Please write an essay on Workplace violence for my PMHNP graduate program. No AI. No plagiarism. Please no AI my professor is a stickler for AI use.

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a health issue (Workplace Violence in Healthcare) requiring advocacy from the nursing profession on a local, regional, state, national, or international level. This topic can be related to health promotion, population health, disease management, or patient safety in the community or other healthcare setting. You are assuming the role of advocate in various capacities. The topic you select for this paper will be the subject of your Policy Brief and Advocacy Letter Assignment. Therefore, research thoroughly your topic of interest to ensure that it can be applied across both assignments. In this paper you will identify a health issue which may or may not already be represented in the form of legislation or health policy. Individuals may just take a position on an issue affecting local policy with decision makers.

An example of this with legislation includes:

Health issue: primary care access for patients

Health policy: increasing primary care providers using nurse practitioners; support of PA HB 765 for CRNP independent practice An example of this without legislation includes:

Health issue: increased chronic back pain from integration of technology in healthcare

Health policy: ergonomic evaluation of work environments for all employees; letter of support to employers for new healthcare organization policy

This assignment is worth 25% of your grade. A minimum of 5 references are required. Three journals must be used with publication dates no later than 5-7 years. Using APA format and criteria from the Grading Rubric for Written Assignments, in 5 double spaced pages (excluding the title page and reference page) present the following detail:

Criteria for Your Advocacy as a Nursing Professional:

Introduction

Outline of health issue and existing or necessary health policy and/or politics. Why is this significant to nursing?

List and discuss any other stake holders who would be concerned with the health issue, in favor or opposition.

Propose a plan on this health issue advocacy:

Effect of the health issue on health policy and politics

Interventions to be implemented in this advocacy to enact change; incorporate health politics as pertinent

Identify opposition which can be encountered.

Conclusion

References

Literature Review Paper

Literature review paper

One of the main learning exercises in the course is a Literature review paper. The literature review paper’s purpose is to answer a significant clinical question. Most of your discussions and activities in this course are created to build the skills need it to write this paper. To do this paper you need to work each week on assignments, that will help you build your skills for the successful completion of this assignment.

Your paper should be 5-6 pages long (double-spaced, 12 font) not including the references and title page). You should have a reference page of at least eight (8) academic sources, including at least five (5) primary research sources that specifically answer the review question. Use APA format for references and citations. All papers must be submitted to be reviewed for similarity, any paper with a score of 20% or higher in the similarity index, will receive an automatic 0, and will not be reviewed until the similarity score is below 20%.

Step by step directions and a rubric is posted below. After your paper has been corrected and graded, you have the option to revise your literature review paper in order to improve your writing and correct your mistakes. If there is a significant improvement, the grade will be increased. Revisions are due a week after receiving feedback.

Instructions:

Your paper needs to follow the following criteria:

1 Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about (Use Activity 1 to identify the problem).

2 Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-built narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling post-operative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be included in the paper) (Use discussion 2 & 3).

3 Write a five (5) to six (6) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question.

4 Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the ones analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections.

5 The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.

6 Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title).

7 The abstract is not required

8 Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is…{PICO Question}).

9 The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, levels of evidence, and other information that establishes credibility to your paper (Use discussion 4 & 5).

10 The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study, you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection, and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies (Use discussion 6 and activity 2).

11 Submit a table of the studies as per the matrix development (see discussion 7).

12 The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section, you would discuss any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here.

13 Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point, you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings, and any major recommendations for the profession.

14 In general, your paper should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea supported with evidence. The writing should be logical, and the ideas should be linked together in a logical sequence. The ideas need to be put together clearly for the writer and for the reader.

15 Papers will be graded by rubric. When preparing to work on an assignment it is a good idea to review the rubric for the assignment. The rubric identifies the important points that will be graded as well as the description of the information that should be provided to receive all of the points in each section of the assignment. Reviewing the rubric before you begin a paper and then once again as you complete the paper will give you confidence that you included the required information and will receive maximum points for each section. See the grading rubric for this assignment.

16 Format references and citations using APA

Exploring Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Practice (Assignment # 3)

Objective:

This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of clinical decision-making processes in nursing practice, focusing on evidence-based practice, ethical considerations, critical thinking skills, interprofessional collaboration, cultural sensitivity, patient autonomy, technological advancements, and continuous learning.

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) and Clinical Decision Making:

Discuss how evidence-based practice (EBP) influences your clinical decision-making process in nursing.

Provide examples of how you incorporate research findings into your practice to inform your clinical decisions.

Challenges in Implementing Evidence-Based Practice:

Identify common challenges you face when trying to implement evidence-based practice in real-time clinical scenarios.

Describe strategies you employ to overcome these challenges effectively.

Ethical Dilemmas in Nursing Practice:

Share a challenging ethical dilemma you’ve encountered in your clinical practice.

Describe how you navigated the ethical dilemma, considering principles such as beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. Discuss the outcomes of your decision.

Balancing Patient Autonomy and Optimal Care:

Discuss how you balance patient autonomy with the need to provide optimal care when making clinical decisions.

Share a situation where you had to navigate this balance and describe your approach.

Interprofessional Collaboration and Clinical Decision Making:

Explain the importance of interprofessional collaboration in healthcare delivery.

Discuss how collaboration with other healthcare professionals influences your clinical decision-making process as a nurse.

Critical Thinking in Clinical Decision Making:

Discuss the role of critical thinking in clinical decision making in nursing.

Describe how you cultivate critical thinking skills to make sound clinical judgments in your practice.

Cultural Considerations in Clinical Decision Making:

Explore how cultural considerations impact your clinical decision making as a nurse.

Explain how you ensure culturally sensitive care while making clinical decisions.

Prioritizing Competing Patient Needs and Preferences:

Describe how you prioritize competing patient needs and preferences when making clinical decisions in a busy healthcare environment.

Technology and Clinical Decision Making:

Discuss how the use of technology influences your clinical decision-making process as a nurse.

Continuous Learning for Enhancing Clinical Decision-Making Skills:

Explain the importance of continuous learning in staying updated on best practices in nursing.

Describe how you ensure ongoing professional development to enhance your clinical decision-making skills.

Format and Submission:

Your assignment should be structured as a formal written report.

Each section should be clearly labeled with the corresponding heading.

Ensure your writing adheres to proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

The assignment should be written in a formal academic style, following APA (American Psychological Association) guidelines for formatting and referencing.

The length of the assignment should be 1200-1500 words, excluding title page, abstract. Please ensure to select scholarly journals within the last 5 years.

Grading Criteria:

Your assignment will be assessed based on the following criteria:

Depth of analysis and understanding demonstrated in each section.

Clarity and coherence of writing.

Application of relevant examples and experiences.

Integration of evidence-based practice, ethical considerations, critical thinking, interprofessional collaboration, cultural sensitivity, patient autonomy, technological advancements, and continuous learning.

Originality and creativity in addressing the questions.

Note to Students: This assignment provides an opportunity for you to reflect on various aspects of clinical decision making in nursing practice. Draw from your experiences, knowledge, and research to provide comprehensive responses to each question. Consider how each element contributes to your development as a competent and compassionate nurse.

Cite 3 sources for each assessment please. no plagiarism and please cite your sources

Improving Nursing Staff Responsiveness to Call Lights Through Structured Hourly Rounding on an Oncology Unit. Focused PICOT Statement P In adult patients admitted to an oncology unit I how does implementation of structured hourly rounding C compared to current rounding practices O affect call light response time and patient satisfaction related to staff responsiveness T over an 8 week period? Written PICOT: In adult patients on an Oncology unit, how does implementation of structured hourly rounding compared to current rounding practices affect call light response time and patient satisfaction scores related to staff responsiveness over 8 weeks?

Please look at the instructions and guidelines to create the learning plan. It should be thorough and must include at least 9 peer-reviewed journals supporting the learning plan. You are to input the details in the appropriate sections and tables in the given template. Each Lesson should have evidence for why this is being done in such a manner, with cited journals supporting its efficacy.

A sample is given as a guide.

This is my rough lesson plan and rationale but it needs to be fixed:

Rough Learning Goal and Rationale: (Needs to be fixed) Proposed Learning Goal Learning Goal: Utilize Community Health Nursing Standards 4 (Professional Relationships) and 5 (Capacity Building) to collaboratively implement a mental health leadership framework within Ms. Zuzartes Grade 6 class at St. Dorothy Catholic School, empowering students to recognize internal stressors and apply healthy strategies to navigate digital, relational, and academic challenges. Rationale: This goal directly addresses identified mental health needs, observed classroom stressors, and systemic resource limitations. By collaborating with the classroom teacher and focusing on sustainable skill development, the intervention supports long-term capacity building within the school community.

The paper must be a strict 7 pages of text, exclusive of the title and references pages. It must be formatted in APA 7th edition, using times new roman 12-point font, double spaced (including headings & references). In the literature review section, 5 journals must be used of which 3 MUST be peer reviewed nursing journals; and please do not utilize blocked domains. My instructors do check reference information by clicking on links provided/ referenced. Please review all attachments and reach out with any needs for clarification.

Debriefing

Purpose

The purpose of this debriefing is to discover information and deepen knowledge based on the Week 7 Lesson and Anthony James i-Human Virtual Patient Encounter to improve skills and clinical reasoning.

Course Outcomes

This debriefing enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

• CO 1: Demonstrate a head-to-toe physical assessment. (PO 1)
• CO 2: Differentiate between normal and abnormal health assessment findings. (PO 4)
• CO 4: Demonstrate effective communication skills during health assessment and documentation. (PO 3)
• CO 6: Demonstrate caring and professional behavior during patient interactions. (POs 6, 7)

Due Date

Graded debriefings are due Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.

Total Points Possible

This debriefing is worth a total of 50 points.

Preparing the Debriefing

Directions

Debriefing: Discover and Deepen

1. You are encouraged, but not required, to complete at least one i-Human Virtual Patient Encounter attempt before participating in the debriefing.
2. Include a citation from the weekly lesson (Explore pages) in your response and reference list.

• Here is an example of how to cite the lesson:
• Chamberlain University College of Nursing. (2024). NR-305 Week 2: Conducting a Holistic Assessment [Online lesson]. https://chamberlain.instructure.com/login/canvas

1. Answer all questions below with explanations and details.

Paragraph one: How does providing nursing care at the end of life impact the emotional well-being and resilience of nurses, and what strategies can be used to support their mental and emotional health?

Paragraph two: Answer the questions based on the first letter of your last name below.

Last NameQuestion to Answer

A – G How would you approach an assessment differently if you were providing end-of-life care to a client who expresses fear and anxiety about death and has no family present?

H – Q How would you approach an assessment differently if you were providing end-of-life care to a client and family who have unresolved family conflict and tension?

R – Z How would you approach an assessment differently if you were providing end-of-life care to a client who has a large and involved family support system present at the bedside?

Paragraph three: Reflect on the care needs of clients and families at the end of life in your practice setting. How can you integrate the principles of client-centered care and end-of-life nursing assessment introduced in the week 7 lessons into your nursing practice? You may respond using a former work setting or clinical experience if you are not currently practicing at the bedside.

Posts should meet the following criteria:

1. Integrate Evidence: Cite evidence from the weekly lesson at least once in weekly posts.
2. Integrate evidence from the weekly lesson.
3. Cite and provide a complete reference for the evidence from the weekly lesson.
4. Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
5. Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.
6. Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.
7. Add depth to the debriefing.
8. Communicate Professionally: Communicates professionally on all posts.
9. Communicate clearly and concisely.
10. Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.
11. Communicate with minimal English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation errors.
12. Participate: Participates during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.
13. Post in the debriefing at least two times.
14. Post in the debriefing on two different days.

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the three (3) dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the debriefing title and then Show Rubric.