Category: Health & Medical

Part 1:

Post Discussion: Chapter 2 and Reply to a Classmate

1. Watch the following video regarding sliding filament theory.

2. Watch this second video on ATP production.

3. Post an answer to the following 2 questions:

1. Describe the role of ATP as it relates to muscular activity
2. Identify two different processes for ATP production.

4. After you post your discussion, reply to a classmate.

20 points for your original post

As a reminder on your replies:

10 points for your reply to a classmate original posts, not on a reply they left for another classmate. (Click “Reply” at the bottom of their main post):

Your reply to a classmate must be at least 3 substantial sentences. The items below are example of brief, vague or “throw-away” response statements and will not receive credit. It is okay to include them in addition to your 3 substantial sentences, but not instead of your 3 substantial sentences.

1. • • • Hi David.
       • Nice to meet you.
       • I like your post.
       • Have a good semester.
       • I posted the same thing.
2. Your replies must be written in proper sentence for with emojis, emoticons, or text abbreviations (e.g. LOL)
3. Your reply must relate to what they posted, not only what you posted.
4. Your reply must be respectful, but may disagree.
5. If you post that you agree, disagree, like, or dislike something in their post, you must state what the item was and why you felt that the way you did.
6. Vague or short replies will receive very little credit.
7. Asking a question does not count as one of your 3 sentences, but you may ask a question in addition to your required response

Part 2:

Post Discussion: Chapter 3 and Reply to a Classmate

1. Watch the 2 videos below.

2. Post a discussion on the 2 items below:

1. What might make it difficult to get athletes to participate in the tests?
2. Is the value from the testing data important to an athlete and would they benefit?

3. Post a reply to a classmate’s post.

Do not reply to a reply.

20 points for your original post and 10 points for replying to your classmates.

As a reminder on your replies:

10 points for your replies to a classmate original posts, not on a reply they left for another classmate. (Click “Reply” at the bottom of their main post):

Your reply to a classmate must be at least 3 substantial sentences. The items below are example of brief, vague or “throw-away” response statements and will not receive credit. It is okay to include them in addition to your 3 substantial sentences, but not instead of your 3 substantial sentences.

1. • • • Hi David.
       • Nice to meet you.
       • I like your post.
       • Have a good semester.
       • I posted the same thing.
2. Your replies must be written in proper sentence for with emojis, emoticons, or text abbreviations (e.g. LOL)
3. Your reply must relate to what they posted, not only what you posted.
4. Your reply must be respectful, but may disagree.
5. If you post that you agree, disagree, like, or dislike something in their post, you must state what the item was and why you felt that the way you did.
6. Vague or short replies will receive very little credit.
7. Asking a question does not count as one of your 3 sentences, but you may ask a question in addition to your required response

Required Textbooks: Shi, L., & Singh, D. A. (2017). Delivering health care in America: A systems approach (7th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13: 978-1284124491

Recommended Textbooks: Matthew, D. B. (2015). Just medicine: A cure for racial inequality in American healthcare. New York: New York University Press. ISBN-13: 978-1479896738

Please do not use AI.

Please read all instructions

Group Presentation Assignment Overview

1. Select a Nursing Theorist: FlorenceNightingales Environmental Theory
2. Submission Details:

• Format and Length:
• Your presentation should consist of 15 to 20 slides in total [excluding cover slide and reference slides].
• Submit as a PowerPoint
• Every slide must include recorded audio that explains or expands on the content-each student records their portion into the single slide deck. Add script for each slide to present
• The PowerPoint must be formatted according to APA guidelines.

Required Slides and Content: Your presentation must include the following slides:

• Title Slide:
• Include the presentation title, your name, your school’s name, course number and title, professors name, and the date.
• Also, list all members of your group.
• Introduction of the Nursing Theorist:
• Give a brief background of the chosen theorist. Explain their significance in the field of nursing.
• Classification of the Theory:
• Identify whether the theory is a Grand Theory, Middle Range Theory, or Practice-Level Theory.
• Theoretical Overview:
• Discuss the model or core concept of the chosen theory. Explain its main ideas and how it is structured.
• Applicability to Nursing Practice:
• Provide clinical or professional examples to show how this theory is applied in actual nursing practice.
• Implications for Nursing Research:
• Explain how this theory can contribute to advances in nursing practice and research.
• Conclusion:
• Summarize the key points of your presentation.
• Reference Slide:
• Include all references formatted in APA style.
• Use at least 8 scholarly EBP references- not older than 5 years old

Grading Considerations: Make sure you follow the provided grading rubric closely. Your presentation should meet all the content and formatting requirements outlined above, and every slide must have accompanied audio narration.

By understanding and following these instructions carefully, your group will be able to create a comprehensive, well-organized, and academically rigorous PowerPoint presentation. Make sure your slides are visually clear and not overcrowded with text, since the audio will serve as the primary vehicle for your detailed explanations. Good luck and collaborate effectively to showcase your understanding of the chosen nursing theory!

Ensure your review the rubric for the assignment.

REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up-

This paper should come across the Saudi healthcare context and give examples.

It can be a comparison over the last 3-5 years.

It should include an introduction, a literature review of the topic, methods, results, a discussion and recommendations, and a conclusion and bibliography.

It should not be more than 15 pages and no less than 10 pages. not including the title or references page.

You may utilize the attached documents as a data resource.

PART 1; Write a system of linear inequalities and solve the system graphically. You can do this by hand or use one of the online tools. You will need to embed a picture of your system with the correct shaded area if you solve it by hand.

PART2: Create a question

• • Identify a USLO from your syllabus and then using your notes as your guide, create a multiple-choice test/quiz question. Carefully consider the intended outcomes of the USLO. Think about what you want to ask and then write the stem (question) and the distractors (multiple choice answers).

Here is an example from BIO 1300 Human Anatomy and Physiology II

USLO 6.2 Identify the mechanisms of the innate (non-specific) defenses.

Question: Which cell type is involved in the innate response to destroy abnormal cells in peripheral tissue?

1. 1. 1. 1. Natural killer
         2. Cytotoxic T cells
         3. B cells
         4. Plasma cells

PART 3 Morphemic Analysis

• • • Find a medical term that you were not familiar with and apply morphemic analysis to this word by breaking it down to see if you can make out the meaning. Explain the way that you broke the word down in order to determine its meaning. If you haven’t already, check out the video from this week .

Example: Hyperthyroidism: Hyper – means higher than normal, Thyroid – thyroid gland, Ism – means condition of. When you combine it all together and you get the meaning that Hyperthyroidism is the overactivity of the thyroid gland.

PART 4- Exam Prep and Managing Test Anxiey After watching , share your exam day preparations and strategies, and how you can incorporate Dr. Brodie’s strategies. For example, this may include: rest, diet, environment, etc.** is a helpful resource for this discussion. View this video below for more details on how to create a system of inequalities and how to embed the graph.

PART. 5- USLO 6.2 Describe the concepts of privacy, confidentiality, security, and integrity as they apply to AI use and the management of electronic data. (CSLO 1)

When using AI tools or managing electronic data, protecting privacy and confidentiality is critical, especially in fields like healthcare and education.

In your own academic, professional, or personal experiences, how have you seen privacy or confidentiality maintained (or violated) when using digital tools or AI? What are some best practices you think everyone should follow to protect personal or sensitive information when using technology? This will help demonstrate your understanding of the content while providing a thorough and detailed post. Must include at least one APA 7thedition style in-text citation and full matching references of an appropriate reading to support your responses.

Overview

In an effort to evaluate and develop an effective expatriate performance management system in the previously selected multinational corporation, you will write an essay analyzing performance management processes in multinational corporations.

Instructions

Please review the information posted in the Instructor Insights for resources to assist you.

In 24 pages, your assignment must address the following:

• List the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.
• Explain in detail each of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.
• Evaluate the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.

Integrate at least three supporting resources, one from the textbook and the others from the .

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Help Resources

• Check out the [DOCX].
• Check out the [Video].
• Check out the [PDF].
• Check out the .
• Check out the .
• Check out the .

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

• Analyze performance management processes used to assess performance throughout a multinational corporation.

Week 6 Assignment Performance Management

Week 6 Assignment Performance Management
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
List the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.	37.5 to >33.75 pts Exemplary Listed the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system. 33.75 to >30 pts Competent Listed four of the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system. 30 to >22.5 pts Satisfactory Listed three of the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system. 22.5 pts Needs Improvement Listed 1 – 2 of the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system. 22.5 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not list the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.	/ 37.5 pts
Explain in detail each of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.	45 to >40.5 pts Exemplary Explained in detail each of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system. 40.5 to >36 pts Competent Explained in detail four of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system. 36 to >27 pts Satisfactory Explained in detail three of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system. 27 pts Needs Improvement Explained in detail 1 2 of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system. 27 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not explain in detail each of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.	/ 45 pts
Evaluate the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.	45 to >40.5 pts Exemplary Evaluated the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system. 40.5 to >36 pts Competent Described the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system. 36 to >27 pts Satisfactory Identified the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system. 27 pts Needs Improvement Provided a general statement about the challenges of conducting performance evaluations but did not identify, describe, or evaluate the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system. 27 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not evaluate the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.	/ 45 pts
Utilize three quality sources. Sources are credible, relevant, appropriate, and cited correctly.	15 to >13.5 pts Exemplary Utilized three quality sources that are credible, relevant, appropriate, and are cited correctly. 13.5 to >12 pts Competent Utilized three quality sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate but have 1 error in the citations. 12 to >9 pts Satisfactory Utilized three quality sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate but have 2 errors in the citations. 9 pts Needs Improvement Utilized fewer than three sources, or sources are not credible, relevant, or appropriate. More than 2 errors in the citations. 9 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not utilize or did not cite resources used in the assignment.	/ 15 pts
Clarity, writing mechanics, and SWS formatting requirements.	7.5 to >6.75 pts Exemplary 02 errors present. 6.75 to >6 pts Competent 34 errors present. 6 to >4.5 pts Satisfactory 56 errors present. 4.5 pts Needs Improvement 78 errors present. 4.5 to >0 pts Unacceptable More than eight errors present.	/ 7.5 pts
Total Points: 0

Setting: Hospital emergency department

Scenario

The time is 1900. You are working in a small, rural hospital. It has been snowing heavily all day, and the medical helicopters at the large regional medical center, 4 hours away by car (in good weather), have been grounded by the weather until morning. The roads are barely passable. W.R., a 48-year-old plumber with a 36-pack-year smoking history, is admitted to your floor with a diagnosis of rule out myocardial infarction (R/O MI). He has significant male-pattern obesity (beer belly, large waist circumference) and a barrel chest and reports a dietary history of high-fat food. His wife brought him to the emergency department after he reported unrelieved indigestion. His admission vital signs (VS) were BP 202/124, pulse 106, respirations 18, and oral temperature 98.2F (36.8 C). W.R. was put on oxygen (O2) by nasal cannula (NC) titrated to maintain SpO2 over 92% and started on an IV nitroglycerin (NTG) infusion. He was given aspirin 325 mg to chew and swallow and was admitted to Dr. A.s service. There are plans to transfer him by helicopter to the regional medical center for a cardiac catheterization in the morning when the weather clears. Meanwhile, you must deal with limited lab and pharmacy resources. The minute W.R. comes through the door of your unit, he announces hes just fine in a loud and angry voice and demands a cigarette. He also says he has no time to fool around with hospitals.

1. What is the priority in his care?

2. Are these VS typical for a man of his age? If not, which one(s) concern(s) you? Explain why or why not.

3. Identify 5 priority problems associated with the care of a patient such as W.R.

4. Several diagnostic and lab have been ordered. Which of these would you anticipate for W.R.? Use an X to indicate if the tests below are Anticipated (appropriate or necessary) or Unnecessary (makes no difference).

Test	Anticipated	Unnecessary
a. Complete blood count
b. Electroencephalogram in the morning
c. Basal metabolic panel
d. Prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time
e. Bilirubin
f. Urinalysis
g. STAT 12-lead electrocardiogram and repeat in the morning
h. Type and crossmatch 2 units of packed red blood cells
i. Chest x-ray on admission and in the morning

5. What significant lab tests are missing from the previous list?

6. How are you going to respond to W.R.s angry demands for a cigarette? He also requests something for his heartburn. How will you respond?

7. Mrs. R. asks you, If he cant smoke, why cant you give him one of those nicotine patches or some nicotine gum? How will you respond?

8. Are there any alternatives to help him with his nicotine cravings? Would they be helpful now?

CASE STUDY PROGRESS

At 2000, you phone Dr. A.s partner, who is on call. She prescribes morphine sulfate 4 mg STAT IV push (IVP), then 2 to 4 mg IVP q1h prn for pain (burning, pressure, and angina).

9. Explain 2 reasons for this order.

10. What special precautions will you follow when administering morphine sulfate via IVP?

11. The pharmacy supplies morphine for injection in vials of 5 mg/mL only. For the first dose, you will be giving 4 mg of morphine. How many milliliters will you give for this dose?

12. What will you do with the rest of the morphine in the vial?

13. Angina is not always experienced as pain as many people understand pain. How would you describe symptoms you want him to warn you about? Why is this important?

14. What safety measures or instructions would you give W.R. before you leave his room?

CASE STUDY PROGRESS

When you come into W.R.s room at 2230 hours to answer his call light, you see he is holding his left arm and states that he has aching in his left shoulder and arm.

16. What information will you gather? What questions will you ask him?

CASE STUDY PROGRESS

You titrate the NTG drip up, assess whether he is using the oxygen cannula, and assess his vital signs. In addition, you administer a dose of morphine, but his pain is not relieved. Based on your assessment findings, you decide to call the physician.

17. Using SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation), what information would you provide to the physician when you call?

18. W.R.s chest pain subsides after the dose of morphine and he settles down for the night. You monitor him closely and watch for side effects of the NTG infusion. Side effects of NTG include which of these? Select 3 options.

1. Pruritus
2. Headache
3. Tachycardia
4. Constipation
5. Dysrhythmias
6. Postural hypotension
7. Decreased respirations

CASE STUDY PROGRESS

In the morning, W.R. is transferred by helicopter to the medical center, and a cardiac catheterization is performed. It is determined that W.R. has coronary artery disease (CAD) but has not had an MI. The cardiologist suggests it would be best to treat him medically for now.

19. What does it mean to treat him medically? What other approaches might be used to treat CAD?

20. A new order for atenolol (Tenormin) is added to his medication list. Which is/are the rationale for starting a beta blocker at this time? Select all that apply.

1. Reduction of myocardial stimulation
2. Increased force of cardiac contractions
3. Decreased myocardial oxygen demand
4. Prolonged sinoatrial (SA) node recovery
5. Increased conduction through the atrioventricular (AV) node

CASE STUDY OUTCOME

The physician orders follow-up counseling regarding risk factor modification, especially smoking cessation, hypertension management, weight loss, and lipid (cholesterol) management. W.R. is discharged with a referral for a follow-up visit to his local internist in 1 week.

please on lab doc do part 4 and the other file please do the last page the table finish it of

please make sure you read the results in part 1 and 2

Part 4 Written Sections

Observation (max 250 words)

Summarize exactly what was seen under the microscope. Use descriptive, objective language.

Analysis (max 500 words)

Interpret your findings. Explain clinical significance (association with diseases) with literature references if appropriate.

solve0 plagrasim

solve 0 plagrasim