Category: Business and management

Directions

Submit a 4- to 6-page draft opportunity analysis plan. The following rubric criteria must be included in this milestone submission:

Title page: <Your Business Idea or Name> Opportunity Analysis Plan

Report includes the following sections:

Section 1: Description of Idea

• Provide general overview of idea
• Explain how it solves a problem, meets a need, and so on
• Describe the basic business concept
• Discuss and evaluate the competitive advantage

Section 2: Market Analysis

• Include the short paper from Milestone One

Section 3: Assessment of the Entrepreneur and the Team

• Where are the knowledge gaps and how are they covered?
• How is the team structured?

What to Submit

Written components of projects must follow these formatting guidelines when applicable: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. The number of pages required for this milestone is 4 to 6, not including cover page.

Please use the attachment for the

For CT 5 using your individual career perspective, describe the corporate-level strategies used at your company. What strategies are used by your area/functional unit? Do these area/functional unit strategies support the corporate-level strategies of the wider organization or are the areas/functional unit strategies unique? Describe your companys international involvement. Critique the entry strategy(ies) that was/were used to enter foreign markets. Compare and contrast the strategic management process used by your company for its domestic organization and its international organization. How important is it to you that you work at an organization with an international presence? Your paper should be 5-6 pages in length and align with APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (available in the left-hand navigation panel). Include at least 2 credible references including the course textbook. The CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references (available in the left-hand navigation panel).

MGT350_M05_CT

MGT350_M05_CT

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Requirements

20 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all the required components as specified in the assignment.

16 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Content

30 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the course material; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

24 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

18 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Critical Analysis

30 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

CLO1: Describes the strategic management process for both domestic organizations and international organizations.

24 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

18 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Sources / Examples

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least two credible sources as specified in description. Sources meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates two credible sources as specified in description. Sources meet required criteria but are lessthan adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one credible source as specified in description. Source is poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources. Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style

5 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

4 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

3 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

2 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Demonstrates proper use of APA style

5 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.

4 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.

2 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.

5 p

Short Essay:

• What positive outcomes could result from implementing job enlargement, job rotation, and job enrichment in an organization with which you are familiar? What objections or obstacles might be encountered?
• Think of a job that you have done in your life that you really enjoyed. Now also think of a job that you did that you hated going to work. Now with both the job you loved and the one you hated, what were the levels of competence, self-determination, impact, and meaningfulness that you felt in each job? Compare the two lists. What do you see?
• Imagine you are considering starting a new job or leaving your old job for a new one. What aspects of a companys integration of work and life would you consider an important factor in your decision?

Application Essay:

Imagine that you are the manager of a small clothing manufacturer. You wish to retain your more senior employees, who typically work faster in completing each item of clothing than newer employees. Nevertheless, because 80 percent of your current workforce is over 50 you need to incentivize new hires in order to be sure you have an adequate supply of skilled workers in ten years time. Devise an extrinsic reward plan that rewards skilled workers as well as new workers who need to acquire skills.

Needs to be edited if possible

I need the Annotated Bibliography and then the next week I need a 4 page essay using the resources from the bibliography, if you accept the bibliography I’ll select you for the essay

this is a powerpoint…

all the information is in the task I have to follow

My Topic is A Research Report focused on the issue of patient no-shows and their financial impact on healthcare organizations. Instructions: For this assignment, which you will begin working on this week and complete next week, you will choose a problem that is relevant to your current or future career, and write a brief research report, recommendation report, or feasibility report. The type of report you choose to write will depend on the type of business problem you are trying to address. If you are simply trying to understand the causes of the problem and its importance, choose a research report. If you already know what the problem is, choose a recommendation report. If you already have a solution to the problem in mind, choose a feasibility report. The report should include the following sections: Introduction. Explain the purpose of the report and provide sufficient background information for the reader to understand the full context. Body. Provide the methodology, results, and discussion of your data. The methodology refers to your method, or process, by which you conducted your study. This would include your research methods. The results include all your facts, data, and evidence found through your research. The discussion is your interpretation of that data. Conclusion. Sum up the main points, and, for a recommendation report or feasibility report, provide a recommended action or actions. For a research report, provide the findings and suggest possible next steps. Back Matter. A list of references in APA style for data derived from external sources. Other Assignment Requirements Length: 2-3 pages (600-900 words) Research: at least two high-quality sources relevant to the problem you are exploring, cited in APA format. Formatting: a short, internal report such as this one should be formatted in the style of a memo. It should include To, From, Subject, and Date fields. It should be in block format: single spaced, no indents, and skip a line between paragraphs.

Question: What are the critical differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods, and how do these approaches shape the outcomes of a research project? Provide a scenario in management where one method is preferable over the other. Key Points for Discussion Forums: Engagement: Students must provide an original post addressing the weekly question and critique a peer’s post with meaningful insights and constructive feedback. Deadlines: Your initial post of at least 300 words with multiple in-text citations and reference section is due on Thursday at 11:59 PM ET. Your response post to 2 classmates of at least 150 words with multiple in-text citations and reference sections are due by 11:59 pm ET on Sundays each week. Scoring: Each discussion is worth 20 points, with 10 points for the original post and 10 points for the peer critique.