Category: Hospitality

  • Hospitality Question

    I am currently working on my Real Estate assignment as part of my Executive Master in Advanced Studies in International Hotel Management at Les Roches Marbella, Spain. I would appreciate your support and guidance with this project, as I would like to ensure that my analysis and approach meet the academic and professional standards required.

    Requirements:

  • Request for Academic Support Global Business Strategy (BMHT…

    I am currently working on my Masters final project at Les Roches Marbella for the course BMHTC2-01-153 Global Business Strategy 25.2, and I would like to inquire if there is a qualified academic tutor or specialist in this subject who could provide professional guidance and support with the research and analytical components of the project.

    As this is an important part of my Executive Master in Advanced Studies in International Hotel Management, I am seeking someone with relevant expertise in global business strategy, preferably within the hospitality industry.

    If there is any recommended expert or academic support available, I would highly appreciate your guidance.

    Thank you very much in advance for your time and support.

    Kind regards,

    Requirements:

  • BMHTC2-01-153 Global Business Strat 25.2

    I am currently working on my Masters final project at Les Roches Marbella for the course BMHTC2-01-153 Global Business Strategy 25.2, and I would like to inquire if there is a qualified academic tutor or specialist in this subject who could provide professional guidance and support with the research and analytical components of the project.

    As this is an important part of my Executive Master in Advanced Studies in International Hotel Management, I am seeking someone with relevant expertise in global business strategy, preferably within the hospitality industry.

    If there is any recommended expert or academic support available, I would highly appreciate your guidance.

    Thank you very much in advance for your time and support

    Requirements:

  • Hospitality Question

    I am currently working on my Real Estate assignment as part of my Executive Master in Advanced Studies in International Hotel Management at Les Roches Marbella, Spain. I would appreciate your support and guidance with this project, as I would like to ensure that my analysis and approach meet the academic and professional standards required

    Requirements:

  • Hospitality Question

    Instructions

    Objective: Analyze the effectiveness of the market segmentation strategy of a company

    For your assignment this week, you will be working through a case study related to destination marketing and the market segmentation strategy of a hotel company.

    To begin, you will need to access the textbook titled Marketing for Tourism and Hospitality: Collaboration, Technology and Experiences. Access it by searching the Trefry Library. The case study begins on page 343 and is titled .

    For your assignment, respond in essay form to questions 1-3 at the end of the case study.

    Use outside research to provide validation, corroboration, or contrasting perspectives in order to support your perspective.

    WITH AI & PLAGIRISM REPORT ATTACHED PLEASE?

    Requirements: COMPLETED

  • Case Study

    Case Study:

    Plant-based Menu Overhaul in a Legacy QSR Chain
    Follow the steps:
    1. Answer at least one (1) question from each of the four (4) headings below.
    2. 700 words in paragraphs under headings and with your conclusion/solution.
    3. Copy the case study with your response (solution) in any AI.
    4. Ask for the solutions in 150 words each from the top three (3) business consulting companies MBB McKinsey, Boston Consulting Group, Bain & Company.
    5. Provide a short reflection (100 words) of your and the consulting companies findings, difference?
    6. Then upload and submit your case study answer.

    Background
    A long-established quick-service restaurant (QSR) chain with thousands of locations globally has relied for decades on a meat-centric menu (burgers, fried chicken, and breakfast sandwiches). Facing a post pandemic surge in consumer interest in healthier, plant-forward eating and growing concern about climate impact, senior leadership commissions research to explore whether the chain has permission to play in the plant-based space. Partnering with an insight firm, the company conducts focus groups and mini-groups with current and lapsed guests to understand attitudes toward plant-based proteins, desired nutritional profiles, sensory expectations, and menu positioning. Research shows mainstream guests are open to plant-based options if they feel indulgent, are competitively priced, and are fully integrated into the main menu rather than segregated as special diet items.

    Based on these findings, leadership pilots a plant-based burger and breakfast sandwich in 300 stores across three regions, supported by modest marketing emphasizing flavor and value rather than ideology. Operations must adapt sourcing, kitchen workflow, staff training, and digital menu design while maintaining speed of service and profitability. You are part of the strategy team tasked with evaluating the pilot and recommending whether and how to scale the plant-based portfolio chain wide in a way that aligns with health, sustainability, and financial objectives.

    Quantitative and performance results
    1. What were the most important performance indicators the QSR chain needed to improve (e.g., same-store sales, customer traffic, profitability, brand equity), and which ones should leadership have prioritized first to demonstrate operational grit in action?
    2. How would you measure the success of introducing plant-based core items in terms of operational and financial outcomes (short-term vs. long-term)? Consider metrics such as attachment rate, cannibalization of meat items, food cost percentage, and drive thru times.
    3. Imagine you have access to five years of the chains financial and operational data around the plant-based rollout. Which three metrics would you track monthly to determine whether the gritty operational changes (new SKUs, training, layout changes) were actually working, and why?

    Cause-and-effect on results
    4. Select two major operational moves (for example: adding plant-based proteins to the main grill line, integrating and repeating them in both general and dedicated plant-based sections on the digital and in-store menus). For each, map out the chain from operational decision internal behavior change customer experience measurable business result.
    5. To what extent are improved results driven by cost advantages of plant-based items (lower food cost, reduced volatility) versus growth in traffic and check size from new and existing guests seeking healthier or climate-conscious options? How would you attribute impact between these categories using data and observation?
    6. If the chain had focused only on adding one token plant-based item without investing in menu design, staff training, or marketing (i.e., check-the-box approach), what different results would you expect to see three years later in terms of plant-based penetration, brand relevance with Gen Z, and overall same-store sales?

    Comparing intended vs. actual outcomes
    7. For one key initiative in the case (e.g., integrating plant-based items alongside meat items and repeating them in a dedicated plant-forward section), identify the intended result, the actual result, and at least two unintended consequences (positive or negative). How does this illustrate grit (disciplined, data-driven persistence) versus simple persistence?
    8. Which result in the pilot (financial, operational, cultural, or brand-related) best validates leaderships insistence on treating plant-based as core, not nichefor instance, improved menu mix, higher brand consideration scores among younger consumers, or margin expansion on signature plant-based items? What evidence from the case supports your argument?
    9. Where did operational grit risk backfiring on results (e.g., overcomplicating kitchen workflows, confusing loyal meat-focused guests, increasing waste from new SKUs)? How did the chain manage or fail to manage those risks during the pilot?

    Scenario and decision questions
    10. Assume key metrics plateau after an initial strong uplift in plant-based sales and brand relevance. As the chief operating officer, what next wave of gritty operational decisions would you make to keep improving results (e.g., new dayparts, limited-time flavors, supply-chain changes, digital menu personalization) without eroding culture or alienating core meat-eating guests?
    11. You are a skeptical board member concerned about overinvesting in plant-based given uncertainty about long-term demand. What result-based questions would you demand answers to before approving a global rollout (e.g., payback period by market, sensitivity to ingredient inflation, regional cultural fit, effect on franchisee economics)?
    12. If you had to present a one-page operational grit scorecard for this plant-based turnaround, what 68 results or leading indicators would you put on it (for example: plant-based mix of sales, margin per equivalent item, guest satisfaction scores on taste and healthfulness, Gen Z consideration, kitchen throughput, and food waste rate), and how would you justify each?

    Requirements: NA

  • Global Business Strat

    Hi kindly find the attached of the guideline of the project

    Requirements: as per guideline

  • Discussion Post

    AdriaDiscussion: Decoding Ferran Adria

    Discuss Ferran Adria’s leadership in comparison to Anthony Bourdain’s (Trade Secrets) and Gordon Ramsey (Kitchen Nightmares). SWOT analysis and your own reflection.

    Discussion

    Rubric

    Discussion

    Discussion

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePost SourcesMin. 2 sources

    5 ptsFull Marks

    0 ptsNo Marks

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord countMin. 300 words

    10 ptsFull Marks

    0 ptsNo Marks

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentQuality of your original post

    10 ptsFull Marks

    0 ptsNo Marks

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReplyMust post min. 2 replies to peer’s original post

    5 ptsFull Marks

    0 ptsNo Marks

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply SourceMin. one source

    5 ptsFull Marks

    0 ptsNo Marks

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse ContentMust include one original suggestion to peer’s comment:
    Activity such as reading, watching video, training

    5 ptsFull Marks

    0 ptsNo Marks

    5 pts

    Total Points: 40


    Responses

    Mary:

    After watching the Nightline segment, I found Anthony Bourdains leadership style to be ineffective and not a type of leadership that I respect. Throughout the video, I found Bourdain to be rude, conceited, and dismissive towards others. I specifically did not like when he refers to his staff as the help. This type of language reflects a lack of respect for his employees, which I believe is important and necessary to be a successful leader. Leaders set the tone of their workplace, and I believe that dismissive language like that can create an environment where employees feel undervalued instead of motivated.

    Northouse explains that authentic leaders are genuine and act in alignment with their true beliefs, instead of adapting themselves to meet social expectations (Northouse, 2021). Bourdain clearly demonstrates that in his Nightline segment. He does not attempt to change his opinions or to display a romanticized version of the restaurant industry. He is able to speak openly about how he wants his kitchen to operate, the culture, hierarchy, and what he expects from his employees. While I personally disagree with the way he speaks to his staff and others around him, he demonstrates consistency between his beliefs and behaviors.

    In Jim Collins Good to Great, he identifies level 5 leaders as those who blend personal humility with intense professional will; placing the success of the business over individual success of the leader (Collins, 2001). While Bourdain does want the success of the business, I did not feel he possessed the qualities of a level 5 leader. For example, a level 5 leader tries to develop their staff by trying to find opportunities for them and crediting them for their own successes. In the way that Bourdain referred to his staff and the culture of his kitchen, respect and opportunities are not characteristics that come to mind.

    Responce #2

    Gavin:

    Now I am someone who has worked for few businesses in the food industry I have a variety of different experiences over the last few years. Whether it be my time at a bar and saloon or for when I worked at Pizzerizzos or Resturantuasorus I have had vastly different times and this video and the many other articles I have read due show very similar incident. Now while many businesses are vastly different the kitchen is something that always remains the same that being how the rush of a rush hour feels or not having much room with all the loud noise, the heated flames in close proximity. What I loved about this video is that Bourdain describes what a professional kitchen is like and that is “an area of controlled chaos or a symphony of controlled chaos”. Now this quote also relates to another article that being Northhouse’s idea of leadership and the idea of rather then following a meticulous set path that true leaders tend to step in the heat of the moments and steer their ship in the right direction based of adaptably. I once knew someone who fit this exact style of leadership we would constantly be slammed but every time we were stuck he would step up and truly lead the ship when we were sinking. Now besides that point of Leadership another point that is made very clear by not only the video but varies other articles is that he believes that while skills are taught what truly defines his leadership is he hires based off your character. With these traits it really helps and effects the business if you have a good leader and team members then that ship is going to sail far and wide. This also is discussed in another article that I had read Jim Collin’s good to great and it aligns with idea that if you have the right people before knowing where the destination is. This is the idea that it isn’t based off strategy but more about the merit of the people you hire. Another idea that is presented in this video from Anthony Bourdain is the idea people from various and diverse backgrounds can truly come together when under intense situations not only can I agree with this in a kitchen sense but this is actually the case at my job everyday. If you have the right leader as Northouse’s idea represents that with the right environment you can really create a sense of harmony and teamwork not only kitchen but even in every work space you can take this experience and put it in every aspect. What I love about not only this video but all the various articles I have read the one common thread is that leadership is a huge role of whether a business will thrive or if it will sink I truly believe that if the people at the top aren’t kept up in terms of hospitality, adaptivity and character a kitchen and a business for that matter will truly fail the words that Anthony Bourdain speaks is a lesson about life that everyone can learn and take. Reading these articles and watching these videos truly have given me more of an edge and helped me learn further into my mindset and idea of leadership that I can take with me everyday.

    Requirements: NA

  • HR PROJECT ( NO AI NO COPY OR PASTE ) USE SAME TAMPLATE!!

    General Information

    • Course: International Human Resources
    • Course Code: M 9212
    • Project Title: International HR Project
    • Weighting: 40% of the final grade
    • Type: Individual assignment
    • Submission Method: Moodle (Turnitin)
    • File Format: Single Word document

    Word Count Requirement

    • Total length:
      8,000 words OR approximately 16 pages
    • Note:
      The word count does NOT include references, cover page, table of contents, or statement of authorship.

    Project Structure and Requirements

    1. Cover Page

    The cover page must include:

    • Student name
    • Student number
    • Course name and course code
    • Assignment title

    2. Introduction and Organizational Overview

    Provide a concise overview of the selected company or organization, including:

    • Industry and sector
    • Size of the organization
    • Mission and strategic objectives

    Clearly describe:

    • Your current role in the organization (or an assumed role for academic purposes)
    • How this role is linked to Human Resource Management functions

    Briefly explain:

    • The purpose of this project
    • Its relevance to the study of International Human Resource Management

    3. Part 1: Recruitment and Selection Management

    Analyze the organizations recruitment and selection practices, including:

    • Workforce planning and talent requirements
    • Recruitment strategies and sourcing methods
    • Selection tools and criteria (e.g., interviews, assessments, testing)
    • Challenges in attracting and selecting qualified candidates
    • Alignment between recruitment practices and organizational strategy

    4. Part 2: Compensation and Benefits Strategy

    Examine the organizations compensation and reward framework, discussing:

    • Compensation philosophy and objectives
    • Pay structure (base pay, variable pay, incentives)
    • Benefits and non-financial rewards
    • Internal and external equity considerations
    • The role of compensation in employee motivation, retention, and performance

    5. Part 3: Performance Management System

    Evaluate the organizations performance management system, including:

    • Performance appraisal methods and evaluation criteria
    • Goal-setting and performance measurement processes
    • Feedback mechanisms and performance review practices
    • Linkages between performance, rewards, and career development
    • Strengths and limitations of the current performance management system

    6. Part 4: Recommendations for Improvement

    Based on the previous analysis, propose well-supported recommendations to improve HR practices. Recommendations should:

    • Be realistic and aligned with organizational goals
    • Address identified weaknesses or gaps
    • Be supported by relevant HR theories, models, and best practices
    • Consider potential implementation challenges

    7. Conclusion

    Summarize the key findings and insights of the project.
    Reflect on:

    • The importance of recruitment, compensation, and performance management in effective HRM
    • The overall value of the course for your academic and professional development

    8. References

    • Use APA referencing style
    • Include all sources cited in the text
    • Academic books, journals, class materials, and credible websites
    • Wikipedia is not permitted

    9. Statement of Authorship

    Include a signed statement at the end of the assignment confirming that:

    • The work is entirely your own
    • All sources have been properly cited

    Requirements: 8000

  • Strategic Projects management ( no copy paste and no AI ) us…


    1. Assignment Purpose

    This assignment requires you to design, plan, and structure your own project using project management tools learned in the course.

    The project should:

    • Be new, realistic, and preferably related to your professional environment
    • Or be an existing project that lacks formal planning and documentation
    • Be clearly linked to the hospitality industry (hotels, F&B, events, tourism, luxury services, etc.)
    • Be feasible and implementable, not theoretical only

    The aim is to demonstrate your ability to apply project management methodologies in practice, not just explain theory.


    2. Learning Outcomes

    Through this project, you must demonstrate that you can:

    1. Apply project management tools for planning, execution, and control
    2. Design a project that meets stakeholder needs and business objectives
    3. Develop a comprehensive project plan covering initiation, planning, execution, monitoring, and control

    3. Report Structure (Mandatory)

    Your report must follow this structure:

    A. Cover Page

    Should be professional and include:

    • Logo
    • Course name
    • Instructor name
    • Your full name
    • Student ID
    • Semester

    B. Table of Contents

    A clear and properly formatted table of contents.


    C. Statement of Authorship

    A separate page immediately after the cover page containing the provided authorship declaration text, including:

    • Your full name
    • Student ID
    • Signature

    (This statement confirms academic integrity and originality.)


    4. Main Report Content

    I. General Information

    This section introduces the project and provides context. It must include:

    1. Project Main Objective
      • What is the project about?
      • Why is it needed?
      • What value does it bring to the organization or yourself?
    2. Hospitality Sector Description
      • Describe the sector relevant to your project (e.g., luxury hotel, urban hospitality, fine dining, event management, etc.)
    3. Location Details (if applicable)
      • Project location
      • Google Earth images or photos of the site/area

    II. Project Initiation

    This section focuses on formally starting the project and must include a Project Charter, covering:

    • Project Objectives
    • Project Scope (what is included and excluded)
    • Project Purpose (why the project exists)
    • Primary Stakeholders and their roles

    The charter should clearly define the boundaries and direction of the project.


    III. Project Planning (Most Important Section)

    This is the core of the assignment and carries the highest weight.

    You must include:

    1. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

    • A hierarchical breakdown of the project into phases, deliverables, and tasks
    • Should be logical, structured, and easy to follow

    2. RACI Matrix

    • Defines responsibilities for each task
    • Must clearly indicate:
      • Responsible
      • Accountable
      • Consulted
      • Informed

    3. Budget Estimation

    • Overview of project costs
    • Costs should be realistic and logically justified
    • No need for advanced accounting, but clarity is essential

    4. Risk Analysis and Management

    • Identify potential project risks
    • Explain the impact and likelihood of each risk
    • Provide mitigation or response strategies

    5. Critical Path Method (CPM)

    • A network diagram showing task dependencies
    • Identification of the critical path
    • Explanation of why these tasks are critical and how delays affect the project

    IV. Project Execution

    This section explains how the project will be managed during implementation.

    You must include:

    • Monitoring and Control Methods
      • Tools and techniques used to track progress, performance, cost, and quality
    • Auditing
      • Whether auditing is required
      • Type of audit and justification

    You should select relevant methods from the course materials.


    5. Formatting and Layout Requirements

    Your report must follow these formatting rules:

    • Length: 8,000 words or approximately 1216 pages (excluding references and appendices)
    • Font: Calibri, size 11
    • Alignment: Justified
    • Line spacing: 1.15
    • Margins: 3 cm on all sides
    • Page numbers: Bottom of each page
    • Referencing: APA 7th edition

    A professional appearance is essential and affects grading.


    6. Required End Sections

    Your report must include:

    • All required task sections
    • Reference list (if applicable)
    • Appendices, including the AI usage appendix

    7. Mark Distribution (What Matters Most)

    • General Information: 5%
    • Project Initiation: 10%
    • Project Planning: 65%
      • WBS: 15%
      • RACI Matrix: 10%
      • Budget: 10%
      • Risk Analysis: 15%
      • Critical Path: 15%
    • Project Execution: 10%
    • English Language & Writing Quality: 10%

    This means WBS, Risk Analysis, and Critical Path are the most critical sections.


    8. Academic Integrity & AI Usage (Very Important)

    Prohibited Use

    • AI writing the project on your behalf
    • AI replacing your analysis or decision-making
    • Copying large AI-generated sections and presenting them as your own work

    Permitted Use

    • Brainstorming ideas
    • Clarifying concepts
    • Language editing and proofreading
    • Rephrasing short sections only
    • Summarizing information

    Mandatory AI Appendix

    You must include an appendix that documents:

    • All AI prompts used
    • All AI-generated outputs
    • Screenshots if applicable
    • Clear distinction between AI support and your own work

    Referencing AI

    If AI contributed ideas or text:

    • Cite it in-text
    • Include it in the reference list (APA 7)

    If more than 50% of the content is AI-generated, penalties may include grade reduction, oral defense, failure, or academic misconduct procedures.


    9. Assessment Expectations (Excellent Level)

    To achieve a high grade, your project should demonstrate:

    • Clear and professional general information with visuals
    • A strong and well-defined project charter
    • Detailed and logical WBS
    • Clear and complete RACI matrix
    • Realistic and justified budget
    • In-depth risk analysis with mitigation strategies
    • Accurate CPM with identified critical path
    • Clear execution, monitoring, and auditing plan
    • Strong academic English and correct APA referencing

    Requirements: 8000