Category: Business and management

critical thinking assignment below Fiscal Policy in the U.S. Summarize three different fiscal policies the U.S. government has implemented in the last five years. Describe their intended effect on the economy. Consider your current or desired industry; as a future leader in that industry, how might you respond to these policies? Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length and conform to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (available in the left-hand navigation panel). Include at least 1 credible reference in addition to the course textbook. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references (available in the left-hand navigation panel). Note: If you need a boost with your research, the following article may be helpful: Pang, Y. (2022). A theory of fiscal policy response to an epidemic. Links to an external site. Health Economics, 31(9), 2050.

Task: Reflective Journal Topic: What is the relevance of organizational design and structure when developing an organization with social objectives? Use arguments based on theoretical and practical models.

Should Corporations Take a Stand on Political Issues? Primary Argument: Explore the position advanced in your Primary Argument Article. Explain how the argument contains or avoids bias. Provide specific examples to support your observations. Assess the credibility of the overall argument using the Hierarchy of Reliability and CRAAPO. Were the resources used to support the argument credible or scholarly? Why, or why not? Does the credibility of the resources support or undermine the articles claims? How? Counterargument: Craft a counter or alternative argument to the argument presented in the Primary Argument Article for your chosen topic. You will support this position with the critical thinking skills youve learned throughout the course. Note: Your counterargument is not a reflection of your personal opinion in this matter. Provide the argument details of your counterargument to the Primary Argument Article. Submit the claim that you are making in your alternative argument. List at least two premises and a conclusion for your created argument. Support your counterargument with evidence using the provided resources in the Additional Resources and Scholarly Resources sections found on the Final Project Topics and Resources page. Explain the logic and reasoning used to advance the counterargument. In your response, address the following: Identify the argument as inductive or deductive, explaining why. Assess the argument for its strength and cogency (if inductive) or validity and soundness (if deductive). Identify any weaknesses or gaps requiring additional research or support. Explain how the counterargument contains or avoids bias. Provide specific examples to support your explanation.

Name, define, and discuss a fallacy that you have observed in the outside world. Explain why the reasoning is fallacious in the context in which it was used. Name, define, and discuss a fallacy that you have used or witnessed at work or at home. Explain why the reasoning is fallacious in the context in which it was used. In response to your peers, explain how their examples could be corrected using better reasoning. Construct counterarguments to refute the initial fallacious arguments. Your response posts should be informative and delivered in a respectful manner.

Understanding the different types of legal systems helps you navigate diverse business environments and comprehend the laws that govern specific transactions. Businesses often operate in multiple countries with varying legal systems. This assignment prepares you to understand the legal context of international business.

Instructions:

• Review the chapter readings on different legal systems (e.g., common law, civil law, religious law) and consider their impact on business operations.
• Write a 500-750 word essay comparing and contrasting the common law and civil law systems. Address the following questions:
• 1. What are the primary sources of law in each system?
• 2. How does the role of judges differ in each system?
• 3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each system for businesses? Include specific examples to illustrate your points.
• Submit your essay as a Word document (or PDF).
• Use APA citation style for any sources cited.

Facebook and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, continue to be surrounded by controversy. Accusations of political bias and influence are under scrutiny by a variety of stakeholders. A strategic analysis of Facebook using the Five Is can help you better understand the issues it is facing, as well as how the organization should manage them. To use the Five Is in strategic analysis, it is significant for you to gain an understanding of the history of the company. This will help you determine how to strategically deal with stakeholders to avoid future public relations issues. This case can be found in the Harvard Business Publishing module in the course. In addition to reading the Facebook case study, learn about the Five Is strategic analysis stages by reviewing the readings and resources section. Additional information on the Five Is can also be found in the module overview. Ensure you include the theory and its application in the body of the paper. It should be referenced using APA format. To complete this assignment, address the following items in your short paper: Identify the issues Facebook is facing using the HBR article and your own research. Determine (identify) stakeholders who are for or against the direction Facebook is taking to avoid these public relations issues. Identify the incentives of stakeholders by answering the following five questions: What responsibility does the company have to the stakeholders? Can the stakeholder(s) help or hurt the companys performance? Is quick action needed? What is the cost/benefit of the company taking action? What action(s) might the stakeholders take to help or complicate the public relations issue? Identify the company objectives for what it wants to achieve in reducing future public relations issues. Identify interaction strategies that can be implemented in stages. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed in each short paper: Main Elements. Describe the main elements and requirements and cite examples to illustrate each element. Inquiry and Analysis. Provide in-depth analysis that demonstrates a complete understanding of concepts. Explain how you reached your conclusions by using clear and relevant examples from credible research. Integration and Application. Correctly apply the concepts discussed in the module corresponding with the assignment. Critical Thinking. Draw informed conclusions that are justified with evidence. Research. Incorporate some scholarly resources effectively that reflect the depth and breadth of research. Articulation of Response. The submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization.

Please see attached screenshots for instructions. I also attached a file of my essay that you could use to create the PowerPoint and a sample. I’m not sure how many sources are needed aside from the 4 sources in my essay. I just indicated 10 sources because the images or charts need to be cited.

No instructions provided

No instructions provided

Final Exam Pt 1Analysis

Final Exam Pt 1Analysis

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

1. Description & Theory

30 pts

Complete

Description and analysis of the conflict accurately apply theories of I-It relationships and collusion.

24 pts

Developing

Description and analysis of the conflict accurately apply EITHER the theory of I-It relationships OR the theory of collusion, but not both.

18 pts

Incomplete

Description and analysis of the conflict inaccurately apply theories of I-It relationships and collusion.

0 pts

Absent

Analysis is missing OR is not original work.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

2. Challenges & Opportunities

40 pts

Complete

Analysis of the conflict accurately identifies three challenges and three opportunities for transforming the conflict, AND gives detailed explanations of each.

32 pts

Developing

Analysis of the conflict accurately identifies three challenges and three opportunities for transforming the conflict, BUT explanations are only general.

24 pts

Incomplete

Analysis of the conflict accurately identifies fewer than three challenges and three opportunities for transforming the conflict, OR inaccurately identifies challenges and opportunities, OR explanations are nonexistent.

0 pts

Absent

Analysis of the conflict’s challenges and opportunities is minimal OR is missing OR is not original work.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

3. Connections

30 pts

Complete

The relationship between the analysis and the proposed peacebuilding roleprovider, teacher, bridge-builder, equalizer, healer, or witnessis accurate AND explained in detail. NOTE: The roles of arbiter, mediator, referee, and peacekeeper are not options for this project

24 pts

Developing

The relationship between the analysis and the proposed peacebuilding roleprovider, teacher, bridge-builder, equalizer, healer, or witnessis accurate BUT not explained.

18 pts

Incomplete

The relationship between the analysis and the proposed peacebuildingprovider, teacher, bridge-builder, equalizer, healer, or witnessrole is inaccurate OR unclear.

0 pts

Absent

The relationship between the analysis and the proposed peacebuilding role is incomplete OR is missing OR is not original work.