Category: English

Topic: Surrogate pregnancy: Should it be used ondemand or due to health problems?

1. The essay must be in the standard essay format (minimum 5 paragraphs) and have:

An introduction, thesis statement, 3 body paragraphs of main ideas, and a conclusion.

2. For your essay to fit into the Rhetorical Analysis of a Website essay guidelines, you must pick one of the two broad topics that you chose for your first essay, find a website (don’t use the library databases), and evaluate the websites/links by answering the questions below:

• Authority – Who is the author? What is their point of view? Is the author credible? Does the author have bias? Why or why not?
• Purpose – Why was the source created? Who is the intended audience? Does the source play to the correct audience? Why or why not?
• Publication & format What type of website (com, edu, gov, or org) is it?
• Describe the ways the type of website adds to or detracts from its credibility.
• Relevance – How is it relevant to your research? What is its scope? Date of publication – When was it written? Has it been updated?
• Documentation – Did they cite their sources? Who did they cite? Are the sources credible? Why or why not?
• Layout and Appearance- How is the layout on the main web page? Are the background, lettering, images it easy or difficult to read? In what ways?
• Ease of Use- is it easy to information? Is the information easy to understand? Why or why not?

3. Any regular website is fine. The quality of the website is up to you. However, don’t think the best scholarly website, the better. It’s perfectly fine to pick a bad website as well. In fact, it may be better for you so you’ll know what to look for.

4. The essay should be 750-1000 words (3-4 complete pages and doesnt include the works cited page). I won’t mind if it’s a few pages longer. Papers written in Microsoft word with double-spacing, 1 inch margins, and 12 point font. You must also cite your sources in MLA using in-text and on a works cited page. For this essay, you should have at least one source-the website youre discussing. If the in-text citing or works cited page are missing, the highest grade possible will be a D. If both are missing, its and F.

5. Keep in mind, that you can still use the broad topic or narrow it down to something more specific.

6. To be complete, the essays must have a rough draft with a completed peer review worksheet, essay discussion questions, and a final draft.

7. Since it’s a formal essay, it should have no “I believes, with regards to opinions, and should be in a flowing and easy to read style. It should also be neat with few grammar errors. Remember you’re the expert. You have to assume the audience has no clue about what you are stating.

1. The essay must be in the standard essay format (minimum 5 paragraphs) and have:

An introduction, thesis statement, 3 body paragraphs of main ideas, and a conclusion.

2. For your essay to fit into the Rhetorical Analysis of a Website essay guidelines, you must pick one of the two broad topics that you chose for your first essay, find a website (don’t use the library databases), and evaluate the websites/links by answering the questions below:

• Authority – Who is the author? What is their point of view? Is the author credible? Does the author have bias? Why or why not?
• Purpose – Why was the source created? Who is the intended audience? Does the source play to the correct audience? Why or why not?
• Publication & format What type of website (com, edu, gov, or org) is it?
• Describe the ways the type of website adds to or detracts from its credibility.
• Relevance – How is it relevant to your research? What is its scope? Date of publication – When was it written? Has it been updated?
• Documentation – Did they cite their sources? Who did they cite? Are the sources credible? Why or why not?
• Layout and Appearance- How is the layout on the main web page? Are the background, lettering, images it easy or difficult to read? In what ways?
• Ease of Use- is it easy to information? Is the information easy to understand? Why or why not?

3. Any regular website is fine. The quality of the website is up to you. However, don’t think the best scholarly website, the better. It’s perfectly fine to pick a bad website as well. In fact, it may be better for you so you’ll know what to look for.

4. The essay should be 750-1000 words (3-4 complete pages and doesnt include the works cited page). I won’t mind if it’s a few pages longer. Papers written in Microsoft word with double-spacing, 1 inch margins, and 12 point font. You must also cite your sources in MLA using in-text and on a works cited page. For this essay, you should have at least one source-the website youre discussing. If the in-text citing or works cited page are missing, the highest grade possible will be a D. If both are missing, its and F.

5. Keep in mind, that you can still use the broad topic or narrow it down to something more specific.

6. To be complete, the essays must have a rough draft with a completed peer review worksheet, essay discussion questions, and a final draft.

7. Since it’s a formal essay, it should have no “I believes, with regards to opinions, and should be in a flowing and easy to read style. It should also be neat with few grammar errors. Remember you’re the expert. You have to assume the audience has no clue about what you are stating.

Analyze how at least two strategies (disaster declarations, grants, recovery programs) can be used to help the community recover from floods.

For this assignment I am to compare the Grimm Brothers Version of Hansel and Gretel to the 2020 film Gretel and Hansel. I only get credit if all boxes are completed. I used AI to come up with my answers just needs to be worded in own words. score 0% for AI.

No instructions provided

Please submit a brief reflection in about 250 words where you explore the importance of close-reading and annotating texts. Please go into detail about how you used the practices thus far and how you might be able to apply these tools in future classes or situations. Some questions you might ask yourself are: How can you use close-reading and annotating in your future career? How can you use close-reading and annotating in future classes? Why does one need to use close-reading and annotating for understanding a text? You do not need to answer all or any of the suggested questions. However, you do need to reflect on close-reading and annotating in some way.

Read Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail” and the lecture on frame breaking. Then, in an essay of at least 1,200 words, do each of the following:

1. Identify and summarize three key arguments to which Dr. King is responding. (He states these outright.)

2. Explain the frame the arguments employ.

3. Explain how Dr. King breaks the frame using one of the five methods in the lecture

4. Summarize Dr. King’s own arguments on each of these points and identify the Appeal (pathos, ethos, logos) he is using in each argument.

Your essay must be typed, in MLA format, and include both parenthetical references and a Works Citied. Submissions that do not follow this format will be assigned a Zero (0) grade with instructions to resubmit.

Assignment: Write a 5 paragraph analytical summary essay on the we read and annotated during week 3. You are tasked with providing an overview of an article about social anxiety, and you are also expected go include your analysis/opinions of the points made in the article or of the authors themselves. Your audience includes the instructor, classmates, and any writer in general. Your job is to give them an overview that summarizes the article and then analyze its main points. Select three points from the article to analyze. You may consider the concepts valid, significant, and timely. On the other hand, you may consider the points inaccurate, flawed, and need more support. You may also find some points to be valid, yet one point needs improvement. In writing this essay, you have two purposes:

1. Summarize the content of the article to your audience: What is this author seeking to inform the reader of? What are the authors main points? How many main points are there? What evidence does he or she use to support his/her claims?
2. Provide your analyses on this articles main points: What points seem valid or inaccurate? Is any point inaccurate or not convincing? Did the author provide enough support, and what supports were used? Did the writer use the right tone? Explain.

Use the following template for drafting your essay (this starts on the following page). Notice that your paper needs to be in MLA format- using Times New Roman or Arial, size 12 font, double-spaced, your last name should be on the top right corner with pagination, etc. Remember to edit and revise before submitting the final copy. Your essay should be 5 paragraphs: Intro w/thesis, Body 1, Body 2, Body 3, & Conclusion.