Category: Kinesiology

Reflection Assignment— Complete over Chapter 5 Psychology of Physical Activity and Sport

Citation:

Schaefer, Emily, Ragsdale, Rodney. (2025, V 1.6) Introduction to Kinesiology, An Open Educational Resources Publication by College of the Canyons and Lemoore College.

Assignment Description:

Grading Breakdown:

You will develop a detailed analysis of what was learned from this course by responding to a series of questions provided below. Use descriptive detail to thoroughly explain and describe your learning experience. The assignment will be evaluated on grammar, writing style, spelling. For each of the 5 sections write a fully developed paragraph that answers each question. Each question response needs to be 250 words min. Title Your submission: Kinesiology Reflection, include an MLA formatted heading. The use of AI is not allowed on this assignment.

1. Curiosity:

Select a Module or chapter that was covered during this semester and explain in detail how the information provoked interest and awareness to the objectives presented within the chapter. Explain in detail what you learned and how it can be applied to to the field of Kinesiology. Provide details and examples.

2. Initiative:

Explain the measures taken to complete required work for each module. Share how you pursued opportunities to expand topic knowledge in Kinesiology. What measures did you take to ensure online deadlines were met, project assignments completed, and how class projects expanded your knowledge outside of what was in the textbook reading. Provide details and examples.

3. Independence:

How did you use what was learned in class to expand your knowledge outside the classroom requirements. What measures will you use to independently pursue additional experiences that promote your awareness in the field of Kinesiology? Provide detail and examples.

4. Transfer:

Reference a section or sections of textbook content that represents a concept in which you had prior knowledge or as a result of course material has sparked new interest in expanding your perspective about Kinesiology.

5. Reflection

How has the material presented in this course influenced or changed how you view the field of Kinesiology or the principles of physical activity. How has this course become a foundation for improving your general knowledge of Physical Activity? Provide examples from textbook and detailed writing.

Submission Details:

1. You can use textbook image examples and outside sources are encouraged when expressing detail to each set of questions.
2. Cite any outside source used: MLA format.
3. Save your final draft and Upload completed assignment using the submission tab.
4. For each question create a fully developed paragraph. (The use of AI is not allowed on this assignment).
5. Include: Name, Date, Assignment title

• This reflection is worth 100 points.
• Submit your assignment in Canvas. For additional help, see

See Rubric below

Core CT/CS/PR Reflection RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsExplanation of details Context of and Purpose for Writing

view longer description

20 to >14 pts

Excellent

20 to >14.0 pts Excellent Completely responds to the question prompt and refers to course concepts and materials. Uses citations for sources when required.

14 to >8 pts

Satisfactory

14 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Mostly responds to the question prompt but may be missing a key point and/or only sometimes refers to course concepts and materials. Uses citations for sources when required.

8 to >3 pts

Needs Improvement

8 to >3.0 pts Needs Improvement Does not respond to the question prompt and/or does not refer to course concepts and materials. Does not use citations for sources when required.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

3 to >0 pts Needs Significant Improvement Does not fully address the question. There is not a clear understanding of the content.

/ 20 pts

Evidence and Control of Syntax and Mechanics

view longer description

20 to >14 pts

Excellent

20 to >14.0 pts Excellent Writes at least two examples. Crafts responses that add to the concepts by sharing new ideas.

14 to >8 pts

Satisfactory

14 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Writes at least two examples. Crafts responses that may only repeat the ideas of the original text. Demonstrates some conncetion to content

8 to >3 pts

Needs Improvement

8 to >3.0 pts Needs Improvement Writes one or no examples but may not add additional information or address questions asked.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

3 to >0 pts Needs Significant Improvement Writes responses that are short and do not add additional information or address questions asked.

/ 20 pts

Influence of context and assumptions and Control of Syntax and Mechanics

view longer description

20 to >14 pts

Excellent

20 to >14.0 pts Excellent Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefullyevaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.

14 to >8 pts

Satisfactory

14 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Identifies own and others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position

8 to >3 pts

Needs Improvement

8 to >3.0 pts Needs Improvement Writes one or no responses but may not add additional information or address questions asked. The response was submitted in a timely manner.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

3 to >0 pts Needs Significant Improvement Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position

/ 20 pts

Student’s position and Genre and Disciplinary Conventions

20 to >14 pts

Excellent

20 to >14.0 pts Excellent Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes intomaccount the complexities ofnan issue. Others’ points of view are acknowledged within position(perspective, thesis/hypothesis).

14 to >8 pts

Satisfactory

14 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others’ points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis)

8 to >3 pts

Needs Improvement

8 to >3.0 pts Needs Improvement Specific to one or no examples but may not add additional information or address questions asked.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

3 to >0 pts Needs Significant Improvement Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious.

/ 20 pts

Related outcomes and Sources and Evidence

view longer description

20 to >14 pts

Excellent

20 to >14.0 pts Excellent Writes at least two examples. Crafts responses that add to the concepts by sharing new ideas. Demonstrates ties to text content

14 to >8 pts

Satisfactory

14 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Writes at least two examples. Crafts responses that may only repeat the ideas of the original text. Demonstrates some conncetion to content

8 to >3 pts

Needs Improvement

8 to >3.0 pts Needs Improvement Writes one or no responses but may not add additional information or address questions asked. The response was submitted in a timely manner.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Significant Improvement

3 to >0 pts Needs Significant Improvement Writes examples that are short and do not add additional information or address questions asked.

/ 20 pts

-masters level work -plagiarism under 2% -complete sentences for EACH QUESTION -questions have been answered already. check PDF for answers, going in depth in paragraph form for each question -check PDF below for answer #15 – SCHOOL LINK TO SEE VENUE ALSO ANSWER TO QUESTION 3 -check PDF to get overview and assignment instructions – Your final report must be at least 4 pages (double-spaced, APA format) in length and include the criteria listed below (can arrange info as you see fit). Additionally, the report must have a cover page that includes a photo of the person you interviewed and yourself at the site visited.

-masters level work -proper in text citations and references -must answer each question in complete sentences -plagiarism under 2% Please answer the questions in full/complete sentences…always include a citation. Chapter 5- Market Segmentation 1. What is Market Segmentation? (Define and develop your answers with identifiability, accessibility, responsiveness, and segment/niche). 2. What are the four bases of segmentation? (Define and develop your answer) 3. How would you relate the notion of benefits segmentation to the discussion of motivation in Chapter 3? List and compare the benefits of attending MLB games and playing golf at the nearest public golf course. 4. How would you set up a segmentation plan for your favorite sport property and match each segment to a unique or customized product or ticket package offering?

-masters level work -must answer each question in complete sentences -correct references/in text citations in essay -plagiarism under 2% -each question should proper details on what answer is Please develop an emerging strategic planning document for a new sport-related venture, an existing sport program, or the creation of a sport-related business (something you would like to develop). Components of the plan should include: 1. Introduction 2. Core values 3. SWOT analysis 4. Vision statement 5. Mission statement 6. Key goals 7. Strategic priorities 8. Performance indicators aand actions 9. Plan evaluation Please plan for a paragraph (at least) for each of the above items. This is YOUR project. Please make it personal. Follow up on the information from the previous chapters. Include the style of leadership. Include the three R’s – results, relationships, and responsibility. Include emotional intelligence and building a culture. Please let me know if you have any questions.

-masters level work -plagiarism under 2% -answer question in complete sentences -proper in text citations/references -detailed work and descriptions in answers -use link below to help with findings When it comes to facility construction, renovation, management, etc., awareness of current industry trends is crucial. The ability to assess what other facilities, organizations, universities, etc. are doing and determining if certain adjustments make sense for your particular setting is a valuable skill for any facility manager. Read the article (linked below) and briefly explain how these concepts might apply in your current (or future) career setting. Do you agree with the authors perspective? Are these adjustments feasible at your intended level of sport or type of facility? Provide your thoughts in 250-300 words. Use your experiences as a student-athlete, coach, etc. to defend your position and provide specific facility examples as needed.

the assignment and book are proved with the attachment. please write a great paragraph and respond to 3 responses that are proved. please complete it before 11:30 tonight

What should be included in augmented feedback? Is one mode more important or effective than the others? What other types of feedback might be more effective than augmented feedback for enhancing performance? Based on the instructional materials in this module and your own research, summarize the evidence for and against the use of augmented feedback. Do the authors make valid points? Why or why not? Assignment requirements: Initial post: 700-750 words References required: 3 (These could include the textbook, articles in the course, and/or other scholarly articles you locate in the library.) Current APA format is required. Read: Chapter 15 in the Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications textbook. [40 pages] Read: Moinuddin, A., Goel, A., & Sethi, Y. (2021). The role of augmented feedback on motor learning: A systematic review. Cureus, 13(11), e19695. [7 pages.] Petancevski, E. L., Inns, J., Fransen, J., & Impellizzeri, F. M. (2022). The effect of augmented feedback on the performance and learning of gross motor and sport-specific skills: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 63. [15 pages] Review Pacheco, M. M., de Oliveira, L. M. M., dos Santos, C. C. A., Godoi Filho, J. R. M., & Drews, R. (2023). Challenging traditions: Systematic review of practice, instruction, and motor skill acquisition in soccer. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 18(5), 1702-1725. [24 pages]

-masters level work -complete sentences with detailed work -plagiarism under 2% -proper in text citations and references -must put all work on PDF below -check out grading rubric to see how its graded -description of day and class below Interactive FBEs Interactive FBEs Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails Details are specific, clear, and create a vivid picture of the classroom, students, and teaching. 100 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 100 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleteness Questions are answered completely, with all aspects of the prompt fully addressed. 100 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 100 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoursework Responses connect to coursework when relevant. 100 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 100 pts Total Points: 300 7th Grade ELAR Independent Reading Book Report on Current Events Observation Reflection (9:00 a.m.2:00 p.m.) 9:0010:00 a.m. Launch and Mini-Lesson From 9:009:20, I helped students transition into independent reading by reviewing expectations for their current events book report. I clarified the difference between summarizing and analyzing. For example, one student asked, Is this just retelling the article? I explained that analysis requires explaining why the event matters and how it connects to larger issues. I modeled this using a current news article and demonstrated how to identify theme and authors purpose. From 9:2010:00, I facilitated a small group of four students who struggled with identifying credible sources. I guided them through evaluating the author and publication date. One student initially selected an opinion blog. After our discussion, he recognized the bias and replaced it with a verified news source. This showed growth in critical thinking aligned to 7th grade ELAR standards. 10:0011:00 a.m. Independent Reading Conferences During this hour, I conducted one-on-one conferences. I asked guiding questions such as, What is the central idea of your article? and What evidence supports it? One student could not identify textual evidence. I directed her to reread paragraph three and highlight statistics. After guidance, she successfully cited a fact to support her claim. I provided feedback on sentence structure and reminded students to use academic language in their written responses. 11:00 a.m.12:00 p.m. Writing Workshop From 11:0011:30, I supported students drafting their book reports. I circulated and gave feedback on thesis statements. One student wrote, This article is about climate change. I prompted him to be more specific. He revised it to clearly state the impact of climate change on coastal cities, demonstrating improvement in clarity and focus. From 11:3012:00, I facilitated peer review. I modeled constructive feedback and monitored discussions. I intervened when feedback was vague and encouraged students to reference the rubric. Students became more specific, stating, You need more evidence in paragraph two. 12:001:00 p.m. Revision and Differentiation I worked with a small intervention group needing additional support with organization. I provided a graphic organizer and scaffolded paragraph structure. Students responded positively and began structuring their ideas more clearly. One student who previously had disorganized notes produced a coherent outline by the end of the session. 1:002:00 p.m. Reflection and Closure From 1:001:30, students finalized drafts. I provided targeted feedback on transitions and MLA formatting. From 1:302:00, I led a reflective discussion. Students shared what they learned about evaluating current events. Many expressed increased confidence in analyzing news sources. My consistent involvement throughout each hour ensured academic growth, accountability, and engagement aligned to 7th grade ELAR standards.

-masters level work -must answer each question in complete sentence -proper in text citations and references -plagiarism under 2% -must put all work ON PDF BELOW -subject is Spanish 7th grade description on work day below as well ass grading rubric 7th8th Grade Spanish Classroom Interaction Log (9:00 AM 2:00 PM) Focus: Unit Vocabulary Sentence Formation and Visual Representation Role: Substitute Teacher / Instructional Support 9:0010:00 AM Vocabulary Introduction and Guided Practice At the beginning of the instructional block, I actively supported lesson implementation by circulating to ensure students had their vocabulary lists and understood expectations for sentence construction and visual illustration. I reinforced pronunciation and comprehension by modeling phonetic breakdowns of unfamiliar words. For example, I assisted one student with escribir by segmenting the word and modeling correct articulation. I then facilitated whole-group participation by prompting students to orally generate sentences prior to writing. When a student said, Yo comer pizza, I guided them through verb conjugation, resulting in the corrected sentence, Yo como pizza. Students responded with increased willingness to participate and demonstrated improved comfort using target vocabulary orally. 10:0011:00 AM Small Group Sentence Construction During this hour, I implemented small-group facilitation to strengthen syntactic accuracy and collaborative learning. Students worked in groups of three to construct sentences using assigned vocabulary. I rotated between groups, providing scaffolding and targeted questioning. One group struggled with sentence structure using escuela. Through guided questioning (Who is going to school?), students revised their work from Yo escuela to Yo voy a la escuela. I provided bilingual clarification when necessary for English Language Learners. Students demonstrated increased peer-to-peer academic discourse and began self-correcting grammatical errors, indicating growing independence and comprehension. 11:00 AM12:00 PM Independent Practice and Visual Representation Students transitioned into independent application, writing sentences and creating illustrations to represent each vocabulary term. I provided individualized feedback and monitored for alignment between written and visual representations. One student drew an image representing correr but initially wrote an unrelated sentence. Through prompting (What action is shown?), the student revised to Yo corro en el parque. I reinforced effort and accuracy through specific praise. Students exhibited increased engagement, and their visual work reflected deeper conceptual understanding of vocabulary meaning. 12:001:00 PM Peer Review and Oral Language Practice In this segment, I structured a peer-review protocol in which students exchanged work and evaluated vocabulary usage, sentence accuracy, and illustration clarity. I modeled constructive feedback language and monitored interactions to maintain academic discourse norms. Students also practiced oral reading of their sentences. When one student mispronounced trabajar, I provided corrective modeling and guided repetition. Students responded positively, demonstrating improved pronunciation and confidence in oral language production. 1:002:00 PM Closure, Formative Assessment, and Reflection To conclude the lesson, I facilitated a whole-class reflection in which students shared one vocabulary word and used it in a complete sentence. For example, one student stated, Yo leo un libro en mi casa, demonstrating correct conjugation and comprehension. I conducted a brief formative check by asking students to identify the most challenging vocabulary words, which informed targeted reteaching of commonly missed verbs such as escribir and estudiar. Interactive FBEs Interactive FBEs Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails Details are specific, clear, and create a vivid picture of the classroom, students, and teaching. 100 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 100 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleteness Questions are answered completely, with all aspects of the prompt fully addressed. 100 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 100 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoursework Responses connect to coursework when relevant. 100 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 100 pts Total Points: 300