Category: Health & Medical

For this short paper activity, you will learn about the three delays model, which explains why women and/or their babies so often die during childbirth in resource-poor settings. You will look at determinants of health, assess how they influence maternal mortality, and consider how they can be addressed through innovations and interventions that have worked well in similar situations. You may need to do some additional outside research to support your recommendations.For this assignment, complete the following steps:

1. Review .
2. Watch . The captioned version of this video may be accessed in the following link:
3. In your short paper, specifically address the following critical elements:
   • Using the three delays model, identify two to three specific delays that Mama Sessay faced. Why are they significant?
   • What are the core determinants of health that contributed to the specific delays that you identified?
   • What policy recommendations could you make that might help remedy some of these specific delays?

What to Submit

Your short paper submission should be 1 to 2 pages in length. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA style for citations and formatting. No AI please.

Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:

• Slide 1: Title Page.
• Slide 2: SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.
• Slide 3: Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.
• Slide 4: Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patients score and the interpretation of the patients score are required.
• Slide 5: Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your clients score and need for behavioral changes.
• Slide 6: Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary.
• Slide 7: Evaluation of the process – Share the patients outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.
• Slide 8: References 5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors.

Submission Instructions:

• The slides are to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
• The narration is to be fluid with clear enunciation and the volume of speech is appropriate, with no pauses or distracting fillers.
• The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. For presentation clarification, students may include the presenters notes.

Mary is 27 years old and has had a history of alcohol dependence for several years. Mary has a daughter Kylie, aged 3 years, who displays signs of fetal alcohol syndrome. Social work services have been involved with Mary and Kylie since her birth, culminating in Kylie being looked after by the local authority as a result of Mary arriving to collect Kylie from the local nursery while significantly under the influence of alcohol. Mary has demonstrated ambivalence regarding her ability to control her alcohol use. Mary has referred herself to a local counseling agency as suggested by the social worker and her PCP.

• Discuss how you might use the principles of motivational interviewing with Mary.
• Provide a detailed overview of how the interview may progress. Include each step of motivational interviewing in your discussion.
• Describe how a provider would recognize this patient is ready to change. Use principles of motivational interviewing to support your answer.

Submission Instructions:

• Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style.
• Provide support for your work from at least 2 academic sources less than 5 years old.

no chat gpt or plag

Step 1: You will use the graduate comprehensive psychiatric/ psychotherapy evaluation template to:

1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic.
2. Upload your completed comprehensive psychiatric evaluation as a Word doc. Scanned PDFs will not be accepted.

oFor the Comprehensive Evaluation Presentation Assignment: You will need to get it signed by your preceptor for the presentation (actual signature, not electronically typed).

Step 2: Each student will create a focused SOAP note video presentation in the next assignment. See for more details.

SOAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.

S =	Subjective data: Patients Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/ Demographics; History of the Present Illness (HPI) that includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem (OLDCARTS or PQRST); Review of Systems (ROS)
O =	Objective data: Medications; Allergies; Past medical history; Family psychiatric history; Past surgical history; Psychiatric history, Social history; Labs and screening tools; Vital signs; Physical exam, (Focused), and Mental Status Exam
A =	Assessment: Primary Diagnosis and two differential diagnoses including ICD-10 and DSM5 codes
P =	Plan: Pharmacologic and Non-pharmacologic treatment plan; diagnostic testing/screening tools, patient/family teaching, referral, and follow up.

Other: Incorporate current clinical guidelines, or , research articles, and the role of thePMHNP in your evaluation. , .
Reminder: It is important that you complete this assessment using your critical thinking skills. You are expected to synthesize your clinical assessment, formulate a psychiatric diagnosis, and develop a treatment plan independently. It is not acceptable to document “my preceptor made this diagnosis.” An example of the appropriate descriptors of the clinical evaluation is listed below. It is not acceptable to document within normal limits.

AAPC Admin. (2013, August 1). Successfully capture HPI elements in psychiatry E/M notes. Advancing the Business of Healthcare.

no plagiarism, two or more co-morbidities, psychotherapy.

I have a question with these instructions and i need help to undertand the question. The question says: In your professional life, youll need to find credible evidence to support decisions and plans of action. This assessment helps you practice research skills by investigating a current healthcare problem or issue.

You will select a current healthcare problem or issue from the provided options for this assessment. Research your topic, and develop a written assessment, which includes an annotated bibliography to document your resources.

The purpose of this assessment is to ensure you know how to research topics and find credible references to use in your assessments. Part of the assessment is an annotated bibliography. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of research references, along with key information about each; the detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about your chosen problem or issue.

This assessment is a culmination of the resources found throughout the previous assessment resources. You may need to refresh on the topics to successfully complete this assessment.

This assessment has three partsall three parts must be submitted to pass the assessment.

A 35 page annotated bibliography (not including the title page or reference page).

The three articles you have selected from the Capella library (full articles in PDF format, not abstracts).

A 35 minute Kaltura video of you performing the search in the Capella library. Ensure you are capturing your screen actions showing the following:Navigating to the Capella library.

Showing the search engine, database(s), and key words you have used.

You do not need to appear on video but you should narrate your actions. Conduct research in the Capella library to find a total of three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles in relation to a selected healthcare problem or issue presented in the Assessment 05 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF] resource. You must select your healthcare-related issue or problem from the topic areas presented in this resource.

Articles should be published within the last five years.

Review the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) Program Library Guide for help.

Other useful resources:Assessment 2: Networking and Collaboration.

Finding Scholarly Evidence (under the Resources tab).

Assessment 2: Effective Communication Skills.

Assessment 2: Becoming a Good Information Detective.

How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles?

View theWhat Not To Do: Source Material for the Annotated Bibliographymultimedia presentation.

Examine theExample Annotated Bibliography,which is another demonstration of What Not to Do.

Review the Annotated Bibliography section of the Writing CentersAssignment Types.

Review the Kaltura Basics Tutorial for help with creating your Kaltura video.

Important Note: Review the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) Program Library Guide for assistance. Be sure to review journal articles published within the last five years. Part 1

Create a Kaltura video of you conducting your research in the Capella library as you locate three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles related to your selected healthcare problem or issue. This video should be about 35 minutes in length.

Part 2

Write a 35 page paper in which you include the following:

1. Topic Identification

Select one of the healthcare problems or issues presented in the Assessment 05 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF] resource. Write a brief overview of the healthcare problem or issue. In your overview:

Summarize the healthcare problem or issue, including a description of its professional relevance.

Describe your interest in the problem or issue.

Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

2. Discussion of Research

Discuss your research and selection process for each of the three journal articles you have chosen to include in your annotated bibliography.

Describe your process of applying library research skills to identify the journal articles relevant to the healthcare problem or issue you are researching.Identify the keywords you used to select the articles.

Describe the criteria you used to select the resources, including the names of the Capella library databases that you used.

What was the process like to locate relevant articles?

Assess the credibility of the information sources.Determine whether each resource is from an academic, peer-reviewed journal.

Determine whether the publication is current (published within the last 35 years).

Determine whether information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.

Assess the relevance of the information sources.Is the information relevant to your topic? For example, did you select an article about a health system in Japan and how is that applicable to your topic of a U.S. healthcare issue or problem?

Explain how the healthcare problem or issue is addressed in each source.Discuss what kind of contribution each resource provides.

3. Annotated Bibliography

Summarize each of the three current academic, peer-reviewed journal articles you chose, using the annotated bibliography organizational format. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. Be sure to complete this assessment’s Annotated Bibliography activity before starting this section.

In your annotated bibliography:

List each full reference in APA format, followed immediately by its annotation.Present your three current, annotated references in alphabetical order, according to the reference citation.

Double-space each reference and format it with a hanging indent.

Provide the full APA reference citation, including the author, date, title, publisher or publication, and any additional information required by APA style.

Write the annotation (summary) for each citation in paragraph form, using approximately 150 words (or 13 paragraphs) for each annotation. Make sure to cite the article in your summary. Include the following components for each annotation:Identify the purpose of the article.

Summarize the article.

Include the conclusions and findings of the article.

Ensure each article is relevant to your topic. In a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper, summarize what you learned from the process of developing the annotated bibliography. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of healthcare.Kaltura video showing the location of the three scholarly information to explain a healthcare problem or issue.

Summarize a healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.

Describe the process for selecting academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to a healthcare problem or issue being researched.

Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography as it relates to the topic and the ability to use the annotated bibliography process for future assessments.

Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of healthcare.Assess the credibility and relevance of information sources.

Summarize academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.

Competency 5: Write for a specific audience, in an appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella writing standards.Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references. I will do the video myself

PLEASE NO AI CHATGPT OR PLAGIARISM USED TO COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT

I WILL ATTACH INSTRUCTTIONSBELOW PROVIDE PROOF WHEN DONETHERE IS NO AI OR CHATGPT

Instructions for Completing the SOAP Note

1. Review the SOAP note resources provided in the course content.

2. Read the Case Study: Begin by carefully reading the case study provided below. Pay close attention to the patient’s background, medical history, and presenting complaint.

3. Download the SOAP Form: Access the attached SOAP form. This form will serve as your template for documenting the patient encounter.

4. Complete the SOAP Form: Using the information from the case study, fill out the SOAP form to the best of your ability. Ensure that you provide details for each section: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. Any part of the assessment not mentioned in the case study is considered normal.

5. Thoroughness is Key: Aim to complete each section of the SOAP form as comprehensively as possible. Include relevant information obtained from both the patient’s subjective account and objective observations.

6. Submit Your Completed SOAP Note: Once you have filled out the SOAP form, submit your completed document according to the instructions provided by your instructor. Include at least 1 reference.

CASE STUDY: Fever, Sore Throat, Fatigue

History

A.J. is a previously healthy 17-year-old female who presents to her primary care office due to fever, sore throat, fatigue, and cervical lymphadenopathy. Symptoms started 5 days ago and have been increasingly worse. She has been taking ibuprofen 200 mg every 6 to 8 hours which she states improves the fever and sore throat. She rates her current pain as 8/10. She reports that her brother had similar symptoms about 1 month ago. She denies weight loss, night sweats, other sites of lymph node enlargement, cough, rhinorrhea, abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, or rash. She has allergic rhinitis and takes Loratidine 10 mg PO daily. She has no drug allergies. She had a tonsillectomy at age 8. She has no significant family history. She denies smoking, recent travel, exposure to cats, or IV drug use. She is not sexually active and denies ever having intercourse. She is a high school student who is currently running track. She has had to miss practice due to illness.

Physical Examination

She appears ill. Her temperature is 101.8F (38.7C). Her pulse is 93 and her respirations are 18. Her weight is stable based on her previous visit. On physical examination, the clinician finds anterior cervical, posterior cervical, and axillary lymphadenopathy. Lymph nodes are bilateral, soft, mobile, and tender to palpation. The size of lymph nodes is estimated at 8 to 10 mm. She has no other superficial lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly on examination. Her posterior pharynx is erythematous without exudate. Tonsils are surgically removed. Her skin is clean, dry, and intact without any rashes, abrasions, or signs of infections. Heart rate and rhythm are regular and lungs are clear to auscultation bilaterally.

Soap Note Template, Rubric and Soap Review Activity attached.

Library Assignment: This phase of your project will require everyone to visit the University Library or online to obtain information related to their project.

The students will continue the research topic already started. In this paper you are going to conduct a brief literature review on your topic. This paper must include at least 5 supporting articles related to the chosen topic (3 are peer-review journal articles) and will provide the desired methodology for their project. The paper will be minimum five to six pages (strict adherence to APA guidelines is required). Additionally, is it important the quality of the writing, not the quantity. The writings should be concise, factual and disseminates information. It should not be your opinion. Use the following as subheadings for your paper.

The paper will include: the paper should be minimum 5 to 6 pages of content in APA format.

1. Brief literature review- Support your topic: about 2 pages

2. Methodology and design of the study (Be detailed ) about 1 to 1.5 pages

3. Sampling methodology- Qualitative or Quantitative or Mixed method for example: about 1 page

4. Necessary tools- will you be using any surveys? 0.5 to 1 page

5. Any algorithms or flow maps created- (illustrations) : about 0.5 page, including the illustration

This will be considered a Library Assignment as you will need to visit the library to obtain information.

The paper should be minimum 5 to 6 pages of content in APA format.

Phase I Assignment (continue the research topic already started) and Rubric attached

Based on your readings, please answer the following discussion question.

What are the perceived challenges do you expect to find with validity and trustworthiness in qualitative research? What steps will you implement to ensure that your research is reliable?

Your responses much adhere to APA 7^th edition guidelines. Resources must support your statements. I am looking forward to some intriguing discussions.

Posts must be a minimum of 300 words initial and the references must be cited in APA 7th format , and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years

Please see attached Nursing Chapter 10, 11 and summary

You are required to attend a live music concert during this course and to write a report. The concert report can feature any form of music such as World Music, Classical, Rock, Pop, Country, Jazz, etc. There are many concerts happening on campus (, or you can attend something off campus. The report should be typed in 12-point font and double-spaced format. The length of the report should be at least 500 words (around two pages) and must include a word count and a title page. Please include three clearly marked sections:

Part 1. Describe the concert in as much detail as possible. Report on the instruments, whether there were singers, the mood and style of the music, the costumes worn by performers, and anything interesting about the event. Identify all works performed and comment on any cultural traits you notice.

Part 2. Discuss the music. Compare the features of the two pieces on the program that you found the most striking or interesting. If possible, relate the music heard at the concert to the music we have studied in class, utilizing correct terminology.

Part 3. Give your personal assessment of the experience. What surprised you the most? What did you like most? What did you like the least? Based on this experience, would you go to another concert?

All concert reports must include either a ticket stub, copy of the program, or a photo of the event.