Category: English

  • English Question

    You have two choices for this assignment:

    Option #1-What we need to know about vaccine changes

    Assignment #1 We are hearing quite a bit about vaccines in the news. Our government is planning to change vaccine recommendations for children. Have they changed the recommendations yet?

    The vaccine committee met. Review their recommendations on the site below:

    Research the CDC website to see if any new recommendations are posted there.

    2.Research what vaccines the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends for children.

    What is the currently recommended vaccine schedule for children? (ages and vaccines)

    What is the controversy over Robert Kennedy Jr. and his views on vaccines? What is his area of expertise?

    Write a two page paper explaining what you researched about:

    1. childhood vaccines-what are the recommended vaccines and the ages a child should receive them
    2. explain what happened at the vaccine summit and any changes they recommended to the vaccine schedule
    3. what is the controversy about Health and Human Services Director Robert Kennedy Jr.s appointment to his role?

    Assignment Option #2:

    Two-page paper, Licensing Requirements on Outdoor Environment and Meal Requirements

    Research California Licensing requirements for preschool playgrounds.

    Summarize the playground requirements in your paper, on page one.

    Research California Licensing requirements for food served at preschool.

    Second page is to summarize the snack and meal requirements and procedures surrounding food preparation:

    1 What food preparation requirements are required?

    2.What snacks of meals are required for a full day program? A half day program?

    3.What does licensing say about allergies and special food preparation?

    4, What does licensing say about meals sent from home?

  • archaeologists

    archaeologists with well established reputation argue that easter island had a well documented civilization before the eastes sunday in 1722 , on the basis of the well refined on the hills of easter isand they elaborated a well preseved theory to explain the disappearance of this theory . if civilization in easter island disappeared ,it was because the easter islanders were not well apprecuated about the order to erect over 800 statues for their ,these statues are well informed by tourists today

  • EXPRESSING CONCESSIO

    Lesson, expressing concession

    • Although /though Egypt was ,well resourced with raw materials it needed to import some of them
    • Despite the fact that / In spite of the fact that
    • Despite / in spite of being surrounded by a great wall , the city was invaded

    Egypt waswell resourced but it needed to

    Phoenicians used to live in desert they became famous saillors

    Phoenicians used to live .,however, They became famous

    Although the city was surrounded by a great wall it was invaded

    Rule ,

    Concession =opposition

    ( unexcepted result )

    #) Although / though

    .despite the fact that

    .In spite of the fact that

    .even though

    SUBJ +V+R.S+SUBJ+V+REST OF SENTENCE

    DESPITE /IN SPITE =GRERUND +STCE UNEXPECTED RESULT

    OTHER CONJUCTIONS

    STCE =HOWEVER ,NONETHELESS,NEVERTHELESS.

    STCE 1+BUT,STILL,YET+ STCE 2

  • grammar . EXPOLRER |QUANTIFIERS/COMPARATIVE|

    for example. there are countable nouns like= people. ruins. civilization. traces and there are uncountable nouns like=money .knowledge .information .time……ex also there are both side like=some .any .a lot of. a great…..ex 1 as we said we use much little and a little with uncountable nouns ex- i don’t have much time today 2we use many few ,a few with constable nouns ex- our school has got many classes . little and few . have negative meaning they mean not much not enough ,so the speaker is not happy about /A little and a few , have positive meaning ,they mean quite enough so the speaker is happy about it . some =positive . any=negative ex. there are some flowers in the garden , but the arent any trees

  • English Question

    Love is Sociological by Peter Kaufman

    When I was a kid, my parents had a book that I used to flip through called Love Is Walking Hand in Hand. The book was written by Peanuts illustrator Charles Schulz, and each page had a picture of Charlie Brown, Snoopy, Lucy, and the gang explaining what love is: Love is hating to say good-bye; Love is walking in the rain together; Love is letting him win even though you know you could slaughter him; Love is the whole world (this was written in the 60s, after all!). Although it’s been quite a few years since I’ve looked at this little book, I’m pretty sure there is no page that said: Love is sociological.

    To say that love is sociological may sound strange and even somewhat sacrilegious. Most of us think of love as something that we feel naturally. It’s a spiritual, even cosmic, connection that brings forth an array of reactions such as butterflies in our stomachs, sweaty palms, weak knees, or just warmth and happiness. What could possibly be sociological about these physiological responses and heartfelt emotions?

    It’s true that when we are feeling love we experience a range of bodily sensations and emotions. But what is the cause of these physical reactions? Do these biological processes strike us independently when we are hit by cupid’s arrow? Do we automatically know love when see it or feel it? Or are there social dimensions at work that tells us not only when to feel love but how we should feel about?

    When I ask students to consider if love is sociological, I pose a series of questions to them to get them thinking more critically about the social foundations of love. Most students begin this discussion thinking that love is some sort of natural, psycho-biological process. By the end of the discussion, I hope that many of them are rethinking this assumption and asking their own questions about how love is sociological. Here is a sample of the types of questions I pose:

    Who do we love? Although many of us like to believe in the popular idea that love is blind, in reality, love is often quite prejudiced. As many sociological studies have detailed, most people do not find themselves deeply and madly in love with just anyone; instead, most of us end up in love with someone who looks, thinks, and acts like us. More specifically, we tend to end up in love with people who share our race, ethnicity, religion, age, and social class. Sociologists originally referred to this as homophilythe idea that we gravitate towards those who are similar to us.

    Although there are more instances where “opposites attract”as in the case of interracial or interfaith unions, the majority of situations still demonstrate that birds of a feather are likely to flock together. However, the fact that there are increasingly more heterogeneous couples further demonstrates the social nature of love. As societies become more diverse, and individuals form bonds with a greater variety of peoplewhat’s known as the propinquity effect or contact theorytheir views of who they find attractive and appealing has been shown to change. Like people, love can be prejudiced; however, such prejudices are not natural and they can be overcome through our social interactions.

    How do we love? Most of us know how to properly display the love we have for someone else: we give them things such as chocolate, flowers, or a greeting card; we say certain words and phrases to them such as “I can’t live without you,” “you complete me,” or “we were meant for each other”; or we engage in specific physical acts with them such as hugging, kissing, and having sex.

    Increasingly, we use technology to find and express our love as comedian Aziz Ansari and sociologist Erik Klinenberg discuss in their best-selling book, Modern Romance. Are all of these displays of love natural? Is it just instinctual that we give someone a heart-shaped box full of processed sugar and cocoa, a bouquet of roses, or even a hickey? Or is it more likely that we have learned that these acts are the culturally approved ways to demonstrate love for someone?

    It seems hard to deny that the way we come to express love is a product of our socialization. Practically everything we know about how to love comes from a variety of agents of socialization such as family, friends, the media, and even religious doctrines. And like all things that are social, the ways through which we demonstrate love is variable based on the social context in which we find ourselves. If you doubt the social foundations of how we learn to love just talk to your grandparents, your friends from other cultures, or read some early modern literature, and you will quickly find out that there are many different norms, practices, and behaviors that people have developed to demonstrate love.

    When do we love? It’s not uncommon in many high schools to see couples making out in the hallways, parking lots, or lunchrooms. Some people are quick to attribute this to young love and raging hormones. But if the need to make out in high school is indeed the necessary release of a biological impulse, then why just a few months after students graduate high school and enter college do these public displays of affection seem to end abruptly? In all my years of teaching college, I have rarely seen these public displays of affection in hallways or in any other public spaces on campus. Have students’ hormones changed that drastically over the summer between high school and college? Or have they learned the norms of this new environment about when it is appropriate to display their love for someone else?

    Even beyond these displays of affection between two lovers, we see that the question of “when we love” is highly dependent on the social context. Think back to when you were a teenager. How often did you express your love for your parents or your siblings (with words, a kiss, or a hug) when you were in the company of your friends? As young people growing more concerned about our presentation of self, many of us learn how uncool it is to display or express familial love in front of our peer group. This taboo is especially strong for boys who fear being seen as less masculine or as “momma’s boys”a point that is made poignantly in the new documentary about masculinity, The Mask You Live In.

    These are just some of the questions that I pose to students to uncover the social foundations of love. Other questions you may want to consider include where do we love (are there socially sanctioned places where love occurs), why do we love (are there social functions of love), what do we love (is love only for people or can other living things and objects be loved), and of course the biggest question, what is love (how is love defined and does this definition change across time and space)? These questions, and the answers you come up with, will help you realize that while love is a many-splendored thing, it is also highly sociological.

    Posted by W. W. Norton on February 10, 2016 in Peter Kaufman, Relationships, Marriage and Family, Sex and Gender, Social Psychology


    Assessment

    Answer the following questions that the author posed. Please make sure to use examples from the readings and other course materials to help you with your responses.

    Please number your answers 1-4. There is no need to rewrite each question.

    1. Are there socially sanctioned places where love occurs?
    2. Are there social functions of love?
    3. Are there social rules for love? For example, is love only for particular people? Can other living things and objects be loved? How does society impact this? (Think about how love is defined in other cultures.)
    4. How is love defined by our culture and does this definition change across time and space?
    5. After posting your essay, please respond to at least two other students. Elaborate on their posts and end your responses with a thoughtful question.

    To earn full points for this assignment

    • Demonstrate an outstanding understanding of the sociological aspects of love.
    • Use specific vocabulary from the article.
    • Have fewer than five (5) spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
    • Write between 250 and 300 words.
    • Respond to at least two other students (write between a 100 150 word response for each).
  • Are Chimpanzees from Mars and Bonobos from Venus?

    The close genetic relationship between humans, chimpanzees and bonobos provides us with a window into how early humans may have behaved. Based on the videos and readings concerning chimpanzee and bonobo behavior, which species do you think is a better model for understanding human behavior, and why?

    Your answer should be limited to 300 words (approx. 1 page). After you post your reply, don’t forget to respond to at least one other student’s post. Your responses to other students must be substantive and thought-provoking. In other words, do not simply post “I agree” or “I disagree.”

  • social work

    a. SOCIAL HISTORY/BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL (due March 16)

    b. SERVICE PLAN (due April 16, 2026)
    a & b: 1. Student is to conduct a series of interviews (5+) with an adult individual with a long term vulnerabilities
    (i.e. the elderly, individuals with developmental, physical and/or mental disabilities or illness, dependent or
    abused children, alcoholic or substance abusers). Explain to him/her the purpose of this college assignment and
    obtain written permission to conduct interviews and speak with family members/service providers through a
    disclosure form you create. This form should inform the individual the purpose of the interview, that all identifying
    information will be changed for confidentiality, signed by the individual, student and dated. Do not submit the
    form to the Instructor, since it will have the individuals name. Students can choose a classmate, co-worker,
    neighbor, client in an agency) Do not choose family, close friend or a minor. If possible, student is to consult the
    individuals family, friends, support systems/service providers. After completing the interviews, summarize and
    organize relevant facts.
    2. Gather all relevant information, from the interviews to write a: a. Social History (aka Biopsychosocial) b.
    Service Plan.
    Utilize the text as well as the following instructions. Each assignment is due on different dates.
    a. SOCIAL HISTORY/BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL Note on page one that all identifying information has been changed for
    confidentiality.
    1. Presenting Problem One paragraph for a-c
    a. Source of referral
    b. Reason for case management assessment and intervention, current problem(s), diagnosis.

    c. Demographics: Client age, ethnicity, race, religion, birthplace, marital status, living situation, location,
    employment status, etc.
    2. Complete an extensive history of the client in all of the following:
    Areas:
    A. Psychiatric (Mental Illness)
    B. Psychological (Intellectual Disability)
    C. Family (issues, abuse)
    D. Medical (diseases, exams, prevention, meds)
    E. Social/Interpersonal (support systems, hobbies, etc)
    F. Education/Vocational (special ed, GED, college, skills, etc)
    G. Housing (Independent, daily skills, etc)
    H. Legal (divorce, ACS, bankruptcy, warrants, immigration, etc)
    I. Substance Abuse (use, abuse, dependency)
    J. Employment (termination, seeking, resume, skills, etc)
    K. Finances (debt, budgets, etc) -Write a brief summary of the history (1-2 paragraphs) -Complete the five Axis
    (DSM) -Sign Your Name/Title

  • social work

    a. SOCIAL HISTORY/BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL (due March 16)

    b. SERVICE PLAN (due April 16, 2026)
    a & b: 1. Student is to conduct a series of interviews (5+) with an adult individual with a long term vulnerabilities
    (i.e. the elderly, individuals with developmental, physical and/or mental disabilities or illness, dependent or
    abused children, alcoholic or substance abusers). Explain to him/her the purpose of this college assignment and
    obtain written permission to conduct interviews and speak with family members/service providers through a
    disclosure form you create. This form should inform the individual the purpose of the interview, that all identifying
    information will be changed for confidentiality, signed by the individual, student and dated. Do not submit the
    form to the Instructor, since it will have the individuals name. Students can choose a classmate, co-worker,
    neighbor, client in an agency) Do not choose family, close friend or a minor. If possible, student is to consult the
    individuals family, friends, support systems/service providers. After completing the interviews, summarize and
    organize relevant facts.
    2. Gather all relevant information, from the interviews to write a: a. Social History (aka Biopsychosocial) b.
    Service Plan.
    Utilize the text as well as the following instructions. Each assignment is due on different dates.
    a. SOCIAL HISTORY/BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL Note on page one that all identifying information has been changed for
    confidentiality.
    1. Presenting Problem One paragraph for a-c
    a. Source of referral
    b. Reason for case management assessment and intervention, current problem(s), diagnosis.

    c. Demographics: Client age, ethnicity, race, religion, birthplace, marital status, living situation, location,
    employment status, etc.
    2. Complete an extensive history of the client in all of the following:
    Areas:
    A. Psychiatric (Mental Illness)
    B. Psychological (Intellectual Disability)
    C. Family (issues, abuse)
    D. Medical (diseases, exams, prevention, meds)
    E. Social/Interpersonal (support systems, hobbies, etc)
    F. Education/Vocational (special ed, GED, college, skills, etc)
    G. Housing (Independent, daily skills, etc)
    H. Legal (divorce, ACS, bankruptcy, warrants, immigration, etc)
    I. Substance Abuse (use, abuse, dependency)
    J. Employment (termination, seeking, resume, skills, etc)
    K. Finances (debt, budgets, etc) -Write a brief summary of the history (1-2 paragraphs) -Complete the five Axis
    (DSM) -Sign Your Name/Title

  • engl 4000 encomium on awkward silence brand audit draft

    Im writing an encomium essay on awkward silence we are focusing on award silence in the workspace, our initial grade was a c and we got low marks on using sources – i attached a brand audit draft we made and an example draft from a previous class- I also attached our draft I want you to revise it but also rewrite it- using the professors feedback I want you to fix the essay -here is the professors feedback-

    Summary of Professors Feedback

    1. Focus on the

    Brand Audit first, not the Rebrand

    Your group jumped too quickly into thinking about the rebrand, instead of fully analyzing the current brand of awkward silence.

    What he wants:

    • Break down what awkward silence actually is
    • Identify all the elements that make it awkward
    • Understand how people experience it

    Examples of elements to analyze:

    • Social norms (expectation that someone should speak)
    • Familiarity vs strangers
    • Power dynamics (boss vs employee)
    • Presence and control in a room
    • Nervousness vs incompetence
    • Silence in email / digital communication
    • Workplace hierarchy

    The rebrand must come from this analysis.


    2. Do Not Make Claims Without Sources

    Your introvert vs extrovert claim was the biggest issue.

    Problem:

    • You asserted something without evidence
    • It sounded like speculation

    Professors point:

    • Its okay to raise ideas
    • But you must support them with research

    If you mention:

    • Introversion/extroversion
    • Psychology
    • workplace behavior

    You must show:

    • psychology studies
    • workplace research
    • sociology literature

    3. Expand the Psychological and Social Research

    He thinks psychology is actually a good direction, but you didnt go deep enough.

    Areas to research:

    • Social norms around silence
    • Nervousness vs cowardice (freezing under pressure)
    • Workplace communication psychology
    • Neurodivergence and social cues
    • Ableism in workplace expectations

    Important point:

    Awkward silence assumes normative behavior expectations.

    But:

    • Some people process slower
    • Some people struggle with social cues
    • Some people cannot respond immediately

    So your analysis should acknowledge this ethically.


    4. Analyze the Situation From Multiple Perspectives

    Your paper focused too much on one viewpoint.

    Example you used:

    New employee getting caught in awkward silence.

    But he wants you to consider all stakeholders:

    Perspectives to analyze:

    • Person asked the question
    • Person expected to answer
    • Observers in the room
    • Manager asking the question

    He wants a 360 analysis.


    5. Identify What Actually Makes Silence Awkward

    Your sources mentioned something important you didnt fully unpack:

    Silence feels different depending on relationship context.

    Example:

    • Silence between friends bonding
    • Silence between strangers awkward

    This is a key element of the brand.

    Your audit should identify components like:

    • familiarity
    • power hierarchy
    • social expectations
    • urgency
    • attention/control in a room

    6. Improve Structure and Write in One Voice

    Your professor said the paper reads like separate sections written by different people.

    This happens when:

    • Everyone writes their own section
    • The group only checks for grammar

    Instead:

    Someone should edit the entire paper together.

    Goal:

    • One consistent voice
    • Clear flow
    • Less repetition
    • More logical structure

    He suspects the introvert/extrovert section came from one person and wasnt integrated with the rest.


    7. Use Better Sources

    Your sources currently repeat the same basic ideas.

    He wants more diverse research from:

    • psychology
    • sociology
    • workplace management
    • business communication
    • disability studies

    Even non-academic sources (management advice, leadership training) can help show how people talk about silence in workplaces.


    8. The Paper Can Be Longer

    You can exceed 5 pages if necessary.

    Reason:

    Group research should be condensed and purposeful, not artificially limited.

    But:

    Avoid rambling.


    9. The Topic Is Actually Strong

    Despite the issues, he said:

    • Your topic is strong
    • There is a lot to explore
    • Your group is thinking in productive directions

    You just need to:

    • deepen the analysis
    • ground claims in research
    • focus the audit
  • English Question

    Final Paper (Problem Analysis)

    Assignment Instructions

    This analysis project requires you to tackle a problem within your field of study by first exploring the problem, its causes, and its impacts.Then, if you want, you can recommend one or more practical solutions to solve the problem. After deciding on the problem you wish to tackle, begin building questions about it. Your goal for the analysis is to answer the questions through your sources. Finding multiple angles and perspectives is ideal so that you explore those possibilities in the final paper before settling on your recommendation.Be sure to identify what is at stake.

    Here are questions to help guide your analysis:

    1. What is the problem being addressed (explain, describe, and “prove” that it exists)?
    2. Who is affected by this problem?
    3. Why does this problem exist? (Identify the root causes.)
    4. Why does the problem persist? (Identify the major factors that contribute to the problem’s ongoing presence.)
    5. What is at stake if the problem is not solved?

    If you choose to address a solution (you don’t have to), you may find these prompts helpful:

    1. Who can take action?
    2. What should they do, exactly?
    3. Why would this help?
    4. What are the positive and negative aspects of your solution(s)?
    • PURPOSE: To analyze a problem and possibly provide a solution
    • AUDIENCE: Classmates and others interested in the field
    • LENGTH: 750-900 words (Times New Roman font). Please do not go significantly (~10%) under or above the word count requirement. This word count includes only the paragraphs in your final essay (not the Works Cited/References page or previously submitted sections).
    • SOURCES: 5 (five) sources from the APUS Library (These may include sources you used in previous Assignments. Going under this number will cost points in grading.)
    • FORMAT: The citation style that is appropriate for your discipline. Most papers will use APA style.

    Submit your Assignment as one Word document attached to the Assignment link so it can be automatically processed through Turnitin. You can save your paper with a title like this: Your Name Portfolio Final Paper. Do not submit multiple files or PDF files.

    Turnitin Scores

    Because parts of the portfolio (items 1 and 2) have already been processed in Turnitin, they are now part of Turnitin’s database. That means that, when a portfolio is submitted, Turnitin will identify the phrasing it has previously “seen” (such as items 1 and 2 of the portfolio).

    Turnitin scores are likely to be high for all portfolios. Don’t panic. Review the Turnitin report, and you will likely see that much of the matching phrasing is from work you previously submitted. Your instructor understands this and will focus on the Turnitin matches in the final paper.

    As mentioned above, if the Turnitin AI score is high, your instructor is likely to give you the opportunity to re-write the assignment.

    Title: Employee Burnout in the Workplace OUTLINE

    Thesis statement: Employee burnout is serious workplace problem caused by heavy workloads, poor leadership, and lack of support which negatively affects employees and organizations.

    Introduction

    1. Employee burnout has become a common problem in many workplaces.
    2. Many workers experience stress, exhaustion, and low morale because of the pressure that comes with the job.
    3. Burnout became more noticeable after COVID-19 pandemic.
    4. Employee burnout is a serious workplace problem caused by heavy workloads, lack of support, and toxic leadership which negatively affects employees and organizations.

    Description of the Problem

    1. Burnout happens when employees feel emotionally and physically exhausted from their jobs.
    2. Workers who experience burnout disconnect from their work leaving them overwhelmed.
    3. Over time burnout can reduce job performance and satisfaction.

    Causes of Burnout

    1. One major cause of burnout is work overload meaning employees have too many responsibilities.
    2. Another cause if poor or toxic leadership which can create stressful work environments.
    3. Lack of communication and support from management can also increase employee stress.

    Jobs Most Affected by Burnout

    1. Some careers experience higher stress levels than others.
    2. Healthcare workers, public service employees, and educators often face intense pressure at work.
    3. During and after COVID-19 healthcare workers experienced higher workloads and emotional stress.

    Effects of Burnout on Organization

    1. Burnout lowers productivity and motivation.
    2. Employees who feel exhausted and no support are more likely to resign from their jobs.
    3. Research shows that motivation and support can improve employee retention.

    Possible Improvements

    1. Organizations can make improvements by having better communication and leadership.
    2. Training programs can help managers develop better listening skills.
    3. Supporting employees and improving the workplace culture will have a positive effect in raising morale.

    Conclusion

    1. Employee burnout is an important workplace issue that affects both workers and organizations.
    2. Factors like heavy workloads and poor leadership contribute to this problem.
    3. Understanding the problem will help organizations have a healthier work environment.

    Item 1 of the Portfolio

    Tips for Communicating in My Field

    My Name:

    Zaily Santillan

    My Field of Study (Program):

    Human Resources Management

    Below are the tips for communicating in my field that I posted in the week 2 discussion (section 3 of my initial week 2 post):

    After looking at the comparison between the two I can say that writing in the HR field should be professional, organized, and have supporting evidence. Proving realistic solutions to problems that go in the workplace is one of the best ways to have a positive impact. The terminology in the field should be used correctly and in easy manner to make sure everyone can understand it. HR deals directly with people, their money, policies, performance, etc.. so, communication is very important. HR needs strong writing skills to handle real workplace solutions.

    Annotated Bibliography

    Item #2 of the Portfolio

    Name: Zaily Santillan

    Topic:

    Employee Burnout in the Workplace

    Thesis Statement:

    Employee burnout can be caused by the amount of pressure at the workplace. However, organizations can improve the conditions by making the environment safe and training their leaders correctly.

    Citation Style: __x_APA ___MLA ____Other (please indicate which other style)

    Source #1 from APUS Library

    Full Citation

    (in format for style selected above)

    I

    Itzchakov, G., Weinstein, N., & Cheshin, A. (2022). Learning to listen: Downstream effects of listening training on employees relatedness, Burnout, and turnover intentions. Human Resource Management, 62(4), 565580.

    In-text Citation

    (in format for style selected above)

    (Itzchakov et al., 2023)

    Summary WHAT

    What are the sources main ideas expressed in your own words? Do not use an AI-generated summary.

    NOTE: It is preferable to use only 3rd person pronouns (he, she, it, they, them) in this section.

    Itzchakov et al. (2023) study how listening can influence employees in the workplace. The main idea was to see if employees with good listening skills could have a better relationship at work and reduce the burnout feeling the desire as well to resign. The researchers compared employees who completed listening training with those who didnt. The results showed that the employees who received the training connected well with others, there was less emotional exhaustion, and less likely to leave the organization. The authors conclude that the listening training could reduce the organization burnout and improve morale.

    Evaluation WHO

    What makes the author or publisher a credible source for this topic? Why do you trust this source? Put this information in your own words. Do not use an AI-generated assessment.

    NOTE: It is acceptable to use 1st person pronouns (I, me) in this section.

    The authors are credible because they are researchers in organizational psychology and workplace conditions. The article was published in Human Resources Management, and it was a source that I was able to find in the APUS library which makes it reliable. The article is based on real workplace experiments and has a list of references towards the end.

    Evaluation HOW

    How will you use this source in your project? Why is it valuable to you? Put this information in your own words. Do not use an AI-generated assessment.

    NOTE: It is acceptable to use 1st person pronouns (I, me) in this section.

    This source is beneficial to my paper because it offers a solution for my topic regarding employee burnout. This can be supporting evidence that the burnout isnt always from a heavy workload, but also by a organization with poor communication and listening skills. This article is an example of how listening training can reduce emotional exhaustion and boost morale.

    Source #2 from APUS Library

    Full Citation

    (in format for style selected above)

    Kim, B., Jeon, N., Sohn, H., Lee, N., & Kim, M. (2024). The impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on employee burnout: The crucial role of work overload. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 43454360.

    In-text Citation

    (in format for style selected above)

    (Kim et al., 2024)

    Summary WHAT

    What are the sources main ideas expressed in your own words? Do not use an AI-generated summary.

    NOTE: It is preferable to use only 3rd person pronouns (he, she, it, they, them) in this section.

    Kim et al. (2024) examine how corporate social responsibility affects employee burnout. The study shows how the burnout can go down by increasing the psychological safety and lowering job stress for the employees by having them feel safe in the environment. The authors also find that work overload is another stressful factor. The study concludes that CSR can help with the burnout, but in order for that to happen organizations have to stay on top of employee morale and manage workload.

    Evaluation WHO

    What makes the author or publisher a credible source for this topic? Why do you trust this source? Put this information in your own words. Do not use an AI-generated assessment.

    NOTE: It is acceptable to use 1st person pronouns (I, me) in this section.

    I believe this source is credible because it was published in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management which is a peer reviewed academic journal. This journal was also easy to find in the APUS library which makes it a reliable source. The authors also cite many studies in their reference lis supporting their argument.

    Evaluation HOW

    How will you use this source in your project? Why is it valuable to you? Put this information in your own words. Do not use an AI-generated assessment.

    NOTE: It is acceptable to use 1st person pronouns (I, me) in this section.

    I plan to use this source and help explain the causes and solutions related to employee burnout. It supports that one of the many causes for employee burnout is work overload and an environment that provides the social responsibilities an organization should enforce. This source is helpful because it connects organizational behavior with employee mental health which support my argument.