.

    3109.1.2 : Describes How Interpersonal Skills Are Applied in Leadership

    The learner describes how interpersonal skills are applied to effectively collaborate, communicate, and lead within a team and across an organization.

    3109.1.4 : Explains Leadership of Cultures

    The learner explains how the leadership of cultures fosters diversity, inclusion, ethics, and problem-solving.

    Introduction

    Values-based leaders consider their values in every facet of leadership. Values dictate how they lead, govern culture, make decisions, develop employees, and measure performance, as well as a variety of other applications. Yet challenges arise that can sometimes entice leaders to compromise their values. For this task, you will use the provided scenario in which you assume the role of the newly promoted customer service manager for Corollary Marketing Inc. and complete tasks that will help you to develop as an effective values-based leader.

    Corollary Marketing Inc. Company Values:

    Excellence: In character, decision-making, and service to our clients and customers, we strive for distinction and actions of which we can be proud. Each of the following values contributes to this overriding charge.

    Integrity: We do the right thing, regardless of whether someone is watching. Our word is our bond; we carry a duty of care and responsibility to act ethically.

    Humility: We conduct our work without our egos. Our actions embody respect, humility, authenticity, and openness and invite feedback and input. We actively seek ideas and feedback from employees and value every voice and contribution.

    Trust: We extend the belief and feeling that others can be relied upon. We strive to be trustworthy by showing compassion and consistency and by communicating with care and truthfulness. We are authentic and transparent.

    Growth: Our best today may not be good enough tomorrow, and we continually seek to improve. Both personally and professionally, we aim to accelerate employee learning so that we can become better able to meet customer and company needs.

    Respect: We believe that each person (employee, customer, vendor, etc.) has value and rights. We act based on facts and always assume positive intent. We celebrate the differences in people and seek to utilize each persons unique knowledge, skills, abilities, and perspectives.

    Scenario

    Refer to the “D253 Task 1 Scenario” supporting document to complete this performance assessment.

    Requirements

    Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See for more information.

    Grammarly Note:

    Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See for more information.

    Microsoft Files Note:

    Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc. All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file. For more information, please see

    You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

    A. Complete the VIA Character Strengths Survey using the “VIA Character Strengths Survey” web link and use the results of the survey to complete the following:

    Note: Remember that this VIA Character Strengths Survey is not a test but rather a feedback tool. There is no wrong answer, so respond genuinely. If you download a copy of your survey results, you will receive a list of 24 items in order of your personal strengths, with the first five being your signature strengths and the last five being your lesser strengths. Refer to the attached “D253 VIA Character Strength Survey Instructions” supporting document for additional information on accessing the survey.

    1. Describe an experience in which you used one of your five signature strengths (i.e., the first five) from the survey results to overcome a challenge.

    Note: Consider experiences from a school, volunteer, personal, or professional setting.

    a. Explain how you could apply the strength identified in part A1 as a values-based leader in your new position as the customer service manager from the scenario.

    2. Describe an experience in which being stronger in one of your five lesser strengths (i.e., the last five) from the survey results could have positively influenced the outcome.

    Note: Consider experiences from a school, volunteer, personal, or professional setting.

    a. Explain how improving the lesser strength identified in part A2 will help accelerate your values-based leadership abilities in your new position as the customer service manager.

    b. List three actions you can take to grow in the area identified in part A2.

    B. To set the tone for your new team, explain to them who you are as a values-based leader by doing the following:

    1. List your top three values as a values-based leader from the “” web link.

    Note: When listing your top three values, consider those values you hold most important.

    a. Explain how you will demonstrate each of the values listed in part B1 to serve both the team and the organization in the scenario.

    C. Based on your understanding of who you are as a leader after completing parts A and B, do the following:

    1. Discuss one leadership challenge relevant to ethics and values that you could face as the new customer service manager regarding selecting and announcing the new team lead.

    Note: Consider your purpose as a new leader, ethical principles, relevant stakeholders, your expectations and point of view, and any assumptions you have made.

    2. Discuss how you, as the customer service manager, would use one of your top three values from part B1 and one of the companys values in a conversation about the hiring decision with the person who was not selected as the team lead.

    Note: Consider values, ethical responsibility, and personal and professional consequences.

    D. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

    E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

    File Restrictions

    File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )

    File size limit: 200 MB

    File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

    Rubric

    A1:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include a description of an experience in which the learner used 1 of the five signature strengths from the survey results.

    Approaching Competence

    The description of an experience in which the learner used 1 of the five signature strengths from the survey results is not appropriate, or the description does not include details about the experience. Or the description does not relate to overcoming a challenge.

    Competent

    The description of an appropriate experience in which the learner used 1 of the five signature strengths from the survey results is relevant and includes details about the experience in which the learner used 1 of the five signature strengths from the survey results to overcome a challenge.

    A1a:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include an explanation of how the strength identified in part A1 could be applied.

    Approaching Competence

    The explanation of how the strength identified in part A1 could be applied is not plausible, does not relate to the application of the strength as a values-based leader in the new position as customer service manager, or does not include details from the scenario.

    Competent

    The explanation of how the strength identified in part A1 could be applied is plausible, relates to the application of the strength as a values-based leader in the new position as customer service manager, and includes details from the scenario.

    A2:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include a description of a learner experience relevant to lesser strengths.

    Approaching Competence

    The description of a learner experience is relevant to the results of the VIA Character Strengths Survey but does not address how being stronger in one of the lesser strengths could have positively influenced the outcome.

    Competent

    The description of a learner experience is relevant to the results of the VIA Character Strengths Survey and addresses how being stronger in one of the lesser strengths could have positively influenced the outcome.

    A2a:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include an explanation of how improving in the area identified in part A2 will help accelerate the learners leadership abilities in the new position as customer service manager.

    Approaching Competence

    The explanation of how improving in the area identified in part A2 will help accelerate the learners leadership abilities in the new position as customer service manager is not relevant to values-based leadership abilities.

    Competent

    The explanation of how improving in the area identified in part A2 will help accelerate the learners values-based leadership abilities in the new position as customer service manager is relevant to values-based leadership abilities.

    A2b:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not list 3 actions to help an individual grow in any area.

    Approaching Competence

    The submission lists 3 actions, but 1 or more actions would not help an individual grow in the area identified in part A2.

    Competent

    The submission lists 3 actions that would help an individual grow in the area identified in part A2.

    B1:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include a list of any values.

    Approaching Competence

    The list only includes 12 of the learners top values as a values-based leader, or 1 or more values are not from the “List of Values” web link.

    Competent

    The list includes 3 of the learners top values as a values-based leader from the “List of Values” web link.

    B1a:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include an explanation of how the values listed in part B1 will be demonstrated.

    Approaching Competence

    The explanation of how the learner will use the values listed in part B1 is not relevant to serving both the team and organization in the scenario. Or the explanation does not relate to each of the values listed in part B1.

    Competent

    The explanation of how the learner will use each of the values listed in part B1 to serve both the team and organization in the scenario uses specific details and is related to each of the listed values.

    C1:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include a discussion of a leadership challenge.

    Approaching Competence

    The discussion of the leadership challenge is not relevant to the new customer service manager selecting and announcing the new team lead as described in the scenario or is not relevant to ethics and values.

    Competent

    The discussion of the leadership challenge is relevant to the new customer service manager selecting and announcing the new team lead as described in the scenario and is relevant to ethics and values.

    C2:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include a discussion of how the learner, as the customer service manager, would use 1 personal value identified in part B1 and 1 company value in a conversation with the person who was not selected as team lead.

    Approaching Competence

    The discussion of how the learner, as the customer service manager, would have a conversation about the hiring decisions with the person who was not selected as the team lead does not address 1 personal value identified in part B1 or 1 company value. Or the discussion is not relevant to the hiring decision.

    Competent

    The discussion of how the learner, as the customer service manager, would have a conversation about the hiring decision with the person who was not selected as the team lead includes 1 personal value identified in part B1 and 1 company value.

    D:

    Not Evident

    The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

    Approaching Competence

    The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.

    Competent

    The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.

    E:

    Not Evident

    This submission includes pervasive errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation, negatively impacting the professional quality and clarity of the writing. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category.

    Approaching Competence

    This submission includes substantial errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category.

    Competent

    This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): D253 VIA Character Strength Survey Instructions.pdf, D253 Task 1 Scenario.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Sustainability practices in business, social justice, and en…

    Overview In this course, you have continued to explore how sustainability can be considered in various contexts and within the three pillars of business, social justice, and environmental quality. You will explore these pillars further throughout the rest of the course and will incorporate your knowledge about them into your project. In the Module Three project draft, you began working on your project by examining a chosen scenario and considering sustainable practices and actionable steps related to the scenario. You drafted Part One of the project. Now, for this Module Five project draft, you will draft Part Two and Part Three of the project. Directions First, consult the Project Guidelines and Rubric to review the scope of the project. Also consult the Scenario Profiles document to review the scenario you chose for the Module Three project draft. You will use the same scenario for this Module Five project draft and for the project. Note: You can find the Project Guidelines and Rubric and the Scenario Profiles document in the assignment information section of this course. Then, based on your chosen scenario, respond to each part below by completing the corresponding sections in the Project Template. You can find the link to the Project Template in the What to Submit section of this assignment. Specifically, you must address the following: Profile (Corresponds with Part Two of the project) In this section, you will use a profile related to your chosen group to consider how organizations or groups mentioned in the profile have improved (or not improved) their sustainability practices. The profile is provided in the Scenario Profiles document, which you can find in the assignment information section of this course. Describe the value of sustainability practices in human and environmental systems. What are the short-term benefits of implementing sustainable practices in your chosen groups related profile? What are the long-term benefits of implementing these sustainable practices? Explain the relationship between sustainable systems and human equity in the context of the related profile. In what ways did your profile highlight the relationship between sustainable practices and human equity? Describe how conflict resolution is used in the profile to support sustainability. What examples of conflict resolution were evident in your profile? How were the conflicts resolved (or not) in your profile? How did resolving conflicts impact sustainable practices? Explain how cultural systems relate to sustainability within the profile. What cultural systems were predominant in your profile? What role did culture play in sustainability efforts in your profile? Actionable Steps (Corresponds with Part Three of the project) In this section, you will focus on describing actionable steps related to sustainability for your chosen group. To do this, you will highlight the current state of your chosen groups sustainability practice and then describe actionable steps for each pillar of sustainability. Explain why sustainability improvement is needed in your chosen group. What areas of sustainability are needed in your chosen group? What are the benefits for your chosen group if they improve sustainability practices? Describe how the perspectives of the various stakeholders of your chosen group provide a context to improve sustainability practices related to the concerns of the group. How do the perspectives within the group influence efforts made to improve sustainability practices? Explain how cultural diversity in your chosen group can be of value in addressing sustainability issues. Recommend actionable steps your chosen group could take for each pillar of sustainability. Reflect on what you know about your chosen group and sustainability. What are some actions that could be taken to improve sustainability? For each pillar of sustainability, what are some benefits of improving sustainability practices within your chosen group? What to Submit To complete this assignment, you must submit the following: Submit your Project Template for grading. You will resubmit the same Project Template you used to complete your Module Three Project Draft One, with the work done for this assignment, Module Five Project Draft Two, included in Parts Two and Three of the template. No revisions to the work done in Part One of the template are expected at this time. Additionally, no sources are required. However, if you choose to use sources, they should be cited according to APA style. Although Brightspace allows the addition of video notes in assignment submissions, you may not use the Video Note tool to complete this assignment. Supporting Materials The following resources will support your work on this assignment: Scenario Profiles This resource contains profiles for each scenario of the project. Project Guidelines and Rubric This resource provides an overview of the project, along with specific criteria you must address. Module Five Project Draft Two Rubric Criteria Meets Expectations (100%) Partially Meets Expectations (75%) Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) Value Profile: Value of Sustainability Practices Describes the value of sustainability practices in human and environmental systems Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a more detailed description of the value of sustainability practices or how these practices support efforts towards a more sustainable future Does not attempt criterion 11.25 Profile: Relationship Explains the relationship between sustainable systems and human equity in the context of the related profile Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a clearer or more thorough explanation of the relationship between sustainable systems and human equity Does not attempt criterion 11.25 Profile: Conflict Resolution Describes how conflict resolution is used in the profile to support sustainability Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a more detailed description of how conflicts were resolved to support sustainability Does not attempt criterion 11.25 Profile: Cultural Systems Explains how cultural systems relate to sustainability within the profile Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a clearer or more thorough explanation of how cultural systems relate to sustainability within the case study Does not attempt criterion 11.25 Actionable Steps: Sustainability Improvement Explains why sustainability improvement is needed in the chosen group Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a clearer or more thorough explanation of the areas of sustainability improvement needed Does not attempt criterion 11.25 Actionable Steps: Context Describes how the perspectives of the various stakeholders of the chosen group provide a context to improve sustainability practices related to the concerns of the group Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a more detailed description of how the policies and vision of the chosen group relate to the recommendations Does not attempt criterion 11.25 Actionable Steps: Cultural Diversity Explains how cultural diversity in the chosen group can be of value in addressing sustainability issues Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a clearer or more thorough explanation for how cultural diversity can add value in sustainability practices Does not attempt criterion 11.25 Actionable Steps: Recommendations Recommends actionable steps the chosen group could take for each pillar of sustainability Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include a more detailed description of the sustainability recommendations for each pillar Does not attempt criterion 11.25 Clear Communication Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication 10 Total:
  • IB Assignment 2

    answer the questions 1-4 and the parts in them and the exercises. provide your answer in bold under each question/excercise

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): IB Assignment 2_25275000.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 2

    Pick an industry in the Resilinc 2018 Annual report. Describe uncertainties in the industry and possible risk mitigation. Search the internet for one or two examples of that industry and how they dealt with such uncertainty as described by Resilinc. (minimum of 500 words)

  • Workplace surveillance and management control in WFH environ…

    (1) Read this May 6, 2020 article titled How My Boss Monitors Me While I Work From Home from the New York Times about the technologies of surveillance that have emerged in the recent push towards a WFH (Work From Home) culture: How My Boss Monitors Me While I Work From Home – The New York Times.pdf (2) Pick a workplace you are familiar with. It can be a company where you currently work or have worked at in the past or a place you know well enough. Alternately, it can be a retail establishment like a big-box store or a restaurant that you have been to frequently enough to recall it. Identify at least three ways in which management exercises control over the workers. If you picked your own workplace, you can talk about the ways in which your bosses control you (or have controlled you in the past) or the ways in which you control (or have controlled) your subordinates. (3) Answer the following questions briefly, based on the article I asked you to read and on your own research: (a) What do you think is the future of workplace surveillance? (b) What are the driving forces behind this trend? (c) Should there be any public policy response to this trend? You should take a look at some of current technologies of supervision. You can find them by typing “remote monitoring tools” in a search engine. Instructions: Create a thread with your responses to the prompts above. Your post must be at least 600 words long, not counting any references. Use as many references as appropriate to indicate what sources you are drawing upon in order to substantiate your answers. I am expecting you to use a minimum of 3 references for this post.
  • Rhetorical analysis: Survivor’s Guilt

    In The Moral Logic of Survivors Guilt, philosopher Nancy Sherman examines survivors guilt through a moral and ethical lens, challenging common assumptions about responsibility, blame, and emotional reasoning. Rather than simply describing survivors guilt, Sherman constructs a complex argument about why this emotion exists and how it functions morally.

    For this assignment, write a rhetorical analysis essay in which you examine how Sherman uses rhetorical strategies to develop her moral argument and persuade her audience.

    Your essay should focus on Sherman makes her argumentnot whether you agree or disagree with her conclusions.

    Identify the three main rhetorical appeals and examine at least one rhetorical strategy, such as:

    Diction and tone

    Imagery or figurative language

    Repetition or parallelism

    Organization or structure

    Syntax or stylistic choices

    Format: ML

    ATimes New Roman, 12pt font, double spaced. Include a reference page at the end citing Shermans text.

    make the first body paragraph about ethos, the second body paragraph about logos, and the 3rd body paragraph about pathos and diction/tone.

    Talk about the story, state the thesis “Sherman uses a variety of rhetorical strategies to…”

    Analyze the rhetorical strategies, use EVIDENCE please, and examples and explain the effect of the audience.

    Summarize main points Restate the thesis and discuss the significance

    make the paragraph about logos about actual statistics she says and about the philosophers she cites, also make the ethos paragraph, and pathos paragraph include the story about the commander that she talks about and make the rhetorical analysis a little shorter and make it more understandable, on a high school level

    make it with pieces of evidence