Category: Human relations

In this assignment, you will use the introduction, which includes the thesis statement that you wrote in the previous module, as a starting point to create the first version of the paper you will submit for your project. As such, your draft will focus on your analysis of the article you have been working with throughout the course. Because you have already drafted an introduction, you will now revise that introduction as needed and write the body paragraphs and conclusion.

Directions

For this assignment, you will develop a paper that explains the writers choices in relation to genre, audience, purpose, and subject. You will also write about the core idea of the text, as well as the details that support it, and use at least one quote from the article to support your analysis. All of these elements will be integrated into the body paragraphs of the paper, connecting them to the thesis statement that has outlined these key points. Remember that the goal of your paper is to go beyond explaining what the author does and focus more on analyzing whether or not you believe the author is successful or effective within the text. Your thesis statement should evaluate the authors core idea, and the details that you highlight within the text should support your position about the authors core idea to build your full analysis of the text.

Completing this assignment will result in a draft of the first part of your project. Complete this assignment using either the APA or MLA template linked in the What to Submit section. Your paper should be written in paragraph form and consist of an introduction paragraph, multiple body paragraphs, and a conclusion paragraph, incorporating the elements below.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Part One: Topic: Identify the topic of the text.

Part One: Genre: Explain the writers choices in relation to the genre of the text.

Part One: Purpose: Describe the writers purpose.

Part One: Audience, Purpose, and Subject: Explain the writers choices in relation to the audience, purpose, and subject of the text.

Part One: Historical and Cultural Context: Determine the historical and cultural context of the text.

Part One: Core Idea: Articulate and evaluate the core idea of the text.

Part One: Details: Summarize details of the text that are relevant to the core idea.

Part One: Evidence: Support your analysis of the core idea with evidence from the text.

Include at least one quote from the text.

Explain how this evidence supports the core idea.

What to Submit

Use either the APA template or the MLA template to create your Module Five Project Draft for a First Audience and submit it for grading. Your paper should be a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document (with an additional title page and reference page in the case of APA or a works cited page in the case of MLA) with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use evidence from the text to support your paper. Although you will refer to your selected text in your assignment, you will not refer to any sources from outside this course. Follow APA or MLA citation guidelines when citing the text both throughout and at the end of your analysis.

Supporting Materials

The following resources will support your work on this assignment:

Student APA Exemplar: Module Five Project Draft for a First Audience APA Exemplar

This is an example of a completed assignment using the APA style template. You may want to use this as a guide when addressing the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Student MLA Exemplar: Module Five Project Draft for a First Audience MLA Exemplar

This is an example of a completed assignment using the MLA style template. You may want to use this as a guide when addressing the rubric criteria for this assignment.

I will attach an annotated bibliography to guide the content in the outline. The sources I would like used will be in there. This paper will be about Foundations, Elements, Principles of Interpersonal Communication: Verbal and Non-verbal. It’s more of a research paper than an argumentative paper. Below are the instructions my professor has given me.

• This will be a thorough and well-developed outline of your research paper.
• Include the purpose and thesis of your paper as well as show consideration for the audience.
• Formatting, structure, and grammar as well as content are important to this assignment. This assignment should be 2-3 pages.
• Be sure to use APA format.

Hello I have attached case study + questions and grading rubric. Please only use text book and no outside resources for answers.

6th edition, PH Series in Human Resources Management (Pearson

Education Canada), Larry Suffield, 2020

if you dont have the book I can share a source

you will find the book in the bookshelf. Need to only use materials from Chapter 1-6

Hello I have attached case study + questions and grading rubric. Please only use text book and no outside resources for answers.

6th edition, PH Series in Human Resources Management (Pearson

Education Canada), Larry Suffield, 2020

if you dont have the book I can share a source

you will find the book in the bookshelf. Need to only use materials from Chapter 1-6

Make all revisions from weeks 3, 8, 9, and 10 based on your Instructors feedback, and resubmit the full Final Project including the Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, References, and Appendix.

Support your summary using appropriate scholarly citations and references. Use proper APA format.

Write a draft problem statement in the Prospectus Form by entering the following in the correct field:

• Describe the social problem.
• Identify the gap in practice.
• Present the research problem.
• Support the entire problem statement with current government and/or peer-reviewed research.

Also write a draft purpose in the Prospectus Form:

• The purpose (compare, explore, examine, etc.).
• The tentative population or target. For this draft, the variables do not need to include the actual sample or other criteria.

Conflict is a normal part of lifewhether its with friends, family, classmates, or coworkers. One of the most meaningful ways to understand conflict is by thinking about a time you experienced it yourself. Now, imagine how restorative practiceslike open conversations, listening circles, and so oncould have helped. Could things have gone differently if everyone involved had a chance to speak honestly and be heard? Also, think about how being vulnerable, keeping an open mind, and seeing things from the other persons perspective might have changed the outcome. These qualities are often key to a real resolutionnot just settling a disagreement, but growing from it. Everyones experience is different. Theres no perfect example. The goal is just to think, be real, and discuss what you took away from it. Maybe it was a disagreement with a sibling, a falling out with a friend, or a misunderstanding in class or at work. Create one initial post and respond to at least two classmates. For your initial post, address the following: Think of a conflict youve seenwhether in a TV show, movie, or something from your own life, if you feel comfortable sharing. What was the conflict about, and how was it dealt withor left unresolved? What emotions did you notice from everyone involved? Looking back, how do you think the situation could have been handled differently, especially with cultural awareness or empathy? Describe how restorative practices could be used in this situation to help manage or resolve the conflict. How might being vulnerable, keeping an open mind, and considering others perspectives help in resolving the conflict?

Sternberg types of love was uploaded and its starts on page 295, additional peer reviewed scholarly resources within 8 years (2)

Part 1: Description of the Eight Types of Love

In a minimum of 250 words, briefly describe the eight types of love described by Sternberg (1988). Include a discussion of how the components of intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type of love. Note that an outline format is appropriate for this section, but please write the information in your own words.

Part 2: Create a Case Conceptualization

Create a case conceptualization of 250-500 words involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love (but avoid consummate love as there are no inherent problems with complete love). Include a description of the relationship and some characteristics the couple exhibits. Do not use any personal information or information related to current cases you are working on.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Treatment

In a minimum of 250 words, provide an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that may be appropriate for this couple. Explain why this would be an appropriate treatment for the couple.

In addition to the textbook, please include a minimum of two scholarly sources to support your work

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Rubric Criteria

Part 1: Eight Types of Love

20 pointsCriteria Description

Part 1: Eight Types of Love

5. Excellent

20 points

Provides a thorough description of the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type. Student illustrates a clear understanding of the types and their defining characteristics.

4. Good

17.4 points

Provides a thorough description of the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Provides a cursory description of the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14.8 points

Describes the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type, but the information provided is inaccurate or irrelevant.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Does not describe the eight types of love, including how intimacy, passion, and commitment affect each type.

Part 2: Case Conceptualization

20 pointsCriteria Description

Part 2: Case Conceptualization

5. Excellent

20 points

Provides a thorough case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits. The type of love, relationship, and characteristics are adequately incorporated and clearly addressed. Student illustrates an advanced understanding of the type of love.

4. Good

17.4 points

Provides a thorough case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits. The type of love, relationship, and characteristics are adequately incorporated and clearly addressed.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Provides a case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits. The type of love, relationship, and characteristics are briefly, but accurately incorporated into the case study.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14.8 points

Provides a case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits, but the information provided in the case study is inaccurate or irrelevant to the type of love.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Does not create a case conceptualization involving a fictitious couple experiencing one of the eight types of love, including the relationship and characteristics the couple exhibits.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Treatments

16 pointsCriteria Description

Part 3: Evidence-Based Treatments

5. Excellent

16 points

Provides a thorough description of an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate. Student illustrates a clear understanding of the types and their defining characteristics.

4. Good

13.92 points

Provides a thorough description of an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate.

3. Satisfactory

12.64 points

Provides a cursory description of an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

11.84 points

Describes an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate, but the information provided is inaccurate or irrelevant.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Does not include a description of an evidence-based treatment from a specific theoretical perspective that could be used with the couple and why the treatment would be appropriate.

Thesis Development and Purpose

5.6 pointsCriteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

5.6 points

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

4.87 points

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

4.42 points

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

4.14 points

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

6.4 pointsCriteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

6.4 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

5.57 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

5.06 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

4.74 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing

4 pointsCriteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

5. Excellent

4 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

3.48 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. Satisfactory

3.16 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.96 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Paper Format

4 pointsCriteria Description

Includes use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

5. Excellent

4 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

4. Good

3.48 points

All format elements are correct.

3. Satisfactory

3.16 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.96 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

4 pointsCriteria Description

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

5. Excellent

4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

4. Good

3.48 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

3. Satisfactory

3.16 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.96 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total

80 points

1.For this post, you will want to introduce yourself to the class. Some of the things you might consider sharing in your bio is where you work or plan to work after completing your program, and any hobbies or special interests that you would like to highlight. You might also consider sharing why you are taking this course and what you hope to gain from obtaining your degree.(should be at least 250 words)

2.Reflecting on your current or a past organization, identify and describe two communication scenariosone you participated in and one you observed. Would you consider these communication exchanges effective Explain. What role do you believe perception played in their success or failure?

You may find appropriate articles at the end of each chapter, and/or identify articles through the APUS online Library. Finally, be sure that all discussions are answered in full, to ensure the best possible grade based on the work submitted.