Category: Business and management

This assignment requires you to choose and analyse two real-world business cases, focusing on the governance, law and ethics problems they present. For the two cases you select, you will need to explain the main issues and discuss how they fit into the bigger picture, both within the original country they happen and internationally. Further to task 1, you will discuss the challenges by examining the specific problems related to governance (the company corporate behaviour), ethics (what was right and/or wrong), and the law (what was right and/or wrong in the eye of law). You also need to look at how the organisations responded to these crises. Then reflect on social responsibility by thinking about what duties these organisations have to society, both now and in the future, especially considering the incidents that occurred. Assignment instructions: For this task, you must produce a Case Analysis and Application Report. You are encouraged to discuss suitability of the chosen case with your module lecturer. Task 1: Case analysis For this assignment, you must choose two real-world business cases, discuss the issues and put them within a national and international context: Describe the key governance, legal, and ethical issues each organisation faced. Show how governance and legal principles apply in these cases. Explain how national and international contexts shaped the issues. [Word count: 1,000 words] 25 marks (LOs: 1, 2, 3) Task 2: Application Report Building on the cases you selected in Task 1, critically evaluate the governance, legal, and ethical issues involved. Your report should: Analyse how governance structures and legal frameworks influenced the organisations actions. Assess the ethical implications of the organisations decisions and behaviours. Evaluate the importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the chosen organisations. Provide clear, evidence-based recommendations for how the organisation could have acted differently or how it should act in future. [Word count:2000 words] 75 marks (LOs: 2, 4 & 5) [4790] Arden University reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions 3 Learning outcomes (LO) By completing this assessment, you will have shown and be assessed on all five of the learning outcomes: 1) LO 1: Apply a range of corporate governance and legal principles to a variety of organisational contexts. 2) LO 2: Evaluate the key ethical and governance theories that impact organisations in a range of international jurisdictions. 3) LO 3: Diagnose legal, governance and ethical challenges in organisations. 4) LO 4: Evaluate the importance of corporate social responsibility. 5) LO 5: Responsible Global Citizen: Understand global issues and their place in a globalised economy, ethical decision-making, and accountability. Adopt self- awareness, openness, and sensitivity to diversity in culture.

I want you to make a PowerPoint presentation elaborating on this topic. I also want you to include an example of an incident because of fatigue and burnout of the seafarers. Also include some important regulations of ISM regarding this topic. Be straightforward and clean.

GIVE A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF WELL ESTABLISHED TESTS OF INSOLVENCY IN COMPANY LAW . ( 40 marks )

Chapter 21: Introduction to Sales and Leases

Read pp 422-434.

Read Commerce & Industry Insurance Company v. Bayer Corporation, (p. 438).

Read and consider problems 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 12, and 18 beginning on page 440. You do not need to submit responses to these questions.

Listen to the four VoiceThreads (VTs) for this Chapter. They can be found in the Content tab under Assignment #1.

Note: Do not submit the written portion of this assignment until you have completed the four VTs. Provide proof of completion with your submission. For an example of the proof you can provide, see the attached doc called, “Sample Proof of VT Completion” found in the Content tab under Assignment #1.

Read the following article:

Written submission due after all of the above coursework has been completed:

Fact pattern:

Buyer sends Seller a purchase order. Seller replies by sending an acknowledgment form. The acknowledgment form contains a provision never previously appearing which disclaims (denies) any warranty on the product. Soon, Seller sends goods to Buyer and Buyer forwards payment. Buyer then finds the goods to be defective and claims that there is a breach of warranty by Seller.

Questions:

1. Is there a contract between the parties? Explain why or why not and support your position.

2. If there is a contract, is the Seller’s warranty disclaimer a part of the contract? Explain why or why not and support your position.

In a two to three paragraph essay, with each paragraph being a minimum of four to six sentences, be sure to fully explain your answer to each of the two questions. You must make references to relevant legal concepts including the mirror image rule, the battle of the forms, additional terms, etc. This must be in your own words and, when referring to an applicable section of the UCC, you do not have to quote from it directly.

Part 1

The first part of this assignment is to construct a spreadsheet of the required ratios for a publicly traded company, Black Knight, Inc.

Download the following Excel workbook that is attached. You will find the financial statements taken from BKI’s 2022 10-k. Below them, there is a table “Selected Financial Metrics from Consolidated Financial Statements”. Enter the financial data from the financial statements into the yellow cells. This is all the information you need to be able to calculate the ratios required for this paper. There is also a “FORMULAS” tab for your reference.

You will also see a “Selected Financial Performance Ratios” table. Calculate the financial ratios in the yellow cells. The industry ratios are in the next column. You will use these calculated ratios and the provided industry ratios to complete your research paper. Copy and paste the “Selected Financial Metrics from Consolidated Financial Statement” and “Selected Financial Performance Ratios” tables into your research paper as exhibits on a separate exhibit’s page after the reference page. (Hint: copy and paste as an image for best results.)

Part 2 is very easy it is to write an essay that is already pre outlined and organized for you.

The second part of the assignment is to write a research paper based on your ratio calculations. Your paper should be a minimum of 1,000 words and include an analysis of the ratios, comparison to the industry, and conclusions as to the financial performance of the firm. The paper requires the use of at least five scholarly sources. A good paper will be between 1,000 and 1,500 words, excluding title and reference pages.

• Paper to be APA format.
• Required between 1,000 and 1,500 words. (4 pages)
• Times New Roman 12pt font, double spaced.
• Indent each paragraph, no extra space between headers and paragraphs.
• Separate title and reference pages.
• At least 5 reputable/scholarly sources.
• Must use in-text citations in APA format.

Download the following template for your paper which is also attached. Keep all headers and formatting to ensure proper APA format, and that all required information is included in your paper. The information in [brackets] is intended to be replaced with your own research and writing and provides instruction for what should be included in that section.

Write the following LBS admission essay, with the one I provided from another school, But do change accordingly to LBS.

Description Assignment Details Executive Briefing: Inventory Management, Material Requirements Planning and Demand Focus, and Lean Operations This assignment is designed to assess your ability to apply core operations management concepts in a practical business setting. You will evaluate a companys operational challenges related to inventory management, demand planning, and lean practices. Using this analysis, you will develop an executive-level presentation that communicates clear insights and actionable recommendations to senior leadership. Your final deliverable should demonstrate both a solid understanding of key operational principles and the ability to apply them effectively within the context of your selected company. Student Role You are an operations analyst preparing a high-level presentation for your companys leadership team. Your task is to evaluate and recommend strategies to improve the companys approach to inventory or resource management, demand planning, and lean operations. Your presentation should highlight current operational challenges and propose realistic solutions that align with the companys business modelwhether product-based, service-based, or a combination of both. Company Selection For this assignment, select a company to focus on. You may choose a real business or create a realistic example. The company can be either product-based (such as a manufacturer or retailer) or service-based (such as a hotel, hospital, or restaurant). Make sure your presentation clearly reflects the nature of the company you selected and applies appropriate operations strategies based on whether it delivers products, services, or both. Executive Briefing Slide Deck Your Presentation must include the following: Title slide (your name, course, company name, and date) 68 content slides, grouped into three sections as described below Include visuals such as graphs, icons, and charts Professional tone and formatting Reference slide (APA format) Slide Content Breakdown Slides 12: Operations Strategy and Inventory or Resource Management Introduce your company and describe its main products or services. Clarify whether it is a product-based or service-based business. Briefly explain what makes the companys operations important or unique. Then, describe how the company manages its inventory, materials, or service resources. Share current issues that the company is facing, and explain the strategies it uses or could use to improve resource management and avoid shortages or excess. Slides 35: Material Requirements Planning and Demand Planning Describe how your company plans for what it needs and when. If applicable, explain how systems are used to track materials, services, or scheduling needs. Discuss how customer demand information isor could beused to improve planning. Explain how this focus on demand can improve accuracy, reduce waste, and support overall efficiency. Slides 68: Lean Operations in Disruption Explain the challenges your company may face when trying to stay lean during a disruption. Identify at least 2 specific issues that could affect operations. Then, describe how the company could adapt while continuing to reduce waste and maintain flexibility, even during difficult times. Reference Slide Include a final slide with at least 2 APA-formatted sources that support your analysis. You may use your course textbook, readings, journal articles, or reliable Web sites. Submission Format Choose one of the following options: Submit a slide deck with speaker notes (at least 100150 words per slide). Submit a slide deck with 35-minute recorded executive pitch (upload the video or provide a YouTube link in the assignment submission area). If you are using Microsoft PowerPoint, you may follow this tutorial on how to record your presentation: Record a Slide Show With Narration and Slide Timings.

Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12112(a), requires employers to provide reasonable accommodation to otherwise qualified persons with a disability to enable them to work. The federal government has a similar requirement under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794. A “reasonable” accommodation a determination to be made on the facts by the employer on a case-by-case basis. Ultimately, the decision an employer makes could be reviewed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (or an equivalent state agency) or a court if the employer is sued for discrimination.

DISCUSSION PROMPT:

CASE STUDY (HYPOTHETHICAL)

Jordan, a fully qualified specialized registered nurse, is deaf. Jordan relies upon an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter to communicate with hearing individuals in the workplace. Jordan applied for a job with Carmel Receiving and Trauma Center (“CRTC”), a large medical center that, with all its hubs and subsidiaries, grosses $1.3 billion annually. Net profits are in the millions.

Jordan received a job offer, conditioned upon a health screening and clearance by CRTC’s occupational health department. Jordan was in fact cleared. Jordan notified CRTC of the need for an ASL interpreter as an accommodation for Jordan’s hearing impairment.

The annual salary, including benefits, for Jordan’s position was approximately $75,000. Upon investigation, CRTC calculated that the annual cost to CRTC for the ASL interpreter accommodation would be an additional $100,000 annually; there was the need for a full time interpreter for Jordan, plus several situations where two ASL interpreters would be required.

In considering Jordan’s request for accommodation, CRTC’s hiring supervisor wrote in an email to her boss that the department’s annual budget allocation could not absorb the “excessive cost of the additional personnel” of ASL qualified interpreters “for this one nurse.”

Based on the cost of the accommodation, CRTC immediately determined that the additional salary and overhead for the interpreters would be an “undue hardship,” making the accommodation unreasonable. Relying on the undue hardship defense, CRTC did not hire Jordan.

Did CRTC violate ADA?

DISCUSS:

1. Was CRTC within its legal rights under ADA to refuse the accommodation and thus not hire Jordan on the basis of undue hardship? In considering this case, you should review:

(a) what is considered a “reasonable” accommodation under ADA including sample accommodations listed by ADA (42 U.S.C. 12111(9) (2018)) and the EEOC (www.eeoc.gov); and

(c) the definition of “undue hardship” and standard an employer has to meet to establish “undue hardship” (42 U.S.C. 12111(10)(a) (2018)); and

(d) case law – research what the courts consider in determining if there is undue hardship justifying not providing an accommodation

2. Are there ethical considerations involved in this case beyond what is required by the “letter of the law” and if so what are they?

Please support your thoughts and conclusions with reasoned analysis and your research.

For this Discussion, first READ:

and eReserve Required Readings re: and corporate social responsibility (CSR) Readings.

PROMPT:

What was key corporate decision point that defines BP’s ethical dilemma in this case study? Which ethical frameworks characterizes BP’s decision? In your initial Discussion post, be sure to include the following three areas:

• Explain how the philosophy of Milton Friedman might have played a role in BP management’s decisions leading up to the disaster.
• Explain the role of the ethical framework called “egoism” in the decisions made by BP relating to this disaster.
• Explain how CSR and theories of sustainability such as triple bottom line could have led BP to make different decisions and avoid the disaster. What would have been the corporate considerations and decision making process?

Evaluating Cash Budgets of an Organization Submit the assignment by 11:59 PM PT Sunday of Module 4. Cash budgets serve as critical tools for analyzing cash flow and ensuring adequate liquidity throughout the year. Executives rely on this analysis for strategic decision-making. In this assignment, you will conduct a financial analysis of an organizations cash budget with provided information. You will analyze cashflow management and provide evidence-based recommendations in a 3- to 4-page memo for executive decision makers. Although you are not composing an APA-formatted essay, you must still demonstrate the application of research. Apply APA format for in-text citations and your reference list. Use creativity to develop something that mirrors what you would produce in the workplace. Include a reference page at the end of your document. Step 1 Review the module readings, videos, discussion, and ACE LibraryLinks to an external site. to understand key principles of cash flow management, working capital strategies, and financial decision-making frameworks. Imagine you are the financial manager of Peachey’s Furniture Company. Download and examine the following financial information: Peacheys Furniture Cash Budgeting Information Resource Peacheys Furniture Cash Budget Consider how the concepts discussed this week apply to Peachey’s specific market position and operational challenges. Step 2 Assess the organizations cash flow patterns, operational efficiency, and financial management strategies using the provided cash budget. Consider the impact of industry trends, competitive pressures, and strategic initiatives on the companys cash position. Use these questions to guide your thinking: What patterns do you observe in the cash inflows and outflows, and what might be causing these patterns? Based on the cash budget data, what potential challenges or opportunities can you identify for improving the company’s cash position? Step 3 Compose your memo. Include the following: summary of key findings analysis of current cash flow management strategies evaluation of strengths and weaknesses in financial operations discussion of market conditions and competitive factors affecting cash flow minimum of three evidence-based recommendations for improvement implementation considerations and potential impacts Incorporate at least three APA-formatted citations within your memo and include an APA-formatted reference list at the end. Step 4 Submit your 3- to 4-page memo and reference page (not included in the required page count). Please read the Assignment GuidelinesLinks to an external site. before you begin working. Master’s Assignment Rubric v.3 Master’s Assignment Rubric v.3 Criteria Ratings Points Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding Mastery A. Clearly addressed all elements of the assignment. B. Demonstrated real-world application. 17 to 20 pts Marginal A. Addressed most of the elements of the assignment. B. Demonstrated marginal real-world application. 13.1 to 16.9 pts Needs Improvement A. Somewhat addressed the elements of the assignment. B. Demonstrated little to no real-world application. 0.1 to 13 pts No submission 0 to 0 pts /20 pts Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems Mastery A. Clearly addressed the issue/problem. B. Exhibited scholarly analysis and evaluation. C. Established a solid connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated critical thinking surrounding the issue/problem with depth and breadth. E. Formulated deep conclusion and/or implications. 25.5 to 30 pts Marginal A. Addressed most of the issue/problem. B. Somewhat exhibited scholarly analysis and evaluation. C. Established some connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated a superficial understanding of the issue/problem. E. Formulated surface-level conclusion and/or implications. 21 to 25.4 pts Needs Improvement A. Many issues/problems not addressed. B. Exhibited little to no scholarly analysis and evaluation. C. Established little to no connection to theory and/or research. D. Demonstrated limited evidence of understanding the problem/issue. E. Formulated limited evidence of conclusion and/or implications. 0.1 to 20.9 pts No submission 0 to 0 pts /30 pts Use of Evidence Mastery A. Displayed a variety of scholarly references as evidence. B. Demonstrated use of scholarly literature and research beyond sources provided in the course. 25.5 to 30 pts Marginal A. Displayed a marginal use of references. B. Demonstrated a marginal use of literature and research provided in the course. 21 to 25.4 pts Needs Improvement A. Displayed little to no use of references. B. Demonstrated little to no use of literature and research provided in the course. 0.1 to 20.9 pts No submission 0 to 0 pts /30 pts Scholarly Writing Mastery A. Exceeded or met formal writing standards. B. Demonstrated correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling. 8.5 to 10 pts Marginal A. Met or marginally met a basic level of formal writing. B. Demonstrated inconsistent use of grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling. 7 to 8.4 pts Needs Improvement A. Basic formal writing skills limited or not present. B. Demonstrated difficulty with grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling. 0.1 to 6.9 pts No submission 0 to 0 pts /10 pts APA Format Mastery A. Demonstrated near- perfect APA formatting. 8.5 to 10 pts Marginal A. Demonstrated marginally correct APA formatting. 7 to 8.4 pts Needs Improvement A. Demonstrated limited correct APA formatting. 0.1 to 6.9 pts No submission 0 to 0 pts /10 pts Drag a file here, or click to select a file to upload Drag a file here, orChoose a file to upload or I agree to the tool’s End-User License Agreement Students at ACE are expected to demonstrate appropriate professional writing skills and follow the academic integrity policy. By checking this box, I acknowledge that I have read and understand the Academic Integrity Policy and writing expectations for the college. View the Policies page within your course for additional resources provided on the Academic Integrity Policy and plagiarism. *