Category: Literature

I need this essay rewriting not plagiarized. Must be in MLA format .

The direction how it should be:

For this discussion and all discussion in this class, you’ll want to create a complete essay, 5-7 paragraphs. That essay should include an introduction that narrows to a thesis. That thesis should foreshadow the main ideas of your body paragraphs. After the introduction, you want to include 3-5 body paragraphs based on the paragraph plan shared in Module resources. And after the body paragraphs, wrap up your essay with a conclusion, then a Works Cited in MLA format. You are not required to use outside sources, but if you do, cite them also in MLA format.

*remember: no I–no first person allowed in essays.

Each essay should be 250 or more words.

Essay Question;

In the poetry section of Native American Oral Literature, we read “Cherokee War Song,” and “Lenape War Song.”

From your readings of the Introduction, the poems, and the notes included in the textbook, what are the key values of the speakers in these poems? Quote specific examples from the poems to support your stance.

Essay

:Cherokee war song is part of the memoirs of Lieut Henry Timberlake Who accompanied three Cherokee chiefs to London. Timberlake noted that many of the Cherokee war songs were beautiful to listen to and were created ad lib. Cherokee war song although at first glance it may seem as if it is violent and vengeful; the key value the speaker of the poem gives off is the lamentation of people who have been persecuted and displaced who wish for the safety of them and their families. The Lenape war song on the other hand can be considered more of a religious song rather than a war song: it is a prayer which the people of Lenni Lenape tribe would sing before they went to war with the Europeans. Both of the war songs give insights to the cruel nature of war, as well as the love of family and community/ tribe.

One key value that the speaker in the Cherokee war song and in the Lenape war song have is the desire to ensure safety and peace for their respective families and community. In Cherokee war song the poem states that, Pinchd by each blast, by evry thicket torn, run back to their own nation, now its scorn. (Cherokee war song). From this excerpt it is clear that the Cherokee people just want the English men to go back to their homeland or rather country and leave their (the Cherokee peoples) land and people alone. In the Lenape war song, the speaker states

that, O! though Great Spirit above! Take pity on my children and on my wife! Prevent their mourning on my account! (Lenape war song) In this excerpt, the speaker is asking the gods to protect his family from any dangers that may occur or ensue when he is way, he also in the poem is asking the gods to protect him so that he can back to his family

Another key value of the speakers of the Cherokee war song and the Lenape war song is the cruel nature of war : In Cherokee war song, the speaker states that, But when we go, who knows which shall return, when growing dangers rise with each new morn? Farewell, ye little ones, ye tender wives, for you alone we would conserve our lives. (Cherokee war song). This excerpt showcases that the men would go off to fight in order to protect their families from the invaders, however, they (the warriors)would worry if they would be able to make it back home at the end of the day to their loved ones. In the Lenape war song, the poem opens with the statement, O poor me! Who am I going out to fight the enemy, and know not whether I shall return again, to the embraces of my children and my wife. (Lenape war song) Similar to the speaker of the Cherokee war song, the speaker of the Lenape war song is worried whether he would be able to make safe back home. This showcases that the war between the Europeans and the Natives were so cruel that it left many of the warriors dead therefore whenever the warriors went for war, they did not know whether or not they would make back home alive.

Both of the speakers, in both war songs showcase a key value of wanting to drive the enemy (the Europeans) out of their land and territories. In the Cherokee war song, the speaker states that, Like men we go, to meet our countrys foes, who woman-like, shall fly our dreaded blowsLet them sit down, from friends and country far, and wish, with tears, they neer had

come to war.. Their painted scalps shall be a step to fame, and grace our own glorious countrys name. (Cherokee war song) In this excerpt, the speaker is essentially stating that they would revert to using violence to destroy the white man who invaded their territory, killed their loved ones and stole their lands. The Lenape war song speaker states that, Grant that I may be successful in this attempt- That I may slay my enemy, And bring home the trophies of war to my dear family and friends that we may rejoice (Lenape war song) The speaker is essentially asking the great spirits to give him strength to win the war and this involved killing the enemy or driving them back to their home country.

From observation, it is clear that both the Cherokee war song and the Lenape war song are a plea of people who have been stolen from, murdered, displaced and are therefore terrified and exhausted and just want safety of them, their families and the community at large so that their life can be as it were before the European invaded. The speaker showcase that the only way to accomplish their goals of safety and acquiring their lands is bloodshed, which they are willing to indulge in.

References

“Cherokee War Song” Norton Anthology of American Literature. Gen. ed. Nina Baym. 8th ed. Vol. A. New York: Norton 2012.

“Lenape War song” Norton Anthology of American Literature. Gen. ed. Nina Baym. 8th ed. Vol. A. New York: Norton 2

Case study: Major League Baseball

This week you will prepare your first case studies. To better assist you, an example of a case study analysis is included in this weeks Canvas information. (I always like examples when I’m doing things for the first time!) As you approach the case study, read through the information, and note the key negotiation points for all parties involved.

Please write your analysis in this format:

Section I. Overview of the Case

1. Provide an overview description of the case. The reader should not have to have read the case to understand the analysis. Summarize it for the reader.
2. Identify the key ideas, concepts, principles, actions.
3. Think of the first paragraph of a newspaper article and provide the who, what, where, why, and how. Just the facts and identify what the case centers around.

Section II. Background

Provide a historical general background summary of the case.

Section III. Situation

Discuss the people/groups involved and highlight the situation being negotiated. Provide details and tell the story of what the main points involved with the case are.

Section IV. BATNA and Aspiration Point (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement):

In this section, discuss the agreement.

1. What are the terms being negotiated?
2. What might occur if the negotiation falls apart?
3. What would happen to each side and their positioning?
4. What options would each side have?
5. What actions might they take? Continue discussion? Fail to reach an agreement? Other?
6. What is the optimistic goal for the negotiation? What would appease both sides? How can a win-win for both parties occur?

Section V. Strategies/Tactics:

What approach should be taken to resolve this situation? Why would that approach be beneficial?

Rubric

2020_Writing Rubric_AS/VS/Online (1)

2020_Writing Rubric_AS/VS/Online (1)

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentRubric Weight – 45%	20 to >17.32 ptsLevel 4Paper provides complete analysis and synthesis of the researched information. Paper covers all key points as outlined in the assignment. If required, CWV addressed completely.17.32 to >14.68 ptsLevel 3Paper provides analysis and synthesis of the researched information. Paper covers most key points as outlined in the assignment. If required, CWV addressed adequately. 14.68 to >10.68 ptsLevel 2Paper provides only basic information and key points as outlined in the assignment. If required, only basic CWV included.10.68 to >0 ptsLevel 1Paper does not supply substantive information and key points as outlined in the assignment. Paper also does not present an analysis or synthesis of the researched information. If required, CVW not included.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationRubric Weight – 30%	15 to >12.51 ptsLevel 4Information and key points are appropriately aligned, and the reader can easily follow the organization of the paper12.51 to >9.99 ptsLevel 3Information and key points are mostly aligned so the reader can follow the organization of the paper. 9.99 to >7.5 ptsLevel 2Information and key points are somewhat aligned so the reader can follow the organziation of the paper.7.5 to >0 ptsLevel 1Paper does not supply substantive information and key points as outlined in the assignment. Paper also does not present an analysis or synthesis of the researched information. If required, CVW not included.	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanicsRubric Weight – 15%	10 to >9.0 ptsLevel 4The paper demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions and word choice (mechanics, usage, grammar, and syntax).9 to >8.0 ptsLevel 3The paper demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar, and syntax). 8 to >7.5 ptsLevel 2The paper demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar, and syntax).7.5 to >0 ptsLevel 1The paper does not demonstrate consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar, and syntax). Much of the writing is not clear because of the degree of errors.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA FormattingRubric Weight – 10%	5 to >4.5 ptsLevel 4Nearly error-free APA format4.5 to >4.0 ptsLevel 3Limited minor APA errors in format 4 to >3.75 ptsLevel 2Frequent minor APA errors in format3.75 to >0 ptsLevel 1Frequent APA errors in format	5 pts

Total Points: 50

Case Study: Major League Baseball

Directions: Read the following case study and prepare an analysis of this case study using the

format template provided. See Example Case Study Analysis Paper- Case Analysis for 500

English Sentences on the previous page.

Much of the key information for this case study is highlighted to assist you. Remember to

address the following areas: overview, background, situation, BATNA and aspiration point,

strategies, and tactics used to reach an agreement.

Major League Baseball (MLB) is a professional sports league where contract negotiations

between players and teams are a common occurrence. This case study involves a high-profile

contract negotiation between a star player, Alex Rodriguez, and the New York Yankees.

Alex Rodriguez, commonly known as A-Rod, has had a storied career in Major League Baseball

(MLB). Born in 1975 in New York City, he showed extraordinary baseball talent from a young

age and quickly rose through the ranks of amateur and minor-league baseball. A-Rod made his

MLB debut in 1994 with the Seattle Mariners, where he gained a reputation as a powerful and

versatile player. His impressive skills on the field made him one of the most sought-after players

in the league.

In 2000, A-Rod signed a historic contract with the Texas Rangers worth $252 million over ten

years, making it one of the most lucrative sports contracts in history at the time. This landmark

deal signaled a shift in player salaries and set high expectations for future contracts.

In 2004, A-Rod was traded to the New York Yankees, a team with a rich history and an

established winning tradition. His tenure with the Yankees was marked by impressive individual

performances, including MVP awards and numerous records broken.

However, by the time of this contract negotiation, A-Rod had been with the Yankees for almost a

decade and was nearing the end of his current contract. At the age of 37, he faced questions

about his long-term performance, and concerns about his age were becoming a factor in

negotiations. A-Rod’s agent pushed for a multi-year extension with a salary increase, while the

Yankees’ management was cautious due to A-Rod’s age and the desire to manage their payroll

within a budget.

The New York Yankees had a tradition of fielding highly competitive teams but also faced

financial constraints due to salary cap considerations and the desire to avoid luxury tax penalties.

They had been balancing their commitment to winning with the need to manage their budget

effectively.

The negotiation between A-Rod and the Yankees became a high-profile event, closely followed

by fans, the media, and the entire baseball community. Given A-Rod’s history of groundbreaking

contracts and the Yankees’ reputation as a flagship team in the league, this negotiation had

broader implications for the future of baseball player contracts and team finances.

Both parties entered the negotiation with clear objectives. A-Rod wanted to secure his future and

financial stability, while the Yankees aimed to maintain competitiveness while managing their

budget. The negotiation process was a complex interplay of contractual, financial, and personal

considerations, with both sides ultimately seeking a mutually beneficial agreement that satisfied

their respective needs and concerns.

Key Players Involved:

1. Alex Rodriguez (Player): One of the most prolific and highly paid baseball players, A-

Rod is nearing the end of his current contract with the New York Yankees.

2. New York Yankees (Team): One of the most successful baseball franchises, the Yankees

are eager to retain A-Rod’s services but within a budget.

3. Player’s Agent: Representing Alex Rodriguez’s interests and working to secure the best

possible contract.

4. MLB Commissioner’s Office: Overseeing the negotiation to ensure it adheres to league

rules and guidelines.

5. Media and Fans: Watching closely, with high expectations and opinions about the

negotiations.

Issues to Address:

1. The length of the contract extension.

2. The annual salary needs to be competitive yet reasonable.

3. Performance-based incentives, given A-Rod’s age and performance concerns.

4. Protection clauses in case of injury or declining performance.

5. Public relations and fan sentiment, as this is a high-profile negotiation.

Challenges:

1. A-Rod’s previous contracts have been among the largest in MLB history, setting high

expectations for this negotiation.

2. The Yankees are determined to maintain a competitive team while managing their

payroll.

3. A-Rod’s age and performance concerns have raised doubts among the team’s

management.

4. Public scrutiny and media attention can impact negotiation dynamics.

Alex Rodriguez (Player) Wants:

a. Long-Term Security: A-Rod desires a multi-year contract extension to secure his future

with the Yankees and ensure financial stability in the later stages of his career.

b. Higher Annual Salary: As a high-profile player with a history of impressive

performances, A-Rod expects a significant increase in his annual salary compared to his

previous contract.

c. Performance Incentives: A-Rod wants to include performance-based incentives in his

contract, which would reward him for exceptional achievements, such as home runs,

RBIs, and All-Star selection.

d. Recognition and Legacy: A-Rod values his legacy and wants to continue playing for a

prestigious team like the New York Yankees, where he can maintain his status as one of

the all-time greats in the sport.

New York Yankees (Team) Wants:

a. Budget Management: The Yankees want to maintain a competitive team while

managing their payroll within a set budget to ensure financial stability and allocate

resources to other aspects of the team.

b. Mitigated Risk: Given A-Rod’s age and concerns about his long-term performance, the

Yankees are looking for protection clauses that would safeguard them from potential

financial burdens in the event of injury or severe decline in A-Rod’s performance.

c. Shorter Contract: To balance budget constraints and mitigate risk, the team prefers a

shorter contract term that provides more flexibility in the future.

d. Public Relations and Fan Support: The Yankees are aware of the public relations

aspect and the impact on fan sentiment. They want a contract that, while cost-effective,

doesn’t alienate fans or create negative media attention.

Key Negotiation Points:

1. Contract Length: A-Rod seeks a long-term extension (4-5 years), while the Yankees

prefer a shorter contract (2-3 years) for budget flexibility.

2. Annual Salary: A-Rod is aiming for a high annual salary (comparable to previous

contracts), while the Yankees want to manage payroll by offering a lower base salary.

3. Performance Incentives: A-Rod is interested in performance-based incentives to earn

more, but the Yankees want to ensure the team’s financial stability by limiting additional

payouts.

4. Protection Clauses: The Yankees insist on protection clauses that would reduce

financial risk in case of injury or performance decline, while A-Rod may resist overly

restrictive terms.

5. Public Relations: Both parties need to consider public relations and fan sentiment,

striving for a contract that maintains a positive image for both A-Rod and the team.

Final Negotiation Agreement:

1. Contract Length: The parties agree to a three-year contract extension. A-Rod’s desire

for long-term security is acknowledged, but the Yankees prioritize flexibility in the event

that A-Rod’s performance declines or other opportunities arise.

2. Annual Salary: A-Rod receives an annual base salary of $15 million, which is lower

than his previous contracts but still competitive. The Yankees managed to stay within

budget constraints while retaining a star player.

3. Performance Incentives: The contract includes performance-based incentives to

motivate A-Rod to excel. These incentives include bonuses for reaching specific

milestones, such as home runs, RBIs, and All-Star selections. A-Rod is incentivized to

maintain high-performance levels.

4. Protection Clauses: The Yankees include protection clauses to mitigate risk in case A-

Rod faces a serious injury or a sharp decline in performance. These clauses offer a

reduced salary if he becomes unable to play due to specific injury-related circumstances.

This provides the Yankees with some financial safeguards.

5. Public Relations: Both parties understand the importance of public relations and fan

sentiment. A joint statement is issued to the media, emphasizing A-Rod’s commitment to

the team and the Yankees’ dedication to maintaining a competitive roster. This

cooperative approach fosters a positive image for both A-Rod and the team.

The negotiation process was complex, involving several rounds of discussions, concessions, and

compromises. Ultimately, the finalized contract extension balanced A-Rod’s financial

expectations with the Yankees’ budgetary constraints and risk management priorities.

This agreement allowed A-Rod to continue his career with the New York Yankees while

preserving the financial stability of the team. It served as a testament to the intricate nature of

contract negotiations in Major League Baseball, where both parties must find common ground to

reach a mutually satisfactory agreement.

Negotiating these key points effectively was crucial for achieving a balanced contract satisfying

both A-Rod’s financial expectations and the Yankees’ budgetary constraints and risk management

priorities. This negotiation illustrates the intricate nature of contract negotiations in Major

League Baseball, where the desires and concerns of both parties must be carefully considered.