Category: Nursing

Purpose: This discussion board will allow you to explore the roles of nurses working in community and public health settings. Instructions: Select one of the types of community health nurses: Community Mental Health Nurse School Nurse, Faith Community Nurse Hospice Nurse, Home Health Nurse Disaster Nurse Ambulatory Care Nurse Case Manager Occupational Health Nurse Then include these points in your initial post: Describe the education requirements. Describe the roles (Clinician, Educator, Advocate, Manager, Collaborator, Leader, and Researcher) the nurse plays in their practice. Discuss if certification is available and the requirements for attaining certification. Discuss the unique challenges of this type of nursing. Cite at least one professional or peer-reviewed source other than your text (websites are acceptable). Please post your initial response by 23:59 EST Wednesday and comment on the posts of at least two classmates by 23:59 EST FRIDAY. Each post (Initial and those to peers) must cite and reference at least one professional or peer-reviewed source (a journal article published within the last 5 years) in APA 7th edition. Please upload a PDF copy of any journal articles that you used for your assignment.

Tissue integrity is the concept for this concept map

Week 7 Assignment: Outcomes, Approach, and Budget Objective Identify appropriate expected outcomes for your project. Identify the strategies to implement your project. Deliverables Write a 3-4 page (not including the title and reference pages). APA formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion. APA headings for each section of the paper. At least 5 peer-reviewed references. Step 1: Capstone Project Write a paper identifying the Expected Outcomes, Approach, and Budget for your capstone. Step 2: Consider Expected Outcomes at least 5 What specific questions will your project address? How are these questions related to one another? Approach What will you actually do to address the actionable questions? What will you do to create improved outcomes? Budget (please include the graph containing the budget in this section, copy & paste it just as it is, budget is done already. If not able to do this leave a blank space and I can make the edit) Step 3: Write Write a paper that addresses the criteria above. Use the template attached below. Step 4 Save and Submit Use the template linked below to complete this assignment. BACKGROUND- MY CAPSTONE PROJECT: The goal of this project is to try to improve the mobility and therefore safety of adults with disabilities (physical and cognitive). The adults receive private duty 1-to-1 nursing in their homes and are not acutely sick. They are living their normal lives. This project aims to improve their overall quality of life by a simple intervention. PICOT QUESTION (Must be stated in the introduction paragraph): In adult patients with disabilities that have limited mobility, does a daily 15-minute nurse-led strength exercise program, compared to current practice, increase mobility by 20% over eight weeks? Documents included: -Budget Sheet (for use to include for that section of this paper) -Purpose Paper & Literature Review (previous assignments for clarity on project)

PLEASE USE THESE REFERENCES:

References

Lee, J., Stewart, T. H., & Siebert, E. A. (2021). A university-based exercise program for postsecondary transition students with disabilities. Palaestra, 35(2), 4448.

Ringsten, M., Ivanic, B., Iwarsson, S., & Mnsson Lexell, E. (2024). Interventions to improve outdoor mobility among people living with disabilities: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2), 178.

ORourke, R., Sabiston, C., Trinh, L., & Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. (2023). The indirect effects of basic psychological needs on the relationship between physical activity and mental health in adults with disabilities: A cross-sectional study. Advances in Rehabilitation, 37(4), 111.

Savage, M. N., Tomaszewski, B. T., & Hume, K. A. (2022). Step it up: Increasing physical activity for adults with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability using supported self-management and Fitbit technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 37(3), 146157.

Ringsten, M., Ivanic, B., Iwarsson, S., & Mnsson Lexell, E. (2024). Interventions to improve outdoor mobility among people living with disabilities: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2), 178.

The case study paper will be due in Week 7. This paper may be written in paragraph, bulleted, or a combination of both formats. APA citations, paper formatting, and references must be utilized throughout the assignment. Students are to use the textbook and reputable academic sources as supportive evidence for their analysis. Typical case study paper length is 4-8 pages. Rubric and instructions posted below.” Remember: You must define the disease process down to the cellular level. At least 5-6 references are required.

You will create an 8-to-10-Minute Narrated Video made using Panopto or any other video tool. Videos must include you presenting slides with content regarding your paper.

Using or any other software tool, create a recorded presentation that promotes your EBP paper from Week 7. You may use PowerPoint or any other media to develop up to 10 slides to be used in the video presentation.

The presentation should

• Explain models clarity and conciseness.
• Discuss models diagrammatic representation.
• Discuss model’s comprehensiveness.
• Discuss model’s easiness, discuss model’s flexibility.
• Explain the models use and popularity.
• Describe the resources needed to implement the model.

Include a table that summarizes your evidence in the presentation. Conclude with a summarization of the key points and major lessons you learned from this project.

Presentation Guidelines

Below is a list of the video presentation guidelines:

1. Review the rubric. It will ensure all the required components are present in order for you to obtain the most credit for your efforts.
2. Include visual aids. Reinforce your presentation with graphs, pictures, or charts to keep the presentation interesting and to support your findings.
3. Organize your work. Plan your presentation and structure it in a clear and logical manner. Use professional language and support your content with current literature.
4. Duration of the video is limited to no more than 8-10 minutes You must personally narrate the presentation starting with “This is [your name]” Narration must be audible and clear.
5. Presentation should be made from no more than 10 slides (not including the title page and references) and must have a professional appearance.
6. The first slide contains the title and your name. Content slides must contain both text and images with appropriate captioning to ensure clarity.
7. The final version must be a narrated video recorded using Panopto or any software or tool. The videos will be uploaded to the assignment using My Panopto Videos. See instructions for

EBP Project Presentation Rubric

EBP Project Presentation Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Introduction

5 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Clearly identifies the EBP common model selected.

2.5 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Selected uncommon model or does not discuss any model.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Explains models clarity and conciseness

15 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Clearly explains the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses in details how they can support answering their PICOT question.

13.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Describes the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and addresses with some details how they can support answering their PICOT question.

12 pts

Approaches Expectations

Explains the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization and partially addresses how it relates to their PICOT question.

9 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Inadequately explains the clarity and conciseness of the models concepts and organization or does not relate them to their PICOT question.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of models diagrammatic representation

15 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Thoroughly explains the model’s diagram, addressing how it enhances understanding and applies to the PICOT question, while discussing its clarity, comprehensiveness, and relevance for clinical practice or evidence-based implementation.

13.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Discusses the diagram, pointing out its basic features and its connection to the PICOT question, though lacking deep analysis of how the diagram enhances understanding.

12 pts

Approaches Expectations

The diagram is mentioned, but the description is vague or lacks connection to the PICOT question.

9 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to provide a meaningful evaluation of the diagram or its relevance to the PICOT question.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of models comprehensiveness

15 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Explains how well the model addresses all aspects of the PICOT question (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, time) and explains its broad, holistic approach to solving the clinical problem.

12.99 pts

Meets Expectations

Discusses how well the model addresses most aspects of the PICOT question, though some elements may not be fully covered.

9.99 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides limited explanation of how the model covers the PICOT question, with a focus on only a few elements.

8.01 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not adequately explain how the model applies to or addresses the PICOT question.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of model’s easiness

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Thoroughly explains the ease of understanding and applying the model in clinical practice. Considers factors such as simplicity, user-friendliness, and accessibility for healthcare professionals.

8.66 pts

Meets Expectations

Discusses how easy or difficult the model is to understand and implement but lacks sufficient details regarding its ease of use in clinical settings.

6.66 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides minimal or unclear evaluation regarding the ease of applying the model.

5.34 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not address the ease of understanding or applying the model.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of model’s flexibility

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Explains the models adaptability across various clinical settings or populations. Describes how the model can be modified or applied to different situations and still maintain its effectiveness.

8.66 pts

Meets Expectations

Notes that the model may be flexible but does not discuss in detail how it can be applied in diverse settings or populations.

6.66 pts

Approaches Expectations

Describes limited flexibility or applies it only to a specific scenario without considering broader applications.

5.34 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not discuss the flexibility of the model.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Explanation of models use and popularity

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provides a detailed explanation of the models current use in practice and its popularity among healthcare professionals. Points out evidence of its widespread adoption or endorsement in research or clinical settings.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Mentions the models use in practice but lacks substantial evidence or discussion of its popularity or widespread use.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Briefly addresses the use of the model but lacks depth in discussing its popularity or application in practice.

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to provide any meaningful discussion on the models use or popularity.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Resources Needed

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Fully describes the various resources needed to implement the model. Critically examines internal and external resources, as well as any supplies that will be needed. Explains human resources needed.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Describes the feasibility of the model; describes some potential barriers and includes some strategies to overcome them.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

States a few resources needed to implement model. Identifies internal and external resources that will be needed, but does not fully elaborate.

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to explain the various resources needed to implement the model. Does not address the internal or external resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization of Presentation

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Slides are visually well designed, aesthetically pleasing with appropriate use of white space, visuals, and minimal text, on each slide; color and animations are used judiciously; theme is evident throughout to produce a highly cohesive presentation; free from errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Slides are effectively designed with visual appeal including white space, visuals, and minimal text for the most part; color and animations are used appropriately; theme is evident in the presentation for the most part to produce a cohesive presentation and/or minor errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Slides generally include a mix of white space, visuals, and/or text but not consistently and/or some overuse or inappropriate use of color or animations; theme is not consistently evident throughout the presentation and/or some errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Slides generally lack visual appeal and are text-heavy with little or no visuals and/or exhibit an overuse of color or animations; no theme is evident and the presentation appears disjointed rather than unified and/or frequent errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Quality of Argument in Presentation

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Shows a deep/robust understanding of the model and how it fits the PICOT question. Clearly articulates a position or argument in EBP importance and implementation.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Shows a limited understanding of the model and how it fits the PICOT question; articulates a position or argument that is incomplete or limited in EBP importance and implementation

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Shows a superficial understanding of the model and how it fits the PICOT question. Articulates a position or argument that is unfocused or ambiguous in EBP importance and implementation

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Shows no understanding of the model and how it fits the PICOT question. Does not articulate a position or argument in EBP importance and implementation

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Presentation Delivery

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Delivers with a good volume and energy, proper pace and diction; uses complete and grammatically correct sentences

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Delivers with a good volume and energy, generally proper pace and diction; uses almost complete and grammatically correct sentences

8 pts

Approaches Expectations

Delivers with a low volume and energy in most of the presentation, generally proper pace and diction; some sentences were incomplete or included some errors.

6 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Delivers with a low volume or energy; pace too slow or fast; some sentences were incomplete or included many errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Conclusion

5 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Concisely summarizes key points and major lessons learned from the project.

4.33 pts

Meets Expectations

Summarizes some of the key points and lessons learned from the project.

3.33 pts

Approaches Expectations

Summarizes a few points and lesson learned from the project.

2.67 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to summarize the key points and lesson learned from the project

5 pts

please do powerpoint, with narration notes or presentation notes. I will do narration.

Assignment Instructions:

In this week’s assignment, you will be describing an individual of your choosing from history (more than 50 years ago) that has made a difference in fighting for equality. It can be anyone from around the world in history; you are not limited to historical individuals in the United States. You will provide clues as to who you have chosen, but you will not give away the name until the end of your essay.

Follow the directions below, and be sure to include ALL of the information in the prompt. Please see the ESSAY TEMPLATE located for how to format your essay.

Essay Prompt:

Week Seven ‘Who Am I’ Essay:

1. Begin this essay with an introduction that clearly defines the field of sociology and what we mean by global inequality. Include citations after citing them. Follow this with more of an introduction to the topic of your summary.
2. For the body, without giving away the individual you chose, provide details of the individual, such as birthplace, life growing up, and what made this individual fight for equality.

• Write in either first or third person (NOT BOTH). Use phrases such as: “This individual…” (third person) or “I was born…” (first person)

1. Share theories and concepts that helped make this individual well known, whether in his/her time or currently.
2. Provide a conclusion on the individual’s life, and share (at the end) who you chose to write about, thus answering the question “Who am I?”

Assignment Instructions:

• Answer the essay questions thoroughly in no fewer than 400 words.
• Write in APA format according to the essay template (above) Include:
• Title page with title, name, date, and class
• Introduction; includes an overview of your main points
• Include a heading that says Introduction
• Conclusion; recaps main points, without presenting new information.
• Body; complete paragraphs, each discussing one main point with support and details.
• Include a heading. It can say Body or a unique title for your topic
• Conclusion; recaps main points, without presenting new information.
• Include a heading that says Conclusion
• In-text and full citations are required in APA format.
• MS Word is the only acceptable document for credit. PDF and all other formats submitted will not be graded and will result in a 0 grade.

I am writing a paper and need help on 2 sections of the paper

1. Proposed change implementation: Include suggestions for improvement/change (Aim) to whatever it is you are researching. Patient and/or population expected to benefit directly from improved flow or process. The risk of participation is the same as receiving usual care. If risk or burden is higher than with usual care, consider research & IRB.
2. Proposed method to measure outcomes of the change: State what EBP model will you use to plan for your project. What plans do you have to measure key indicators, what about tools used to measure the outcomes, what is the validity or reliability if any. Measures may include knowledge, attitude, behavior/practices, and outcomes What about the sample? You may propose small but large enough samples to observe changes. What is the feasible for data collection, the minimal time needed, resources, costs? How will you conduct the data analysis? Who will be involved in the Organization?

• I have attached the paper, please make the addition of the 2 sections above flow with the rest of the paper.
• Question/topic being researched: In hospitalized adult patients (P), how does early recognition and sepsis bundle implementation (I), compared to delayed care (C), affect sepsis-related outcomes including mortality and longer hospitalization (O) during the hospital stay (T)?

How the paper is split:

• Abstract
• Title (introduction) with purpose
• Background
• Methods
• Literature Review of the proposed change
• Discussion (what was learned)
• Proposed change implementation
• Proposed methods to measure outcomes of the change
• Recommendations for Practice change.
• Conclusion and implications for nursing.

***** I only need help on the proposed change implementation and proposed method to measure outcomes portion of the paper

Topic Selection:

Focus on the comprehensive topic:

“Breastfeeding: Importance, Challenges, and the Nurse’s Role in Support and Advocacy”

This topic will cover the physiological process of breastfeeding, its benefits, challenges, the nurse’s role, a comparison with formula feeding, and the public health aspect. You may narrow down certain points for a more in-depth discussion if needed.

Research:

Utilize the librarys databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, Medline) to find at least 5 peer-reviewed journal articles, books, or other credible sources. Use government and health organization websites (e.g., WHO, CDC) for supplementary information. All sources should be current (published within the last 5 years), unless you are using a foundational or landmark study in the field.

Tip: Use specific keywords or Boolean operators to refine your search and locate relevant studies.

Report Structure:

Write a 3-5 page report (excluding references) with the following sections:

1. Introduction:
2. Introduce breastfeeding and its significance.
3. Body:

• Physiology and Benefits: Describe the physiological process of breastfeeding and its benefits for both the infant and mother.
• Challenges and Barriers: Identify common challenges and suggest strategies to overcome them.
• Nurses Role in Breastfeeding Support: Explain the nurse’s role in promoting and supporting breastfeeding in various healthcare settings.
• Breastfeeding vs. Formula Feeding: Compare the nutritional content, health benefits, economic factors, and convenience of each feeding method.
• Public Health Aspect (Optional): Discuss how public health programs influence breastfeeding rates and outcomes, and how nurses contribute to these initiatives.

1. Note: Each section should be proportionately balanced in length. You may include or omit the “Public Health Aspect” section based on your chosen focus.
2. Conclusion:
3. Summarize key points and emphasize the importance of evidence-based practices.
4. Citations:
5. Follow APA format for in-text citations and the reference page.

Additional Notes:

• In-text citations: Ensure that in-text citations follow the APA format with the authors last name and year of publication (e.g., Smith, 2023). For direct quotes, include the page number (e.g., Smith, 2023, p. 45).
• Reference page: List all sources alphabetically by authors last name. Ensure the reference list follows APA format, including the author(s), year of publication, title, journal/book title, volume/issue (if applicable), and DOI or URL for online sources.
• Tip: For additional help with APA style, visit or consult your universitys writing center resources https://www.fnu.edu/write-right/.

Instructions

Find a current news article (within the past 3 months) and in 300 to 500 words describe how it connects to the legacy of Greece within Western civilization.