Category: English

  • English Question

    Discussion: Evaluating Rhetorical Analysis Essays

    In the previous discussion, you introduced yourself to your classmates and learned about rhetoric and the rhetorical situation. In this discussion, you’ll read and evaluate sample rhetorical analysis essays.

    Your Post (Due Wednesday):

    After reading the rhetorical analysis essays in choose one and analyze its effectiveness. As you work, consider questions like the following:

    • Which essay was the most interesting or surprising? Why?
    • In your opinion, what did the writer do well in their analysis?
    • What were the weaknesses in the essay?
    • If this was your essay, what would you change?
    • Lastly, do you have any questions or concerns about the rhetorical analysis so far?

    Write up your analysis and submit it as a reply to this discussion.


    Discussion Responses (Due Sunday)

    Read your classmates’ posts and choose one to respond to. Do you agree with your classmate’s assessment of the example essay’s strengths and weaknesses? Respond to your classmate’s questions about the rhetorical analysis. Do you feel confused about the same things? Can you help to answer their questions?

    Requirements: 400

  • Close reading response

    Explication #1 Instructions We can define an explication as a close analysis of a text following New Critical tenets, which means no outside research should be conducted. Forego details pertaining to the author’s biography or historical context. These responses should reflect your careful reading of an assigned creative text. I’m looking for responses that demonstrate your active consideration of the course material, so you should clearly connect to relevant concepts, literary devices, terms, and techniques that weve covered in class. In all cases, you should make specific reference to textual evidence for your idea(s). Quote briefly and cite where necessary, but do not overstuff your responses with quotes. Make a claim and back it up using textual evidence. Reference at at least 3 passages in the text and contextualize those references within the larger framework of the story (why are they important to your interpretation of the story?). Whether you are paraphrasing or quoting directly, you must include in-text citations (author last name and a page number if there is one, line number for poems) to receive credit for your response. Vague references have no place in academic writing. Get concrete and specific. Additional information you should find useful: You are welcome to use the first person ‘I.’ First and foremost: an explication needs a focus (or a claim)! See thesis statement document in the Terms module. These do not have to be groundbreaking claims. They can be relatively straightforward, but you want to your focus to be clear and specific. Thesis statements act as a focus lens by keeping you on a specific topic. Often, it’s best to begin brainstorming about what aspects/elements of the piece are pulling you in or pushing you out: voice, tone, style, form, structure, content (subject matter), diction, etc. I am not expecting you to be an expert on these texts/authors. I am expecting you to do your best to demonstrate nuanced thinking and that you have attempted to engage with the text in a meaningful way. See syllabus Close Reading documents for guidance and best approaches to writing an effective analysis/explication of a text. Topic Questions Answer one of the following questions (below) in detail. Consider tone and other concepts, devices, and craft elements we’ve discussed in class this semester. Remember, tone is crucial to comprehension. It’s not enough to summarize a story, you need to make an attempt to read creatively, which means reading between the lines and attempting to interpret what’s motivating these speakers or characters’ behavior beyond what’s stated on the page. Trust your intuitions, use your brains, and make sure to proofread your response before you submitting it. How does George Saunders’ use of an unreliable narrator (and the first-person POV) in “Adams” influence your reading of the story (your interpretation of events, how the conflict escalates, opinion of the two main characters, etc.)? Explore the ways your opinion of the narrator’s character/personality differs from how she presents and/or views herself in Amy Hempel’s “The Harvest”? Explore the role of setting in Kelly Link’s “Stone Animals.” In other words, how does the setting inform or influence the story’s plot and central conflict? What is the characters’ relation to the setting? How are these various elements interacting? Make a claim about an internal conflict the speaker is wrestling with in one of the poems we’ve read. What are they struggling to express, process, admit, and/or work through? Look to specific imagery, figurative expressions, phrases, etc., in the poem to back up your claim. Formatting Roughly one page, single-spaced, 12pt. Times New Roman. Submit as a .docx file or you won’t receive credit. Make sure your name, class, my name, and date are in the upper-lefthand corner of the first page. Do not use/rely on secondary sources outside of our assigned readings or any lecture notes/annotations you’ve taken (and if you do use an outside source without correctly citing it, that constitutes plagiarism and will be treated accordingly). Outside sources includes. Use your own voice. Include appropriate MLA in-text citations (page/line numbers). Include a Works Cited. This should contain the primary text and any other sources you reference, paraphrase, and/or quote from (including my lecture notes). I understand sometimes that something you read in the past feels vital to whatever insight you had on the assigned text for this class. I don’t want you actively researching, but I’m openminded if you want to safely paraphrase or reference a source you encountered in another class, as long as you cite it accordingly ** Only talk about one of the topic questions, not all of them.
  • English Question

    Review the information on the and pages in Modules 15 and 16.

    The purpose of this assignment is for you to write a composed, polished final essay that makes and supports a claim about your own writing improvement over the semester.

    Directions

    When you are ready to attach your MLA-formatted Word document, click “Start Assignment” in the top right corner.

    Submissions must be .docx files, and originality will be verified using Turnitin.com.

    Reflection Essay Information

    In our essay, you will be reflecting on your growth as a writer this semester. You’ve actually been working on this essay all semester in two ways. First, you’ve been writing essays, so you are building your own topic! Second, you’ve been completing journal entries all semester that can be used as primary source material for your reflection. You are the only expert on this topic, and you have a ton of material to pull from!

    The Basics

    This is the master list of requirements for the essay to be accepted. Essays that do not meet these requirements will be given a 0. No rewrites will be given for this essay.

    • In the correct mode (personal narrative)
    • Subject must be you and your progress as a writer this semester

    Thing to watch out for:

    • You should use first person (I, me, my, mine), first person plural (we, us, our). Do not use third or second person.
    • Who Is the Audience?
      • Your primary audience for this is you, me, and anyone else interested in your growth as a writer.
    • And You? Who are You?
      • You are the subject (this means you can finally use first person!).

    A Note About Organization

    The easiest way to organize this essay is to have an intro, a body paragraph for each essay (so 3), and a conclusion. Your thesis should make an assertion about how you grew as a writer this semester. That will be the argument that your support (the analysis of your growth through the three essays) will support. Here are some things to consider while you are drafting:

    Effective Self-Evaluation

    • Include specific, quantifiable results.
    • Avoid lists, bullet points, or reliance on only grades.
    • Incorporate feedback that you have received, and how you used, incorporated, responded to, and benefited from that feedback.
    • Showcase what makes you unique, and how you differentiate yourself from others.
    • Include 2-3 areas for continued growth meaning things you should and will continue to work on and improve.
    • These can be skills, experiences, or academic practices (like time management).

    My Advice

    • Compare your first writing assignment in this class to your most recent.
    • Think about what has changed. Think about specific moments and experiences.
    • Remember that narrative, specifics, and details are the most compelling.
    • Be honest with yourself. What should you have done that you didnt?
    • Dont be afraid to brag a little.
    • Where did you really excel where did hard work really pay off?
    • Think about how the skills youve been building in this class will benefit your future.
    • Dont forget the writing process!
    • Start with a thesis, organize a multi-paragraph essay that supports that thesis, plan the essay and gather evidence, write a draft, take a break, revise and edit, get feedback from someone, and come back to polish the final draft.
    • Check details and formatting.

    Requirements: na

  • English Question

    Ethos, Pathos and Logos Essay

    In Saying Nothin: Pachucas and the Languages of Resistance, Catherine S. Ramirez discusses how Mexican American youth used language and silence to resist American society during the 1940s, emphasizing on Pachucos. She explained how pachucos style, slang and behavior was viewed as criminal and disrespectful. Throughout the text Ramirez uses rhetorical strategies like ethos, pathos and logos to help readers understand Pachuco’s and Pachucas identity and the meaning behind resistance. In the text Ramirez uses ethos, pathos and logos.q

    Ramirez uses ethos to build her credibility and trustworthiness with the reader. She informs readers of her knowledge and accomplishments. In the introduction she begins with her academic background also adding her expertise in race, migration, and Mexican American history, which helps readers to view her as a reliable author. She continues in the introduction informing readers of real events that occurred like the Zoot Suit riots and citing newspaper reports that occurred during that time period. By using real life events these sources give the readers a credible author along with making her a reputable one.

    Pathos are used in the text to appeal to the emotions of the readers. In the text, Ramirez uses pathos, it is felt when she explains the discrimination and misunderstanding that the Pachucos faced, she explained how social scientists and newspapers in the 1940s described pachuco slang as a criminality. For example, newspapers such as the Los Angeles Times described Pachucos as part of a sinister underworld, associating them with violence, drugs, and crime. This showed readers how

    Ramirez also describes an arrest that happened during the Zoot Suit Riots, where a twenty two year old female was arrested. The female was accused of inciting violence and she was described as a lady zoot suiter; Ramirez points out that the photographs taken of her didnt show her wearing the typical pachuco clothing. These examples appeal to the reader’s emotions by describing the injustice these people faced due to being criminalized over a stereotype. The arrest gives a sense of sympathy for Pachocas being criminalized over assumptions Overall this encourages readers to have a sense of sympathy for Pachucos. Pachucos faced criticism from both cultures they were Mexican enough or American.

    In addition to pathos, Ramirez uses logos when she uses historical examples. Ramirez uses logos to explain why pachuco language was viewed as criminal instead of being seen as a cultural expression. During the 1940s, during World War II, speaking English was connected to being seen as American. Because pachuco slang combined English, Spanish, and calo it was viewed as a form of refusing to assimilate. This caused Pachucos speech to be treated as a sign of rebellion and disloyalty. Ramirez explains this relationship to show that pachuco language was criminalized not because it led to crime, but because it challenged social norms. This helps readers understand how language itself became a form of resistance.

    What I have you can tweak its all over the place

    Requirements:

  • Poetry and song lyrics

    Im doing the third option with the song A million dreams by The Greatest Showman and the poem Invictus By

  • Find the pair of rhyming words used in each stanza

    Find the pair of rhyming words used in each stanza

    Requirements:

  • Find the pair of rhyming words used in each stanza

    Find the pair of rhyming words used in each stanza

    Requirements:

  • Academic writing

    Phase 1: Writing the Introduction Begin by writing only the introduction to an academic essay based on the following question: Successful studies in college involve effective academic writing, effective time management, effective listening and note-taking, as well as effective reading and studying. Discuss. Your introduction should: Provide appropriate hook, background/context, thesis statement and outline.
  • English essay

    read the rubric an rules really carefully for the 5 academic sources in Harvard two sources needs to be from the attached file reading list that has 10 sources select two from the ten

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Reading List – Assessment 3 (Essay).docx, Essay Topics – optional.docx, ESSAY CHEKLIST – guidance for students.docx, ESSAY – marking criteria.docx, Assessment 3 Brief-Writing_Essay Jan 2026.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Redefining Heroism: Thor Ragnarok

    Prompt

    Write a 1500-2000 word essay that presents and develops a cohesive argument about at least one film: Thor: Ragnarok. You may also choose to conduct a comparative analysis of elements from both films.

    A successful essay will present, develop, and support an arguable claim about how and why you are analyzing the film. Analysis is an act of interpretation, which is a form of argument. Provide evidence to support your analysis and convince your readers that your analysis is persuasive. Body paragraphs should include clear, substantive analysis of evidence as well as explanations about why those details and your analysis support your main argument. Concrete details include character development, plot, theme, dialogue, sound, visual composition, film techniques and camera movements, the set and scenery, and actors costumes and mannerisms. Smoothly integrate evidence by embedding quotes and/or by unpacking visuals with vivid and succinct details.

    You must move beyond a denotative reading (e.g. surface) and persuade your audience that your interpretation of connotations (e.g. subsurface, subtext) is compelling. The body paragraphs and conclusion should also endeavor to answer the so what? question. In other words, why is it important that we read your analysis? What insights are you offering, and why do they matter? Spoiler alert: your insights DO matter, so practice articulating your insights and explaining the reasons why your insights matter. See the section below for some tips about developing significance.

    Also, your essay must cite from and engage with at least one of the assigned readings from our unit on analyzing films.

    Potential Topics

    In order to address the following topics, your analysis may engage with concepts of race, gender, sexuality, and/or other identity categories. Please use the readings from The Signs of Life to help you talk about those identity categories.

    • Create an argument that analyzes one or more characters in relation to Linda Segers discussion of the hero myth and/or the healing myth.

    Reminder: No AI Allowed at Any Stage of the Writing Process

    Make sure you form your own analysis instead of relying on an AI to brainstorm or develop ideas. I recommend brainstorming on your own with just your class notes and the assigned readings for help. If you get stuck, ask questions in class, or visit Student Meeting/Office Hours, or go to the ARC.

    Additional Requirements

    • 1500-2000
    • Original essay title that is related to your analysis
    • Analysis of concrete details from Thor: Ragnarok
    • Citations from and engagement with at least one of our assigned readings from the film unit
    • You may choose to conduct outside research if needed, but make sure you cite carefully.
    • MLA formatting
    • Correct grammar, syntax, and punctuation
    • Works Cited page

    Tips on How to Answer the So What? Question

    There are multiple ways to develop significance. Here are some questions to help you generate ideas. You do not need to answer all of these questions.

    • Sometimes significance is personal (what something means to you).
    • Sometimes significance is about the text (for example, why is a certain characters arc important for analyzing the movie as a whole? Or, what does focusing on one theme help us understand about the film as a whole? Or, how do visual strategies like composition and editing help us understand something about the film as a whole?).
    • Sometimes significance is about a shift in genre expectations, which sometimes relate to larger trends or concerns in our society. To provide one example of what this could look like for an essay analyzing a characters heroic journey: what does your characters heroic journey mean within a greater context, such as other Marvel movies, or other Science Fiction movies, or their release dates (Thor in 2017)
    • Sometimes significance is about what the text demonstrates about American culture. How can analyzing details from the film help you make a larger claim about what the film demonstrates in terms of an American cultural myth or value? Perhaps an enduring myth, or maybe youll be asking: what does it mean to watch your chosen movie(s) now in 2026?

    Tips for Analyzing Film

    • Here is a link to our document
    • Here is a link to . That document includes:
    • Answers to a FAQ: How do I cite a film?
    • An example of film analysis that relies on character archetypes and plot points
    • An example of a film analysis that uses shots, camera angles, composition, lighting, etc.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Signs20of20Life-20CITATIONSpdf.pdf, Prewriting20Essay20220-20Matthew20Tranpdf.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.