Final Project (Recommendation Paper) The final project will be a 5-8 page recommendation and report to the President of the University based on a First Amendment controversy on campus that you, as the Chair of a Task Force has provided. Your paper will be evaluated on the following criteria: Demonstrated understanding of the assigned topic Comprehensive Introduction and Conclusion (Thesis) Full APA format (Title page, Headers, Double Spacing, Citations, 1 margins, Times New Roman 12 font, References) – Use the template if you need to. Proper use of sources (80% or more of the paper must be your words and your ideas) Originality Organization of material Coverage of all seven (7) pertinent facts) Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation and sentence structure 2-4 Legal Cases associated with the topic 2-4 Professional Sources to include either books or journals (the textbook can be one source) written in Microsoft Word Legal issues are a challenge for any higher education leader. It is critical that one is knowledgeable about the law and institutional policy and can utilize that knowledge to make informed and educated decisions about legal issues. The law is about Constitutional rights, precedents and past decisions. Leaders in higher education who are grappling with events that include legal or risk management conditions must be able to determine what action to take by knowing how to find and interpret past cases, state and federal law, and institutional policy. The final project allows the professor to evaluate each students ability to find and interpret the law, and determine appropriate policy and practice, and make appropriate recommendations to their institution regarding legal issues to reduce any risks to the institution. The following guidelines will assist students in completing the project: Project Roleplay: Deliverable: A professionally written recommendation that addresses legal issues related to the hypothetical event provided. As a valued administrator with expertise in legal issues in higher education, you have been appointed by the President of the University to chair a task force charged with recommending an approach and decisions related to the First Amendment legal issues potentially facing your institution. The President has asked for a formal recommendation from the committee [written by the chair] submitted electronically to his office [CANVAS]. The Presdient expects that the recommendation will thoroughly review the issue(s), identify current or past case law, policies and practices related to the issue(s), institutional risk, stakeholders, and provide a path forward regarding the issue (recommendations for decisions, practice, policies etc.). While college campuses are meant to be spaces where free expression and academic freedom thrive, there can be instances where First Amendment rights are perceived to be violated. Some possible First Amendment violations on a college campus include: 1 Content-Based Restrictions: Imposing regulations on speech based on its content, especially if it targets specific viewpoints, may violate the First Amendment. 2 Speech Codes: Implementing overly broad or vague speech codes that restrict constitutionally protected speech. 3 Prior Restraint: Attempting to prevent the publication or expression of certain ideas before they are made public. 4 Suppression of Peaceful Protests: Inhibiting or punishing peaceful protests, demonstrations, or assemblies. 5 Censorship of Student Publications: Restricting the content of student newspapers or publications based on disapproval of their viewpoint. 6 Speaker Disinvitations: Canceling or preventing speakers from addressing the campus community due to their views. 7 Free Speech Zones: Restricting expressive activities to designated areas, limiting the ability to engage with a broader audience. 8 Discrimination Against Unpopular Views: Penalizing students or faculty for expressing unpopular or controversial opinions. 9 Selective Funding: Allocating student activity fees or university resources in a way that favors certain viewpoints over others. 10 Faculty or Student Retaliation: Taking adverse actions against faculty or students based on their expression of certain views. 11 Online Speech Restrictions: Applying restrictive policies to online platforms affiliated with the college. SCENARIO At Prestige University, a renowned institution with a diverse student body, a controversial speaker, Dr. Jonathan Foster, known for his highly conservative views, has been invited by the right-leaning student organization ‘The Rational Union for Transparency and Honesty’ TRUTH, to address students. Dr. Foster’s appearance has been controversial on many other campuses including protests, sit-ins, anger and students and faculty claiming to have been offended and triggered by Foster’s rhetoric. Dr. Foster is expected to discuss his perspectives on traditional family values, the discrimination of conservative viewpoints on US college campuses, and express critiques of certain social and political hot topics. Pertinent Facts: 1 Speaker Disinvitations: Some student groups, along with faculty members, express vehement opposition to Dr. Foster’s views and pressure the university administration to disinvite him, claiming her presence would create a hostile environment for marginalized groups. 2 Free Speech Advocates: On the other hand, free speech advocates, including the student organization ‘TRUTH’ that invited Dr. Foster, argue that disinviting her would violate the principles of free expression and academic freedom. 3 Security Concerns: The university administration is concerned about potential security issues due to anticipated protests and counter-protests during Dr. Foster’s visit, prompting them to consider cancellation for safety reasons. 4 Designated Free Speech Zone: Prestige University has a designated “Free Speech Zone” on campus, where opponents of TRUTH and Dr. Foster demand that the event be held. This zone is a small concrete area by the parking lot of the Student Center. Critics of the Free Speech Zone argue that confining expressive activities to a specific area infringes upon the spirit of open dialogue and exchange of ideas throughout the entire campus. 5 Social Media Backlash: The controversy gains traction on social media, with students, alumni, and external groups weighing in on both sides, further polarizing the campus community. 6 Public Funding Debate: Some state legislators threaten to review the university’s public funding, arguing that hosting speakers with controversial views may not align with the values of the state or the taxpayers who fund the institution. 7 Campus Newspaper: Administration is concerned with a conservative student newspaper, ‘Prestige Press’ covering the upcoming event and promoting the ideas of Dr. Foster including its criticism of opposition student organizations and faculty. This hypothetical scenario encapsulates the tension between protecting the principles of free speech and maintaining a campus environment that is inclusive and respectful of diverse perspectives. The controversy prompts a broader discussion about the boundaries of free expression on college campuses and the challenges faced by institutions in navigating competing interests and values. The recommendation will be provided to the President and his executive team who, although familiar with the issue, have little or no background on the legal ramifications of the issue (decisions and risk), what actions should be taken and why, or past cases that may inform their decisions. The introduction should engage the audience [executive team] and provide them with the background of the controversy, the organization of the paper and its contents. The body of the paper should address the legal issue(s) by providing summaries related to case studies, Constitutional Law, and policy. The last section should advance recommendations for moving forward [policies, practices, decisions] based on your understanding of the law and the Constitution. Your professor will be available to work with you throughout the term to help direct research and provide guidance on the development of the paper. Grading will be based on the quality of the writing and the clarity and organization of the paper. The paper should logically and thoroughly explain the legal issues involved with the scenario and make recommendations for action, such as proposed administrative policies and practices, which would lead to effective legal compliance and ease practical difficulties associated with the issues identified (the seven pertinent facts). Final papers are due on February 27th (at 11:59 PM, submitted electronically through CANVAS). Papers turned in after this time are late resulting in a reduced number of points awarded for the paper at the discretion of the instructor. Proper APA Template UTM-1.doc ( )Download Proper APA Template UTM-1.doc ( )

Part 1 discussionUsing your own life as an example, describe your presentation of self in the context of a particular status. What resources do you need to effectively perform the role for the related status? How do you manage role strain and/or role conflict? How do you manage others’ impression of you? What resources do you need to effectively perform the role and manage impressions for that status? Remember that resources can be economic, physical, and emotional. Finally, how do you think our post-industrial society affects your status and role performance? Two paragraph

Part 2 disccussion

Briefly describe a personal experience of deviance. If you are uncomfortable sharing a personal experience, provide a link to a media representation (like a song, advertisement, or poem) and describe how it provides an example of deviance. Be sure to include the social context in which the deviance occurred. Then explain the behavior using one theory of deviance from our text. Be sure to let your reader know which theory you are using:

• Functional theories, including:
• Durkheim and functions of deviance
• Social disorganization theory (social ecology)
• Strain theory
• Deviant subculture/cultural deviance theory
• Conflict/Feminist theory
• Symbolic Interactionism, including
• Differential Association Theory
• Labeling Theory
• Two paragraphs

Part 3 discussion

Several years after the Civil war, statues of leaders of the Confederacy began to appear in public spaces throughout the U.S. south, with most being erected between 1890-1950 (). In 2015, activist Bree Newsome climbed the flagpole on North Carolinas statehouse grounds and removed the Confederate flag. Two years later, she said, Removing the flag in South Carolina was one thing, but racism exists in South Carolina as policy and social practice (). Today, there is controversy over removing the Confederate flag and tearing down monuments to the Confederacy generals.

• How do the symbols of the Confederacy support or challenge our norms, beliefs, and values? Do you think we should remove the statues and the battle flag? Why or why not? What should we do with them? Finally, will removing the symbols of racism help the struggle against racist policies and practices? If so, how? If not, why not?

Plan and teach a one week (FIVE LESSON PLANS) unit that integrates several content area literacy strategies for reading and writing (10 hours) The unit will integrate national and state standards for content and ELA standards. It will include 5 lesson and a pre/post-test using the SOE unit/lesson templates. My content area is HEALTH & PE , grade level High School.

Health Standards: https://www.education.ky.gov/curriculum/standards/kyacadstand/Documents/Kentucky_Academic_Standards_for_Health_Education_2025.pdf

P.E Standards:https://www.education.ky.gov/curriculum/standards/kyacadstand/Documents/Kentucky_Academic_Standards_for_Physical_Education_2025.pdf

please make sure not to use AI NOR PLAGIARISM AND FOLLOW ALL DIRECTIONS THABK YOU FOR HELPING ME.

Review the school board policy and student handbook of your local public school site or district for information regarding their policies on short-term and long-term suspensions of students.

Write a 500-750-word essay containing the following:

1. Summarize the due process requirements prior to a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student at your local site or district.
2. Are the due process procedures for a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student the same or different?
3. Are these requirements consistent with Goss v. Lopez? Support your position with examples from case law, the U.S. Constitution, or other readings.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Create an original Technology Safety Plan for your K-12 classroom. Analyze campus and district plan examples online for ideas and inspiration. But, focus on your classroom.

The audience will be for constituents – for example, this should be prepared in a way that the principal can approve it; it can be looked at by substitute teachers or long term substitutes; and any parent, district leader, etc. would be able to understand it. It should show what you have thought about, are aware of, and attend to in your classroom.

The plan will need to include an introduction/rationale and address at least 4 categories related to technology safety covered in the course. You will need to elaborate on each category-the issue, steps for safety and practice/classroom policies, etc.

Cite and reference the literature and follow APA style. Organize your submission per the components listed below You may use Word or PowerPoint/Visme, etc. for this final project. Even if a grading category does not mention citing/referencing, be sure that every section of the project (except Part IV) includes cited points.

Classroom Technology Safety Plan Sections (with embedded grading criteria)

I. Introduction – include an overview about the need for a technology safety in general for K-12-aged students; identify the grade level for your plan; provide a rationale for having a technology safety plan (10%)

II. Safety Considerations – identify, list, and explain 4 categories of safety considerations related to technology. Draw from law, case law, ethical guidelines, national standards, and the body of literature to explain the need to address the categories and their aspects (40%)

III. Safety Steps – identify, list, and explain specific steps the teacher or substitute of the classroom should take to make sure the classroom is safe for students when using technology (15%)

IV. Classroom Policies – create 4-5 expectations for students using technology…these should be stated as positive/neutral rules (e.g., avoid negative language such as “Don’t”) (10%)

V. Conclusion – Reiterate important aspects of technology safety (5%)

VI. References – cite/draw from/include at least 3 course references and 1 outside reference (10%)

Current APA style followed with few to no grammar/writing errors (10%)

See Attachment

Submission 1: Philosophy of Education

Draft your personal statement of educational philosophy, reflecting your unique teaching beliefs informed by course content, classroom observations, and field experience. Please address the following in your own voice (first-person narrative required):

• Who is the Educated Person?
• What is Worth Knowing?
• What is Learning?
• What is Good Teaching!
• What is the Role of the School in Society?
• Include at least one anecdote or example from your personal educational experience or your field placement that illustrates a belief or insight.
• Do not identify with named philosophies (e.g., “I am a Constructivist”), but you may reference specific theorists or texts we’ve explored and explain how they influence your views.
• Avoid generic definitionsyour responses should be grounded in your developing identity as an educator.

Submission 2: Field Experience Reflection and Log

Write a 3-page reflective paper that critically explores your own field placement experience. This is your opportunity to analyze what you observed, how it connects with learning theories, and how it shapes your understanding of teaching.

Required Elements:

• Include direct, dated examples from your field placement (e.g., describe a moment, interaction, or observation).
• Respond to the following prompts using field-based evidence:
• What effective teaching and learning practices did I observe?
• What created a positive or engaging learning environment?
• How did I see learning process theories reflected in real-world learner behavior?
• Where and how was learning happening beyond the traditional classroom setting?
• What moments excited me or sparked curiosity? What would I like to explore more?
• Attach your completed Field Log (template provided) documenting your hours and brief notes about each visit.
• Include a brief “Before and After” reflection paragraph explaining how your thinking changed between the start and end of your placement.

EON1 EON1 Task 1: Applying Multi-tiered Systems of Support

Personalized Learning for Inclusive Classrooms D662

PRFA EON1

PreparationTask OverviewSubmissionsEvaluation Report

The learner applies MTSS to address the needs of all students.

For this assignment, you will develop a proposal for a new RN-BSN program. Once approved, your goal is to seek accreditation from the CCNE. Please complete the following:

1. Write a mission statement, and choose a nursing framework based on a nursing theorist. This will guide your curriculum.
2. Develop realistic standards for admission to your program as well as realistic graduation requirements (e.g., do students need to maintain a certain GPA?).
3. Review the AACN Essentials for Baccalaureate Education Tool Kit. Based on the Essentials and a review of your prelicensure program in Week 2, what classes will a student need to take to finish their BSN? Create a list of the courses (you will need to create the name of the course only). You will also need to create a list of how you intend to measure quality (refer to the Essentials Tool Kit for ideas).
4. List all of the areas that will cost the program money (Hint: faculty are one, course development is another; think about all of the individuals whom you currently interact with in your nursing program).
5. Conclude with an educated estimate of how much it costs to operate a nursing program per year.