Category: Business

  • MGT 141 Organizational Leadership

    Guidelines on Writing the Week 4 Signature Assignment Paper

    MGT 141 C1 Spring B 2026 Organizational Leadership

    Paper Due Date: Sunday, February 8 midnight

    Guidelines and Strategies:

    The student is to read the Kotter articles,

    Leading Change: Why Transforming Efforts Fail

    by John P. Kotter and the HBR Press chapter entitled,

    Choosing Strategies for Change

    by

    John P. Kotter and Leonard A. Schlesinger.

    For Week 4 the student is to use the case study described by the student in the Week 4

    Organizational Leadership Discussion Forum. Here are the steps that must be followed

    for this Week 4 Signature Assignment.

    1. The student is to describe in detail the case study identified by the student in the

    Week 4 Organizational Leadership Discussion Forum. The more details the student

    can include the better.

    2. The student must then take Kotters

    Eight Steps to Transforming Your Organization

    and apply the 8 stages of Kotters model to the specific case the student described.

    3. Each of the 8 stages must be applied to the case. The student must describe how

    applying each specific stage in Kotters model would have impacted the change

    process and the eventual outcome of the change. Be specific and provide support

    from Kotters article.

    4. This paper should be a clear summary of the week 4 reading in Kouzes and Posner as

    well as the Kotter articles. This paper should explore, discuss, and strategize about

    how to understand organizational change, how to manage the change process, and

    the conditions that must be addressed if this particular change process is to move

    forward successfully.

    NOTE:

    Students are asked to submit their paper to a senior leader/manager for review and

    written feedback. The feedback should be focused on the students strategy and

    approach.

    This written feedback should appear in the form of an Appendix at the end

    of their paper. If this feedback is not included in the paper, points will be deducted

    from the paper. The student must also include the contact information of the person

    providing the review so the instructor can follow up with the leader as needed.

    Structure and Style:

    Students must use their own experiences and lessons learned from the case in addition

    to drawing significant ideas and concepts from both papers as well as Kouzes and

    Sunday, February 1, 2026

    Posner. All ideas and concepts borrowed from the articles must be cited correctly.

    Papers are to have a cover page, references page, and between 3.5 to 4.5 pages of

    written narrative (this page total does not include the cover page and references page).

    As noted above, all papers should include an Appendix that contains the written

    feedback of the leader/manager who has provided commentary/feedback on the

    students paper. This feedback is not included the page total.

    Requirements: 4 PAGES

  • MGT 100 The Manager as Communicator

    Conflict Resolution Project – Assignment and Grading Rubric

    Due at the end of Week 4

    This project is due the end of Week 4. However, begin your work on this assignment during

    Week 3 as it will take some time to plan and implement this assignment.

    Part 1 Planning – 150-250 words.

    1. Describe a

    current conflict

    situation that you face with another person in some aspect of

    your work or personal life that you feel comfortable addressing and sharing with Amy (it will

    not be shared with the rest of the class). Choose a situation that is relevant and important

    to you – however – not one that is too hot to handle.

    2. Provide a brief description of the conflict.

    3. Articulate your goal for addressing this conflict and what you hope will be the result. For

    example, to get a certain action/outcome; to sway a decision; to influence a change in

    behavior; to be heard; etc.

    4. Identify at least one of the tools and techniques discussed in our textbook Chapters 3, 4 or

    5 that you will utilize to address the conflict with this person in real life.

    5. What channel will you use to address the conflict and why?

    6. When will you address the conflict?

    Part 2 – Action Step

    7. Implement your plan in real life: Communicate with the person to address the conflict as

    you described above.

    Part 3 Assessment – 150-250 words

    Following the interaction diagnose how it went.

    8. Was your goal met?

    9. What worked well, if anything? What was unsuccessful, if anything?

    10. What strengths did you bring to the situation?

    11. When were you most challenged?

    12. What might you do differently if you were to do it again?

    Book _ 13th Edition
    Adler, B., Elmhorst, J. M., & Lucas, K. Communicating at Work: Strategies for Success in Business and the Professions, 13th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2019, ISBN 978-1-265-05342-0.

    Requirements: 2 pages

  • business studies

    o level business studies notes are available with me

    Requirements:

  • Business Question

    ISOM 351 3 things

    chapter 4 smartbook

    activity 4

    chapter 4 problems

    Requirements: 3 things to do

  • 5CO01 CIPD Level 5 Organisational Performance and Culture i…

    I am seeking support from a tutor with strong experience in CIPD Level 5 assignments, specifically Unit 5CO01 Organisational Performance and Culture in Practice.

    The assessment must be completed strictly in line with the official CIPD assessment brief, and all answers must be fully applied to the case study of Calmere House under Chaffinch Group ownership as provided in the brief.

    Requirements:
    Total word count: approx. 4,550 words (10%)
    Written in UK English using Harvard referencing
    Clear coverage of all Assessment Criteria (ACs) in line with the grading grid (High Pass target)
    Minimum 15 credible references (20202025) including CIPD and peer-reviewed sources
    Strong application to the Calmere House / Chaffinch Group case study throughout
    Original academic writing with low Turnitin similarity risk

    Attachments provided:
    Official CIPD 5CO01 Assessment Brief
    CIPD Guidance Slides
    Grading Grid

    Requirements: 4550

  • Need help paraphrasing, rewriting and correcting

    I have attached the link for an article. The article needs to be summarised with the main innovation and ideas being covered along with 1 paragraph for SDG linkage. I Need help paraphrasing, rewriting and correcting the AI written summary. I have attached the AI written summary along with the link for the article. Article link:

    Requirements: 600

  • Question 2

    Population and Sampling


    Instructions

    This task centers on the target population and the study sample. It is important to furnish a comprehensive depiction of both the population and sample, outlining and explaining the sampling procedures backed by scholarly research sources. Emphasis should also be placed on the sample selection process, assignment to groups (if applicable), and strategies implemented to mitigate participant attrition. Lastly, you will expound on the site authorization process, confidentiality measures, study participation requirements, and geographic specifics.

    For this task, you should:

    • Clearly define the target population of the study. Specify the characteristics and criteria that define the individuals or entities that the research aims to investigate.
    • Identify and describe the sampling frame, which is the list or source from which the sample will be drawn. Discuss the relevance and representativeness of the sampling frame relative to the target population.
    • Discuss the chosen sampling method (e.g., random sampling, stratified sampling, convenience sampling) and provide a brief rationale for its selection. Explain how the chosen method aligns with the research objectives and population characteristics.
    • Discuss the determination of the sample size. Provide information on the considerations that influenced the choice of a specific sample size, including statistical power, precision, and practical constraints.
    • Outline the criteria used to include or exclude participants from the study. Clarify any specific characteristics that make individuals eligible or ineligible for participation.
    • Summarize the key demographic characteristics of the selected sample. This may include age, gender, ethnicity, education level, or any other relevant factors that impact the research objectives.
    • Acknowledge and briefly discuss any challenges or limitations encountered during the sampling process. This could involve issues such as non-response, selection bias, or difficulties in reaching certain subgroups.
    • Highlight any ethical considerations related to the population and sampling, such as informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality.
    • Finally, provide a summary of your discussion in two concisely written paragraphs. This should provide a condensed, yet comprehensive overview of key elements related to the sampling, selection, and characteristics of the study population.

    Ensure your submission is minimum of 6 pages but does not exceed 8



    Requirements:

  • Business Question

    help me finish the three questions in my document i provided

    Requirements: 1-2 page

  • Business Question

    All details are in the picture i uploaded! And also the ted talk videos link is :

    Requirements: as needed

  • Discussion post and response

    Discussion post. Should be between 350-500 words in length. Should use at least 2 scholarly articles with in text citations.

    Examine the relationship between an organizations values and ethics and its culture. Discuss the relevance of Hofstede and Bond (1984), Dorfman et al. (2012) or Minkov and Hofstede (2012); then explain how global leaders can apply this research to establish a culture of ethics in their organizations.

    (Do not attempt to address all of these points in your first post. Challenge yourself to develop your understanding and interaction with the course concepts as the discussion progresses.)

    Discussion posts should reflect scholarly analysis and interpretation of the topic as well as supporting research. Follow APA formatting guidelines (current edition) to integrate your research and cite your sources. Each post (the initial post as well as the response posts) should be between 300-500 words in length.

    This is a discussion response. Should be between 350-500 words in length. You are only writing a response to what is underneath here.

    Ethical leadership is crucial for creating and maintaining an ethical organizational culture. Leaders set the tone, and their actions determine whether stated values are truly followed. Caldeira and Infante-Moro (2025) argue that ethical leadership is a key factor in organizational sustainability. It builds employee commitment and fosters trust with stakeholders, both of which are essential for long-term success. Organizational culture is fundamentally shaped by its values and ethical principles.

    Culture encompasses the shared norms, underlying assumptions, and anticipated behaviors that evolve within an organization. Values define an organization’s priorities, whereas ethics dictate the practical application of those values. Consequently, the interaction of these components influences employees’ perceptions of their surroundings, their decision-making processes, and their alignment with the organization’s objectives.

    Research increasingly indicates that ethical leadership is crucial for integrating organizational values within the wider cultural context. Caldeira and Infante Moro (2025) found a connection between ethical leadership and organizational commitment, characterized by consistent actions rooted in integrity, fairness, and adherence to core values. Leaders who embody these ethical tenets influence employees’ cultural expectations and solidify norms that encourage responsible conduct. As a result, ethical commitment acts as a crucial mediating element, thereby fortifying and sustaining a positive ethical culture within the organization.

    This finding emphasizes that culture is not simply a passive consequence of an organization’s existence; rather, it is actively molded by leadership guided by fundamental values. When leaders articulate ethical expectations, employees internalize these values, thus cultivating a culture that encourages transparency, accountability, and a common moral purpose. Hofstede (2011) provides a broader cultural perspective, clarifying how societal-level values affect organizational culture. The framework demonstrates that cultural dimensions, such as power distance, individualism versus collectivism, and uncertainty avoidance, influence assumptions about authority, communication, and acceptable behavior within organizations (Hofstede, 2011).

    These cultural dimensions subsequently affect the interpretation and application of ethics. For example, organizations operating within high power-distance cultures may depend more on hierarchical ethical directives, whereas those in collectivist cultures may prioritize group-oriented moral standards. Now the research underscores the significance of shared values, both internal and external to the organization, in shaping its culture (Hofstede’s, 2011). These values, in turn, dictate the definition, communication, and practical application of ethics throughout the organization.

    Sinclair (1993) suggests that organizational culture is a crucial factor in determining employees’ ethical behavior, given that culture establishes the implicit behavioral norms. The examination of organizational culture models distinguishes between the “unitary culture” approach, wherein leaders strive to cultivate a unified, cohesive set of shared moral values, and a “subculture” approach, which acknowledges the presence of diversity and discussion within the organizational structure (Sinclair,1993). It is suggested that cultures fostering open dialogue and critical assessment of established norms might be more successful in promoting ethical conduct than those that mandate strict conformity. The research also emphasizes that ethics are not merely codified regulations; rather, they are socially constructed through everyday interactions (Sinclair,1993). The congruence or incongruence between stated values and actual practices ultimately dictates whether ethical standards are maintained or compromised.

    Ethical leadership (Caldeira & InfanteMoro, 2025) ensures that values and ethics are communicated and modeled consistently, strengthening organizational culture. Broader cultural dimensions (Hofstede, 2011) influence how values and ethics are understood and enacted. Cultural mechanisms (Sinclair, 1993) determine whether ethical behavior is reinforced through strong shared norms or through constructive dialogue among diverse subgroups. Ultimately, an organizations culture becomes the living expression of its values and ethics. Where alignment exists, culture fosters trust, integrity, and sustainable performance; where misalignment occurs, ethical risks and dysfunctional behaviors are more likely to emerge.

    Caldeira, R., & Infante-Moro, A. (2025). The Importance of Ethics in Organisations, Their Leaders, and Sustainability. Administrative Sciences, 15(9), 372.

    Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2 (1).

    Sinclair, A. (1993). Approaches to Organisational Culture and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1), 6373.

    This is a discussion response. Should be between 350-500 words in length. You are only writing a response to what is underneath here.

    Organizational values and ethics form the normative core of an organizations culture, shaping how employees interpret expectations, resolve dilemmas, and understand appropriate conduct. Culture becomes the lived expression of these values, reinforced through leadership behaviors, shared assumptions, and the social influence processes that unfold across levels of the organization (House & Aditya, 1997). Leadership research increasingly shows that ethical culture is not created through policy alone but emerges through dynamic interactions among leaders, followers, and contextual forces (Eberly et al., 2013).

    House and Aditya (1997) emphasize that leadership is a social influence process embedded within broader cultural systems, meaning that values and ethics are transmitted through leader behaviors, follower expectations, and contextual cues. This perspective aligns with Eberly et al.s (2013) integrative process model, which conceptualizes leadership as a series of event cycles in which leaders, followers, and contextual factors continuously influence one another through cognition, affect, and behavior. Through these repeated interactions, ethical culture becomes internalized and reinforced across the organization (Eberly et al., 2013).

    Hofstede and Bonds (1984) cultural dimensions framework adds a critical global layer by demonstrating that societal values such as power distance, collectivism, and longterm orientation shape how individuals perceive authority, fairness, and ethical responsibility. These cultural value patterns influence how employees interpret ethical expectations and what they consider legitimate leadership behavior (Hofstede & Bond, 1984). Dorfman et al. (2012) extend this understanding through the GLOBE project, showing that societal culture indirectly shapes leadership effectiveness through culturally endorsed leadership prototypes. For example, charismatic/valuebased leadership is universally endorsed, whereas participative leadership varies significantly across cultures (Dorfman et al., 2012).

    For global leaders, applying these insights requires integrating cultural awareness with consistent ethical leadership. Leaders must model ethical behavior in ways that resonate within local cultural frameworks while upholding universal principles such as integrity, transparency, and respect (Hofstede & Bond, 1984; Dorfman et al., 2012). By aligning organizational values with culturally informed leadership behaviors and reinforcing these values through ongoing event cycles leaders can cultivate ethical cultures that are both globally coherent and locally meaningful (Eberly et al., 2013).

    References

    Dorfman, P., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., Dastmalchian, A., & House, R. (2012). GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 504518.

    Eberly, M. B., Johnson, M. D., Hernandez, M., & Avolio, B. J. (2013). An integrative process model of leadership: Examining loci, mechanisms, and event cycles. American Psychologist, 68(6), 427443.

    Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstedes culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeachs value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417433.

    House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409473.

    Requirements: Read description