Category: English

please read the PDF and work after you read the question that I send for u as an picture.

single source analytical essay on Jenny Zhang in American like me paraphrasing and quoting ass well

Instructions for Peer Responses:

Choose two classmates drafts to review. Respond with at least 150200 words per review. If a draft already has two reviews, please move on to those with no reviews or only one review. Use the following questions to guide your feedback:

Summary Section:

• Is the summary clear and objective?
• Does the writer cover the main ideas of the source text accurately?
• Do you feel like you understand the original essay just from their summary?

Response Section:

• Does the writer clearly express their reaction, opinion, or analysis?
• Are their thoughts well-supported with examples, reasoning, or personal connections?
• Do they stay focused and avoid repeating the summary?

Overall Structure and Style:

• Is there a clear thesis statement?
• Do the ideas flow logically from one paragraph to the next?
• Is the essay easy to read, with mostly clear sentences and transitions?

MLA Format:

• Does the paper follow basic MLA guidelines (header, in-text citation, font, spacing)?
• Is there a Works Cited entry for the source essay?

Instructions for Peer Responses:

Choose two classmates drafts to review. Respond with at least 150200 words per review. If a draft already has two reviews, please move on to those with no reviews or only one review. Use the following questions to guide your feedback:

Summary Section:

• Is the summary clear and objective?
• Does the writer cover the main ideas of the source text accurately?
• Do you feel like you understand the original essay just from their summary?

Response Section:

• Does the writer clearly express their reaction, opinion, or analysis?
• Are their thoughts well-supported with examples, reasoning, or personal connections?
• Do they stay focused and avoid repeating the summary?

Overall Structure and Style:

• Is there a clear thesis statement?
• Do the ideas flow logically from one paragraph to the next?
• Is the essay easy to read, with mostly clear sentences and transitions?

MLA Format:

• Does the paper follow basic MLA guidelines (header, in-text citation, font, spacing)?
• Is there a Works Cited entry for the source essay?

It is for a 7th grader.. I cant seem to be able to

make time to help.. it is just on hurricanes vs earthquakes.. yk compare and contrast essay

Before you write an outline or a draft of your summary and assessment essay, you may find it helpful to answer the questions below. They will help you think about the structure of the argument you plan to write about as well as its strengths and weaknesses.

Your source for this short assignment is Vivek Murthy’s article Surgeon General: Why Im Calling for a Warning Label on Social Media Platforms: Guest Essay. New York Times *I attached the article*

What do you think is the main claim?

In other words, what does the writer most want to convince us of? Where is the writer going with all this? If they had to make their point in just one sentence, what would they say? Explain in your own words.

What are the arguments reasons, counterarguments, and limits?

What reasons does the author give for the main claim? (See 2.5)

What, if any, counterarguments are described? (See 2.6)

Does the author respond to the counterarguments? (See 2.7)

Does the author put any limits on their claims? (See 2.8)

How will you describe the arguments claims, reasons, and counterarguments?

Introduce the argument and describe claims of policy, fact, or value (See 3.2)

Describe the reasons given (See 3.3)

Describe how the author handles counterarguments (See 3.4)

Describe how the author limits the argument (See 3.5)

How would you assess the main claim/argument? Review Chapter 4

What are the strengths of the text?

What are its weaknesses?

Are there any problems with the logic of the argument? Name and define them.

Does the text contain assumptions that might need to be questioned?

Has the text sufficiently considered counterarguments?

Evaluate the merit of the work: how persuasive are its points, its accuracy, completeness, organization, and so on?

Would you recommend that others read this work? Why or why not?

*I attached the article, book & grading rubric*

Before you write an outline or a draft of your summary and assessment essay, you may find it helpful to answer the questions below. They will help you think about the structure of the argument you plan to write about as well as its strengths and weaknesses.

Your source for this short assignment is Vivek Murthy’s article Surgeon General: Why Im Calling for a Warning Label on Social Media Platforms: Guest Essay. New York Times *I attached the article*

What do you think is the main claim?

In other words, what does the writer most want to convince us of? Where is the writer going with all this? If they had to make their point in just one sentence, what would they say? Explain in your own words.

What are the arguments reasons, counterarguments, and limits?

What reasons does the author give for the main claim? (See 2.5)

What, if any, counterarguments are described? (See 2.6)

Does the author respond to the counterarguments? (See 2.7)

Does the author put any limits on their claims? (See 2.8)

How will you describe the arguments claims, reasons, and counterarguments?

Introduce the argument and describe claims of policy, fact, or value (See 3.2)

Describe the reasons given (See 3.3)

Describe how the author handles counterarguments (See 3.4)

Describe how the author limits the argument (See 3.5)

How would you assess the main claim/argument? Review Chapter 4

What are the strengths of the text?

What are its weaknesses?

Are there any problems with the logic of the argument? Name and define them.

Does the text contain assumptions that might need to be questioned?

Has the text sufficiently considered counterarguments?

Evaluate the merit of the work: how persuasive are its points, its accuracy, completeness, organization, and so on?

Would you recommend that others read this work? Why or why not?

*I attached the article, book & grading rubric*

REPLY to 2 PEERS AT THE END-will upload when available For this online discussion, you will: Write an initial post introducing your peers to a background reading for your closed research theme OR an article you have found while researching for your Mini Annotated Bibliography. Respond to at least two peers To prepare: Read Module 6 Instructions for Writing Project 3: Argument. Read all reading assignments from The Little Seagull Handbook in this module. Complete the Module 6 Closed Research Theme Background Reading Check-In. You may also prepare by beginning your research for Module 6 Research Activity: Mini Annotated Bibliography. person holding pencil near laptop computer Module 6 Initial Post In this discussion, you will introduce your peers to either a relevant background reading included with your closed research theme or a source you have found while researching for your Mini Annotated Bibliography. Start a new thread in this board and respond to the following prompt. Click the Post Reply button to submit your initial post. Select either a background reading included with your class’s closed research theme (in Modules) or a source you have found while researching for Module 6 Research Activity: Mini Annotated Bibliography. (NOTE: You are not committed to using this source in either your Mini Annotated Bibliography or in Writing Project 3: Argument; all that matters now is that the source is relevant to your class’s closed research theme question and is a possible source under consideration.) Briefly explain the angles or problems you are interested in pursuing in response to the closed research theme question for Writing Project 3: Argument. Introduce your peers to your selected background reading or source you found using an Ivy Tech Library website search database. Explain how you think you could use this background reading or research source to answer your personal questions about the closed research theme and/or provide evidence for arguments you could make about the closed research theme question. Also, what new ideas, information, contradictions, or corroboration do you see in this source that you did not see addressed yet in the closed research theme readings? You are encouraged to provide relevant “They Say” summaries or quotes from the background reading or research source that you could use as evidence to support or validate your explanation. Provide a complete source citation of the source in APA or MLA style (as specified by your instructor) Your Module 6 initial post should be at least 150 original words. Module 6 Responses Respond to 2 or more posts made by your classmates. To respond to a peer, click the Reply button underneath that peer’s post. After you’ve written your response, click the Post Reply button to submit your response. Possible ways to respond include: Comment on how useful you find your peer’s source in addressing the angles or problems they are interested in. Comment on whether or not you would find this source useful for addressing the angles or problems you are interested in. Could you see yourself using this source in your own argument essay? If so, explain. If your peer has found something that could benefit you as well, let your peer know. Offer your peer suggestions for further research–what sort of background information or additional articles do you think your peer should consider? Offer suggested corrections of the source citation. Respectfully disagree with any of your peer’s comments and offer further reasons or suggestions. Answer a question a peer asked you or respond to a comment they made on your initial post. Altogether, your Module 6 posts (initial post and at least 2 responses) should add up to at least 350 words, and each reply to a classmate needs to be a minimum of 100 words each. All posts are due by the end of Module 6.