Category: English

  • Week 6: Writing Assignment – Writing Instructions

    Assignment Instructions

    Writing clear and concise instructions is crucial in healthcare environments to ensure consistency and safety in task execution. For this assignment, you’ll create a set of instructions for a healthcare-related task targeting nonspecialists, such as new nurses or family caregivers.

    Your task

    Choose a healthcare-related task that you are highly familiar with, ensuring it is manageable yet requires multiple steps. Organize the task into a series of 5-7 steps. Create illustrations of your task by taking photographs or making simple drawings. Your instructions should be original, not copied from existing sources.

    Your final instructions should:

    • Be created as a document and submitted as a .docx file
    • Be 250 – 500 words
    • Include 5-7 individual steps in your own, original writing
    • Include 5-7 accompanying images, created yourself (photos or drawings)
    • Utilize simple language, avoiding jargon or technical terms
    • Utilize clear document design that makes effective use of headings, bullets, lists, body text, and image placement
    • Include a relevant title, an introduction, and a conclusion
    • Be a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) only. Submissions in any other format, such as PDF, will not be accepted. Please ensure you use the correct file type before submitting.

    ENG 311 Writing Assignment – Writing Instructions

    ENG 311 Writing Assignment – Writing Instructions

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Mechanics (25%)

    Spelling, punctuation, and grammar are correct. Both sentence and paragraph structures conform to current conventions.

    25 to >20.0 pts

    Exemplary (25%)

    Meets all guidelines with no errors.

    20 to >15.0 pts

    Accomplished (20%)

    Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.

    15 to >7.0 pts

    Acceptable (15%)

    Meets some of the guidelines; contains minor errors.

    7 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate (7%)

    Does not meet the guidelines

    0 pts

    No Submission

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Structure and Organization (25%)

    Submission meets minimum length and does not exceed the maximum length as assigned. Work shows logical flow from one topic to the next; transitions are used.

    25 to >20.0 pts

    Exemplary (25%)

    Meets all guidelines with no errors.

    20 to >15.0 pts

    Accomplished (20%)

    Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.

    15 to >7.0 pts

    Acceptable (15%)

    Meets some of the guidelines; contains minor errors.

    7 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate (7%)

    Does not meet the guidelines

    0 pts

    No Submission

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Steps (25%)

    The essay contains the minimum required number of steps to needed complete the chosen task as indicated by the assignment prompt.

    The steps follow a logical order and success of the chosen task seems reasonable if followed.

    25 to >20.0 pts

    Exemplary (25%)

    Meets all guidelines with no errors.

    20 to >15.0 pts

    Accomplished (20%)

    Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.

    15 to >7.0 pts

    Acceptable (15%)

    Meets some of the guidelines; contains minor errors.

    7 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate (7%)

    Does not meet the guidelines

    0 pts

    No Submission

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Images (25%)

    The essay contains the minimum required number of images per the assignment prompt.

    The images correspond appropriately to the essay topic and the related steps or steps.

    25 to >20.0 pts

    Exemplary (25%)

    Meets all guidelines with no errors.

    20 to >14.0 pts

    Accomplished (20%)

    Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.

    14 to >7.0 pts

    Acceptable (15%)

    Meets some of the guidelines; contains minor errors.

    7 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate (7%)

    Does not meet the guidelines

    0 pts

    No Submission

    25 pts

    Total Points: 100

  • its about the book I’m reading iggy

    Principal Olmos says, We can all make something of ourselves, no matter what our situation. We can do something that contributes to the world, live a life that has meaning. Do you believe that?

    Iggy replies in his mind, Ive never thought about meaningnot even oncebut I nod because, okay, whatever (Going 6).

    Explain what Principal Olmos cannot see or understand regarding Iggys life and situation.

    While Iggy is walking to the party with Mo on page 35, he finds a newspaper clipping: HERO SAVES CHILD FROM CRACK DEALER.

    How does this relate to the conversation he has with Principal Olmos?

    On pages 35-36 he imagines that he is the hero who saves someone and he imagines how the kids and Mrs. Brando would react at school when they hear the news.

    How does this passage relate to his plans for himself on page 17?

    What does this passage reveal about who he wants to be as a person?

    Requirements:

  • Essay 1: Thesis Statement Review / Very Brief Outline – KF

    This is part of 2: 10274134

    For the link to the article that was chosen;

    Part 1:

    Essay 1: Thesis Statement Review (3-4 sentences)

    For this assignment, post a brief summary of the article you have chosen to respond to for the first essay and your thesis statement. You may also want to provide a brief explanation about your thesis if you have chosen to focus on only one specific point in the article you have selected.

    Part 2: (1-2 sentences)

    Once part 1 is done, I will add 2 classmates discussion post that you can respond to.

    Part 3: Very Brief Outline

    For this assignment, write up a bullet point list of the main ideas from your essay. Each bullet point should represent no more than a full paragraph, but you may want to break your ideas down even further and list two or three points from each paragraph. Only one idea per paragraph is required. As such, if your essay is going to be seven paragraphs long, you should have seven bullet points.

    Then, between each bullet point, place a word or words that clearly explains the connection between the ideas. For example, I might have the following two ideas listed on my brief outline:

    • The political climate in America today is deeply divided.
    • Many of society’s biggest problems are not being solved.

    Each of these points represents a full paragraph in my essay. As such, I will have several other sentences in my paragraphs explaining each point. However, the topic of each paragraph is summarized by the idea presented. But if you really think about it, it isn’t entirely clear how I have decided that these two ideas are related. So instead of just a list of several bullet points, also include a word in between each of the ideas that clearly explains how these ideas are related. For example:

    • The political climate in America today is deeply divided.
    • As a result
    • Many of society’s biggest problems are not being solved.

    Making clear the logical connections between your ideas is called developing your line of reasoning, and it is one of the three central things your essay will be graded on.

    Some of the words you can include between your bullet points are conjunctions. The most common are the coordinating conjunctions (FANBOYS, for those who remember that acronym): For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, So. However, there are also quite a few others. The conjunctive adverbs do exactly the same thing as the coordinating conjunctions, but they “sound” a lot “smarter.” I often use the acronym HOTSHOTCAT to help my students remember some of them: However, Otherwise, Therefore, Hence, On the other hand, Thus, Consequently, As a result, Then. Obviously (there’s another one!), there are a lot of these conjunctive adverbs and they can consist of more than one word. Here’s

    , but there are many, many more. You don’t have to watch it, but a decent (and relatively short) video on this topic is below:

    Part 4: 1-2 sentences

    Once part 3 is complete, I will add classmates discussion post that you can respond to.

  • Week 6: Written Assignment

    Drawing upon the topic you selected for last week, you will create a basic outline of your informative speech. [NOTE: Be sure to check to make sure your topic was approved. You will find this in the feedback on your Week 5 assignment.]

    A Look Ahead: To learn more about the informative speech in Week 8, check out the

    Click here:

    A basic outline includes more details compared to last weeks assignment. Follow the

    found here:

    What and How to Submit:

    Submit a Word document. Do not submit a PDF.

    Upload your submission to Canvas using the Submit Assignment link in the top, right-hand corner of the page. Your submission should meet the following criteria:

    Length: Follow the Basic Outline Guide.

    Writing Mechanics: Submission is free from spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

    Formatting: Use 12-point font, such as Times New Roman or Helvetica; double-spaced; 1″ margins all around; and the text is aligned only on the left side of the page.

    Organization: Follow the

    References: You need to cite at least 2 sources (references). List them on the references page. Source material used in a speech should be worded as verbal citations.

    Center the word References (without quotation marks) at the top of the very last page, and then list each source you used. They must be written in APA style. NOTE: Do not use Wikipedia, videos, blogs, or any social media.

    Link to:

    PDF.

    COM301 Week 6 Written Assignment Rubric

    COM301 Week 6 Written Assignment Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    APA Style Formatting (10%)

    Formats correctly using APA style with in-text citations. Formats correctly using APA style cover page and complete reference page.

    2.5 to >1.5 pts

    Exemplary

    Meets all the criteria guidelines with not errors.

    1.5 to >1.0 pts

    Accomplished

    Meets all criteria guidelines; contains minor errors.

    1 to >0.5 pts

    Acceptable

    Meets some of the criteria guidelines; contains major errors.

    0.5 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate

    Does not meet the criteria guidelines and contains major errors.

    0 pts

    No Submission

    Assignment was not submitted.

    2.5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics (15%)

    Spelling, punctuation, and grammar are correct. Both sentence and paragraph structures conform to current conventions.

    3.75 to >2.5 pts

    Exemplary

    Meets all the criteria guidelines with not errors.

    2.5 to >2.0 pts

    Accomplished

    Meets all criteria guidelines; contains minor errors.

    2 to >1.25 pts

    Acceptable

    Meets some of the criteria guidelines; contains major errors.

    1.25 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate

    Does not meet the criteria guidelines and contains major errors.

    0 pts

    No Submission

    Assignment was not submitted.

    3.75 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Assignment Structure (30%)

    Topic is fully explored; minimum number of sub-points (as assigned) are identified and explored for inclusion in the speech. Research is included to boost sub-points as assigned.

    7.5 to >6.25 pts

    Exemplary

    Meets all the criteria guidelines with not errors.

    6.25 to >5.0 pts

    Accomplished

    Meets all criteria guidelines; contains minor errors.

    5 to >2.5 pts

    Acceptable

    Meets some of the criteria guidelines; contains major errors.

    2.5 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate

    Does not meet the criteria guidelines and contains major errors.

    0 pts

    No Submission

    Assignment was not submitted.

    7.5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Assignment Purpose (15%)

    Submission reflects the purpose of the intended occasion; topic is appropriate for the assigned speech (informative, persuasive, special occasion, etc.)

    3.75 to >2.5 pts

    Exemplary

    Meets all the criteria guidelines with not errors.

    2.5 to >2.0 pts

    Accomplished

    Meets all criteria guidelines; contains minor errors.

    2 to >1.25 pts

    Acceptable

    Meets some of the criteria guidelines; contains major errors.

    1.25 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate

    Does not meet the criteria guidelines and contains major errors.

    0 pts

    No Submission

    Assignment was not submitted.

    3.75 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Introduction and Conclusion (30%)

    The first paragraph of the introduction is written out, and contains an effective attention-getting device, a concise thesis statement, and a clear roadmap.

    The first paragraph of the conclusion is written out and summarizes the speech, recaps the main points, and provides a memorable attention-maintaining device.

    7.5 to >6.25 pts

    Exemplary

    Meets all the criteria guidelines with not errors.

    6.25 to >5.0 pts

    Accomplished

    Meets all criteria guidelines; contains minor errors.

    5 to >2.5 pts

    Acceptable

    Meets some of the criteria guidelines; contains major errors.

    2.5 to >0.0 pts

    Inadequate

    Does not meet the criteria guidelines and contains major errors.

    0 pts

    No Submission

    Assignment was not submitted.

    7.5 pts

    Total Points: 25

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): annotated-The20Importance20of20Sleep20for20Nursing20Studentsdocx.pdf, Basic Outline Guide.pdf, Speech Guidelines (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Civil Disobedience Synthesis essay

    This AP Language & Composition synthesis essay should argue a clear position on the value of civil disobedience today while recognizing both its power and its risks, using evidence from at least three sources that are woven together rather than discussed separately. It should connect historical examples like the Underground Railroad or womens suffrage with modern cases such as student walkouts or public concern over political violence to show how civil disobedience can prompt reform when it exposes injustice but lose support when it appears disruptive or unsafe. Each piece of evidence should be explained in terms of how it shapes public perception, challenges government legitimacy, or pressures authorities to respond. The paragraph should stay analytical, focused on cause and effect, and maintain a formal academic tone with clear citations and logical reasoning.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Sample Outline_Brainstorming.pdf, Student Synthesis Samples.pdf, Copy of Synthesis_ Value of Civil Disobedience.pdf, Synthesis Framing Claim-Building (Thesis-Level Thinking).pdf, Printer Choice Synthesis Rubric 26.pdf, Revised Synthesis Essay.pdf, Copy of Synthesis_ Value of Civil Disobedience.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Reading Response 01: Personal Reflection

    Reading Response 01: Personal Reflection

    Reflection

    For this assignment, write a personal reflection that connects themes from our readings to a personal experience you have had with technology.

    Assigned Readings:

    • Costanza- Chock, Sasha. Design Values: Hard-Coding Liberation? Design justice : community- led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, 2020, pp. 31-68
    • Winner, Langdon. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, Vol. 109, No. 1, 1980, pp. 121-136

    What to Do:

      1. Engage the readings: Identify at least one key concept from each author and briefly summarize each one.
      2. Make it personal: Connect those concepts to a personal life experience where you interact(ed) with technology. This could be an everyday moment or something more singular.
      3. Reflect critically: Reflect on questions such as:
        • How does Winners or Costanza-Chocks framework help you understand this moment differently?
        • Did the technology embody politics or values you hadnt noticed before?
        • Did it reproduce inequities, or did it open up new forms of access, expression, or justice?
        • How do your own position and identity shape how you experienced this technology?

    Format & Requirements:

      • Length: 500 words
      • Format: Google Doc, Word Doc, or PDF
      • Reference both readings (at least one quotation or paraphrase from each)
      • Clear connection to your own lived experience
      • Focus on analysis and reflection, not just summary
      • Cite your sources

    Guiding Questions (if youre stuck):

      • Have you ever used a technology that worked well for some people but not for others? How does this relate to Costanza- Chocks discussion of affordances or disaffordances?
      • Have you encountered a technology that seemed neutral at first, but later you realized it carried political or social consequences?
      • Can you think of a time when digital technology that you were using reflected assumptions about your gender, race, class, or ability?

    Requirements: as needed

  • Podcast script

    write a podcast script on Metal health, it can be formatted similar to a okay script.
  • Design practical

    practical process drawings and mind map must be included
  • Module 2 Quiz

    Read this and the other two pdf files.

    Writing Quiz #2: Consider and write briefly about the most recent spectacle you participated in or witnessed.

    Directions:

    1. Below is a list of spectacle types.
    2. Select 1 type of spectacle below.
    3. Name the specific spectacle and describe briefly how it manifests (appears).
    4. Why is this spectacle problematic? Keep in mind problematic does not mean bad or wrong. (See #6 below)
    5. 200-250 words

    Types of Spectacle

    1. Social Media:
    2. The curated online persona on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, etc. where individuals present an idealized version of their lives through carefully crafted photos and posts, is a prime example of the spectacle.
    3. News Media:
    4. Sensationalized headlines, clickbait articles, and the focus on dramatic events over nuanced reporting often create a spectacle out of news, prioritizing entertainment value over in-depth analysis.
    5. Celebrity Culture:
    6. The constant media coverage of celebrity lives, scandals, and relationships, often presented as a form of entertainment, contributes to a culture of obsession with celebrity personas.
    7. Commercial Advertising:
    8. The constant bombardment of advertisements across various media platforms, designed to create desire and a sense of need for products, even if they are not essential.
    9. Large-Scale Events:
    10. Events like the Olympics, major music festivals, and sporting championships, where the focus is on the spectacle and entertainment value rather than the athletic competition itself.
    11. Why is the chosen example considered problematic? According to Debord, the “spectacle” alienates people from their own lives by replacing real experiences with a mediated representation of reality, leading to passive consumption and a disconnection from genuine human interaction.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Debord.pdf, Spectacle1_26.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Source Map

    Description:

    Now that youve selected your final research topics that you will build upon for the last 4 weeks of this course, we are going to take a deep dive into research and source evaluation. To this point, youve had experience evaluating other authors arguments, sources, logic, and claim types and now its your turn to try your hand at crafting a multidimensional and hybrid argument of your own.

    The choices we make surrounding what kinds of source material help us form our arguments are rhetorical choices. Selecting high quality source material and practicing ethical and sound research is not only important in the context of academia but can tremendously increase your writerly ethos when done well. Using research strategies and techniques outlined by our authors alongside practicing important source annotation techniques will be the first and most vital step in crafting your final hybrid argument and extended research paper.

    Module Objectives:

    1. Integrate outside perspectives into texts

    2. Distinguish high quality source materials

    3. Practice accurate citation style and MLA formatting conventions

    Chapter Readings:

    • Understanding Rhetoric: A Graphic Guide to Writing 2e, Issue 6 More Than Detective Work p. 220-253
    • Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings 11e
    • Chapter 4 Using Evidence Effectively p. 52-66
    • Chapter 16 Finding and Evaluating Sources p. 341-359
    • Chapter 17 Incorporating Sources into Your Own Argument p. 360-374
    • Chapter 18 Citing and Documenting Sources p. 375-396

    Instructions:

    Follow the prompts in the Source Map Assignment

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Source Map Assignment.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.