Category: Law

Contracts are fundamental to business transactions, forming agreements through offer, acceptance, and consideration. If one party changes the original offer, it constitutes a counteroffer, giving the other party the option to withdraw. Once terms are agreed upon and documented, the contract typically outlines remedies for breaches, such as compensation for nonperformance. Courts rely on these terms to determine the expectations of the parties if a dispute arises. Understanding contract law is crucial for professionals to navigate agreements effectively, manage breaches, and negotiate favorable terms. For example, a business manager must know how to address a suppliers failure to deliver goods on time and pursue appropriate remedies, ensuring agreements protect organizational interests and minimize disputes.

In Assessment 2, you will analyze a legal case involving a breach of contract, evaluating key elements such as offer and acceptance and examining how courts resolve contract disputes. You are also encouraged to perform the ungraded knowledge check activity to gauge your readiness before completing the assessment.

These activities will allow you to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each partys arguments real-world contract scenarios, deepening your understanding of contract law and providing you with practical insights into how contracts are formed, enforced, and breached in business settings.Once you have selected a decision and an organization impacted by the decision, imagine youre a senior manager in the organization you selected and that you were asked to prepare a briefing (34 double-spaced pages) of the court decision to help the executive team of the organization understand the impact the case might have on the company.

In your briefing, please complete the following:

1. Summarize the facts of the case.
   • Include detailed explanations of the facts.
   • Include key distinctions and nuances that enhance understanding of the case.
2. Explain all key contractual terms in dispute.
   • Include detailed and nuanced explanations of their relevance.
   • How do these terms matter in the case?
3. Apply relevant legal principles (for example, offer and acceptance, consideration, performance) accurately.
   • Demonstrate exceptional understanding and insight into how these principles relate to the case.
4. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each partys arguments.
   • Provide insightful and nuanced analyses of each party’s arguments.
5. Analyze the courts ruling and rationale clearly and accurately.
   • Offer detailed commentary on the rationale and implications.
6. Analyze alternative outcomes clearly.
   • Argue the potential impact of these alternative outcomes.
   • Demonstrate nuanced understanding of the feasibility and implications of these outcomes.
7. Explain accurately how the ruling applies to a specific industry and third-party company.
   • This is the company and industry where you should imagine yourself to be a senior manager for this assessment.
   • It is for the real or imagined executives of this company that you write this briefing.
   • Provide these executives with concrete examples to demonstrate how they should modify their their operating procedures to be consistent with the case opinion.

I have attached the grading rubric along with the Demichele and Bateson readings. Use those sources back up an original idea answering the prompt below.

The assignment is to produce a 6 page thesis-driven paper using the materials in our reading and viewing (not a

research paper). Students are to make quote and paraphrase use of the DeMichele and Bateson reading while
analyzing John Q.
Option 1: Repositioning back to legality: Should John Q go to jail for what he has done? How do you believe the
hospital, courts, and society could productively respond to his actions?

Reference the part of the movie in the end where the judge reads out the indivdual charges. you can search how much time each charge comes with and argue why or why not he should be held guilty/innocent.

Use time stamps when referencing scenes in the movie JohnQ

Do not use AI and attach an AI report at the end.

6 pages double spaced.

Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Guidelines for Writing Scientific Lab Reports (1).pdf, Cemetary Lab Report_Example.docx, NEW 243 Rubric of Lab Reports.pdf

Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): law school requirements (1).pdf

Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

a. Issue [1 sentence]b. Rule(s) Offer, Acceptance, Awareness (Intent), Consideration, Capacity, and Legality [1-3 sentences]c. Analysis / Application(s) [7-10 sentences]d. Conclusion(s) [2-3 sentences]3. Writing in the inline-text function to enter response. There will be no other formatsaccepted. 4. Plagiarism is not allowed.

Del Carmen, R. V., & Hemmens, C. (2016). Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice. (Chapter 1: The Court System, Sources, of Rights and Fundamentals of Principles, pgs. 1-31). Cengage Learning.

Respond to the below discussion in 300 each section

Include a Cover Page for each assignment. Always list your name, Professor’s name, course title, and the name of the assignment. I would like the assignment to be completed with Times New Roman Font (#12) and double-spaced. There is no need to repeat the questions or case studies in your responses. Just begin with your responses.

Chapter 3: PROBABLE CAUSE AND REASONABLE SUSPICION

1. Officer Makin, a university police officer, received information that a student living in a campus dormitory was selling drugs. This information was conveyed to Officer Makin by an anonymous caller to the officers cell phone. Officer Makin knew the suspect in question and had similar suspicions. Officer Makin immediately went to the dormitory and stopped the student as he was leaving the building. Officer Makin arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs. Were these actions valid? Justify your answer.
2. List the differences between probable cause and reasonable suspicion. (HINT: PAGES 84/85 of the textbook.

Chapter 4: THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE

Answer the below review questions.

• What is the exclusionary rule? Does it apply only to violations of Fourth Amendment rights or also to violations of any constitutional right in the Bill of Rights?
• The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct. Critics, however, say the exclusionary rule has failed to achieve that purpose. Do you agree? Why or why not?
• What is the purged taint exception to the exclusionary rule? Why is it difficult to apply?
  • Are you in favor of or against the exclusionary rule? Justify your answer.

Chapter 5: STOP AND FRISKS AND STATION HOUSE DETENTION

• What is a stop and frisk? What is station house detention?
• Sean, a student, was stopped by the police, based on reasonable suspicion, after midnight in the suburbs of Los Angeles and detained for one hour. Was his detention valid? Give reasons for your answer.
  • An officer has invited a suspect to come to the stationhouse for questioning in connection with a report received from a confidential informant that said the suspect may have been involved in a burglary. During the questioning, is that suspect under arrest or not? What are the implications either way?
  • Why is Terry v. Ohio a landmark case?

Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): OSCOLA Quick Guide.pdf

Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

This week, you will focus on contracts.

Ally owned several businesses in New Jersey. Because the United States population is getting older, she started a new business manufacturing a lotion to soothe aching muscles and joints. The lotion is called Calm Natural Safe (CNS). Ally created the lotion using natural ingredients and other materials.

Milly’s Global (MG), New Jersey-based company, wants to purchase 1,00000 bottles of CNS, each costing $20.00 per bottle.

She has retained your law firm (Wright and Wrong, Attorneys at Law) to create a contract between Ally and MG. A partner at the firm has asked you to prepare a memo (review page 22 of our ) addressing the following:

1. What additional questions would you want to ask Ally so you can properly prepare the contract?
2. What are the requirements for the proper formation of a contract?
3. What if the parties want to modify the contract?
4. Describe a clause(s) that you feel should be included in the contract. Explain why you noted this clause(s).
5. What is the statute of limitations to sue if there is a breach of contract? Set forth the law to support your conclusion.

On Nexis Uni, you may want to review the following New Jersey cases and statutes:

• Weichert Co. Realtors v. Ryan, 128 N.J. 427, 435 (1992);
• Hatzell & Pascu, LLC v. Medical Records Online, Inc., 445 N.J. Super. 173, 183 (App. Div. 2016);
• Nester v. O’Donnell, 301 N.J. Super. 198, 210 (App. Div. 1997);
• Manahawkin Convalescent v. O’Neill, 217 N.J. 99, 118 (2014);
• DeAngelis v. Rose, 320 N.J. Super. 263, 280 (App. Div. 1999).
• N.J.S.A. 12A:2-201(1)
• N.J.S.A. 25:1-5
• N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1

Submission Instructions:

A 35-page Word Document