Category: Literature

  • literature in global context

    a critical analysis of any 2 of the following work

    I am from clothespins,

    from Clorox and carbon-tetrachloride.

    I am from dirt under the back porch . . .

    Im from the know-it-alls

    and the pass-it-ons,

    from Perk up! and Pipe down!

    Im from He restoreth my soul

    with a cottonball lamb

    and ten verses I can say myself.

    George Ella

    A POEM BY

    I am Hajara Eve Muzammal.

    First generation, Pakistani American, and female.

    My Pakistani dad called me for dinner in his thick accent.

    I rush downstairs and begin eating Daal and Roti with him.

    As we eat, we watch the 2021 election.

    Biden vs Trump.

    Biden’s vote goes higher, OUR BUSINESS!, my dad blurted out.

    I am distraught.

    How can my dad be so selfish about his business rather than human issues?

    Women’s rights, racism, etc.

    Does that mean nothing to him?

    Is he okay seeing his brown daughter suffering from sexism and racism?

    As a white male, he has no worry in the world.

    Male and white. Perfect!

    I am ambitious.

    I blurted back How can you be so self centered? My brown eyes are secured on him.

    Stew trickling down on his chin.

    The next 1800 seconds, we were at each other’s throat.

    My mother comes in with her red sequin lehenga.

    We stop and admire my mothers beauty.

    Mother scolded me for disrespecting dad, love patriarchy.

    I am disappointed.

    I go back upstairs with one piece of roti.

    I sit in solitude and start questioning my family.

    Am I okay with this?

    No.

    I am a feminist.

    by

  • Analyze how the stories of past kings in the opening of Beow…

    For this in-class writing assignment, you will write a brief critical analysis essay, just as we practiced in class. Choose one of the three questions, and respond, using the excerpts from both the accompanying literary text and the critical text. As practiced in class, your essay can take the following shape: I. Introduction: Answer the prompt question in a way that is specific, arguable, and focused. (Remember: For a bluebook essay, this just needs to be a sentence two sentences tops!) Il. Body Paragraphs): You only need to do one, but if you are feeling ambitious, you can certainly attempt two. (Be mindful of time.). Here you will support your argument with reasons and evidence. You can use the TEXAS paragraph format. Topic Sentence: Make a claim about the literary text that supports your argument. Explain: Explain the critical context or lens that you’ll be applying. eXample (Evidence): Provide examples from the literary text that demonstrate what you’re claiming. Analyze: How or why does this example demonstrate what you’re claiming. Summarize / So what?: Say what applying the critical lens helps us understand about the literary text. Ill. Conclusion: You have two options restate your argument or explain the big picture/broader implications. Like your introduction, this should only be a sentence or two. 3: The Old English poem Beowulf is a monomythic story, the tale of a “hero’s journey” about Beowulf himself. However, in the opening of Beowul, the narator relates stories of past kings to his own community, so how might these stories function as a kind of “monomyth” for the community Joseph Campbell describes in The Power of Myth? listening to the narrator? How might Beowul/help them make sense of their own world in the way Excerpts Beowulf Anonymous, Oral Tradition (Unknown date, between the 6th and 10″h centuries) Bro! Tell me we still know how to speak of kings! In the old days. everyone knew what men were: brave, bold, glory-bound. Privilege is the way-men-prime power. teworld.over. Only stories now, but I’ll sound the Spear-Danes’ song, hoarded for hungry times. Their first father was a foundling: Scyld Scefing. He spent his youth fists up, browbeating every barstool-brother, bonfiring his enemies. That man began in the waves, a baby in a basket, but he bootstrapped his way into a kingdom, trading loneliness for luxury. Whether they thought kneeling necessary or no, everyone from head to tail of the whale-road bent down: There’s a king, there’s his crown! That was a good king. Later, God sent Scyld a son, a wolf cub, further proof of manhood. Being God, He knew how the Spear-Danes had suffered, the misery they’d mangled through, leaderless, long years of loss, so the Life-lord, that Almighty Big Boss, birthed them an Earth-shaker. Beow’s name kissed legions of lips by the time he was half-grown, but his own father was still breathing. We all know a boy can’t daddy until his daddy’s dead. A smart son gives 20 gifts to his father’s friends in peacetime. When war woos him, as war will, he’ll need those troops to follow the leader. Scyld was iron until the end. When he died, his warriors executed his final orders. They swaddled their king of rings and did just as the Dane had demanded, back when mind and meter could merge in his mouth. 30 They bore him to the harbor, and into the bosom of a ship, that father they’d followed, that man they’d adored. She was anchored and eager to embark, an ice maiden built to bear the weight of a prince. They laid him by the mast, packed tight in his treasure-trove, bright swords, war-weeds, his lap holding a hoard of flood-tithes, each fare-coin placed by a loyal man. He who pays the piper calls the tune. His shroud shone, ringed in runes, sun-stitched. I’ve never heard of any ship so heavy, nor corpse so rich. Scyld came into the world unfavored; his men weighted him as well as the strangers had, who’d once warped him to the waves’ weft. Even ghosts must be fitted to fight. The war-band flew a golden flag over their main man; the salt sea saluted him, so too the storms, and Seyld’s soldiers got drunk instead of crying. They mourned the way men do. No man knows, not me, not you, who hauled Scyld’s hoard to shore, but the poor are plentiful, and somebody create something like this on hamlet act 1 scene 1

    No exact word count or page length is mentioned.

    However, the instructions indicate that this is a very short in-class critical analysis essay (bluebook essay) with the following structure:

    1. Introduction
    • 12 sentences answering the prompt.
    1. Body Paragraph(s)
    • At least one paragraph (two if time allows).
    1. Conclusion
    • 12 sentences restating the argument or explaining the broader significance.

    So the expected length is essentially a brief essay of about 12 analytical paragraphs.

    The assignment asks students to:

    1. Choose one of the three questions (the text you shared corresponds to Question 3).
    2. Use excerpts from two sources:
    • the literary text (Beowulf)
    • the critical text (The Power of Myth by Joseph Campbell).
    1. Write a critical analysis essay applying a theoretical perspective to the literary text.

    The body paragraph should follow the TEXAS paragraph structure:

    • T Topic Sentence: A claim about the literary text that supports the argument.
    • E Explain: Explain the critical framework or theoretical lens.
    • X Example: Provide textual evidence from Beowulf.
    • A Analyze: Explain how the example supports the claim.
    • S Summarize / So What: Explain what this analysis reveals about the text.
  • CHEY: LITERATURE REVIEW

    The topic: The relationship between stress and students achievements.

    ONLY REVIEW THE PROVIDED SOURCE.

    You will be required to complete a literature review of of the provided article. To help you to start the process, I will require 3 literature reviews of a single scientific paper. For these literature reviews you will need the following in your papers:
    1. Purpose
    2. Literature Review (Summary)
    3. Hypothesis
    4. Subjects
    1. Number
    2. Describe
    3. How they were selected (how the article was selected)
    5. Materials
    6. Procedures –
    1. Independent variable
    2. Dependent variable
    3. Statistical Analysis charts + graphs of data
    4. Procedures (Method Section)
    7. Results – What ere the results – statistics – p value
    8. Conclusions – Whut do there suts mean? Wimpould he done differently?
    Each paper should be no less than 3 pages and no more than 5 pages with 1.5-inch margins all the way around and nothing bigger than an 11-point font.

    Struthers, C. W., Perry, R. P., & Menec, V. H. (2000). An examination of the relationship among academic stress, coping, motivation, and performance in college. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 311330.

  • Literature Question

    The articulation of the relationship between individual and societal forces is often challenged in modern literary studies using character and narrative structure. Choose any work that you have read and critically analyze the way the author describes the conflict between individual selfhood and current social norms.

    In your analysis, you must explain how one of these main characters tried to cope with at least some external pressure, such as cultural norms, family obligation, social hierarchy, gender ideology or political thought. Demonstrate how the author uses particular literary deviations, like symbolism, subtle characterization, dialogic conversation, expressive imagery, or change of narrative point of view, to prefigure this conflict.

    Moreover, consider the ways in which the decisions or changes of the character contribute to the thematic issues of the text in general. Establish the following: Does the protagonist eventually internalize itself to social expectations, or does it struggle forcefully, or does it aim to establish a compromise, and give specific textual proof to your argument.

    Your answer will also be expected to be rigorously critical and an active engagement with the content. It is suggested not to recapitulate the plot in a reductive manner, but focus on the interpretation analysis of the communicative intent of the author with respect to the individual-society dynamic.

    Answer should be in APA format times new roman.NO use of AI

  • Discussion Post 5 and 6

    Discussion Post 5: Jacobs Part 2 300 words

    In the second part of Jacobs’ narrative we see the extraordinary journey she takes to secure her young family’s freedom. This section ends with her retreat into the attic hiding spot, where she will remain for a mind-boggling seven years. Write a post in which you reflect on Jacobs’ determined path to freedom. How does her story clarify for her readers the evils of slavery and the promises of freedom?

    Discussion Post 6: Douglass Part 1 300 words

    Douglass’ iconic narrative, published in 1845, is the most widely read of all the slave narratives produced during the abolition movement. It’s the model for Olney’s outline of the slave narrative and a remarkable literary achievement. The first part of Douglass’ narrative recounts his childhood and young years in slavery. Write a post in which you choose one facet of Douglass’ story as your focus. How does his narrative unveil the realities of plantation slavery for his readers?

  • Discussion Post 3 and 4

    Discussion Post 3: Olaudah Equiano Part 1 300 words

    Olaudah Equiano’s narrative, published in 1789, was the first slave narrative published for the English-speaking world. Readers were riveted by Equiano’s story, which is first and foremost a slave narrative, but also recounts his conversion to Christianity and his adventures as a sailor and merchant. His narrative galvanized the abolition movement in Great Britain and significantly impacted the growing national conversation about slavery in the newly formed US.

    Among slave narratives, Equiano’s literary achievement is notable for two elements: the description of his home culture in present-day Nigeria, and his account of his kidnapping and terrifying journey through the Middle Passage. Both of these accounts are found in chapters 1-3.

    Write a post in which you choose one of the many arguments that Equiano makes in these chapters. Why do you think this argument was effective for Equiano’s readers?

    Discussion Post 4: Mary Prince 300 words

    Mary Prince was the first woman of color to publish her own story about her experience as a slave. Published in 1831, her narrative tells the story of her life and how she became caught between Antigua and Great Britain. It was her idea to write the narrative–she explicitly states her purpose of informing English-speaking readers about the realities of slavery. Write a post of about 300 words in response to this question: How does Mary Prince’s narrative reveal new aspects about life in slavery, particularly women’s experiences in slavery?

  • Discussion Post 1 and 2

    Discussion Post 1: Lydia Maria Child 300 words

    Lydia Maria Child presents a variety of arguments to her northern readership about slavery’s evils. Choose one of the arguments she makes as the focus for your post — what do you think this particular argument is trying to demonstrate about slavery, and what do you think it reveals about Americans’ understanding of slavery? In other words, why was this argument necessary?

    Excerpts from Lydia Maria Child’s An Appeal in Favor of that Class of Americans Called Africans, 1833

    Discussion Post 2: The Abolitionist Press Part 1 300 words

    The Liberator was the leading newspaper of abolitionist movement, and William Lloyd Garrison was one of its most prominent voices. Write a post of about 300 words in which you give an overall description of the first two issues. What are the most significant aspects of this newspaper’s tone, delivery, and framing of key issues? How does it characterize the abolitionist movement and their opponents?

  • Long Essay: Wicked Stuff

    Choose one (1) of the following three topic questions to write a well thought-out and organized literary response paper based on your reading of Wicked. Remember to state your thesis early and clearly in your finished paper, and a reminder you MUST use other texts from the course as well (dont ask for a minimum requirementjust do it).

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): GRADINGRUBRIC.docx, Wicked28Maguire29.pdf, Essay204pdf.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • ELT381 Singapore Literature Tutor-Marked Assignment 2

    Pick either Option A or Option B. (100 marks) Option A: Analyse how Haresh Sharmas Model Citizens and Felix Cheongs Two Heads Are Better Than One use irony and dialogue to reveal the tension between public morality and private hypocrisy in Singapore society. OR Option B: Analyse how Haresh Sharmas Model Citizens and Felix Cheongs The Model Family portray the family as a microcosm of the nation. How do domestic conflicts mirror broader social and political anxieties in Singapore? You should also cite at least two relevant scholarly sources in your essay. Dont forget to cite both your primary text and secondary sources in MLA style and include them in Works Cited. ‘The Model Family’ and ‘Two Heads are Better than One’ are included in the attachments. The file titled ‘ELT381 TMA Jan26 (Revised)’ is the original question paper. The checklist was provided by my lecturer as reminders before we submit our assignments. I would like you to include the cover page in the final copy. The file name beginning with a number is my previously submitted assignment. I hope you can write similar to my writing style with improvements based on the feedback provided by my lecturer.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): BAEL Assignment Cover Page_MLA style (ELT).docx, 2876145456 – NADA TAY BINTE ROSLAN – ELT381_TMA01_Z2480020_NadaTayBinteRoslan.docx, ELT381 TMA Jan26 (Revised).pdf, CHECKLIST.docx, The Model Family.pdf, Two Heads are Better than One.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • See instructions

    For this assignment, you are expected to write a university-level literature essay that analyzes and interprets a literary text. Each student has a specific approved topic that should be discussed and book that should be cited. The purpose of the essay is not to simply summarize the story, but to present a clear argument about the text and explain how different literary elements contribute to its meaning. As you read the work, you should pay attention to aspects such as themes, characterization, symbolism, and the authors use of language.

    Your essay should begin with an introduction (100-150 words) that briefly presents the text and introduces the main argument of your essay. This central argument, or thesis, should clearly state the interpretation you will develop throughout your paper. It should be specific and guide the direction of your analysis.

    In the main part of the essay (800-1000 words), you should develop your argument by closely analyzing the text. You are expected to refer to specific moments, descriptions, or quotations to support your ideas. Rather than retelling the plot, focus on explaining how the authors choicessuch as imagery, narrative structure, or character developmenthelp communicate deeper themes or ideas.

    Throughout the essay, maintain a clear structure and a formal academic tone. Each part of your discussion should connect to your main argument and help build a coherent interpretation of the text. Your writing should guide the reader through your reasoning and demonstrate careful engagement with the literary work.

    In your conclusion (100-150 words), briefly restate your main argument and reflect on the significance of your analysis. This final section should show why your interpretation of the text is meaningful and what it reveals about the work as a whole.

    Do not forget to cite other course materials and any credible sources to support your statements.