Bright Academic Experts

Category: Law

  • Moot Court Case Paper

    It is imperative that you follow the instructions for the briefs and opinions. Papers must be

    between 5-7 pages in length, not including the title page. The papers should include a title page,

    which contains the name of the case, the students name, role in the case, the instructors name, the

    course number and title of the course, and the date the assignment was completed.

    Each paper should have the following subheads: Facts, including the prior proceedings, Issues(s), Analysis, and Conclusion. The papers must be double-spaced, contain page numbers, and use a size 12 font.

    Each requires a ruling from the perspective of a Conservative, Republican Justice (my role) on the following cases. I am against allowing males to participate in womens sports and vice versa. I am also against allowing transgender individuals to participate in sports of the opposite sex (transgender males should not be able to participate in female sports, and transgender females should not be allowed to participate in male sports). This is mainly based on the biological makeup and advantages that males have over females in growth, development, and strength. My opinion must be supported by previous court cases to justify my ruling.

    Attached is a more detailed look at the 2 court cases: West Virginia v. B.P.J., and Little v. Hecox:

    An example of what the paper is supposed to look like is also attached.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Moot court paper sample 1.docx, Moot court paper example 2.docx, Fairness in Womens sport law.pdf, Hecox v Little_ 104 F4th 1061.pdf, BPJ v W Va State Bd of Educ_ 98 F4th 542.pdf, Moot Court Case Short opinion.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Law Question

    Article links

    Requirements: 3 sentences each

  • How to Become an Advocate?

    I want to know the educational requirements and steps to become an advocate in Bangladesh. Please explain clearly.

    Requirements:

  • Criminal Legal Analysis.

    Ally, our continuing storys client at the law firm of Wright and Wrong, Attorneys at Law, was furious that Sadie Pickett requested additional time to complete tasks, a sign language interpreter, a special chair, and use of the women’s restroom. Ally argued with Sadie while discussing the matter at a local bar. Ally was inches from Sadie’s face, screaming at Sadie. Sadie was disgusted and scared that Ally was so close to her while screaming. In response, Sadie pushed Ally away. Ally lost her balance and fell into Willard Smithton. Willard then lost his balance, fell face-first onto the tile floor, hit his head, and died at the scene.

    Terrified about what occurred, Sadie fled the scene and drove home. While driving home, she hit another car. The driver of the other car was pronounced dead at the scene. When the police caught up with her, they administered a breath test to Sadie, who failed it. She was arrested for driving under the influence.

    Using page 22 of our APUS Legal Studies Writing Guide for the format, write a memo addressing the following:

    1. What crimes can Sadie be charged under the penal code in your home state? Cite the law. If Sadie was interested in pursuing a plea deal, what type of plea deal would you discuss with the prosecutor?
    2. Sadie was advised there would be an arraignment. What is that, and what, if anything, does Sadie need to do?
    3. Explain why you think the prosecutor in your home state would pursue this case by filing information or by an indictment.
    4. Sadie was charged with several crimes, given the facts presented. Assuming your firm can represent Sadie, your firm has learned from a reliable source that the prosecutor may have information related to a faulty breathalyzer device and that a witness stated that someone else may have pushed Willard. Is the prosecution required to provide this information (about the witness and breathalyzer test) to Sadie’s attorney? What is the Brady rule, and what would you argue on behalf of Sadie?
    5. Now assume that Sadie does not have a great deal of money. She cannot hire an expensive attorney. Explain what access to justice issues are related to this sort of factual scenario and make suggestions about how to reduce the legal burdens associated with such problems.

    Submission Instructions:

    A 35-page Word Document

    Requirements: 4-5 page

  • Indigenous Law – Talking Circle Assignment

    Hello,

    This is talking circle assignment (a script) for a canadian law school class. Please use appropriate grammar. PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY.

    Students will be divided into groups, provided with a fact scenario, and asked to use Anishinaabe stories, their understanding of Anishinaabe constitutional order, and talking circle protocols to identify legal issues, apply legal principles, and propose resolutions to the problem. Each student will have a maximum of 5 minutes to present their analysis of the fact scenario and propose tentative resolutions.

    The final 15 minutes will be set aside for open reflective dialogue. During the final 15 minutes of open reflective dialogue, each circle will have an opportunity to reflect on the assignment, including discussing the different arguments proposed, any unanswered questions, and whether the assignment shifted your thinking about Indigenous law and legal issues. The discussion should be respectful and I expect that you will all listen carefully to the other submissions in your circle so that you can have a meaningful discussion in the final 15 minutes.

    PLEASE LOOK AT THE INSTRUCTIONS AND THE TALKING CIRCLE QUESTION. AFTER, MAKE A SCRIPT (I HAVE ATTACHED AN EXAMPLE) USING THE READINGS I HAVE ATTACHED. THE READINGS ARE TITLED WITH THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE/THEME, I HAVE CAPITALIZED THEM SO YOU KNOW WHICH READING BELONGS TO WHICH PRINCIPLE/THEME.

    PLEASE MAKE A SCRIPT OF 2-3 PAGES SINGLE SPACED THAT I CAN PRESENT TO THE CLASS. PLEASE MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AND THE TALKING CIRCLE QUESTION WORD DOCUMENT.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Lana Ray and Paul Cormier Killing the Weendigo With Maple Syrup METHODOLOGIES.pdf, Leanne Simpson Land As Pedagogy (1) METHODOLOGIES.pdf, Growing together from the earth_pp 199-201 (1) METHODOLOGIES.pdf, Legend of the Oriole_pp 59-62 GIFTING.pdf, Our Treaty with the Hoof Nation_pages 9-12 RELATIONSHIPS.pdf, Want_pp 46-48 (1) FREEDOM.pdf, The Dog and the Squirrel_pp 42-45 (1) FREEDOM.pdf, Nenebuc Transforms the Bear (1) WORLDVIEWS.pdf, Lindsay Borrows Introduction Otters Journey (1) METHODOLOGIES.pdf, Land is the Boss_pp 35-38 RELATIONSHIPS.pdf, Heidi Bohaker Doodem and council fire The Doodem Tradition (1) DOODEM AND COUNCIL FIRE HISTORY.pdf, Woman who was kidnapped_pp 93-95 (1) FREEDOM.pdf, The Gift of the Stars_pp 19-21 GIFTING.pdf, Windigos in Drawing out the Law_A Spirits guide_pp 216-227 (1).pdf, Dismantling the Doctrine of Discovery-EN TREATY SINCE NIAGARA.pdf, Leroy Little Bear_Dispute settlement among the Naidanac_pp 341-349 (1) WORLDVIEWS.pdf, John Borrows Canadas Ind Consti Law as Hierarchy 12 to 22 REN WORLDVIEWS.pdf, Seagull_pp 37-40 GIFTING.pdf, Windigos in Drawing out the Law_A Spirits guide_pp 216-227 (2) FREEDOM.pdf, Piche-Robin_pp 128-131 (1) FREEDOM.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Analysis of Bartz v. Anthropic and Kadrey v. Meta

    This assignment is part of a chapter on a piece I am currently working on which analyses the following cases: Bartz v Anthropic / Kadrey v. Meta. The overall piece this case analysis is part of, is my study on the boundaries of fair use when it comes to generative AI. However, your task is to analyse the cases.

    • Start with an introduction (about 200 to 300 words): State clearly that this is a current law analysis (not a normative proposal); briefly introduce the two cases and their relationship (same technology and similar facts); structure of the chapter (analysis Kadrey, analysis Bartz, conclusion).
    • After the introduction you can discuss the two cases separately (integrate Warhol into the discussion of both cases rather than discussing separately). Make sure to structure your discussion of the cases. Start with the factual and procedural background (who are the parties, what do parties claim about fair use, what legal question did the court had decide in relation to fair use); factor-by-factor fair use analysis (purpose and character of the use, nature of the copyrighted works, amount and substantiality, effect on the market); outcome and scope of the holding.
    • You can end the chapter with a conclusion based on what the courts have decided (both courts agree training is transformative; both reject automatic licensing markets; they diverge on market harm and evidentiary thresholds; state clearly what the current law looks like (training on copyrighted works can qualify as fair use but fair use is fact-, model-, and market-specific; market dilution is a legally cognizable theory, but not an easy one to prove); Clarify the evidentiary lesson (plaintiffs must show more than fear or abstraction; defendants cannot rely on transformativeness alone). Finish with a bridge to the next chapter (literature discussion).

    Start with Bartz to discuss the criticism on Kadrey

    I have attached both cases below. ONLY USE THE DOCUMENTS I ATTACHED TO REFERENCE THE CASES. No AI and No Plagiarism.

    THE PROFESSOR HAS STRESSED THE NECESSITY OF MENTIONING RELEVANT FACTS TO THE CASES. After that, Go into detail of what the court says, how the court distinguished between these type of fair use and what cases they used.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Kadrey v Meta Platforms_ Inc_ 788 F Supp 3d 1026 (1).PDF, Bartz v PBC_ 787 F Supp 3d 1007 (23 June).PDF

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • research question

    Firstly, Choose One General Area of HK Constitutional Law from the List of Permitted Areas in the Document attached below. (check guidelines attached below from page 17, for the topics. and see which topic you can do and come up with a research question) there are total 13 topics. you have to choose one area and write a research question and on that topic write 3000 words. use footnotes and bibliography. You are only allowed to write your research paper about those areas of Hong Kong Constitutional Law which are listed in this document. So read carefully through the list of permitted general areas of Hong Kong Constitutional Law listed on the following pages and choose one of these areas which most interests you. *So dont try and write about another area which is not listed in this document (e.g., judicial review, freedom of association, etc.) as this is not permitted and you will not receive any marks. Word count (maximum 3,000 words) Must Use cover sheet attached below. Number and General Area of Hong Kong Constitutional Law from the List of Permitted Areas later in this document: (You must use the same number and same wording as used in the List of Permitted Areas later in this document) Research Question: (This can be any question you want as long as it is within the General Area of Hong Kong Constitutional Law you have listed above) – must use footnotes. and proper footnotes(check guidelines) – use the OSCOLA (Oxford University Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities) style for footnotes and so you should try to follow broadly the same style for footnotes. – A single footnote is also never sufficient for more than one paragraph in your paper. If you are relying on the same source for the next paragraph, then you need to insert a new footnote (e.g. Ibid, at page 76) for that next paragraph. – must use bibliography (check guidelines) – word format (check guidelines) – no quotations should be longer thn 1-2 sentences. (check guidelines) – use up to date sources (check guidelines)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HKCL Coursework Submission Guidelines.pdf, 2025-26 Cover Sheet for HK Constitutional Law.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Understand Mens Rea vs. Mens Actus Rea

    Understand Mens Rea vs. Mens Actus Rea

    Understand Actus Reus and Mens Rea

    Discussion: What is the difference between the two?

    1) Do both have to be present in a crime?

    2) Identify an example pf this crime prevalent in your community.

    3) You must post & respond to receive full credit.

    4)Post must be at least 300 words or more, respond to two other colleagues (each response should be no less than 200 words)

    Requirements: as needed

  • Is This Still An Important Fact?

    Is This Still An Important Fact?

    Discussion Background

    Rosa Parks
    Rosa Parks deliberate decision to test the practice of Jim Crow was the catalyst that triggered the 1955 bus boycott in Montgomery, Alabama. The daughter of James and Leona Edwards McCauley, she grew up in Pine Level, Alabama., and was sent away to a private girls’ school in
    Montgomery at the age of 11. She later met Raymond Parks, a serious young barber with whom she spent many hours discussing the burden and injustice of the racial situation; they married in 1932.

    Mr. Parks was a member of the National Committee to Save the Scottsboro Boys, and she soon joined him in becoming active in the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP, serving as secretary and youth adviser. On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat for a white passenger on a Montgomery bus. Her arrest and the subsequent development of a 381-day bus boycott by tens of thousands heralded a new phase in the civil rights movement.

    The Black community formed the Montgomery Improvement Association, electing as president,
    Martin Luther King, Jr.; Mrs. Parks served for a time on its board of directors. Fired from her job as an assistant tailor in a department store, she stayed in Montgomery until the boycott forced an end to all discriminatory practices on the bus lines. In 1957 she and her husband moved to Detroit, Mich., where in 1965 she took a part-time job as receptionist and administrative aide in the office of Congressman John Conyers. She was the first woman in 1980 to receive the Martin Luther King, Jr., Nonviolent Peace Prize.

    There is a National Committee for the Rosa L. Parks Shrine, organized to commemorate her life by the establishment of a home and library.

    Do you feel this is still relevant today? Why or Why not?

    Criteria

    You must post and respond (to two other classmates) for full credit.

    Your post must be 300 words or more, Responses should be 200 or more.

    Apply decorum and respect in post and response.

    Requirements: as needed

  • Lstd w 5

    The following discussion comes from your Week 5 readings. Outside research to address these issues is required. Use the online library for additional sources of information and research. In addition, I recommend utilizing the Legal Studies Program Guide. Please analyze the following utilizing the Model Penal Code: 1) Sean breaks into a house with the intentions of stealing some jewelry. He is surprised that the owner is at home, grabs his gun, and fatally shoots him. What charge can be filed against Sean? Discuss why. 2) Billy sneaks into a warehouse with the intent on theft and is surprised by a security guard, whom Billy knocks down a flight of stairs, killing him. What crime was committed? Discuss why. 3) Lisa drives 80 MPH on a windy road, drives off a cliff, killing his passenger in the crash. What charges can be filed against Lisa? Discuss why.