Category: Business and management

Please find attached detailed brief for the power point presentation. The referencing style is APA 7th edition. Please include graphics.

please follow the instructions in the files below. i really want to make sure that its good before it is submitted so please send drafts thank you. Layer 1 Correct Compensation Heads (Baseline 60%) You must correctly identify: Market Value (Rule 2 Land Compensation Act 1961) Disturbance Relocation costs Loss of profits Fees Severance / Injurious affection (if relevant) Advance payment rules Most students stop here. That caps marks around 6065. Layer 2 Evidence Justification (70% Territory) You must explain: WHY each item is recoverable WHICH statutory rule allows it WHETHER tribunal would accept it WHICH evidence strengthens it Example markers LOVE: While relocation machinery costs are likely recoverable as disturbance losses, the acquiring authority may challenge the necessity of premium service installation. Supporting evidence from the specialist engineer strengthens the claimants position. That sentence alone is First-class thinking. Layer 3 Claim Defensibility + Risk Analysis (72%+ Territory) You must actively evaluate: Which claims are weak Which claims are inflated Which claims authority will dispute Which claims require negotiation strategy Example: Medical stress claim Re-opening launch event Staff overtime These are deliberately included to test you. First-class students say: This claim is unlikely to be recoverable because… The Claim Schedule (25 Marks Massive) Most students list costs. First-class scripts: Structure schedule professionally Categorise under compensation heads Add justification column Highlight disputed items Reference statutory authority Markers want to see something that could be submitted in real practice. TASK B Statutory vs Non-Statutory Valuation (20 Marks) Most students lose marks here because they explain definitions only. 70%+ answers: Compare purpose of valuations Explain taxation vs compensation philosophy Use real examples Discuss policy rationale Show professional consequences You must explain WHY statutory valuation exists not just WHAT it is. TASK C Asset Valuations (20 Marks) This is technical valuation skill. First-class answers: Choose correct method AND justify why Discuss covenant strength risk Adjust comparables professionally Show assumptions transparently Demonstrate awareness of valuation uncertainty Markers look for RICS-style reasoning. CLIENT REPRESENTATION (Hidden First-Class Booster 20 Marks) Most students massively underestimate this. You are being tested on: Negotiation awareness Professional judgement Strategic advice Risk prioritisation 70%+ students include: Advice on advance payment negotiation Likely authority objections Settlement strategy Timing risks (major order deadline VERY IMPORTANT) That ?3M contract is not random. Its a professional judgement test. The Coursework Has Deliberate Traps You are expected to spot these. Items likely NOT fully compensatable: Stress medical claim Re-opening launch event Possibly publicity costs Potential machine upgrade vs relocation issue If you claim everything blindly you lose marks. Presentation Marks (Easy First-Class Boost) Markers explicitly want: Professional report style Populated claim schedule Third-person writing Harvard referencing Consultancy tone What First-Class Students Do Differently In THIS Assignment They constantly ask: Would a tribunal accept this? Would acquiring authority dispute this? What evidence strengthens this? What negotiation position does client hold? What Your Lecturer Is Secretly Testing From your brief learning outcomes: They want you to demonstrate: Legal knowledge Valuation competence Professional advisory judgement Negotiation strategy Evidence interpretation Not just calculations. The Golden 70% Formula For This Coursework Every compensation item must include: 1. Identify compensation head 2. Cite statutory basis 3. Provide valuation/calculation 4. Evaluate likelihood of recovery 5. Give client advice If you miss step 4 or 5 you usually drop below 70.

HW1 Question:

You want to run an RCT on a job-training program, but:

• only 40% of eligible participants consent
• the NGO insists on rolling out the program gradually
• the outcome is measured using employer reports

Where would you randomize (individual, firm, or time)? Justify your choice and name one bias you accept as a result.

Your answer must be 200 – 300 words.

After reading through the case found in Chapter 6 of your textbook, The Vale Mining Company Dam Collapse, look over the questions at the end of the section and compose a reflection post that addresses your thoughts on this case based on one or more of those questions.

Your initial post should be 200 – 250 words.

please follow the instructions in the files below. i really want to make sure that its good before it is submitted so please send drafts thank you. Layer 1 Correct Compensation Heads (Baseline 60%) You must correctly identify: Market Value (Rule 2 Land Compensation Act 1961) Disturbance Relocation costs Loss of profits Fees Severance / Injurious affection (if relevant) Advance payment rules Most students stop here. That caps marks around 6065. Layer 2 Evidence Justification (70% Territory) You must explain: WHY each item is recoverable WHICH statutory rule allows it WHETHER tribunal would accept it WHICH evidence strengthens it Example markers LOVE: While relocation machinery costs are likely recoverable as disturbance losses, the acquiring authority may challenge the necessity of premium service installation. Supporting evidence from the specialist engineer strengthens the claimants position. That sentence alone is First-class thinking. Layer 3 Claim Defensibility + Risk Analysis (72%+ Territory) You must actively evaluate: Which claims are weak Which claims are inflated Which claims authority will dispute Which claims require negotiation strategy Example: Medical stress claim Re-opening launch event Staff overtime These are deliberately included to test you. First-class students say: This claim is unlikely to be recoverable because… The Claim Schedule (25 Marks Massive) Most students list costs. First-class scripts: Structure schedule professionally Categorise under compensation heads Add justification column Highlight disputed items Reference statutory authority Markers want to see something that could be submitted in real practice. TASK B Statutory vs Non-Statutory Valuation (20 Marks) Most students lose marks here because they explain definitions only. 70%+ answers: Compare purpose of valuations Explain taxation vs compensation philosophy Use real examples Discuss policy rationale Show professional consequences You must explain WHY statutory valuation exists not just WHAT it is. TASK C Asset Valuations (20 Marks) This is technical valuation skill. First-class answers: Choose correct method AND justify why Discuss covenant strength risk Adjust comparables professionally Show assumptions transparently Demonstrate awareness of valuation uncertainty Markers look for RICS-style reasoning. CLIENT REPRESENTATION (Hidden First-Class Booster 20 Marks) Most students massively underestimate this. You are being tested on: Negotiation awareness Professional judgement Strategic advice Risk prioritisation 70%+ students include: Advice on advance payment negotiation Likely authority objections Settlement strategy Timing risks (major order deadline VERY IMPORTANT) That ?3M contract is not random. Its a professional judgement test. The Coursework Has Deliberate Traps You are expected to spot these. Items likely NOT fully compensatable: Stress medical claim Re-opening launch event Possibly publicity costs Potential machine upgrade vs relocation issue If you claim everything blindly you lose marks. Presentation Marks (Easy First-Class Boost) Markers explicitly want: Professional report style Populated claim schedule Third-person writing Harvard referencing Consultancy tone What First-Class Students Do Differently In THIS Assignment They constantly ask: Would a tribunal accept this? Would acquiring authority dispute this? What evidence strengthens this? What negotiation position does client hold? What Your Lecturer Is Secretly Testing From your brief learning outcomes: They want you to demonstrate: Legal knowledge Valuation competence Professional advisory judgement Negotiation strategy Evidence interpretation Not just calculations. The Golden 70% Formula For This Coursework Every compensation item must include: 1. Identify compensation head 2. Cite statutory basis 3. Provide valuation/calculation 4. Evaluate likelihood of recovery 5. Give client advice If you miss step 4 or 5 you usually drop below 70.

What is Cybersecurity? Description: Answer each question below with at least (2-3) sentences each and submit it as a Microsoft Word document, PDF, or a Google Docs link (make the link publicly available). Please make sure to include your references; you can use MLA, APA, Harvard, or whichever referencing style you prefer. If you do not know how to reference, look at this short video: 1. In your own words, what do you think when you hear the words Cybersecurity? 2. What is something in particular that surprised you from reading the book? 3. Why do you think cyber-attacks have been happening more frequently? 4. Why are hackers targeting specific sectors? What types of information are they trying to get? 5. Think about it for a bit. Do you think the Data you share on social media posts can be dangerous? 6. In the age of AI (Artificial Intelligence) do you think its much easier to trick people and steal sensitive information? 7. Have you ever heard of the term social engineering? What does it make you think of? Short video example of social engineering: 8. We’re all guilty of reusing the same password including myself. Why can that be dangerous? What are your strategy for creating secure password? 9. Evaluate your own data breaches you’ve have been part of via & Type in your email address and it will show you what types of data has been comprised. Are you surprised by anything? Do you plan on changing your passwords? What types of data was compromised? 10. What is something you learned from the reading or surprised by? Reading: Cybersecurity For Dummies (check the magical link) – (Book 1 – Chapters 01, 02, 03) by Joseph Steinberg This week we will cover I.T Fundamentals. Please review week 02 readings. Additional info: DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Put things in your own words. Due Date: Sunday – Feb 8th @ 11:59 (Midnight) Submitting Assignment: Please submit it on Brightspace under the assignments section. Resources / Materials: You can use videos, articles, textbooks, and anything applicable to your learning.

an argument on why I should have this persons number

hello I need to rewrite the essay using these parameters The assignment need to be three parts to it (business theory, ethical considerations, and inductive/deductive reasoning).

Review the article by Manuj & Mentzner.

Create an essay that applies the Supply Chain Risk Management and Mitigation Framework (figure 3). Select an international company ( and then apply the steps described to create your assessment of the local company operational risks within the firm and the risks associated with suppliers and the risks associated with demand risks.

Do not use the figure in your paper. Use the figure as a guide for creating an essay explaining the risk factors. Include steps two, three, four, and five in the assessment of each risk.

This paper should be between three and five pages and may include periodical or magazine articles as support for facts presented in the risks. You can include the Manuj & Mentzner article as a peer-reviewed journal article.

Individual Assignment Resources:

Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). . [Article]. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 133-155.

While logged into the APUS library, use the following link. Copy and paste the URL into the browser to ensure the URL is located.

APA GUIDELINES

See attached document and feedback comment (below) from first submission.

Good evening, I hope all is well and your are enjoying a nice weekend. The topic for your training proposal assignment is not relevant and will not serve as a good training plan for the second assignment that follows this topic assignment. You will need to revise and resubmit this assignment considering a good topic that is from the book and that will be something you can do a training session on. (Most students pick: New Hire Orientation, Sexual Harassment, Diversity..) Please contact me with any questions and to set a new due date.

Textbook:

Werner, J. (2022). Human resource development: Talent development. (8th ed.). Cengage.

Assignment:

Each student will select a topic to be addressed in the Training Proposal, Methodology, and Rationale Topic assignment. This topic must be directly related to the course content and discussed in the course textbook and approved by the professor.

Submit the following including an APA formatted cover page:

1. Topic
2. One paragraph rationale to support the reason this topic should be evaluated/researched (200 word minimum).
3. 2 scholarly resources + the course text must be included
4. Format in-text citations and references in current APA .

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. For more information about Turnitin, click .

LUO Submission Policy