Category: Nursing

: Do you believe a struggle still exists within nursing today regarding whether doctoral education should be research-focused or practice-focused? Provide reasoning and examples.

2: Do you believe the masters degree for APRNs should transition to a doctoral degree requirement? Why or why not? Support your stance with evidence and your own professional perspective.

Do in APA with references atleat 2 within 5 years

In your professional life, youll need to find credible evidence to support decisions and plans of action. This assessment helps you practice research skills by investigating a current healthcare problem or issue.

You will select a current healthcare problem or issue from the provided options for this assessment. Research your topic, and develop a written assessment, which includes an annotated bibliography to document your resources.

The purpose of this assessment is to ensure you know how to research topics and find credible references to use in your assessments. Part of the assessment is an annotated bibliography. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of research references, along with key information about each; the detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about your chosen problem or issue.

This assessment is a culmination of the resources found throughout the previous assessment resources. You may need to refresh on the topics to successfully complete this assessment.

This assessment has three partsall three parts must be submitted to pass the assessment.

• A 35 page annotated bibliography (not including the title page or reference page).
• The three articles you have selected from the Capella library (full articles in PDF format, not abstracts).
• A 35 minute Kaltura video of you performing the search in the Capella library. Ensure you are capturing your screen actions showing the following:
• Navigating to the Capella library.
• Showing the search engine, database(s), and key words you have used.
• You do not need to appear on video but you should narrate your actions.

I need a 24 page essay (excluding title page and references) discussing documentation of core measurement, which is a reimbursement linked requirement. These have to be addressed.

What the requirement is and why it exists.

How your workplace implements or audits it.

Whether it adds true value to the patient experience (support with evidence).

Whether it feels like additional work for staff and why.

The nursing role in meeting and sustaining this requirement.

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

General Instructions

Download the and complete the required information using the template.

Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric)

1. For each medication listed, complete the following:
2. Include indication, approved ages, target symptoms, and affected neurotransmitters.
3. For each medication, include all available formulations (if IR, XR, ODT, LA), duration of action, and peak (if noted).
4. List notable side effects.
5. List client education instructions for each formulation of each medication.

What advocacy actions might you take to improve health care through legislation at the state or federal level? *Please do not use AI. I have my own detctor and will cancel the order if it is detected. I’ve had to do this in the past for a large percentage of AI detection.*

General Directions

Review the provided case study to complete this weeks discussion.

Include the following sections:

1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
2. Select one drug to treat the diagnosis(es) or symptoms.
3. List medication class and mechanism of action for the chosen medication.
4. Write the prescription in prescription format.
5. Provide an evidence-based rationale for the selected medication using at least one scholarly reference. Textbooks may be used for additional references but are not the primary reference.
6. List any side effects or adverse effects associated with the medication.
7. Include any required diagnostic testing. State the time frame for this testing (testing is before medication initiation or q 3 months, etc.). Includes normal results range for any listed laboratory tests.
8. Provide a minimum of three appropriate medication-related teaching points for the client and/or family.

NR546 W7 Case Study Discussion Rubric

NR546 W7 Case Study Discussion Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Application of Course Knowledge

6 Required Criteria

Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail:

1. Select one drug to treat the diagnosis(es) or symptoms.

2. List medication class and mechanism of action for the chosen medication.

3. Write the prescription in prescription format.

4. List any side effects or adverse effects associated with the medication.

5. Include any required diagnostic testing. State the time frame for this testing (testing is before medication initiation or q 3 months, etc.). Includes normal results range for any listed laboratory tests.

6. Provide a minimum of three appropriate medication-related teaching points for the client and/or family.

40 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

36 pts

V. Good

5 requirements met.

33 pts

Satisfactory

4 requirements met.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1-3 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Integration of Evidence

5 Required Criteria

Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:

1. Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.

2. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.

3. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.

4. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.

5. Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.

20 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

18 pts

V. Good

4 requirements met.

16 pts

Satisfactory

3 requirements met.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 requirements met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue

3 Required Criteria

Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice:

1. Respond to at least one peer [on a topic other than the initial assigned topic].

2. Respond to at least one faculty post.

3. Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.

30 pts

Excellent

All requirements met.

24 pts

Satisfactory

2 requirements met.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

1 requirement met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No requirements met.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Professionalism in Communication

Communicates with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

V. Good

2-3 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 7 errors.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Reference Citation

Uses current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

5 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors.

4 pts

V. Good

2 errors.

3 pts

Satisfactory

3-4 errors.

2.5 pts

Needs Improvement

5-6 errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

More than 6 errors.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Late Penalty Deduction

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e., student will receive an automatic 0).

0 pts

No Points Deducted

Posts submitted on time; no points deducted.

0 pts

Points Deducted

Posts submitted late. 10% deduction in points for initial posts entered after Wednesday.

0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Total Participation

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not posting on the minimum of TWO separate days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

0 pts

No Points Deducted

Posts submitted on a minimum of two separate days; no points deducted.

0 pts

Points Deducted

Participation requirement not met. 10% deduction in points for not posting on a minimum of two separate days.

Budget Analysis (2-3 slides) Obtain a current or previous capital or operating budget or annual report that exists within your healthcare organization from your supervisor or research a healthcare organization budget that is publicly available. Include background information and some context about the healthcare organization. Include a copy of the budget as one of the slides in the presentation. Identify the components of the budget and describe which categories are impacted by patient outcomes (e.g., patient satisfaction, HCAHAP scores, length of stay, readmissions). Discuss the relationship between the budget categories and patient care. Recommendations for Improvement (3-4 slides) Review the budget and identify expected or unexpected items or outliers. Make general recommendations as if you were presenting to the appropriate leader of your organization about areas that should be cut, reappropriated, or realigned to improve the issue, opportunity, or concern identified. Develop specific recommendations for the appropriate leader about one area of focus within the budget for the upcoming fiscal year, reflecting on this budget and your current practice. Policy Implementation and Budget Impact (5-6 slides) Referring to the organizational policy changes you recommended in Unit 3, discuss both the positive and negative financial implications of your proposed policy. Outline the policy review process and procedures at your local organization. Given the opportunity to make revisions to your existing or proposed policy, outline the next steps, considerations, and timeline. What resources would be needed to implement the proposed policy changes Reviewing your presented budget, what line items could be adjusted to support the policy change and resources required? Conclusion & Reflection (1-2 slides) Summarize your policy justification and identification. Synthesize your suggested recommendations for policy improvement. Reflect on the process by discussing: What aspects of the policy analysis and budget projection were the most challenging, and which were the most straightforward? What is your most important takeaway regarding the relationship between healthcare policy and financial management? How will this exercise in linking a policy to its financial implications influence your future decision-making as a healthcare provider or leader?

In 200300 words, write a response to the Discussion Question (DQ) Post Prompt posed for this week’s reading in Foreign to Familiar by Sarah Lanier. Please make sure you address each point in the DQ Post Prompt. Although there may be several question posed in the DQ Prompt, write one cohesive discussion post that integrates your thoughts in a well-written response. Your post must follow these requirements: Use APA (7th ed.) formatting for citations and references. Check the Discussion Questions and Replies Rubric and follow the guidelines carefully to maximize your success. Two scholarly sources are required for your initial post: One scholarly source must be the textbook (Foreign to Familiar). The second scholarly source must be the Holy Bible or a peer-reviewed scholarly article published within the last five years. In-text citations should be used to support your discussion. A reference list should be included at the end of your post, formatted in APA (7th ed.). For your Replies, at least one scholarly source is required. Guidelines for Scholarly References: Foreign to Familiar (Lanier, 2021). The Holy Bible (New International Version) OR a Peer-reviewed scholarly article 5 years or less from date of publication Chapter Two: Relationship vs. Task Orientation Read Foreign to Familiar Chapter 2 and Luke 10:38-42 Use the reading to respond to the following prompts. Remember to read the DQ Prompt Forum instructions and follow the Rubric for guidelines. After reading Chapter Two of our book selection, what stood out to you about the characteristics of the hot-climate and cold-climate orientation concepts? As future nurses, you will face the challenge of balancing relationship and task in patient care. How might the story in Luke 10:3842 help you think about this balance in nursing practice? How could cultural differences in relationship orientation versus task orientation impact nursepatient interactions and rapport? Based on Laniers (2021) descriptions of hot-climate and cold-climate cultures, consider where you were raised. Did these examples offered in this chapter resonate with your personal experiences? If yes, how? If no, why not? How has your own background/culture and values shaped the way you approach relationship and task? You may use a may informal writing style in your responses, such as “I believe” versus “One may believe”, etc., but solid academic writing with proper spelling and basic grammar is expected. APA Format is required for citations and references. References Lanier, S. B. (2021). Foreign to familiar: A guide to understanding hot- and cold-climate cultures (Rev. ed.). McDougal Publishing. The Holy Bible, New International Version. (2011). Zondervan. (Original work published 1978)

My PICOT question: In the ICU, how can a nurse led ventilator-acquired pneumonia prevention bundle/strategy decrease the incidence of complications associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia in the adult patient who has been intubated?

1. Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about
2. Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-built narrow clinical question.
3. Write a five (5) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question.
4. Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals.
5. The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.
6. Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is…{PICO Question}).
7. The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, levels of evidence, and other information that establishes credibility to your paper.
8. The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study, you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection, and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies
9. The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section, you would discuss any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here.
10. Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point, you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings, and any major recommendations for the profession.

Sources to use

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8129291/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507711/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8189711/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5706660/

https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/12/2/227