Category: Criminal Justice

rewrite my capstone

Use the attached instructions.

Assignment:Locate a Crime Analysis Product

Using either:

• The Textbook Product Bank (Canvas Files Reports), or
• A credible online source (police department, crime analysis unit, government report),

identify one sample crime analysis product that clearly represents your chosen analysis type.

Examples may include:

• Bulletins or BOLOs
• Crime pattern alerts
• Hot spot maps
• Weekly crime trend reports
• Compstat summaries
• Annual crime reports or dashboards

Write one well-developed paragraph that addresses the following:

1. Product Classification

• Clearly state why this product is an example of the crime analysis type you selected (crime intelligence analysis, tactical crime analysis, strategic crime analysis, or administrative crime analysis).

1. Component Analysis

• Identify at least three components of the product (e.g., time frame, data type, geographic focus, audience, purpose).
• Explain how each component aligns with the chapters definition of that analysis type.

1. Analytical Purpose

• Briefly explain how this product would be used by police or decision-makers.

Textbook:

Crime Analysis with Crime Mapping

• Author: Rachel B. Santos
• Publisher: Sage Inc., 2022
• Edition: 5th Edition
• Chapter: 4

1. Although crime control is certainly the central police role, the police indeed have other functions. What are some of those functions, and why are they the responsibility of law enforcement agencies?

2. Why is community engagement used far more frequently in conjunction with geographic targeting than it is when targeting offense type or offender type?

3. What factors limit the utility of police sting and reverse sting operations?

Use textbook only as reference:

Police Crime Control Strategies; 1st Edition; Larry Hoover. Chapter 5

• Identify two (2) legal cases, related to domestic violence, and provide an overview of each.
• Summarize the domestic violence laws in a state where you do not reside.
• Are any of the elements from the cases incorporated into the state law? Discuss.
• Read all prior posts in this discussion and select cases and states that have not already been selected by your peers, prior to your post.

This weeks assignment is just some discussion post questions. They don’t have to be long at all some only 2-3 sentences. I included pictures of all the questions and requirements

During his first term, President Donald Trump had the opportunity to nominate three justices to the United States Supreme Court. Each nomination followed the constitutional process, but the tenor of each was distinctly different.

Using resources readily available on the internet, research the confirmation process for U.S. Supreme Court justices, in general, and Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett confirmations specifically. After conducting your research, develop and fully discuss your personal position on whether or not the appointment/confirmation process as currently conducted is what the framers of our Constitution envisioned.

Your response must be a minimum of 750 words and must reference a minimum of three resources outside of the textbook. Upload your response in a MS Word document.

criminal justice Part 1: Topic and Reference List (100 pts) due Sunday, February 8th by 11:59PM Title page with your topic as the title List of at least ten scholarly, peer-reviewed sources that address your topic formatted in proper APA 7th edition style Tip: This is a minimum number of sources, I promise you, you will likely use more than this by the time you actually get to writing Abstracts for each source (copied/pasted or screenshot)

Discuss Chapter 3 and associated materials with your classmates here. First, find and share an example of one of the approaches of the courts and community justice in Chapter 3. Briefly describe and evaluate your example and identify the type of community court that it involves. How does this example relate to your textbook’s treatment of courts and community justice? With those offered in the additional materials from this week–for example, how does it relate to the main concepts and ideas from the two TED Talks? The short film on Teen Court? Red Hook Community Center? Taken together, how do all of these sources inform your understanding of courts and community justice?

The literature review assignment serves as the major scholarly project in this course, allowing students to demonstrate their ability to locate, analyze, and synthesize peer-reviewed research on a criminal justice topic of their choosing. This assignment progresses through three developmental stages designed to scaffold the research and writing process: (1) Topic and Reference List, in which students identify a research topic and compile a list of at least ten scholarly, peer-reviewed sources formatted in proper APA 7th edition style; (2) Annotated Bibliography, in which students summarize and evaluate each source, articulating how it contributes to their understanding of the topic; and (3) Draft Literature Review, in which students submit a preliminary version of their literature review for feedback prior to making revisions and completing the final submission. The final literature review will be a five-page synthesis of the scholarly literature that demonstrates students’ advanced knowledge of a component of the American criminal justice system, their ability to read and critically evaluate peer-reviewed journal articles, and their competence in producing graduate-level writing using APA formatting. Through this staged approach, students will develop skills essential to master’s level study in criminal justice connecting academic scholarship to real-world issues in the field while building the foundational research and writing abilities necessary for continued professional and academic success. The project will progress in multiple stages throughout the semester (see below and Course Calendar in Syllabus for specific due dates), with your final draft of the literature review due Friday, May 1st by 11:59PM. Requirements General Formatting Title page (not included in page count) Double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt font Page numbers (bottom middle of page) References in APA 7th style Follow the examples provided on the Canvas page All About the Literature Review Assignment Topic & References Example 1.docx Topic & References Example 2.docx Part 1: Topic and Reference List (100 pts) due Sunday, February 8th by 11:59PM Title page with your topic as the title List of at least ten scholarly, peer-reviewed sources that address your topic formatted in proper APA 7th edition style Tip: This is a minimum number of sources, I promise you, you will likely use more than this by the time you actually get to writing Abstracts for each source (copied/pasted or screenshot) Part 1 Rubric Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement Topic Selection & Title Page (20 pts) (18-20 pts) Topic is clearly defined, appropriately focused for a 5-page literature review, and relevant to criminal justice. Title page is properly formatted. (12-17 pts) Topic is identified but may be too broad or narrow. Title page contains minor formatting errors. (0-11 pts) Topic is unclear, unfocused, or not relevant to criminal justice. Title page missing or improperly formatted. Source Quality (30 pts) (27-30 pts) All 10+ sources are scholarly, peer-reviewed, and directly relevant to the topic. Sources represent current scholarship. (18-26 pts) Most sources are peer-reviewed but 1-2 may be questionable or marginally relevant to the topic. (0-17 pts) Fewer than 10 sources provided, multiple non-scholarly sources, or sources lack relevance to the topic. APA 7th Ed. Formatting (30 pts) (27-30 pts) All references are formatted correctly in APA 7th edition style with no errors. (18-26 pts) References contain minor APA formatting errors (1-3 errors across the list). (0-17 pts) Multiple APA formatting errors throughout, inconsistent formatting, or incorrect citation style used. Abstracts Included (20 pts) (18-20 pts) Abstracts are provided for all sources (copied/pasted or screenshot), clearly legible. (12-17 pts) Abstracts provided for most sources but 1-2 are missing or illegible. (0-11 pts) Multiple abstracts missing, illegible, or not provided.