Category: Business Law

Im currently writing my response but i need help finishing it. Heres the Ethics essay questions and explanation.

Poker4u

Last year, Mark and Jason started a business called Poker4u, based in the

British Virgin Islands, through which they run a gambling website called

Poker4u.com. For a fee, visitors to the website can play poker and other card

games against players from around the world. Game winners earn cash prizes.

Poker4u accepts all major credit cards. This website has become very popular

with players from across the globe and, as a result, Poker4u has become a very

profitable business.

Before playing on Poker4u.com, all players must sign a document stating that

they are over 18 years of age and agreeing to assume full responsibility for their

debts incurred while playing on the site. Many adults have visited this website,

played cards and have lost thousands of dollars. However, despite warnings on

the site to discourage underage players, Alan, a 14 year old in Cincinnati, Ohio

visited this website and used his fathers credit card to play and lost $20,000. In

addition, Roger, a 12 year old in Thailand, and Jacob, a 16 year old in Australia,

committed similar offenses. The website is now demanding full payment from

Alan, Roger and Jacob and each of their parents.

Instructions

1) Identify the ethical dilemmas

2) Evaluate who are the stakeholders in this scenario.

3) What are the alternative courses of action. Please discuss the pros and cons

of each possible course of action. Make sure you include how the stakeholders

will be impacted by the various solutions you are proposing.

4) Discuss the ethical schools of thought in evaluating your decision.

5) Recommend a decision. Make sure to provide the rationale for your decision.

I’ll attach the rubric & my essay that you just have to add to and edit (finish) for me.

For this third assessment, students are to apply the concepts taught in the law modules for the unit (modules 9, 10 and 11) to a case study (Chevron: Dont be a Fossil Fool) and answer four short answer questions. To best answer these questions, students will be required to research beyond the principles taught in the lectures and tutorials, and will be required to reference any external material that is used to form the substance of their answers. In breaking down the marks that are available for this assessment, each question is worth 9 marks for a total of 36 marks for the content portion of the assignment. The remaining 4 marks are awarded for the use of referencing and the structure / presentation of assignment submissions. Students are to integrate a completed cover page (a template is provided on blackboard) into their assignment document and submit their assignment file in soft copy format to a turnitin link in blackboard. A hard copy version of your assignment is not required to be submitted to your lecturer or tutor.

find out all the mistakes in employment contract and correct it according to the Saudi Labor Law. After correction the students need to write a whole new employment contract by following all the relevant articles of the Saudi Labor Law

There are 6 feedbacks i want them fixed

1 – introduction add laws and more citations

2 – Discussion part (a) add details about LLC Lagal Personal

3 – Discussion part (b) Need more details on approvals time and cost add laws and more citations

4 – Discussion part (c) add more citations

5 – Discussion part (d) add citations

6 – Cconclusion this is short

Note: please make sure the Ai and similarities are not more the 10% minimum 10 reference

There are 2 separate questions: one is the assignment question on Saudi companies law, and the other is a case study. I want both of them in a Word document separately with its references. It has the same instructors which is the following:

Instructions:

Use clear academic language.

Avoid copying from sources; use your own words.

Submission format: Typed, Times New Roman, size 12, single-spaced.

Al-generated content must not exceed 30%. Submissions will be checked using plagiarism and Al-detection tools.

Requires six (6) pages of analysis. Each reaction paper counts as five percent (5%) of your grade. This is not a creative essay. Please show me you actually read the assignment closely [For example, you might write, on page 12 the author says xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Then, tell me your thoughts and analysis of the quote and why it is important or not in your personal opinion. Please show me at least ten (10) page numbers from the assigned reading where you believe a significant statement is made. Please use Microsoft Word, double spaced, 12-point font, no title page or footnotes required. Points will be reduced for papers that are not stapled. Only official university absences are acknowledged. Otherwise, late assignments will not be accepted for any reason; you may submit assignments as early as you desire, without penalty. If you plan to be absent from class or have any other circumstances that may prevent you from submitting your assignment on time, you need to submit your assignment early. You must submit work both to eCourses and before class, on-paper. ONLY THOSE ASSIGNMENTS SUBMITTED ON PAPER, ON-TIME WILL BE GRADED. Note that the purpose of the assignments is for you to read the articles and react to them. The study of law requires actual reading to absorb. Accordingly, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for reaction papers is considered plagiarism and consequences for any such use may include, but not be limited to, a zero (0) for the class along with more serious consequences to be determined by the University. Using AI is of no utility for these assignments since you are presenting your own thoughts and not an explanation of the article or anyone elses thoughts regarding the article or its contents.

Touchstone 2: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car?

SCENARIO: Jim and Laura Buyer visit the local car dealership because they are interested in buying a new car. The car they currently have is aging and is starting to have mechanical problems. Jim and Laura would share the new car, and use it to go back and forth to work and school. Before going to the dealership, Jim and Laura decide that they can only afford $400.00 a month in car payments.

Once at the car dealership, Jim and Laura meet Stan Salesman. Stan shows them several vehicles and Jim and Laura test-drive several of the cars. Jim and Laura particularly like the blue 4-door sedan. Therefore, they agree to give Stan Salesman a $100.00 deposit to hold the car for a day. Stan Salesman does not give them the receipt but guarantees that the $100.00 is refundable. No documents were signed.

The next day, Stan Salesman calls Jim and Laura to ask them when they would like to take delivery of the car. Jim and Laura, on the way home from the dealership, decided that they were not going to buy the car because they did not want to spend that money each month. Therefore, Jim and Laura tell Stan Salesman that they have decided not to buy the car and request their $100.00 deposit back.

Stan insists that the $100.00 was a deposit on the car and was meant to be part of the contract to buy the car. Stan is very persistent and insistent that Jim and Laura have contracted to buy the car; therefore, the $100.00 will be applied to the purchase price of the car. Jim and Laura are shocked and angry as not only do they not want to spend the money, but now feel as though they are being duped by Stan Salesman.

Jim and Laura have an appointment to see a lawyer in a few days, but know you are a student taking a business law class and come to you for advice. They are very frazzled, and understandably upset that they may have just purchased a car. Since you have been taking business law, you have read and understand the elements of a contract and the defenses to a contract. Therefore, although you are not a lawyer, you provide some basic advice from what youve learned in your business law class.

ASSIGNMENT: Advise Jim and Laura based on the above facts as presented and the material covered in the lessons by answering each section in the template below. In this touchstone, be sure to address the following:

1. Identify the elements that must be present for a legal contract to exist. Define each element using examples.
2. Determine the facts from the scenario that you will use to support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.
3. Decide whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.
4. Include two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note:Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.

DOWNLOAD

Helpful Links:

---

A. Directions

Step 1: Answer Questions

Follow the directions for each part of the . Include your response and all relevant elements under the Requirement section. Prompts in the Inspiration section are not required; however, they may help you to fully think through your response.

Part 1: Contract Definition
Identify the elements that must be present for a legal contract to exist. Define each element using examples.

Part 2: Case Support
Determine the facts from the scenario that you will use to support your decision on whether or not Jim and Laura entered a contract with Stan Salesman for the purchase of the automobile.

Part 3: Case Judgment
Based on the facts in Part 2, decide whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.

Part 4: Sources & Conventions
Include two academic references to support your judgment and review your document for standard English writing conventions.

Step 2: Review Rubric

Review the rubric to ensure that you understand how you will be evaluated. Contact the Sophia Learning Learner Support team with any questions.

Step 3: Review Checklist and Requirements

Review the checklist and requirements to ensure that your Touchstone is complete.

Step 4: Submit

Submit your completed Touchstone 2 Template using the blue button at the top of this page.

Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Contract Definition
Have you identified the elements of a legal contract?
Have you defined each element?
Have you provided an example for each element?
Have you included reference citations as appropriate?

2. Case Support
Have you identified relevant facts from the scenario?
Have you written a clear explanation of how these facts support your decision?
Have you included reference citations as appropriate?

3. Case Judgment
Have you clearly stated your decision on the existence of a contract for purchase of the automobile?
Have you defended your decision with relevant facts from Part 2 about the scenario that support your choice?

4. Sources & Conventions
Have you provided two high quality academic references?
Have you explained how each source relates to and supports your judgment on the case?
Have you reviewed the touchstone for proper academic and/or professional writing conventions?

---

B. Rubric

	Advanced (100%)	Proficient (85%)	Acceptable (75%)	Needs Improvement (50%)	Non-Performance (0%)
Contract Definition Define the elements of a legal contract using examples from the scenario where applicable. (25%)	Thoroughly defined the elements of a legal contract using examples from the scenario where applicable.	Satisfactorily defined the elements of a legal contract using examples from the scenario where applicable.	Partially defined the elements of a legal contract using examples from the scenario where applicable.	Insufficiently defined the elements of a legal contract using examples from the scenario where applicable.	Did not submit or incompletely defined the elements of a legal contract using examples from the scenario where applicable.
Case Support Identify the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile. (25%)	Thoroughly identified the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.	Satisfactorily identified the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.	Partially identified the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.	Insufficiently identified the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.	Did not submit or incompletely identified the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.
Case Judgment Decide whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile. (25%)	Thoroughly decided whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.	Satisfactorily decided whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.	Partially decided whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.	Insufficiently decided whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.	Did not submit or incompletely decided whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.
Sources Include two academic references to support your judgment. (15%)	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices.	Meets the required number of references; most references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; most references poor quality choices.	No references provided; or, does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
Conventions Follow conventions for standard written English. (10%)	There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.	There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.	There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.	There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.	There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.

---

C. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:

• Written responses must be words combined for all prompts.
• Use a readable 11- or 12-point font.
• All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
• Composition must be original and written for this assignment and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
• Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
• Submission must include your name, the name of the course, and the date.
• Include all of the assignment components in a single (.doc and .docx) file.

The Scenario

Alex, the owner of a high-end coffee shop called “The Golden Roast,” wants to upgrade his espresso machines. On October 1st, he sends a signed letter to BrewTech Corp, a commercial kitchen supplier, stating:

“I am interested in purchasing three (3) Model-X Espresso Machines. I am willing to pay $5,000 per unit. This offer stays open until October 10th.”

BrewTech receives the letter on October 3rd. On October 5th, the manager of BrewTech sends an email back to Alex saying:

“We accept your offer for the three Model-X machines, but the price is $5,500 per unit due to recent shipping increases.”

Alex does not respond to the email. On October 8th, BrewTech sends a second email stating:

“Forget our previous email. We have reconsidered and accept your original offer of $5,000 per unit. We will ship the machines tomorrow.”

Alex immediately replies, saying he is no longer interested and has already purchased machines from another supplier. BrewTech sues Alex for Breach of Contract, arguing they accepted his offer before the October 10th deadline.

The Assignment Tasks

1. Analyze the “Mirror Image Rule”

In your opinion, did a valid contract exist when BrewTech sent the first email on October 5th? Explain the legal effect of BrewTech suggesting a price of $5,500.

2. The Revocation of the Counter-Offer

Legally, what happened to Alexs original offer ($5,000) once BrewTech sent the first email? Can a party “take back” a counter-offer and go back to the original terms?

3. The Final Verdict

Based on the principles of Offer and Acceptance, who should win the lawsuit: Alex or BrewTech? Justify your answer using contract law terminology.

NO CHATGPT FOR ANSWER

In the news we often see cases involving lawsuits against businesses based on torts. In this discussion we will look at another recent hot coffee case. These cases can be instructive for businesses. Torts can be an important area of liability risk for many businesses.

Instructions and points:

Read the summary of the following WSJ article and look up a similar one on the internet regarding this case.

Jury Awards Starbucks Customer $100,000 Over Hot Coffee Spill

by: Jacob Gershman

May 19, 2017

TOPICS: Damages, Fault, Jury Award, Negligence, Torts

SUMMARY: In 2014, Florida resident Joanne Mogavero drove to a Starbucks shop in Jacksonville for a cup of coffee. She sued Starbucks after the beverage she bought spilled on her. A Florida jury in Duval County circuit court concluded that Starbucks was mostly to blame for the accident and awarded the woman $100,000 in damages, including $85,000 for pain and suffering.

PART 1: Students Post

Read the entire article referenced above. Based on what you have learned about Torts consider each of the questions below. Please provide typed responses submitted in Brightspace Module Discussion. Address each question and answer in complete sentences. Be sure to answer all parts of each question. You may need to refer to your textbook, the Internet and other resources in order to fully address the questions.

QUESTIONS:

What are the facts of the lawsuit? Who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant?

How were damages assigned? How was fault or negligence assessed?

Why was negligence assigned to each of the parties? Why was the plaintiff awarded damages if the plaintiff was partially responsible for the harms?

Should Starbucks implement any changes in policies or procedures after this lawsuit?

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.

Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.

No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.

We can all learn from other’s mistakes. Business crime and ethics are closely linked, there are often violations of one or both. Some of the most notorious crimes in history have been white collar crimes. In this discussion students will review and share about a famous crime. From this we will attempt to learn lessons to avoid these outcomes.

A grading rubric is attached assist students in criteria for effective discussion postings.

Instructions and points:

PART 1: Student’s Post

Post your answer to the discussion scenario and question below; use at least three complete sentences to answer the question. Note: You must post to the discussion board in order to view your classmates posts.

Look up* a famous white collar business crime or criminal. (IE Andy Fastow, Weston Smith, Betty Vinson, Ponzi, Vaughn in NM, Enron, Health South, World Com Etc…)

or Famous Ethics Scandle

Describe in a paragraph or more:

What the crime was and who committed it? Describe the impact and harm.

What the ethical issue was. Who the stakeholders were.

How was it discovered?

What were the results? Incarceration, Claw Back, Sentencing, Payback, other?

What lessons can be learned from this situation?

Requirements: Please Be Sure to Carefully Follow the Instructions Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.

Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.

No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.

Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.

No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Please be sure to include in-text citations where necessary.