Bright Academic Experts

Category: Cyber Security

  • Cyber Security Question

    I have attached the assignment instruction in the PDF read it carefully and tell me if you could do it in the best way possible, I will send u links to use in the assignment read the PDF tell me if you could do it the best way possible and ill explain more about it in details.

    Requirements: 2000

  • drawing an ER diagram and its relational schema for a given…

    use appropriate tools (or platforms) to draw an ERD and relational schema, but as presented in the instruction file above, ERDplus is encouraged to use. It is a great tool to draw an ERD using the Chen notation. Thus, you don’t need to worry about whether you are using the Chen notation correctly or not; ERDplus takes care of it on your behalf.

    Requirements: perfect

  • Cyber ThreatRiskAttack Landscape Survey

    Description:

    You are required to research and analyze and conduct in-depth survey of the current cyber threatriskattack landscape, exploring the evolving nature of cybersecurity challenges faced by organizations today. You need to focus on cyber threat landscape from a global, GCC and UAE perspective that

    changes both over time and has significant impact on the organization and the internetworked users (IU).

    The objective is to examine and critically assess how risks, threats, and attacks interrelate, and how they shape business vulnerabilities in various industries and what organizations are doing to protect themselves.

    You are expected to:

    Part A: Identify at least 10 real-world examples of cyber incidents from recent years, analyze their causes and impacts, and evaluate the broader trends these cases reveal. The analysis should include specific discussion of:

    Risk: The potential for loss or damage to assets, systems, or data.

    Threat: The actors, vectors, and conditions that could exploit vulnerabilities.

    Attack: Specific incidents or actions taken to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability.

    Identify and analyze the emergence and discovery of threats and the associated vulnerabilities that

    provide cybercriminals with new attack opportunities (pre covid and post covid).

    Part B: Review and comment on current best practices and strategies organizations employ for risk mitigation, including frameworks, technologies, and governance approaches. Identify the global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic compelling organizations to make major changes to their IT infrastructure.

    Deliverable:

    A comprehensive written report (~2,000 words) that:

    (Use this report template)

    1. Explains the relationship between risk, threat, and attack in the cybersecurity context.
    2. Provides at least three detailed case studies from recent real-world incidents (Every Recent 2025 if possible).
    3. Identifies patterns and trends in the current cyber landscape.
    4. Discusses the effectiveness of current industry/business best practices for risk mitigation.

    Evaluation Criteria:

    Depth and clarity of analysis.

    Relevance and credibility of cited examples.

    Integration of theory with real-world evidence.

    Critical evaluation of mitigation strategies.

    Report structure, writing quality, and citation of sources (APA format).

    Requirements: 1 day

  • Cyber Security Question

    Case Response Paper 1

    The FBI & Apple Security vs. Privacy

    For Case Response Paper 1, we will use a case from Ethics Unwrapped at the

    McCombs School of Business, University of Texas

    at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-studies.

    In this case we will focus on Security and Privacy issues. In particular when the

    disagreement between Apple and their focus on user privacy came into direct

    conflict with the FBI’s request to examine encrypted iPhone data. This debate also

    touched on First Amendment rights and the potential increase in the U.S.

    government’s search and surveillance powers.

    The FBI did not need Apple’s assistance because forensic specialists were able to

    decrypt the iPhone data using Cellebrite’s Forensic software suite

    (https://www.cellebrite.com/en/home/). However, this case serves as a useful

    illustration of the tension between privacy and government’s data access.

    To prepare for this case, please do the following:

    1. Read over the FBI & Apple Security vs. Privacy web page

    at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/fbi-apple-security-vs-

    privacy

    2. Watch the Incrementalism

    Video at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/video/incrementalism. There is

    a video transcript included at the bottom of the page

    (https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/video/incrementalism#narration-

    transcript).

    3. Return to the FBI & Apple Security vs. Privacy web page

    at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/fbi-apple-security-vs-

    privacy

    4. Read the Bibliography links at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-

    study/fbi-apple-security-vs-privacy#additional-resources

    5. Answer Discussion Questions 1-5 using supported academic

    arguments at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/fbi-apple-

    security-vs-privacy#discussion-questions.

    Please note the following:

  • Make sure to answer all parts of each question.
  • Pay particular attention to key words in the questions. For example, Question

    • #1 uses the word “harm”. This should be an indication to use particular

    ethical theories.

  • Address and apply “incrementalism” when appropriate.
  • Remember to follow the General Response Paper Guidelines. This includes

    • citing additional references for support.

  • Use headings and sub-headings to organize your paper. At a minimum, each

    • question number should be a heading.

    ReferencesEthics Unwrapped. (n.d.). Retrieved August 23, 2021,

    from

    The FBI & Apple Security vs. Privacy. (n.d.). Ethics Unwrapped. Retrieved

    September 28, 2021, from https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/fbi-

    apple-security-vs-privacy

    Incrementalism. (n.d.). Ethics Unwrapped UT Austin. Retrieved September 28,

    2021, from

    the case response paper must:

    Have a cover page with name, date, and assignment name

    Use numbered headings and sub-headings (e.g., 1.0, 2.0, 2.2) to

    organize the

    content. In case responses with numerical questions, please use the

    question

    number as a heading.

    All case response papers must have an Introduction and Conclusion

    section.

    Use 2.0 spacing.

    1500 word limit

    Use a standard 12-point font. Serif, sans-serif, or monospace font

    family. Cursive

    or fantasy font families are not acceptable.

    Use American English spellings (color versus colour, or realize

    versus realise).

    Cite at least eight (8) sources. News coverage of the case can be

    cited, but more than half of sources should contain academic and/or

    technical resources.

    The textbook can be cited but does not count as one of the eight (8)

    minimum

    references.

    All references on the reference page must be cited in text as wel

    Requirements: 2 days

  • Cyber Security Question

    Case Response Paper 1

    The FBI & Apple Security vs. Privacy

    For Case Response Paper 1, we will use a case from Ethics Unwrapped at the

    McCombs School of Business, University of Texas

    at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-studies.

    In this case we will focus on Security and Privacy issues. In particular when the

    disagreement between Apple and their focus on user privacy came into direct

    conflict with the FBI’s request to examine encrypted iPhone data. This debate also

    touched on First Amendment rights and the potential increase in the U.S.

    government’s search and surveillance powers.

    The FBI did not need Apple’s assistance because forensic specialists were able to

    decrypt the iPhone data using Cellebrite’s Forensic software suite

    (https://www.cellebrite.com/en/home/). However, this case serves as a useful

    illustration of the tension between privacy and government’s data access.

    To prepare for this case, please do the following:

    1. Read over the FBI & Apple Security vs. Privacy web page

    at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/fbi-apple-security-vs-

    privacy

    2. Watch the Incrementalism

    Video at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/video/incrementalism. There is

    a video transcript included at the bottom of the page

    (https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/video/incrementalism#narration-

    transcript).

    3. Return to the FBI & Apple Security vs. Privacy web page

    at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/fbi-apple-security-vs-

    privacy

    4. Read the Bibliography links at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-

    study/fbi-apple-security-vs-privacy#additional-resources

    5. Answer Discussion Questions 1-5 using supported academic

    arguments at https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/fbi-apple-

    security-vs-privacy#discussion-questions.

    Please note the following:

  • Make sure to answer all parts of each question.
  • Pay particular attention to key words in the questions. For example, Question

    • #1 uses the word “harm”. This should be an indication to use particular

    ethical theories.

  • Address and apply “incrementalism” when appropriate.
  • Remember to follow the General Response Paper Guidelines. This includes

    • citing additional references for support.

  • Use headings and sub-headings to organize your paper. At a minimum, each

    • question number should be a heading.

    ReferencesEthics Unwrapped. (n.d.). Retrieved August 23, 2021,

    from

    The FBI & Apple Security vs. Privacy. (n.d.). Ethics Unwrapped. Retrieved

    September 28, 2021, from https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/fbi-

    apple-security-vs-privacy

    Incrementalism. (n.d.). Ethics Unwrapped UT Austin. Retrieved September 28,

    2021, from

    the case response paper must:

    Have a cover page with name, date, and assignment name

    Use numbered headings and sub-headings (e.g., 1.0, 2.0, 2.2) to

    organize the

    content. In case responses with numerical questions, please use the

    question

    number as a heading.

    All case response papers must have an Introduction and Conclusion

    section.

    Use 2.0 spacing.

    1500 word limit

    Use a standard 12-point font. Serif, sans-serif, or monospace font

    family. Cursive

    or fantasy font families are not acceptable.

    Use American English spellings (color versus colour, or realize

    versus realise).

    Cite at least eight (8) sources. News coverage of the case can be

    cited, but more than half of sources should contain academic and/or

    technical resources.

    The textbook can be cited but does not count as one of the eight (8)

    minimum

    references.

    All references on the reference page must be cited in text as wel

    Requirements:

  • Swot analysis power point slide

    Convert to Power point slides Plss add additional information as well.

    Requirements: 3 pages

  • CMIT 382 configure and secured device

    Requirements:

  • Log Files Article

    You work for a cybersecurity company that offers a full range of forensic tools and services. As part of an ongoing marketing effort toward forensic investigators, the company is publishing a series of short articles that will be posted to LinkedIn and other social media sites.

    In an effort to educate the companys customers and showcase expertise, write a 2- to 3-page web article that will be posted to LinkedIn on the role of log files in a network forensics investigation. This will be the first of two LinkedIn posts related to log files you will write. Complete the following in your article:

    • Describe why log files are an important source of information for network forensic investigators.
    • Discuss why network forensic investigators need to understand centralized logging and IIS binary logging.
    • List and justify best practices for network forensics in finding, handing, analyzing, and safeguarding log files.
    • Assess the value of software that helps organize, acquire, or analyze log files.
    • Include table or images if relevant.

    You will need to do additional research to complete this article.

    Requirements: 2-3 pages

  • CYBR 520 Insider Threat Training Proposal

    Create a proposal for your insider threat training module that includes:

    1. Training Needs Analysis (15 points)
      • Identify specific insider threat concerns to be addressed
      • Target audience description and learning needs
      • Current gaps in typical insider threat awareness
    2. Learning Objectives (15 points)
      • 3-5 specific, measurable learning objectives
      • Knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be developed
      • How objectives address identified needs
    3. Training Approach (10 points)
      • Format of the training (presentation, handbook, interactive, etc.)
      • Delivery method (in-person, online, hybrid)
      • Engagement strategies to maintain interest
    4. Influence Strategy (10 points)
      • Which of Cialdini’s principles you plan to incorporate
      • How you’ll apply these principles to change behavior
      • How you’ll balance information with persuasion

    Deliverable Format: 2-3 page proposal document (PDF or Word)

    Requirements: 2-3 pages

  • CYBR 520 Security Awareness Draft

    Initial Plan

    Re-read the Security Awareness Campaign overview in the Term Projects project.

    Requirements

    Develop an initial draft of your security awareness campaign that includes:

    1. Theme Selection and Justification (15 points)
      • Choose a security awareness theme/event from the provided security awareness calendar
      • Explain why you selected this particular theme for your target organization
      • Discuss its relevance to contemporary security challenges and threat landscape
      • Connect your theme choice to current threat intelligence or industry-specific risks
    2. Target Organization and Audience Analysis (20 points)
      • Define your target organization (size, industry, geographic considerations, regulatory environment)
      • Analyze the current security culture maturity level using the awareness/behavior/culture framework
      • Identify specific audience segments, their roles, risk exposure levels, and existing security knowledge
      • Identify specific vulnerabilities (e.g., “Very Attacked People,” high-risk departments, common attack vectors for this audience)
      • Define specific, measurable behavioral changes you want to achieve (not just awareness goals)
    3. Campaign Strategy and Psychology (15 points)
      • Explain how your campaign addresses the forgetting curve and incorporates spaced learning principles
      • Connect your approach to autonomy/mastery/purpose model – how will your campaign make security personally relevant?
      • Describe how you’ll achieve repeated exposure through varied channels and timeframes
      • Outline your approach to recognition and positive consequences rather than punitive measures
    4. Implementation Timeline and Channels (10 points)
      • Plan for diverse delivery methods beyond email (consider accessibility and preference differences)
      • Detailed implementation schedule (before, during, and after the main event/theme)
      • How this campaign connects to broader organizational security objectives and existing programs
      • Realistic assessment of what you’ll need to execute this campaign
    5. Measurement and Success Metrics (15 points)
      • Define how you’ll measure actual behavior change (not just completion rates)
      • How will you assess whether people feel empowered to report security concerns?
      • Plan for measuring belief and attitude changes (surveys, observational indicators)
      • Specific, realistic benchmarks that align with your behavioral objectives
      • When and how often you’ll assess progress

    Deliverable Format: 3-4 page document (PDF or Word) with any preliminary visuals attached

    Notes for Success

    • Avoid Compliance Theater: Focus on genuine behavior change rather than checkbox completion
    • Think Like a Marketer: Consider how to make security the “cupcake” rather than the “broccoli”
    • Leverage Real Experience: Draw on your professional knowledge of organizational culture and constraints
    • Be Specific: Generic approaches will not be as effective as targeted, contextual strategies
    • Plan for Sustainability: Consider how your campaign creates lasting cultural change rather than temporary awareness

    Requirements: 3-4 pages