Category: Nursing

History of Nursing Paper

Nursing Figure: (19192017)

1. Overview: In this paper you will reflect on one specific historical theme, event, idea, or person within this course, and articulate the implications for the present state of the nursing profession.
2. Instructions:
3. In this paper you will:
4. Reflect deeply on a course theme, event, idea, or person of your choice, in the context of the past and consider the implications for the state of the nursing profession;
5. Research one primary source and at least five secondary sources as you explore your topic;
6. Cite relevant literature, including the course text and other scholarly literature;
7. Submission Requirements: Articulate your ideas thoroughly and concisely in fewer than 2000 words (8 pages), with no grammar or spelling errors. APA format double spaced with title and reference pages. Title and reference pages are not included in the page count.

Use PowerPoint’s Notes Page view feature to include speaker notes. Speaker notes should be included for all slides except the title and reference slides. Use complete sentences. Use APA in-text citations and complete references to support your PICOT quality improvement project. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy. Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Title Slide Introduction (1-2 slides) Identify and describe the patient-focused practice issue. Explain the significance of the issue and its impact on patient health outcomes, nursing practice, or healthcare delivery. You may use the description of the issue completed in Week 1. Provide an in-text citation from a scholarly source to support your writing. PICOT Question (1 slide) Include your PICOT question from Weeks 2 and 5 in sentence format. Include the required elements in the PICOT statement (P – population and problem, I – intervention, C – comparison, O – outcome, T – timeframe for outcome achievement). You may use the PICOT question and elements developed in Week 2. Findings (2-3 slides) Present the findings of the Literature Summary completed in Week 5. Provide a 1-2 sentence overview of the results of each of the five studies related to the PICOT question. Provide an in-text citation from a scholarly source to support your writing. Synthesis (1-2 slides) Discuss common themes found in the literature. Explain any gaps found in the literature related to the PICOT question. Identify whether the evidence in the literature was sufficient to support the intervention in the PICOT question. Provide an in-text citation from at least two scholarly sources to support your writing. Recommendations (1-2 slides) Based on your literature review, what are your recommendations [implement practice change or conduct additional research]? Identify the stakeholders impacted by your recommendation. Discuss the resources needed to implement your recommendation. Provide an in-text citation from a scholarly source to support your writing. References Provide complete references in APA format; you may use bullets. Hanging indents are not required. Please include the Chamberlain University permalink to the direct full copy of the articles. Speaker Notes Speaker notes are provided for each slide (except the title and reference slides). Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate references. Presentation Format The presentation is a total of 8-11 slides. Slide information is succinct and presented with bulleted points. Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide. A minimum of 18-point font is used and appropriate for audience reading. Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate. ok

Instructions:

1. Look up the word “Monologue” to obtain a clear definition and description of the word.
2. Read the articles and visit the website regarding standards and ethics (located in Major Project #2 – Description)
3. Then write a monologue that relates to an ethical issue.

• See the suggested list of topics (also located in Major Project #2 – Description)

1. Your paper should also be:

• your original work
• five (5) pages (including the cover page and the reference page)
• typed according to
• for margins, formatting and spacing standards

Instructions:

1. Write your own unique personal nursing philosophy based on your beliefs and values.
2. Your philosophy paper should contain the four (4) Meta-paradigm concepts.
3. Your paper should also be:

• your original work
• four (4) pages (including the cover page and the reference page)
• typed according to
• for margins, formatting and spacing standards

I witnessed patients not having on DNR bracelets , i also Witnessed the IV not being labeled.

please refer to the rubric and the example i have provided. My clinical day was on 2/12 2/5 you can use either day.

Assignment 2: Health Disparity/Epidemiology Profile

Purpose:

This assignment allows you to develop advanced community health nursing competencies by collecting, analyzing, and synthesizing epidemiologic data to understand health disparities and risk factors affecting populations. By completing this activity, you will practice population-level assessment skills, identify vulnerable groups, and apply evidence-based approaches to guide public health interventions.

• Knowledge:
• Principles of epidemiology and health disparity analysis.
• Understanding of morbidity/mortality statistics, prevalence rates, and census data.
• Social determinants of health and their relationship to vulnerable populations.
• Skills:
• Data collection and interpretation from primary (e.g., census) and secondary (e.g., CDC, state health department) sources.
• Critical thinking in analyzing epidemiologic patterns.
• Synthesis of complex data into clear, evidence-based conclusions.
• Application of population health nursing models to identify interventions.
• Competencies:
• D1: Apply epidemiologic principles to analyze population-level data.
• D3: Conduct population assessments and identify health disparities for targeted interventions.
• D5: Use data-driven decision-making to improve outcomes for vulnerable groups.
• D7: Integrate data from multiple health sources for collaborative community assessment.
• D8: Utilize public health databases and digital resources for data collection and presentation.

Task:

1. Collect Epidemiologic Data relevant to your selected geographic area and/or population:

• Census data (demographics, socioeconomic indicators).
• Morbidity and mortality statistics (leading causes of illness and death).
• Prevalence and incidence rates of chronic/acute diseases.
• Risk factors (behavioral, environmental, occupational, or genetic).

1. Analyze Data:

• Identify significant health disparities.
• Discuss the impact of social determinants of health (e.g., income, education, access to care).
• Highlight vulnerable subpopulations at greatest risk.

1. Synthesize data into Health Disparity/Epidemiology Profile:

• Present findings in a PowerPoint format.
• Include tables, charts, and visual representations of data.
• Discuss implications for community/public health nursing practice.
• Construct a priority community diagnosis statement that reflects the a significant health concern identified in your selected population using the format (problem, population, etiology, evidence).
• Ex: Obesity (problem) in adults aged 18-65 (population) due to limited access to healthy foods (etiology); supported by a 30% obesity rate in local surveys (evidence).

Criteria for Success:

Your submission will be evaluated based on:

• Data Accuracy & Sources: Uses credible, up-to-date sources (CDC, WHO, County Health Rankings, Census Bureau).
• Analysis Quality: Demonstrates critical thinking in identifying disparities and vulnerable populations.
• Application to Nursing Practice: Clearly connects findings to implications for public/community health nursing.
• Presentation: Organized, visually clear, and professional PowerPoint with accurate citations (APA format).

Use the rubric provided and the examples to have a structure of what is needed for this project! I would like maximum points possible! ( The assigned area is Buford Georgia)

Dear,

I am seeking professional academic assistance with a full rewrite and substantive improvement of an anatomy essay that previously failed and is now being resubmitted. This is a high-stakes resubmission, and it is essential that the work is academically rigorous, clearly human-written, and fully compliant with university assessment standards.

1. Essay question and scope

Question:

Different research methods are required to understand human anatomy.

Discuss this statement by focusing on one anatomical area of your choice.

Word count:

4000 words (excluding references)

Discipline:

Applied human clinical anatomy

2. Module aims and learning outcomes (must be explicitly met)

The rewritten essay must clearly demonstrate alignment with the following:

Module aim

• Application of anatomical sciences to applied anatomical knowledge and clinical skills.

Learning outcomes (all must be addressed explicitly and critically):

• Critical awareness of current theories underpinning applied human anatomical structure and function
• Understanding of human dissection techniques and other anatomical research methods, with critical evaluation of their strengths and limitations
• Analysis of how clinical anatomy informs professional and clinical practice
• Critical evaluation of current research and advanced scholarship in human anatomy

The essay must not be descriptive. It must be analytical, critical, and evaluative throughout.

3. Context: why this is a resubmission

My original submission received 48% (fail). The examiner raised serious academic concerns, including:

• Significant problems with referencing
• At least 22 cited articles that do not exist
• Writing style flagged as showing possible AI involvement

Because of this, the rewritten essay must be treated as a fresh academic piece, not a light edit.

4. What I need you to do (very important)

I am asking for:

• A complete rewrite, not paraphrasing
• A clear, human academic voice consistent with postgraduate/upper-undergraduate anatomy work
• Only real, verifiable academic sources (peer-reviewed journals, standard anatomy texts, authoritative reviews)
• Accurate in-text citations that match the reference list exactly
• No fabricated, unverifiable, or obscure references
• Logical structure with a strong introduction, critical main sections, and a well-reasoned conclusion

Please assume the essay will be scrutinised carefully for academic integrity, so clarity, transparency, and scholarly tone are essential.

5. Use of research methods (core of the essay)

The essay must clearly compare and critically evaluate different research methods used to understand the chosen anatomical area, for example:

• Cadaveric dissection
• Imaging techniques (e.g. MRI, CT, ultrasound)
• Histology and microscopy
• Biomechanical or functional studies
• Clinical/surgical anatomy evidence

Each method should be discussed in terms of:

• What anatomical knowledge it provides
• Its limitations and biases
• Why multiple methods are necessary for full anatomical understanding

6. Supporting materials

I have provided:

• A model essay (on the aortic valve) for structural guidance only
• My failed essay
• The similarity report and examiner feedback

These are reference materials only. The final essay must be original, not derivative.

7. Non-negotiable requirements

• The work must be entirely human-written
• No AI-generated text or fabricated references
• Clear academic argumentation and critical engagement
• Suitable for resubmission after a fail

This resubmission is extremely important for my progression, and I am looking for a writer who understands both academic anatomy and assessment expectations.

Please let me know:

• Your experience with anatomy or biomedical writing
• How you ensure referencing accuracy
• Your process for producing original academic work

Thank you for your time and consideration.

An Annotated Bibliography is a list of the sources you have found so far (and that you can continue to add to as needed throughout the semester). For this assignment, these sources should: directly reflect your topic and working thesis be current demonstrate authority on the author’s part Look for sources that will help you write, develop, and support your semester research project. To complete the Annotated Bibliography successfully, locate three current sources, demonstrate authority, and are relevant to your topic. For each source (repeat all of this 3 times in total), include all of the following – place each source and annotation on a new page. So your MS word document should be one document that is 3 pages in total. a full MLA citation as it would appear on your Works Cited page refer to Content >> Guide A: Research and MLA, as needed a summary, two to three sentences long, where you highlight the main argument of the source and the most important takeaways in a sentence or two, an evaluation of the effectiveness and credibility of your source a response of your reaction to the source and how you will use it in your writing or research project, in a sentence or two The list should be in alphabetical order as it would be on your Works Cited page. In addition, because the goal of this assignment is to identify sources that you will be able to subsequently critique and eventually use in your upcoming essays, work to identify sources that will meet the Argument Essay’s requirements: All sources for your paper need to be accessed via a library index (SEE RESOURCES ATTACHED). For the purposes of this assignment and to clarify, Google Scholar (or similar) does not count as a library index. One of the outcomes of ENC 1102 that students must demonstrate is how to access a library index, such as a database, and, when relevant, at least one of the 3 sources can reflect your topic’s local impact (at the state, city, or county level).

Create a pharmaceutical treatment regimen for each of the following.

• 48-year-old Asian female with newly diagnosed T2DM. A1c is 7.4, FBG is 200.
• 48-year-old White female with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism. TSH level is 17
• 48-year-old Hispanic male with newly diagnosed GERD, BMI is 40
• The patient specific details are yours to develop and consider to support your choices.
• The non-prescription medication if any, AND the prescription details must be present.
• You may apply more than one prescription:
• For each the drug name, dose, route, frequency of administration and if prescribed, the quantity to dispense must be present
• Include the drug class details
• Justify your reasoning
• What labs will you monitor? Why
• Include content on communication. How will you clearly address the goals of therapy?

DOES NOT NEED A TITLE PAGE!