Category: Healthcare

Your initial post should be at lease 495 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support of two academic sources dated after 2021.

Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in an essay format.

Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2, followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.

1. Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommendations

2. Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management

3. Compare and contrast Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative colitis

4. Discuss Diabetes, its causes, symptoms, and treatment

Instructions are in the files, make it 2 pages not including the APA format title & reference page YOU ARE ONLY DOING THE 2nd CASE STUDY which is called “Case Study: California Measles Outbreak 2014 Assignment Read/Review: Chapter 7, Case Study 7.1″ Also here is the class textbook ” Khaliq, A. A. (2020). Managerial epidemiology: Principles and applications. Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284082173″

Using your community health profile, policy analysis, and stakeholder mapping, develop the final piece of your CHAP: the community health intervention plan. This plan should include evidence-based strategies to address the identified health disparities, promote health equity, and improve overall community health related to the top three population health priorities you identified. Address, too, those necessary resources, potential barriers, and methods for evaluating the success of your proposed interventions.

In the context of community health assessment and planning, embracing change and transformation theories can lead to the development of more effective and targeted interventions that address the unique needs of various population groups. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement and innovation, health care organizations can better collaborate with community stakeholders to design and implement strategies that promote better health outcomes for all. This holistic approach to population health management not only benefits individual patients and health care providers but also contributes to building healthier, more resilient communities overall.

Where do we go from here? Looking ahead, technological advancements have the potential to transform both private and public health in ways that will increase access to care, enhance quality and safety, and support more equitable health outcomes. Innovations such as telehealth, remote monitoring, and artificial intelligence will play a significant role in shaping the health care landscape. As organizations continue to build cultures of health and wellness, they will also need to adapt to these technological advances and leverage them to create more efficient and patient-centered care. This forward-thinking approach will ultimately contribute to the overall well-being of communities and promote a healthier future for all, emphasizing the importance of population health management.

For this assessment, you will use the information from your previous assessments to create a CHAP presentation that is ready for publication and distribution to community stakeholders. Based on your community health profile, policy analysis, and stakeholder mapping, you will develop the final piece of your CHAP: the community health intervention plan. This plan should include evidence-based strategies to address the identified health disparities, promote health equity, and improve overall community health related to the top three population health priorities you identified. You will also consider the resources needed, potential barriers, and methods for evaluating the success of your proposed interventions.

For this assessment, you will use the information from your previous assessments to create a CHAP presentation that is ready for publication and distribution to community stakeholders. Based on your community health profile, policy analysis, and stakeholder mapping, you will develop the final piece of your CHAP: the community health intervention plan. This plan should include evidence-based strategies to address the identified health disparities, promote health equity, and improve overall community health related to the top three population health priorities you identified. You will also consider the resources needed, potential barriers, and methods for evaluating the success of your proposed interventions.

Before you begin the assessment:

• Review the .
• You will use this provided template to complete your assessment.

Using , complete the following:

1. Produce a title slide with hospital name and presenters name and a follow-up purpose statement slide that includes stakeholders.

• Align both slides with the top three health priorities in the CHAP.

1. Provide a clear and comprehensive executive summary introduction.

• Provide an engaging summary of the CHAP research and content.

1. Provide accurate, detailed, and insightful community profile data.

• Provide effective analysis and interpretation that aligns with the CHAP.

1. Provide well-researched, clearly articulated health priorities.

• Include disparities, barriers, and corresponding SMART goals.
• Draw strong connections drawn between research, priorities, and goals.

1. Propose detailed and innovative community health intervention programs.

• Include clear and practical implementation steps.

1. Provide a clear, insightful conclusion.

• Include specific, actionable next steps that align directly with and build upon the CHAP.

1. Produce a visually appealing, engaging, and relevant CHAP presentation.

• Communicate effectively with the community.
• Design the presentation to resonate with members of the community.

Written communication: Apply scholarly and professional communication skills consistent with expectations for the intended purpose. Offer academic citations or professional experiences as examples.

Introduction Qualitative research uses inductive reasoning based on an exploration or observation. The focus is typically on the researcher investigating the reasons why something happened. The information comes from interviews or observations. The answers emerge as more information is discovered. You could relate it to the work of a detective who gathers facts and organizes them to find patterns that lead to explanations for events. In this assignment, you will continue to expand your understanding of a research framework in the context of qualitative research by analyzing and evaluating research questions in qualitative studies. You will also continue to analyze the interrelated elements of a research study, making the connection between theory, problem, purpose, and, now, qualitative research questions and design. Summary For this assignment, you will craft a qualitative research question based on the HAC that you selected for the Research Problem and Purpose Statements assignment. You will also examine qualitative methodologies and data collection strategies that would enable you to answer your research question. There is no length requirement for this assignment. Most submissions that fully address all scoring guide criteria will be 25 pages long. Instructions For this assignment, it is suggested that you build on the work that you did in the Research Problem and Purpose Statements assignment. This assignment has two distinct parts. Part 1: Qualitative Research Question For this first part of the assignment, you will formulate a research question that is appropriate for a research project that will use qualitative methodologies. Remember the HAC that you used in your Research Problem and Purpose Statements assignment for this course. Your research question should align with the problem and purpose statements that you developed in this assignment. A well-written research question should be a single statement. When examining or creating qualitative research questions, the following checklist may be useful. Qualitative Research Question Checklist Does the purpose statement fit logically with the problem statement? Does the purpose statement use similar words to the problem statement, or does it seem to address a different topic? Do the research questions align with the method and design of the study? For instance, are words like perception used that would automatically reject a quantitative study? Do questions seek to describe responses to the variables described in the study? Do the questions begin with the word why? Do the questions focus on a single phenomenon? Do the questions include exploratory verbs? Is the language non-directional? Are the questions open-ended? Do the questions specify the participants and research site? Relevant Scoring Guide Criteria Formulate a qualitative research question. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for healthcare professionals. Part 2: Qualitative Methods and Data Collection For this second part of the assignment, you will draw on your readings about qualitative methods and data collection to first identify specific qualitative methodologies that will enable you to answer your research questions. You will then discuss specific qualitative data collection tools or strategies that are appropriate for answering your research questions. Questions to consider when looking for tools and strategies and tools include: Which research question are you specifically trying to answer? How does the specific HAC affect the types of tools and strategies that would work best? How does the healthcare setting where the research project will occur affect the types of tools and strategies that would work best? This part should include a review of why it is important to a potential research plan as a whole to ensure that your data collection plan is relevant to your chosen methodology. This section should be 25 pages long, depending on the level of detail required to fully present your methodologies and data collection tools and strategies. Relevant Scoring Guide Criteria Identify relevant qualitative methodologies that will support answering a research question. Describe qualitative data collection tools or strategies that are appropriate for answering research questions. Explain the importance of methodologically relevant data collection to a research plan as a whole. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for healthcare professionals. Additional Submission Requirements Structure: Include a title page, table of contents, and reference page. Length: There is no length requirement for this assignment. Most submissions that fully address all scoring guide criteria will be 25 pages long. References: Cite at least five current scholarly or professional resources. You may find the Capella University Library: Search by MethodologyLinks to an external site. guide helpful. Format: Use APA style for references and citations. You may wish to refer to the following APA resources to help with your structure, formatting, and style: Evidence and APALinks to an external site.. APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]Links to an external site.. Font: Times New Roman font, 12 point, double-spaced for narrative portions only. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria: Competency 1: Explain the different types of healthcare research methodologies. Identify relevant qualitative methodologies that will support answering a research question. Describe qualitative data collection tools or strategies that are appropriate for answering research questions. Explain the importance of methodologically relevant data collection to a research plan as a whole. Competency 2: Develop a research question based on a hospital-acquired condition. Formulate a qualitative research question. Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with the expectations of healthcare professionals. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with expectations for healthcare professionals.

Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide education to clients on the use of the selected wearable technology in health and wellness. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO 2: Demonstrate how current and emerging information and communication technologies are utilized to address the needs of a diverse population. (POs 3, 4) CO 5: Apply ethical, legal, regulatory, and professional standards to the use of information systems and communication technologies. (POs 2, 6) Due Date Students must complete the Part 3: Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies assignment and submit it to the Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Total Points Possible This assignment is worth 175 points. Preparing the Assignment Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. Directions: Complete the Part 3: Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies template, following the steps below. Download the Part 3: Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies template Download Part 3: Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies templateOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReader. Use of this template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name. To complete the template, use the wearable technology device, population, and health condition you selected in the Week 3 Part 1: Examining Wearable Technologies assignment. On the template, click into each [Text Box] that contains the client education to include. Remove the words [Text Box] and answer the questions. Please use a combination of full sentences and bullet points within the template, keeping in mind the chosen population and health condition/health behavior. Do not change the font size. Ensure the font color is black and your answer fits within the box. Use information from the previous assignments and at least two external scholarly sources of evidence from the Chamberlain Library to complete the template for educating clients on the chosen wearable technology. To add an image to the template, save the image to your device. Select Insert > Pictures > This Device. Select the image and click Insert. Provide APA in-text citations for all listed references. Reference sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical references. The required scholarly sources should come from the Chamberlain Library and should include the full APA reference plus the permalink. Follow grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with professional writing. Abide by Chamberlain Universitys academic integrity policy. Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail. A combination of complete sentences and bullet points may be used. Safety Precautions and Appropriate Use Provide education on: Safety precautions Appropriate usage of the device Possible limitations Features and Functions Provide education on: Core function Additional features Potential benefit Interoperability Provide education on: How the device communicates with other healthcare applications The advantages of data sharing Privacy settings Device Maintenance Provide education on: Maintenance Software updates User information Troubleshooting Provide education on: Common issues How to troubleshoot issues How to get user support Photos Insert a photo of the chosen wearable technology onto the first page of the brochure. Insert a photo of the chosen wearable technology onto the second page of the brochure. Photos are appropriate and maintain the format of the brochure. Format Answer all questions/criteria with explanation and detail appropriate to the assignment. A minimum of two scholarly sources with permalinks from the Chamberlain Library are used. Answers are written using professional language. Scholarly sources pertain to the topic and are no more than five years old unless they are historical references. Removes [Text Boxes], uses the proper font, and maintains the template format. Citation and Reference Formation Use the current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors. Writing Requirements Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. Submit the completed Part 3: Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies template to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Rubric NR361_W6_Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies Part 3 Rubric NR361_W6_Educating Clients on Wearable Technologies Part 3 Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSafety Precautions and Appropriate Use 3 Required Criteria Answer the questions with explanation and detail. Provide education on: 1. Safety precautions 2. Appropriate usage of the device 3. Possible limitations 25 pts Excellent All requirements met. 21 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 13 pts Needs Improvement 1 requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFeatures and Functions 3 Required Criteria Answer the questions with explanation and detail. Provide education on: 1. Core function 2. Additional features 3. Potential benefit 25 pts Excellent All requirements met. 21 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 13 pts Needs Improvement 1 requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteroperability 3 Required Criteria Answer the questions with explanation and detail. Provide education on: 1. How the device communicates with other healthcare applications 2. The advantages of data sharing 3. Privacy settings 25 pts Excellent All requirements met. 21 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 13 pts Needs Improvement 1 requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevice Maintenance 3 Required Criteria Answer the questions with explanation and detail. Provide education on: 1. Maintenance 2. Software updates 3. User information 25 pts Excellent All requirements met. 21 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 13 pts Needs Improvement 1 requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTroubleshooting 3 Required Criteria Answer the questions with explanation and detail. Provide education on: 1. Common issues 2. How to troubleshoot issues 3. How to get user support 25 pts Excellent All requirements met. 21 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 13 pts Needs Improvement 1 requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePhotos 3 Required Criteria Answer the questions with explanation and detail. 1. Insert a photo of the chosen wearable technology onto the first page of the brochure. 2. Insert a photo of the chosen wearable technology onto the second page of the brochure. 3. Photos are appropriate and maintain the format of the brochure. 20 pts Excellent All requirements met. 17 pts Satisfactory 2 requirements met. 10 pts Needs Improvement 1 requirement met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat 5 Required Criteria 1. Answer all questions/criteria with explanation and detail appropriate to the assignment. 2. A minimum of two scholarly sources with permalinks from the Chamberlain Library are used. 3. Scholarly sources pertain to the topic and are no more than five years old unless they are historical references. 4. Answers are written using professional language 5. Removes [Text Boxes], uses the proper font, and maintains the template format. 10 pts Excellent All requirements met. 9 pts Very Good 4 requirements met. 8 pts Satisfactory 3 requirements met. 5 pts Needs Improvement 1-2 requirements met. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No requirements met. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation and Reference Formation Use the current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors. 10 pts Excellent 0-1 errors. 9 pts Very Good 2-3 errors. 8 pts Satisfactory 4-5 errors. 5 pts Needs Improvement 6-7 errors. 0 pts Unsatisfactory More than 7 errors. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Requirements Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. 10 pts Excellent 0-1 errors. 9 pts Very Good 2-3 errors. 8 pts Satisfactory 4-5 errors. 5 pts Needs Improvement 6-7 errors. 0 pts Unsatisfactory More than 7 errors. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Used 0 pts No Points Deducted Correct template used. 0 pts Points Deducted 17.5 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used. 0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction 0 pts No Points Deducted Submitted on time. 0 pts Points Deducted Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day) 1 day late = 8.75 deduction; 2 days late = 17.5 deduction; 3 days late = 26.25 deduction; 4 days late = 35 deduction; 5 days late = 43.75 deduction; 6 days late = 52.5 deduction; 7 days late = 61.25 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late 0 pts Total Points: 175

Assignment objective: For this assignment, you will be applying critical thinking to case studies related to health care law.

Length: Your submission should be at least two pages in length (all responses combined).

References: APA style will not be required for this assignment. Cite any references that you use to formulate a response.

Details: For this assignment, refer to Chapter 6 on page 151 of your textbook. Write your responses to the questions listed in the three Discussion Cases. Number your responses to each question and letter listed in the case studies.

Submission: Save the submission as a Word document and upload the document to Blackboard.

Discussion Cases

Jessica Mass, a phlebotomist, drew a blood sample from Glenn Ross, a 30-year-old patient of Dr. Williams, to test for AIDS. As Glenn was leaving the office, his friend Harry came in and they greeted each other. Jessica took Harry into an exam room, and in the course of making conversation, he told her that he was a good friend of Glenns. He asked Jessica why Glenn was seeing the doctor. Jessica responded that it was just for a test for AIDS.

When Harry arrived back home, he called Glenn and told him what the phlebotomist had said. Glenn called Dr. Williams and complained about Jessicas action and said that he planned to sue Dr. Williams. Dr. Williams dismissed Jessica. Dr. Williams told Jessica that if Glenn did bring a lawsuit against her and she lost, then she would sue Jessica.

What should Jessica have done or said when Harry asked about Glenns reason for being in the office?

Did Dr. Williams have a legal right to sue Jessica if she was sued and lost?

What important right did Jessica violate?

Denise, an LPN, works in a nursing home on the 3:00 to 11:00 pm shift. She is instructed to prepare medications to give to her own patients as they eat their evening meal. She is also told that it is the policy of the nursing home that she will also prepare all the medications to be distributed in the morning by the LPN who will pass medications at both breakfast and lunch the next day. Denise is told that the reason for doing this is because she will have more time, as the evening shift is not as busy as the morning shift. Denise does not want to object because she really needs the job.

What are the potential problems with this policy?

What should Denise do?

If a patient is harmed by receiving the incorrect medicine, who would be charged with the negligence?

David, an 89-year-old war hero with no living relatives, drove himself at night to a local hospital when he experienced shortness of breath and a headache. When he entered the emergency room (ER) he was placed in a wheelchair and briefly seen by an ER doctor. He was told that he could not be admitted because he was a veteran and had to go to a VA hospital, which was 90 minutes away, for treatment. David was wheeled into the hallway to wait for transportation to a VA hospital. The night shift was very busy. After sitting in the hall for five hours, David complained that he needed to lie down. The ER staff, who had been trying to move him to a VA hospital with no luck, finally transferred him by ambulance to a local nursing home. David had a massive stroke shortly after being admitted to the nursing home and died six weeks later.

Does there appear to be negligence in this case?

In your opinion, who might have acted on behalf of David?

In your opinion, would contributory negligence be a defense if there is a malpractice lawsuit relating to Davids death?

Write me a research question on anything related to healthcare in the US. I’m thinking more like mental health.

In a 3-5 page paper using APA formatting, respond to the following questions.

1. The Board of Directors of Sebago Lake Medical Group (a fictitious organization) has approved a new compensation program that will affect all 184 non-provider employees. Some employees will receive a significant increase in salary, some will receive a small increase, and some will have no increase. Develop a communication plan to inform all employees of how this change will impact them. For this case study material from the textbook and lecture notes will be helpful, but independent thinking is encouraged. Put yourself in the role of a senior leader or a board member; how can senior leadership explain this important change to engender understanding and support? Also, put yourself in the role of an employee affected by the change; what do you want to know? How do you want to be informed? What communication methods would increase your understanding and support?
2. Explain to a new employee the importance of participating in system-wide committees and the value of networking with others within and outside of the organization.
3. Compare and contrast the three strategies for negotiation. Which is the preferred strategy, and why? Discuss how influence can be used both positively and negatively, formally and informally.
4. Look back on the case study from Week 2, The New Department Director (page 51). Explain how Dr. Grant may negotiate with team members to solve the problem(s) and identify the communication and interpersonal skills needed. What negotiation tactics should Dr. Grant utilize? (Refer to information in the text on negotiation tactics on pages 177 180.)

One reference is: Burns, L. R., Bradley, E. H., & Weiner, B. J. (2020). Shortell & Kaluznys health care management: Organization design & behavior (7th ed.).

Camp Fire, 2018

The California Wildfire of 2018 called the Camp Fire was the deadliest and most destructive wildfire in California’s history and the most expensive natural disaster in the world in 2018 in terms of insured losses. Named after Camp Creek Road, its place of origin, the fire started on Thursday, November 8, 2018, in Northern California’s Butte County. Ignited by a faulty electric transmission line, the fire originated above several communities and an east wind drove the fire downhill through developed areas. The fire caused at least 85 civilian fatalities, with one person still missing as of August 2, 2019, and injured 12 civilians, two prison inmate firefighters, and three other firefighters. It covered an area of 153,336 acres, and destroyed 18,804 structures, with most of the destruction occurring within the first four hours.

Adventist Health Feather River, also known as Feather River Hospital, is a 101-bed acute care hospital located in the town of Paradise, in Butte County, California, with a wide array of outpatient departments and services designed to meet the health care needs of Paradise, Magalia, and neighboring communities. Feather River Hospital was severely damaged in the November 2018 Camp Fire and is currently closed. The hospital was forced to evacuate after the fire jumped a road going to the hospital. Some people were trapped under Adventist Health Feather River in a tunnel until they could escape. Employees at Adventist Health Feather River evacuated 60 patients the morning of November 8, 2018. The patients were transported in ambulances, by helicopter, and in employee vehicles.

Your assignment: In a MEMO format, in 900-1000 words, please discuss the following about the Camp Fire 2018 Disaster Response:

• What were three areas that went well with the response?
• What were three significant challenges with the response?
• What were three ways in which the response could have been improved?
• During Week One, we discussed Fayol’s Five Functions of Management; not necessarily in this order: (a) Planning, (b) organizing, (c) coordinating, (d) commanding, and (e) controlling. As Adventist Health Feather River Hospital’s Chief Operating Officer (COO), how would you augment your healthcare facilitys disaster preparedness? Discuss how you would utilize Fayol’s commanding function, to enhance your facilities’ disaster preparedness, response, and continuity of operations (COOP) plan. You must reference Fayol to receive credit for this section.

Ensure that your assignment is in the APA 7th edition format with a cover page, separating your sections by the appropriate APA Level Headings. Also, make sure you include a reference page and at least five references.

A. Create a computer-generated mind map that identifies a main idea that contributes to or impedes joy in work and includes the following factors:

three individual factors

three team or department factors

three organizational factors

Note: This assessment requires you to submit an original computer-generated diagram. You may use the software program of your choice. Save and submit your mind map as a PDF or Word document (i.e., DOC or DOCX). Using another file type may cause the file to be too large to submit.

Note: A main idea could be a concept, a strategy, or an idea.

B. Using the attached Force Field Analysis Template, complete a force field analysis that includes the following components:

one recommendation of a social communication strategy or technology strategy for implementing the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Framework for Improving Joy in Work (see Supporting Documents) in the workplace

five facilitating forces for implementing the recommendation

five restraining forces against implementing the recommendation

one score for each of the ten identified forces

one Facilitating Forces Total Score

one Restraining Forces Total Score

one Force Field Analysis Total Score

Note: This assessment requires you to complete the force field analysis using the Force Field Analysis Template in the Supporting Documents section. Save and submit your force field analysis as a PDF or Word document (i.e., DOC or DOCX). Using another file type may cause the file to be too large to submit.

C. Write a reflection paper (suggested length of 4-6 pages) discussing how to use social and emotional intelligence power skills to handle difficult workplace situations and implement joy in the workplace by doing the following:

1. Describe, using scholarly sources, how advanced professional nurses can manage difficult workplace situations by using each of the following social and emotional intelligence power skills:

self-awareness

self-management

interpersonal communication

executive function

social awareness

2. Describe how you, as an advanced professional nurse, would use two of the social and emotional intelligence power skills in the workplace to achieve each of the following results:

a professional presence

enhanced mindfulness in healthcare

a positive social presence to promote a sense of caring and belonging

a culture of joy to solve the problem of incivility in the workplace and initiate organizational change

3. Discuss how you, as an advanced professional nurse leader, would implement the four steps from the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work in the workplace, including one strategy for each of the four steps.

Note: Refer to the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work, pages 8-15 in the Supporting Documents.

4. Include three or more scholarly sources in your reflection paper.

D. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions

File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )

File size limit: 200 MB

File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

RUBRIC

A:MIND MAP

NOT EVIDENT

A computer-generated mind map that identifies a main idea that contributes to or impedes joy in work is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

A computer-generated mind map that identifies a main idea that contributes to or impedes joy in work is provided, but it does not include all of the given factors. Or any of the factors submitted do not logically contribute to or impede joy in the workplace.

COMPETENT

The computer-generated mind map that identifies a main idea that contributes to or impedes joy in work includes all of the given factors, and all of the factors submitted logically contribute to or impede joy in the workplace.

B:FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS

NOT EVIDENT

A force field analysis is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

A force field analysis is provided, but it is not in the attached template. Or the force field analysis is missing 1 or more of the given components. Or the recommendation of a strategy is not relevant to the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work, or 1 or more of the identified forces would not logically affect the recommendation. Or the Facilitating Forces Total Score, Restraining Forces Total Score, or the Force Field Analysis Total Score is calculated incorrectly based on the instructions provided in the template.

COMPETENT

A complete force field analysis is provided using the attached template. The force field analysis includes all of the given components. The recommendation of a strategy is relevant to the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work, and all of the identified forces logically affect the recommendation. The Facilitating Forces Total Score, the Restraining Forces Total Score, and the Force Field Analysis Total Score are all calculated correctly based on the instructions provided in the template.

C1:DIFFICULT WORKPLACE SITUATIONS

NOT EVIDENT

A description of how advanced professional nurses can manage difficult workplace situations using social and emotional intelligence power skills is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description does not address how advanced professional nurses can manage difficult workplace situations using each of the given social and emotional intelligence power skills. Or 1 or more of the methods described for using the power skills would not logically resolve difficult workplace situations. Or the description is not supported by scholarly sources.

COMPETENT

The description addresses how advanced professional nurses can manage difficult workplace situations using each of the given social and emotional intelligence power skills. All of the methods described for using the power skills logically resolve difficult workplace situations. The description is supported by scholarly sources.

C2:POWER SKILLS

NOT EVIDENT

A description of how the candidate, as an advanced professional nurse, would use the social and emotional intelligence power skills in the workplace is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description does not address how the candidate, as an advanced professional nurse, would use 2 of the social and emotional intelligence power skills to achieve each of the given results in the workplace. Or 1 or more of the described methods of applying the power skills would not logically achieve the given results for an advanced professional nurse.

COMPETENT

The description addresses how the candidate, as an advanced professional nurse, would use 2 of the social and emotional intelligence power skills to achieve all of the given results in the workplace. All of the described methods of applying the power skills would logically achieve the given results for an advanced professional nurse.

C3:FOUR STEPS

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of how the candidate, as an advanced professional nurse leader, would implement the 4 steps of the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work in the workplace is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of how the candidate, as an advanced professional nurse leader, would implement the 4 steps of the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work in the workplace does not include 1 strategy for each of the four steps. Or 1 or more of the strategies discussed are not logical for implementing the step in the workplace.

COMPETENT

The discussion of how the candidate, as an advanced professional nurse leader, would implement the 4 steps of the IHI Framework for Improving Joy in Work in the workplace includes 1 strategy for each of the four steps. All of the strategies discussed are logical for implementing the step in the workplace.

C4:SCHOLARLY SOURCES

NOT EVIDENT

The reflection paper does not include any scholarly sources.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The reflection paper includes 12 scholarly sources.

COMPETENT

The reflection paper includes 3 or more scholarly sources.

D:

NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.

COMPETENT

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.

E:

NOT EVIDENT

This submission includes pervasive errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation, negatively impacting the professional quality and clarity of the writing. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

This submission includes substantial errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category.

COMPETENT

This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

IHI Framework For Improving Joy In Work.pdf

Force Field Analysis Template.docx

Reflection Paper Template.docx