Will like for you to answer 4 essay questions the day I open my quiz =
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Quiz Grading Rubric.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Will like for you to answer 4 essay questions the day I open my quiz =
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Quiz Grading Rubric.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Ethical Issue Assignment:
Please use the ethical issue framework and questions from Chapter 2 power point to help you go step by step through this process.
I want you to copy/paste the format I have below and write your answers under the questions.
Scenario:
You are working in internal affairs, and in the course of another investigation, you discover disturbing evidence regarding the police chiefs son, who is also an officer in the department. Several informants have confided in you that this individual has roughed them up and taken their drugs, yet you find no record of arrest or the drugs being logged in the evidence room. When you write your report, your sergeant tears it up and tells you that there is not enough evidence to justify an investigation and for you to stick to what you are told to do. The chief calls you into his office the next day and offers you a transfer to a high-status position that will lead to a promotion. What should you do?
You can go through the process and explain your thoughts using the headings. I put the information for your below. Please go back through the end of Chapter 2 PP to make sure you understand the process.
General Framework:
(1) Relevant Law? (take a guess on a law that would be relevant – if you don’t know, you can just write “Not sure”)
(2)Relevant Policies? (every police department, organization, etc. has policies) (take a guess on any policies that would be relevant – if you don’t know, you can just write “Not sure”)
(3) Which ethical principles will be applied? (Select 2 or 3. Explain what it is and then tell me how it applies)
Critical thinking questions:
(1)What info an I USING in coming to a conclusion?
(2) What info do I NEED to settle the question? (What info is missing)
(3) Is there another way to INTERPRET the info? (There is always another way to interpret – tell me what it is)
(4) What ASSUMPTION led to my conclusion? (Tell me what you assumed about the people in the scenario)
(5) Is there another POINT OF VIEW to consider? (there is always another POV)
(6) What CONSEQUENCES might be the result of the conclusion?
–> After you complete these steps, tell me what you what do if you were in this situation and explain why (2-4 sentences)
Ethical Principle Sample from class:
Values are elements of desirability, worth or importance. Values become clear when there is a choice to be made. When there are competing values, the value that wins is the priority at that time.
Poole is in a situation where his values may clash because of the expectation of his superior and his dedication to his job. If Poole was to value honesty and Justice, he would stick with his 40-page report that clearly shows the corruption and the assault of Jimenez. Justice is shown because he is committed to his oath as a public servant. He is demonstrating an unbiased view of the incident.
Poole is under a lot of pressure to cut his report down to 2 pages, which would leave out important information. If Poole values loyalty to his chief, then he will go against his instinct and appease the chief. By showing loyalty, the gang remembers who reported the corruption will not see any change and will likely face the consequences of reporting. Poole may receive backlash from the gang members, however, he would likely make his life easier in the workplace by not going against his team.
There is 2 different discussion posts
Rewrite them using 350+ simple words for each discussion
First Discussion Post
The early 20th century (19001930) was a period of rapid social, economic, and cultural change in the United States. Two major developments that significantly impacted drug use were rapid urbanization/industrialization and large waves of immigration. These changes reshaped the fabric of American society and contributed to shifting public attitudes about drugs.
First, industrialization and urbanization transformed the country. As explained in Drugs in Society: Courses, Concepts, and Control (Lyman, 8th ed.), the United States moved from a rural, agricultural society to a more urban, industrial one. Millions of people moved to cities to work in factories. With crowded living conditions, poverty, and stressful working environments, substance use became more visible in urban areas. Drugs such as morphine, heroin, and cocaine were widely available in medicines before regulation. However, as drug addiction became more associated with urban crime and social disorder, public concern increased. Drug use shifted from being viewed as a personal or medical issue to a social problem requiring government intervention.
Second, immigration significantly influenced attitudes toward drugs. Between 1900 and 1920, millions of immigrants arrived from Europe and Asia. Certain drugs became associated with specific minority groups, which increased racial tension and moral panic. For example, opium smoking was linked to Chinese immigrants, and cocaine was often associated with African American communities in the South (Musto, 1999). These associations fueled fear and stereotypes, leading to stronger support for regulation. This social climate contributed to the passage of the Harrison Act of 1914, which regulated opiates and cocaine.
Beyond laws, the moral reform movements of the Progressive Era also played a major role. Religious and social reformers promoted temperance, self-control, and moral discipline. This broader cultural shift toward government responsibility for public health and morality influenced drug policies. Society was changing from a laissez-faire approach to one where the federal government became more involved in regulating behavior.
Overall, urban growth, immigration, and Progressive Era reforms reshaped American society and influenced changing perceptions of drug use. These social transformations laid the foundation for federal drug control policies in the early 20th century.
Word Count: 421
References
Lyman, M. D. (2019). Drugs in society: Causes, concepts, and control (8th ed.). Anderson Publishing.
Musto, D. F. (1999). The American disease: Origins of narcotic control (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Drugs in Society: Courses, Concepts, and Control, 8th Edition. Publisher: Anderson Publishing, Co Author(s): Lyman ISBN: 97811380202276
Second discussion post
Victim blaming occurs when responsibility for a crime is placed partly or fully on the victim instead of the offender. According to Mallicoat (Women, Gender, and Crime, 3rd ed.), victim blaming is especially common in cases of sexual assault and domestic violence. For example, women who report rape are often asked what they were wearing, whether they were drinking, or why they were alone. These questions shift attention away from the offenders behavior and suggest that the victim could have prevented the crime. This mindset discourages reporting and reinforces harmful gender stereotypes.
The effects of victim blaming are serious for both future victims and the criminal justice system. First, it creates fear and silence. When victims believe they will not be believed or will be judged, they are less likely to report crimes. Research shows that many sexual assaults go unreported due to fear of shame or not being taken seriously (Grubb & Turner, 2012). This allows offenders to avoid accountability and potentially continue offending. Second, victim blaming damages trust in the criminal justice system. If police, lawyers, or jurors question the victims behavior instead of focusing on the crime, it can lead to lower conviction rates and public distrust.
An example from the media is the case of Brock Turner in 2016. During the trial, much attention was placed on the victims alcohol consumption rather than Turners actions. Public outrage followed because many felt the system minimized the harm done to the victim. This case shows how victim blaming can influence sentencing outcomes and public confidence in justice.
The question what do elephants have to do with crime? relates to the concept of the elephant in the room. Victim blaming is often the elephant in the criminal justice systeman obvious issue that people avoid directly addressing. Instead of confronting cultural attitudes about gender, power, and violence, society sometimes focuses on the victims choices. Ignoring this elephant allows harmful beliefs to continue.
Overall, victim blaming discourages reporting, protects offenders, and weakens the justice system. Addressing it requires cultural change, better training for criminal justice professionals, and victim-centered approaches.
Word Count: 429
References
Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity, and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
Mallicoat, S. L. (2016). Women, gender, and crime: A text/reader (3rd ed.). Sage.
Author: Stacy Mallicoat
Title: Women, Gender, and Crime: A Text/Reader, 3rd Edition
Publisher: Sage
The purpose of this paper is to help consider opposing points of view with regard to crime in society and criminal behavior
Instructions:
Write a response paper demonstrating their position and the depth of understanding about the following issues (Chose one):
Format/Content Requirements:
Requirements: 3 pages
APA format research paper, no longer than 600 words. Including abstract, text, and references. Research on the impact on law enforcement as it pertains to accountability, civilian complaints, use of force incidents, before and after the adoption of body worn cameras, and unintended consequences that arose after adoption.
For this assignment, you will research well-known motivation theories and studies, including:
Once you have gathered sufficient information on each theory, write a 800– 1,000-word essay that addresses the following:
Formatting and Submission Guidelines
By following these guidelines, you will produce a well-structured and insightful analysis of motivation theories and their application in the workplace.
Laws in the US are constantly evolving as society continues to evolve. A great example of this evolution is the state of Washington legalizing marijuana. In this week’s lectures we compared the consensus and conflict paradigms and determined that laws can be an example of either paradigm.
Based on your learning answer the following question:
Citizens can express themselves freely in the United States by exercising their Constitutional rights. One way citizens express themselves is through protests.
Based on this fact express your views on the following:
Based on your discussion above answer the following questions:
In your response, discuss the following:
List these three goals in the order of importance and explain your reasoning: (a) allowing the public to express itself (b) protecting the public (c) enforcing the law.