Category: Law

Research Essay: Civil and Islamic Legal Traditions Assignment Instructions

Overview

For this assignment, we analyze the Islamic legal tradition. This tradition has many different interpretations in our world, but like most legal traditions it is unique in its history and traditions. This tradition, referred to by our textbook author as the law of later revelation, has connections to the other legal traditions you have already studied. Considering what we learned about the Civil Law tradition last module; we will compare the two legal traditions. This assignment hones your research and writing and sharpens your analytical skills by requiring you to identify similarities between two legal traditions that seem vastly different.

Instructions

Over the past two Modules: Weeks you have examined two different legal traditions: Civil and Islamic. The Civil legal tradition focuses on the individual while Islamic legal tradition focuses on the revelation. At first glance, these two systems may seem vastly different. However, there are some similarities. In this essay, explain 3 areas where these two systems are similar. The essay should be structured as follows:

• Similarity #1 between the Civil legal tradition and the Islamic legal tradition.
• Similarity #2 between the Civil legal tradition and the Islamic legal tradition.
• Similarity #3 between the Civil legal tradition and the Islamic legal tradition.

Your essay must be 56 pages in current Bluebook format and contain at least 5 scholarly sources in addition to/other than the course textbook and the Bible. Wikipedia does not count as a scholarly source. Include headings for clear organization. Cover Pages will not count toward the page total, and your citations should be in-text citations (not footnotes, endnotes, reference pages, etc.).

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Narration Guidelines: Maintain a professional tone by summarizing observations and evaluations for each slide. Ensure that your presentation is highly ordered, logical, and unified. Words should be clearly enunciated, and a professional tone should be sustained throughout the presentation narration. Audio recording should be free of background noise and interruptions. For assistance with embedding the audio into your PowerPoint presentation, please make use of this tutorial. Directions Your 8- to 10-slide requirement is excluding your title, introduction, and reference slides. Use one basic slide design and layout. Text large enough to be read by your audience (font size 2034 points). Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content. You may use pictures, charts, and graphs to supplement your material as long as they do not take up the entire slide. Use bullets for your main points. Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience, being sure to follow the Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained. Presentation should be well-ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful. Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics. Appropriate citation style should be followed. You should also make sure to: Use examples to support your discussion. Cite all sources on a separate reference slide at the end of your PowerPoint and reference and cite within the body of the presentation using APA format and citation style. Your old professor from Purdue Global is retiring from many years as a trial judge. He hires you to help him start a small law firm specializing in ADR. While he has experience in mediation and arbitration, he is unfamiliar with some newer but less common forms, such as private judging, summary jury trials, and mini-trials. He asks you to prepare a PowerPoint presentation summarizing them for him. You need to concentrate on the following items: List the requirements and procedures for each of these forms of ADR. Compare the advantages to a potential client in using each form. Analyze what procedures your firm would utilize in representing a client in each form. Contrast the effectiveness of each form compared to pursuing litigation through trial. Here are the recommended topics for your slides: Slide 1: Cover slideThis slide should include a title for the presentation and the name of the student presenting the PowerPoint. Slide 2: List the requirements and procedure for each of these forms of ADR. Slide 3: List the requirements and procedure for each of these forms of ADR (continuation of slide 2). Slide 4: Compare the advantages to a potential client in using each form. Slide 5: Compare the advantages to a potential client in using each form (continuation of slide 4). Slide 6: Analyze what procedures your firm would utilize in representing a client in each form. Slide 7: Contrast the effectiveness of each form compared to pursuing litigation through trial. Slide 8: List of references. The Unit 10 Assignment should contain 8 slides, including the title page and reference page, and meet the following APA format requirements.

In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the assignment, a successful paper must also meet the following criteria: Your 3- to 5-slide requirement is excluding your title, introduction, and reference slides. Use one basic slide design and layout. Use text large enough to be read by your audience (font size 2034 point). Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content. You may use pictures, charts, and graphs to supplement your material as long as they do not take up the entire slide. Use bullets for your main points. Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience, being sure to follow the Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained. Presentation should be well-ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful. Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics. Appropriate citation style should be followed. You should also make sure to: Use examples to support your discussion. List all sources on a separate reference slide at the end of your PowerPoint and cite them within the body of the presentation using APA format and citation style. In Chapter 9, you explored the varying levels of judicial scrutiny applied when courts review decisions made by administrative agencies. Courts do not always approach agency decisions with the same level of deference. Instead, they utilize distinct standards of review, each providing a different threshold for questioning an agencys actions. The three most common standards are de novo, substantial evidence, and arbitrary and capricious. For this weeks task, prepare a 3- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following: Define and discuss, in your own words, a clear definition of each standard of review. Discuss the amount of deference the courts give to an agencys decision under each standard. Research and present a real-world example for each standard to illustrate how they are applied in practice. Be sure to provide the citation to each example.

In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the assignment, a successful paper must also meet the following criteria: Your 3- to 5-slide requirement is excluding your title, introduction, and reference slides. Use one basic slide design and layout. Use text large enough to be read by your audience (font size 2034 point). Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content. You may use pictures, charts, and graphs to supplement your material as long as they do not take up the entire slide. Use bullets for your main points. Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience, being sure to follow the Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained. Presentation should be well-ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful. Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics. Appropriate citation style should be followed. You should also make sure to: Use examples to support your discussion. List all sources on a separate reference slide at the end of your PowerPoint and cite them within the body of the presentation using APA format and citation style. In Chapter 9, you explored the varying levels of judicial scrutiny applied when courts review decisions made by administrative agencies. Courts do not always approach agency decisions with the same level of deference. Instead, they utilize distinct standards of review, each providing a different threshold for questioning an agencys actions. The three most common standards are de novo, substantial evidence, and arbitrary and capricious. For this weeks task, prepare a 3- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following: Define and discuss, in your own words, a clear definition of each standard of review. Discuss the amount of deference the courts give to an agencys decision under each standard. Research and present a real-world example for each standard to illustrate how they are applied in practice. Be sure to provide the citation to each example.

As you have learned this week, the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is the principle that administrative remedies must be pursued and exhausted before judicial review is available. Specifically, before a party is permitted to seek judicial review of agency action, an agency must be given an opportunity to correct its own errors. Your textbook outlined five commonly raised reasons why the doctrine of exhaustion is necessary: Agencies learn by correcting their own mistakes. Exhaustion promotes and preserves agency autonomy and independence. Judicial economy is promoted by permitting an agency to make a complete record. Judicial economy is further promoted by allowing an agency, and not a court, to make findings. By limiting a party’s appeal to the courts, exhaustion encourages cooperation and communication between agencies and the party. Applying the concept of the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies, answer the following questions: Why does the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies exist, and what purpose does it serve? Do you believe the doctrine helps or hinders individuals in resolving disputes with administrative agencies? Do any exceptions to the doctrine exist? If so, do you agree or disagree with the exceptions? Should the doctrine be reformed to better balance agency autonomy and individual rights? If so, what changes would you recommend?

Amendment VII Research the strong feelings the Founders had when they passed Amendment VII to the U.S. Constitution, which states in relevant part, “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” Reflecting on what you have learned in this course and the sentiment of the Founders, what, if anything, has changed which would allow the use and prevalence of the ADR within the U.S. legal system? Do you feel that ADR will, or has, actually become primary dispute resolution (PDR)? Why or why not?

instructions attached no outside sources other than the 3 provided PGA Tour v. Martin 532 US 661 (2001) Bragdon v. Abbott 524 US 624 (1998) Abbott v. Bragdon 163 F. 3d. 87 (C.A. 1, 1998)

Welcome to this weeks discussion! This conversation is your chance to engage deeply with the course concepts while connecting them to real-world situations and your own professional experiences. By sharing your thoughts and insights here, youll not only strengthen your understanding of the material but also gain new perspectives from your classmates, each bringing unique experiences and viewpoints that can expand your thinking. Active participation helps you build communication skills, professional connections, and a collaborative mindset that are valuable in any career field.

For context on key concepts or connections to learning goals, visit this module’s Learning Goals page.

Complete Your Work

Initial Post

Jordan Miles signed a written purchase agreement to buy a 1995 Honda Civic from Blue Ridge Auto Sales, a used-car dealership in Maryland, for $4,995. Blue Ridge agreed to keep the vehicle on layaway for up to 21 days if Miles put down $1,200 and then made additional payments according to a payment schedule. However, the schedule required Miles to pay $100 per week for six weeks (a total of 42 days), which extended beyond the 21-day layaway period. The contract labeled these weekly payments as non-refundable storage and prep fees and stated that they would not be applied toward the purchase price. Miles paid over $1,000 under this arrangement before asking for his money back. When Blue Ridge refused to issue a refund, he filed suit in Maryland state court. At trial, witnesses gave conflicting testimony about the mismatch between the timing of the layaway period and the payment schedule, as well as the fee provisions in the contract.

Answer the following:

1. From an ethical standpoint, what is problematic about this arrangement? Explain.
2. Using the IDDR framework, evaluate whether Blue Ridge Auto Sales has an ethical responsibility to revise the type of contract it uses with consumers.
3. If you were managing Blue Ridge Auto Sales, how would you resolve this situation, and why?

Reply Posts

After creating your own original post (worth 15 points), review your classmates posts and reply to at least two of them with substantive responses (worth 7.5 points each). A substantive response goes beyond simply agreeing or offering brief praise. It meaningfully contributes to the conversation by:

1. Expanding on your classmates ideas or experiences
2. Offering alternative viewpoints or solutions
3. Identifying potential challenges or questions to consider
4. Respectfully disagreeing and supporting your perspective with reasoning or evidence

Engaging thoughtfully with your peers helps deepen everyones understanding of the topic and builds a more collaborative learning environment.

Guidelines

• Your initial discussion post should be 200300 words, demonstrate understanding of the topic, and include APA-style citations for any sources used. Post early in the week to allow time for engagement. You must also respond to at least two classmates with substantive replies (about 100 words each) that add to the discussion by expanding on ideas, offering new perspectives, asking thoughtful questions, or providing respectful feedback. Use clear, professional writing with proper grammar and punctuation. Follow netiquette by being courteous, open-minded, and respectful of differing opinions. All work should be original, and any sources referenced must be cited appropriately.

This assignment is worth 100 points and is due at the end of Unit 9. The rubric that will be used to grade your assignment is available from the Grading Rubrics page under Course Resources. SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENT When you are ready to submit your assignment, select the Assignment tab at the top of the screen and choose the Unit 9 Assignment Dropbox to upload your completed assignment. This assignment addresses the following unit learning outcomes: Analyze how criminal courts operate in American society. Examine adversarial and consensual models of the criminal court system. Analyze the pros and cons of plea bargaining. Examine the role played by juries in the criminal court system. Of particular importance to the U.S. is the criminal justice process. The reliance on juries to deliver justice is essential. You can evaluate this system through many different lenses or models, such as due process, adversarial, and crime control models. Another major element of the American legal process is the work of the attorneys within the system. The system requires trained professionals. You need to understand how attorneys are trained to work within our system. This assignment will evaluate your understanding of these components. Please complete the following two parts. Part 1: The Jury Process Barkan provided several reasons why juries are important to American society. Please explain two of the reasons why this process is important to our community. Describe the four models Barkan uses to assess the criminal jury process: due process, consensual, crime control, and adversarial models. Describe how they successfully work in pairs. Which is more often demonstrated in our criminal court process today? Explain and support your answer with examples. Part 2: Evaluating the Legal Profession Barkan explains the current design of the typical law school education in the U.S. He also explains how some have critiqued the legal education that one will study in law school. Barkan focuses on three main criticisms of legal education: It shuns social science and neglects important considerations of race, class, gender, and other social variables. It socializes students to be more politically conservative and orients them to the needs of corporations and other established interests rather than to the needs of the poor and people of color. It is brutal for students and particularly alienating for women. For additional information, check out the following article in Westlaw in the Library: Steven B. Dow, There’s Madness in the Method: A Commentary on Law, Statistics, and the Nature of Legal Education, 57 Okla. L. Rev. 579 (2004). In your response, you will first explain the design to the typical American law school curriculum, focusing particularly on the main features of the first year of studies at law school. Then select two of the three criticisms. Explain Barkans critique. You may wish to conduct some outside research to find out more about these three criticisms, in addition to the Dow article. How would you respond to this criticism? Do you agree with the critique or not? Explain and support your answers with examples and authoritative support. This assignment should be 23 pages in length (roughly 600800 words, excluding title page and references). You will use the chapter reading and at least two outside authoritative sources to help support your analysis. In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the assignment, a successful paper must also meet the following criteria: Length of the paper should be 23 pages (600800 words), excluding title page and references. Include a cover page and references page in 10- to 12-point font (Arial, Courier, and Times New Roman are acceptable). Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained. Assignment should follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). Writing should be well-ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful. Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics. Appropriate citation style should be followed. You should also make sure to: Include a title page with full name, class name, section number, and date. Include an introductory and concluding paragraph and demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard English. Use examples to support your discussion.