Category: Criminology

  • Police and Juveniles

    Paper # 2 Police and the Juveniles (175Points) This paper must be in APA 7th ed. FORMAT. The paper must be a total of 1200 words minimum according to APA standards including Title page, Abstract Page and Reference Page. Papers will be evaluated according to grammar, syntax, organization, and APA format.

    Each student is to research and write a paper about police and Juveniles. What are police doing to help control and educate juveniles. Provide some different program both current and past that have been used to educate our youth, also the pros and cons of these programs. What do you feel should be done, provided, taught or corrected to the youth in America when it comes to juveniles family, education, social income, the family foundation and any other variable dealing with youth.

    Each research paper must have a minimum of four (4) developed sources. (Only online CSU library (Database like Criminology Collection) or government websites can be used). Google sites, Wikipedia, encyclopedia, and blogs are NOT acceptable as sources in academic writings. All research papers must conform to the America Psychological Association (APA 7th edition). For additional information on this formatting please refer to . The professor MUST receive the assignment by Feb. 15, by 11:59 pm. Do NOT exceed 30% in similarities on SafeAssign or you will have major points taken off your paper.

    Assignments that are submitted after the due date without prior approval from the instructor will receive the following deductions:

    1. Assignments submitted one (1) day of the due date will receive a 20% deduction

    2. Assignments submitted two (2) days after the due date will receive a 30% deduction

    3. Assignments submitted three (3) days after the due date final date will not be accepted

    • You can post your paper up to three time through SafeAssign to check to make sure it is under 30%………….MAKE sure you post it with enough days to get the results back to you in time. Do not wait till the day of to check your results.
    • DO NOT EXCEED 30% Match on SafeAssign
    • Save your paper using your last name as part of the saved file name.

    COURSE TEXTBOOK: Merlo & Benekos – The Juvenile Justice System : Delinquency, Processing, and the Law (9th ed.) Pearson

  • Midterm CRJ

    This midterm is a short-answer essay exam covering Modules 14.

    The questions are straightforward and similar in format to the review questions at the end of the chapters. Each answer should be about two substantive paragraphs long. Strong responses will clearly reference specific concepts, terminology, arguments, or examples drawn directly from the course materials. Write clearly and directly and demonstrate familiarity with the assigned readings and learning materials.

    Essay Questions

    1. Define criminal justice/criminology research and explain why research is considered central to the development of knowledge in this field. Include discussion of who conducts research and why.
    2. Explain the idea that research generates power and power generates research. Provide at least one example of how this dynamic plays out in criminal justice or criminology.
    3. Discuss the major purposes of research exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, and evaluative and explain how each contributes to knowledge development.
    4. Explain how social science research differs from alternative ways of knowing such as authority, tradition, common sense, media narratives, or personal experience. Include discussion of social science norms.
    5. Explain Thomas Kuhns ideas about the progression of knowledge and discuss how those ideas apply to research in criminal justice or criminology.
    6. Compare Positive Social Science, Interpretive Social Science, and Critical Social Science. Discuss their underlying assumptions, goals, and typical research approaches.
    7. Explain the concept of theory in social science research and distinguish it from ideology. Include discussion of hypotheses and levels of analysis.
    8. Discuss research ethics in criminology/criminal justice research. Include historical examples of unethical research and address issues such as informed consent, privacy, deception, and IRB oversight.
    9. Explain the importance of literature reviews in research. Discuss their purposes, different types, and the role they play in shaping research questions.
    10. Define triangulation and explain how combining qualitative and quantitative approaches can strengthen research findings.
    11. Explain causal reasoning in research. Include discussion of variables, hypothesis testing, and at least two common errors in causal explanation.
    12. Compare probability and nonprobability sampling. Explain when each might be appropriate and discuss challenges in studying hidden populations.
    13. Explain the role of experimentation in criminology/criminal justice research. Include discussion of randomization, internal and external validity, and practical challenges.
    14. Discuss the strengths and limitations of experimental research in our field. Provide examples where experimental designs are especially useful.
    15. Explain the purposes and logic of survey research in criminology/criminal justice. Include discussion of questionnaire construction and principles of good question writing.
    16. Discuss the challenges involved in collecting accurate survey or interview data. Include issues related to interpretation, communication, and meaning.

    BOOK: (Criminal Justice and Criminology Research Methods)

    Chapters 1 through 8

    https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9780429649264/epubcfi/6/2%5b%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover%5d!/4/2%4050:76″ rel=”noopener noreferrer” target=”_blank”>https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9780429649264/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover]!/4/2%4050:76

  • Midterm CRJ

    This midterm is a short-answer essay exam covering Modules 14.

    The questions are straightforward and similar in format to the review questions at the end of the chapters. Each answer should be about two substantive paragraphs long. Strong responses will clearly reference specific concepts, terminology, arguments, or examples drawn directly from the course materials. Write clearly and directly and demonstrate familiarity with the assigned readings and learning materials.

    Essay Questions

    1. Define criminal justice/criminology research and explain why research is considered central to the development of knowledge in this field. Include discussion of who conducts research and why.
    2. Explain the idea that research generates power and power generates research. Provide at least one example of how this dynamic plays out in criminal justice or criminology.
    3. Discuss the major purposes of research exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, and evaluative and explain how each contributes to knowledge development.
    4. Explain how social science research differs from alternative ways of knowing such as authority, tradition, common sense, media narratives, or personal experience. Include discussion of social science norms.
    5. Explain Thomas Kuhns ideas about the progression of knowledge and discuss how those ideas apply to research in criminal justice or criminology.
    6. Compare Positive Social Science, Interpretive Social Science, and Critical Social Science. Discuss their underlying assumptions, goals, and typical research approaches.
    7. Explain the concept of theory in social science research and distinguish it from ideology. Include discussion of hypotheses and levels of analysis.
    8. Discuss research ethics in criminology/criminal justice research. Include historical examples of unethical research and address issues such as informed consent, privacy, deception, and IRB oversight.
    9. Explain the importance of literature reviews in research. Discuss their purposes, different types, and the role they play in shaping research questions.
    10. Define triangulation and explain how combining qualitative and quantitative approaches can strengthen research findings.
    11. Explain causal reasoning in research. Include discussion of variables, hypothesis testing, and at least two common errors in causal explanation.
    12. Compare probability and nonprobability sampling. Explain when each might be appropriate and discuss challenges in studying hidden populations.
    13. Explain the role of experimentation in criminology/criminal justice research. Include discussion of randomization, internal and external validity, and practical challenges.
    14. Discuss the strengths and limitations of experimental research in our field. Provide examples where experimental designs are especially useful.
    15. Explain the purposes and logic of survey research in criminology/criminal justice. Include discussion of questionnaire construction and principles of good question writing.
    16. Discuss the challenges involved in collecting accurate survey or interview data. Include issues related to interpretation, communication, and meaning.

    BOOK: (Criminal Justice and Criminology Research Methods)

    Chapters 1 through 8

    https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9780429649264/epubcfi/6/2%5b%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover%5d!/4/2%4050:76″ rel=”noopener noreferrer” target=”_blank”>https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9780429649264/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover]!/4/2%4050:76

  • CJ340M6

    CJ340-6: Evaluate noble cause corruption within law enforcement. Video Analyses Noble cause corruption follows the teleological model of ethics. The approach emphasizes good ends and is a product of police officer overinvestment in their work. Police officers believe that in foregoing established legal procedures, they will more effectively remove criminals from the street and protect the public from harm. Examples of noble cause corruption include falsifying reports, planting or fabricating evidence, and/or exceeding or abusing lawful authority. In doing so, police officers believe that a desirable end is achieved (Martinelli, 2006). Before starting this assignment, be sure you have read the Martinelli article titled Unconstitutional Policing. You should also view the following video segments regarding police practices. Video 1: NYPD Frisk Program: Noble Cause Corruption Video 2: Washington Police Caught Speeding Compose a 3- to 5-page essay that examines the merit of the police action. In your essay, please examine and apply concepts from the course that are relevant to the actions demonstrated by the police officers depicted. Your essay should accomplish the following: Identify whether the behavior is ethical or unethical. If ethical, what greater purpose or law enforcement responsibility does it serve to accomplish and why? If the action is unethical, why is it unethical, and why does it not serve a law enforcement responsibility or tasking? What theory or theories could be applied to either the ethical or unethical action or approach adopted by the police officer(s)? The completed essay should be a minimum of three but no more than five pages in length. The essay should examine the action depicted and its merits, and effectively integrate ethical concepts and theory into your analysis. NOTE: This assignment will require outside research. Use at least two credible sources beyond the text material. You may consult the Library, the internet, the textbook, other course material, and any other outside resources in supporting your task, using proper citations in APA style. Discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used. Read about how to select credible sources. References ABC News. (2013, May 1). NYPD’s stop-and-frisk: Racial profiling or ‘proactive policing’? [Video]. YouTube. ABC News. (2014, October 10). Washington police caught speeding past state troopers [Video]. YouTube. CBS News. (2016, July 22). Video shows white cop in violent confrontation with black motorist.
  • CJ340M6

    CJ340-6: Evaluate noble cause corruption within law enforcement. Video Analyses Noble cause corruption follows the teleological model of ethics. The approach emphasizes good ends and is a product of police officer overinvestment in their work. Police officers believe that in foregoing established legal procedures, they will more effectively remove criminals from the street and protect the public from harm. Examples of noble cause corruption include falsifying reports, planting or fabricating evidence, and/or exceeding or abusing lawful authority. In doing so, police officers believe that a desirable end is achieved (Martinelli, 2006). Before starting this assignment, be sure you have read the Martinelli article titled Unconstitutional Policing. You should also view the following video segments regarding police practices. Video 1: NYPD Frisk Program: Noble Cause Corruption Video 2: Washington Police Caught Speeding Compose a 3- to 5-page essay that examines the merit of the police action. In your essay, please examine and apply concepts from the course that are relevant to the actions demonstrated by the police officers depicted. Your essay should accomplish the following: Identify whether the behavior is ethical or unethical. If ethical, what greater purpose or law enforcement responsibility does it serve to accomplish and why? If the action is unethical, why is it unethical, and why does it not serve a law enforcement responsibility or tasking? What theory or theories could be applied to either the ethical or unethical action or approach adopted by the police officer(s)? The completed essay should be a minimum of three but no more than five pages in length. The essay should examine the action depicted and its merits, and effectively integrate ethical concepts and theory into your analysis. NOTE: This assignment will require outside research. Use at least two credible sources beyond the text material. You may consult the Library, the internet, the textbook, other course material, and any other outside resources in supporting your task, using proper citations in APA style. Discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used. Read about how to select credible sources. References ABC News. (2013, May 1). NYPD’s stop-and-frisk: Racial profiling or ‘proactive policing’? [Video]. YouTube. ABC News. (2014, October 10). Washington police caught speeding past state troopers [Video]. YouTube. CBS News. (2016, July 22). Video shows white cop in violent confrontation with black motorist.
  • Theory Portfolio 1

    I need help writing my first entry for my theory portfolio. I want to use deterrence theory for my first entry and I have to describe the core assumptions, key concepts, propositions, and causal logic. The full detailed instructions are provided

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Stafford Warr (1993).pdf, Grasmik Bursik 1990.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Foreign surveillance intelligence act

    The Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act (FISA) was created in 1978, long before the internet, mobile phones, and personal computers were part of every Americans life. After reviewing the background materials, address the following in a 4- to 6-page essay. What is the intent and purpose of FISA? Explain the role of the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Court (FISC). How has the age of the internet and personal electronics complicated the application of FISA? Consider PRISM and BLARNEY in your answer. SLP Assignment Expectations Length: This SLP Assignment should be 4-6 pages, not counting the cover page and references. Assessment and Grading: Your work will be assessed based on the performance assessment rubric that is linked within the course. Review it before you begin working on the assignment. Source Citations in the Body of the Paper: Cite sources in the body of the paper to provide supporting evidence for main points and definitive statements; to identify where you found your information; and to give credit to those whose ideas you are using. References: Use reliable, authoritative, and credible sources as your references, such as, professional and established periodicals; peer-reviewed journal articles are preferred. If you use the internet to find articles, make sure the sources are credible. Wikipedia is not an acceptable source. Originality of Content: Quoted material should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Direct quotes are rarely necessary; students who use them when unnecessary will forfeit credit for critical thinking. For verbatim/direct quotes, enclose the quoted text in quotation marks and then cite the author, date, and location within the source (i.e., page number, paragraph number, or time stamp). For paraphrased ideas, you must give credit to the original author in an in-text citation. Organization: Include a Cover Page on your paper. Use headings and subheadings to organize your paper. Grammar and Spelling: Assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity. Writing Help: Please take advantage of the writing help resources available in the Student Resources Tab on your Trident Home Page. On this tab you will find numerous APA and Writing-Style Guides. Strive to achieve the following elements of scholarly writing: Relevance: All content is connected to the question. Precision: Specific questions are addressed; content is specific and accurate. Depth of discussion: Present and integrate points that lead to deeper issues. Breadth: Multiple references, multiple perspectives and factors considered. Evidence: Points are well-supported with facts, statistics, and references. Logic: Content makes sense and is supported by premises or factual information. Clarity: Writing is concise and understandable. Objectivity: Avoid use of first person and subjective bias.
  • Modern psychobiological approaches argue criminal behaviour…

    Modern psychobiological approaches argue criminal behaviour is the result of nature and nurture. Critically discuss this standpoint. Draft Academic Blog Post
  • Modern psychobiological approaches argue criminal behaviour…

    Modern psychobiological approaches argue criminal behaviour is the result of nature and nurture. Critically discuss this standpoint. Draft Academic Blog Post
  • Assignment 1

    Assignment 1, CRJU 7370, Civil Liability in CJ

    Choose one question from each of the following four pairs. This is an open book essay exam, but it is imperative that you discuss the issues in your own words. Ive got access to the same text, and I do not want any cutting and pasting. Nor are any AI generated manuscripts allowed. Refer to the course policy on Academic Honesty and Integrity set forth in the Course Syllabus.

    1) Chapter One presents a lot of statistics related to liability claims filed against police and correctional agencies. As CJ scholars we know that it is more important to look at trends rather than one or two highly publicized cases. So, identify the most common types of civil liability incurred by law enforcement agencies. Then discuss the trends that you see in terms of who wins those claims. For this question stick to cases that involve non-CJ plaintiffs. In other words, the people filing claims do not work within the CJS.

    1A) Chapter One, take on the same issue as presented above, except this time go with claims that are filed by CJ plaintiffs, i.e., officers or staff that are suing their respective agencies.

    2) Chapter Two and Three lets begin with Torts. What type of actions are Torts? Go through the necessary elements to bring a successful case. Describe the different types that are most applicable to the CJS and use examples to illustrate. Also, in terms of bringing civil actions, which is best a state or federal court? Or does it matter?

    2a) Chapter Two, just when we were establishing Civil Law principles along comes another application of the Criminal Law. Anyway, it is clear to see that criminal liability under Title 18 U.S. Code Sections 241 & 242 (1886) may be connected to successful civil lawsuits. There are plenty of examples to demonstrate when one set of bad actions leads to both types of liability.

    3) Chapter Three, summarize the general defenses to tort actions, illustrate with examples.

    3a) In Chapter Three we see that Federal Agents and Officers are NOT immune to civil liability however, plaintiffs must choose the correct laws and procedures. Explain.

    4) Chapter Four is all about Section 1983 litigation. First, what are the elements of a Section 1983 claim? Then discuss the significance of the landmark decision Monroe v Pape, this should include the facts of the case, the Supreme Courts ruling and the impact of this decision on the CJS.

    4a) First identify the elements of a Section 1983 claim. Then present the remedies available under a Section 1983 claim.

    The textbook is Civil Liability in Criminal Justice, 8th Edition, Routledge Publishing.