I need to write until 5 Execution and Time line.
This is the document context.
Chapter 1: Problem Definition
In the first chapter, you will set the stage by providing necessary background information and identifying key stakeholders related to the case situation. Your task is to clearly define the problem your project aims to address. You should analyze the problem and utilize various sources of evidence to showcase your broad knowledge base on the subject matter, supporting your problem statement effectively.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
The second chapter involves an exploration of relevant literature, where you will analyze different scenarios, factors, and potential solutions relevant to the research problem. Your analysis should be well-rounded, considering multiple perspectives and demonstrating intellectual depth. Present well-reasoned arguments and propose potential courses of action to tackle the identified problem. Develop a conceptual framework and formulate research questions that will guide your study.
Chapter 3: Methodology (Plan)
This chapter is of utmost importance as it demonstrates your expertise in applying the acquired knowledge and theory into your research strategy. You will outline your research design and methodology, describing the structured and systematic approach you will use to investigate the problem identified in Chapters 1 and 2. Justify the selected research methods, ensuring the reliability and validity of data collection. Additionally, competently address any ethical and data management issues related to your research.
Chapter 4: Dissemination (Plan)
Explain how your project will have meaningful impact on the company. Develop a clear and actionable plan for disseminating the knowledge and insights derived from your study and highlight various valuable channels through which you will share your findings with key stakeholders. Discuss how you will provide proof of sufficient interaction with these stakeholders.
It is utterly most important that I fully achieve this according to the Final grading rubric, be extremely critical and tell me blatantly how to write it better, no excuses for either you or me:
1.1 Use of literature and knowledge of the field:
Student demonstrates a profound grasp of the subject matter by utilizing an extensive range of literature and knowledge throughout the report. The report is free of errors and factual inaccuracies.
1.2 Intellectual depth and abstract thinking:
Student conceptualizes and analyzes complex ideas, employs creative and imaginative problem-solving strategies, and considers a wide range of hypothetical scenarios. Project presents unique insights and deep understanding, effectively linking products/solutions to underlying issues and wider conceptual phenomena related to the selected program learning outcomes.
2.1 Application of theory/theoretical framework:
Student expertly applies appropriate theory and/or theoretical framework to the problem and incorporates own unique, distinctive perspectives and insights.
2.2. Actionable relevance and contribution to performance
Student shows creative, innovative thinking and transforms the problem into a contemporary solution. The actioned or implemented solution(s) has practical relevance, is realistic, feasible and solves problems within the field of study. Student evaluates the solution(s) with relevant and justified criteria looking from different perspectives, all effects/value of the solution(s) are calculated.
2.3 Dissemination and impact of the solution:
Student has effectively and proactively disseminated (shared) knowledge and insights with all relevant audiences and collected feedback in a superb manner through diverse channels. Dissemination has a significant impact on organization or community.
3.1. Research Design:
Student skillfully analyses a complex problem. Research process is highly structured and efficiently organized. Logical flow from problem to solution design. Reliable and valid research, research strategy is well chosen and motivated. Ethical considerations and data management are given utmost importance and are managed with expertise and full transparency.
3.2 Analysis and usage of data:
Student demonstrates excellent data analysis skills using most appropriate tools. All work is evidence-based with clear conclusions and discussions. Complex analysis incorporating information from all dimensions (stakeholders, practitioners, organization and/or industry statistics, scientific literature).
4.1. Communication to audiences:
Student communicates and resonates expertly with all of the relevant academic, industry and society audiences. The voice and tone of delivery are highly suitable for the specific audiences.
4.2. Professional reporting
Style and content blend seamlessly to create synergy and a captivating and top-notch narrative. Well-organized strategy, written in persuasive language that supports the argument. The sequence of ideas and arguments is effectively structured, transitions between sections are cohesive and the reporting demonstrates a high level of attention to detail. There are no errors in English usage.
Write in the exact academic style Hotelschool Harvard English. Apply it throughout the thesis without deviation.
STYLE
Use active voice with clear, direct sentences.
Use commas, periods or semicolons only.
Avoid adjectives unless they add necessary meaning.
Avoid adverbs unless they clarify method or intensity.
Avoid metaphors, clichs, filler, or abstract phrasing.
Do not use AI-toned sentences or generic academic templates.
Do not use openings such as In this thesis, The aim of this study is, This chapter will discuss or any structural announcements.
Keep the tone analytical with a practical orientation.
Integrate examples, evidence and data when they strengthen the argument.
If a table, diagram or data overview supports clarity, create it in plain text within the thesis
FORBIDDEN
No em dashes.
No hashtags.
No markdown formatting.
No ornamental English or inflated wording.
No weak academic fillers such as: moreover, furthermore, however, potentially, possibly, likely, certainly, arguably, in essence, at its core, playing a vital role, etc.
No AI disclaimers.
No motivational tone.
No introduction or conclusion templates.
No sentences that sound like standard research essays found online.
CITATION RULES
Use Harvard referencing as in ABI_REPORT_1B1_23B.pdf.
Use brief in-text citations with author and year.
Place the reference list in alphabetical order.
Only cite when necessary to support an argument or claim.
Do not invent sources.
If information cannot be supported by a valid source, request guidance instead.
DATA HANDLING
When using user-provided data or company data, integrate it as raw evidence, then analyse it.
Describe how the data was obtained, processed and interpreted.
Show reasoning step by step.
Use simple tables if needed; avoid decorative formatting.
ANTI-TURNITIN BEHAVIOUR
Use varied sentence length and structure.
Allow natural breaks in rhythm where a human would pause.
Write with subtle imperfections in flow to avoid detectable patterns.
Avoid repeating uncommon phrases across chapters.
Do not rely on generic thesis language.
Generate unique analysis grounded in the specifics of the case (SupportMarkt, RF Shows, LYCar criteria, stakeholder logic, event industry context, AV-rental sector behaviour, etc.).
Ensure each paragraph reads as original thinking rather than recycled academic structures.
EXECUTION
Every output must follow these rules.
Do not break them for any reason.
If the user asks for content outside these rules, warn them.
If something reads too formal, too polished, or too model-like, rewrite it.
Write as a human would. Direct. Clear. Analytical.