Bright Academic Experts

Category: Literature

  • Inteligncia

    Quais s?o os mtodos de intender melhor matria da escola

    Requirements:

  • NRSE 4565 1006 spr 26

    Please review the attached document, which contains all the guidelines. No AI WORK, NO PLAGIARISM, CORRECT PUNCTUATION, ll written assignments must follow APA 7th edition formatting, citations and references.

    Requirements: Read directions on doc

  • Analysis of Antigone conflict and consequence and the clash

    engage with at least two scholarly articles or two substantial chapters/sections from a longer academic work. Include at least six block quotations (58 sentences each) drawn from these sources. Each block quotation must be accompanied by: o A clear explanation of the critics argument and relevant context o At least 2-3 paragraphs of detailed analysis and interpretation Each group member must submit at least 750 words of original interpretation and analysis that brings the relevant secondary material into conversation with the play. These quotations and analyses should be integrated into both your presentation and the written materials you submit. + Ill attach primary source (Antigone) and( three more) secondary sources and lastly i want you to focus on the image I attached as this is part in the presentation and based on it we need to include analysis no external ideas. and the two image from the dugdale source will be attached too.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Greek theatre in context (Dugdale Eric Kari) (Z-Library).pdf, Action and Identity in Antigone and Aristotle.pdf, Sophocles I Antigone Oedipus the King Oedipus at Colonus (Sophocles David Grene Richmond Lattimore) (z-liborg).pdf, butler_antigones_claim.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Close reading of a canto of the Divine Comedy

    Length: 3-5 pages = 750-1000 words (No AI on this assignment!) Assignment Description: This short paper will be a CLOSE READING. You will offer your own individual interpretation of any canto of the Divine Comedy, after Canto XVIII of Inferno. Things to do in a CLOSE READING: Summarize the action/plot Describe the characters Offer your own interpretation Offer close textual analysis of passages (verbs, nouns, adjectives, tone, similes, metaphors, etc) Describe and interpret images that the author uses Things NOT to do in a CLOSE READING: Write other peoples opinions (including your teachers) Compare the text to another text by the same or a different author Use AI to generate your interpretation

  • Literature Question

    I need this essay rewrite no plagiarize I will upload the essay need to be rewrite . Must be writing in MLA format. Essay to rewrite: Directions:For this discussion and all discussion in this class, you’ll want to create a complete essay, 5-7 paragraphs. That essay should include an introduction that narrows to a thesis. That thesis should foreshadow the main ideas of your body paragraphs. After the introduction, you want to include 3-5 body paragraphs based on the paragraph plan shared in Module resources. And after the body paragraphs, wrap up your essay with a conclusion, then a Works Cited in MLA format. You are not required to use outside sources, but if you do, cite them also in MLA format.

    Ben Franklin on the Savages

    From his youth, Benjamin Franklin observed the world around him through his own critical lens, and more often than not, he saw things differently from his contemporaries. A staunch advocate of freedom and liberty, Franklin also possessed attributes of wisdom far beyond his years. And while the popular public consensus of the time and, in fact, one of the driving ideologies for the virtual enslavement and destruction of the Native American peoples in what would become the United States was the premise of their savagery. The godless heathens that knew no civility and were little more than wild animals that should be struck down at the slightest provocation turned out in fact to be quite civilized with long-practiced skills in parliamentary procedure, public affairs, and hospitality. Through Franklins own musings, one can appreciate just how cultured, civil, and unsavage-like the Native Americans were.

    In one construct of respect for others and their offers is the Indian practice of considering matters deemed important. Taking the time to weigh issues and consider the offers of others for a day or more not only encourages critical decision-making but also imparts respect and honor to the offering party, as Franklin describes;

    It is one of the Indian rules of politeness not to answer a public proposition the same day that it is made; they think it would be treating it as a light matter, and that they show it respect by taking time to consider it, as of a matter important (Franklin 463).

    In this case, the Indians politely declined, as previously, those university-educated braves returned “totally good for nothing” (Franklin 463).

    Public speaking, “parliamentary procedure,” and general conversational civility are topics Franklin illuminates in his writings. In the Indians council meetings, the group “observes a profound silence” while the speaker rises to address the council with emphasis on decorum and civility, in which “to interrupt another, even in common conversation, is reckoned highly indecent” (Franklin 463). In contrast, Franklin sarcastically speaks of the “polite British House of Commons,” in which “the speaker grows hoarse from the calls to order” (Franklin 463464).

    Likewise, the Native American practice of quietly listening to guests and their stories, as related by the author, in which a Swedish minister preaches his Christian version of creation to the Susquehanah chiefs, after which they offer him their story of the great provider. “What I delivered to you were sacred truths; but what you tell me is mere fable, fiction, and

    falsehood” bellowed the Swede, to which the chiefs replied;

    My brother, it seems your friends have not done you justice in your education; they have not well instructed you in the rules of common civility. You saw that we, who understand and practice those rules, believed all your stories; why do you refuse to believe ours? (Franklin 464).

    Hospitality is often the measuring stick by which a civilization is measured, and the native Americans, according to Franklin, were masters of accommodation for their guests and strangers alike (Levine 466). Retelling the tale of Conrad Weiser and his meeting with Canassatego, the two speak of common courtesies and the treatment of guests. Discussing traveling white men, Canassatego exclaims, “We dry him if he is wet, we warm him if he is cold, we give him meat and drink, that he may allay his thirst and hunger; and we spread soft furs for

    him to rest and sleep on; we demand nothing in return,” to which, in contrast, he laments, “But, if I go into a white mans house at Albany, and ask for victuals and drink, they say, Where is your money? and if I have none, they say, Get out, you Indian dog” emphasizing who the true savage is (Franklin 466).

    Clearly, Benjamin Franklin revered the manners and civil ways of the Native American people. From their respect for the council speakers and elders among them to their manners in dealing with offers and questions posed to them by outsiders, the Indians were polite, thoughtful, and attentive. Even when faced with discriminatory bias regarding the lack of quid pro quo in the hospitality and warm welcome of strangers, the Native Americans maintained their traditions of welcoming and caring for those who passed their way. Franklin speaks glowingly and with admiration of the culture and ways of the much-maligned people that the settlers saw as lowly savages and not as the rich and diverse culture that they really were.

    Requirements: 500 words to 700

  • Honor, Duty, and Causalities of War in Book 6 of The lliad

    Instructions from Instructor :Responses must be typed, 2-3 pages, MLA 9th edition format, double-spaced. The response must include a clear intro (with thesis statement), body paragraphs, a clear conclusion, and textual evidence from the story. A full paragraph is 5-8 sentences. All quotations must be cited according to MLA format. You may only quote 3 typed lines of text at a time. NO BLOCK QUOTATIONS ALLOWED.

    Each essay must include a Works Cited page, in MLA 9th edition format. The Works Cited entry should be the COURSE TEXTBOOK or the correct citation (and page numbers) for the version of the reading you are using. I will double-check these. Simply copying information online will not suffice.

    Assignment: Using the themes and outline previously submitted for part 1 of this assignment, craft a 2-3 page, thematic analysis of Homers The Iliad in which you respond to at least three themes you see in book 6 You may ONLY respond to themes in these assigned books. Any essays submitted that address content NOT assigned in this course will receive a grade of ZERO. Any papers submitted that do not discuss the themes from part 1 of the essay assignment will receive a grade of ZERO. Any essay that does not clearly and accurately cite direct quotes from the assigned reading in MLA 9th edition format will receive a grade of ZERO. The point of this assignment is for you to accurately demonstrate your ability to READ a text, IDENTIFY recurring themes, and ANALYZE their importance while showing EVIDENCE from the textbook to support YOUR readings.

    For example: Homers use of Achilles character reveals the themes _____, ___, and ____ to show the reader_______.

    Remember: This is a reading response to gauge how well you understand the material. Do NOT summarize the epic. I already know what happened in each book. I am interested in what you think about a specific occurrence or theme. You MUST refer to specific passages/lines from the epic. Please reach out to the University Writing Center for extra assistance. See syllabus for AI policy. Chat GPT, Gemini, and other software that writes responses for you are strictly prohibited. That includes Grammarly Plus subscriptions that rewrite entire sections of your paper. I reserve the right to follow up with a Zoom conversation if I suspect a submission was not authentic. You will also be asked to discuss the paper topics on Quiz 2 and the Final Exam. Make sure you are conducting an authentic analysis that you can recall later. You will be asked to recall this information in later assignments.

    I’ve already typed and submitted a outline and thesis statement for this Thematic Analyis Essay. I am needing assistance typing a 2-3 page essay supporting the outline provided. I chose to write about the three themes : Honor, Duty, and Causalities of War book 6 of The llliad.

  • Paddington

    Essay on Paddington Paper length: 2000 words Include a bibliography Use MLA style for citation Introduction: the popularity of Paddington + any relevant info on the matter Literature review on Paddington (Use Google Scholar to discuss the existing criticism: how is the book interpreted?)+ your thesis (what contribution does your paper bring to the existing scholarship? What nuances? What are the question(s) that it addresses?) The idea (how did Bond get the idea + Kindertransport+ personal history of the author) Post-war multiculturalism and questions of integration: how society looked like + the educational role of Paddington+ how exactly does the book educate (text analysis) Cultural negotiation and identity formation: based on text analysis Conclusion

  • Comparison of one character from The Iliad and one character…

    1. Required Topic Printed in the lecture material for ancient Greek epic poetry are several characteristics of this type of poetry along with the main characters of each poem. For this essay, you will choose ONE character from The Iliad and ONE character from The Odyssey. You are to compare and contrast these two characters. You should compare and contrast the following: Characterization Motives Relevancy to the work You will need to have at least 2 primary sources AND 3 secondary sources and cite them using proper MLA citations. In-text citations are REQUIRED and must include proper notations. 2. Required Organization and Development Your essay should contain 5 paragraphs: Introduction Body Paragraph 1 Body Paragraph 2 Body Paragraph 3 Conclusion Your essay should be developed according to this recipe: Paragraph #1 Introduce your topic. Include a clear thesis statement. Paragraph #2 Begin this paragraph with a topic sentence about the first main idea. Develop this topic sentence with ample support. Paragraph #3 Begin this paragraph with a topic sentence about the second main idea. Develop this topic sentence with ample support. Paragraph #4 Begin this paragraph with a topic sentence about the third main idea. Develop this topic sentence with ample support. Paragraph #5 Begin this paragraph with a summary sentence of your main ideas. End this paragraph with an appropriate closing thought; do not mention any new information. Your essay length: Include no more than a total of 1000 Additional guidelines: Use present tense Use third person Required Format Microsoft Word only Double-space every Use 12 pt. Times New Required Identification Heading to be typed in the upper left area of page 1: Your name ENG 271 Date submitted Required Title Center a brief title that capsules the subject of the paper. Required Submission Submit this essay by the required date/time. Grading Plagiarism of any kind will earn a grade of 0%. An essay that does not address the topic will earn a grade of 0%. An essay that is not in the correct format will earn a grade of 0%. In this assignment, you will submit two key components essential to the completion of your research paper: the rough draft and the Brainfuse feedback report. 1. Rough Draft: Your rough draft should be a comprehensive version of your research paper, written in its entirety. This draft should reflect your best effort in organizing your thoughts, presenting your arguments, and integrating the research you have conducted. While this is a rough draft, it should still be polished enough to demonstrate your understanding of the topic and the requirements of the assignment.

  • Comparing and contrasting characters from The Iliad and The…

    Here are some thesis statement templates you can use for your essay comparing and contrasting a character from The Iliad and The Odyssey: Template 1: “In both The Iliad and The Odyssey, [Character A] and [Character B] serve as pivotal figures, but their characterization, motives, and relevance to their respective works reveal striking differences and surprising similarities, shedding light on the complexities of heroism in ancient Greek literature.” Template 2: “Although [Character A] in The Iliad and [Character B] in The Odyssey both embody the traits of a classical hero, a close examination of their character development, personal motives, and significance within each epic highlights contrasting perspectives on courage, honor, and fate.” Template 3: “While The Iliad’s [Character A] and The Odyssey’s [Character B] share a common heroic stature, their distinct character traits, motivations, and importance within the narratives showcase how Homer explores different facets of leadership and human struggle in Greek society.” Template 4: “By comparing the characterization, motives, and relevance of [Character A] from The Iliad and [Character B] from The Odyssey, it becomes clear that although both characters are central to their epics, their paths to heroism reveal contrasting views on glory, loyalty, and personal growth.” Assignment Description: In this assignment, you will share your thesis statement for your upcoming paper and provide constructive feedback on your classmates’ thesis statements. This exercise will help you refine your own thesis and develop critical analysis skills. Part 1: Thesis Statement Submission (Discussion Board) Instructions: Create a new post in the “Thesis Statement Critique” discussion board. In your post, include: a. Your name b. Your research paper topic c. Your current thesis statement (1-2 sentences) d. A brief explanation of your thesis (2-3 sentences

  • Discussion

    Exercise

    In this module we explored different types of reasoning, including thought experiments, subjective and objective claims, and scientific reasoning. At the end of Chapter 2 in Critical Reasoning and Writing on pgs. 20 and 21, the authors describe the Monty Hall Problem which demonstrates how knowing more helps us to guess better, even when it seems like the outcome is already fixed. Please reflect on the questions at the end of the chapter 2 about the Monty Hall problem in about 300 to 400 words. Here are the questions:

    “Suppose you’re on a game show, and you’re given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what’s behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, ‘Do you want to pick door No. 2?’ Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?”

    Is it to your advantage to switch? Does it matter? Think about what you would do and why. Try it out yourself in a little experiment where you use cards to represent the goats and car. Pretend to be the contestant and host by picking a door and then either switching or staying with your door. Try sticking with your pick the first 10 times and then switching the next 10 times (remember that Monty Hall will ALWAYS show you a goat when he reveals a door). Was there any difference in outcome? Why do you think you got these results? You can look online for further discussions of this ‘puzzle.’ (pg. 21)

    Please read and respond to at least two of your peers’ posts in 75 to 100 words each.