Write a biography based off clinical experience. I have been a registered nurse since 2014. I have worked in multiple different settings medical/surgical unit, emergency medicine. I have gained exposure in the plastic surgery setting since 2024. I have always had a strong belief that if a person does not like what they see in the mirror that a person can change their appearance. I have acquired skills for Botox and other neurotoxins. I have also acquired skills working with lasers. I will continue to serve your needs. I recently just finished my family nurse practitioner and will be taking my boards within the next few months. I will be transitioning my role as a nurse practitioner where I will be focusing on holistic medicine such as peptides. I look forward to meeting you all.
Category: Nursing
-
Nursing program application
rewrite these 6 questions on the these three pages for application for nursing program.Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): WGU application questions.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Analyzing Causation through the Bradford Hill Criteria
- Objective:
This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of causation and to develop your ability to apply these principles to assess the likelihood of causal relationships in public health and epidemiology.Instructions:
Write a 1 page, single-spaced paper (Times New Roman, 11-point font, double margins) discussing the Bradford Hill Criteria for causation. Include citations for any references you use. Your paper should focus on the following elements:- Provide a brief overview of the criteria Include the background of Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s work and explain why these criteria are important in establishing causality in epidemiological studies.
- For each criterion, provide a concise definition and offer an example that illustrates its use in public health research.
- Select and briefly discuss a public health issue or epidemiological study of your choice and analyze it through the lens of the Bradford Hill Criteria. Provide evidence or studies that support your analysis.
- Summarize the relevance of the Bradford Hill Criteria in public health research and its application to your chosen example. Briefly reflect on the limitations or challenges in using these criteria to establish causation.
Grading Rubric:
Your paper will be graded on the following criteria:- Clarity and Depth of Understanding (50%): Demonstrating a clear understanding of each of the Bradford Hill Criteria and their application.
- Application of Criteria (30%): A well-thought-out analysis of a public health issue or study.
- Organization and Structure (10%): Clear and logical organization of ideas, with appropriate formatting.
- Use of Sources (10%): Proper citation of sources and integration of evidence to support your argument.
Submission Details:
- Submit your assignment as a Word document or PDF.
Plagiarism Reminder:
Ensure that your work is original and properly cites all sources. Plagiarism will result in a failing grade for this assignment. Refer to university policy on responsible use of AI.
Requirements: 1 page
- Objective:
-
Nursing Question
APART FROM THESE INSTRUCTIONS, I HAVE UPLOADED THE TEMPLATE FOR THE ASSIGNMENT AS WELL AS MY TOPIC AND MY STANCE THAT I CHOSE IN WEEK 2, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF ANYMORE INFO IS NEEDED AT ALL –> This week, you will submit a detailed outline of your term paper. Your submission must include sections corresponding to the following subheadings:
- Technical Aspects
Provides necessary medical and scientific information to understand the issue. - Public Policy
Describes current and proposed changes in public policy/law. - Arguments For and Against
Include a summary of the arguments in favor of and opposed to specific interventions, techniques, or products and a discussion of underlying ethical principles. Discuss the public policy with two additional argumentative paragraphs- one discussing the in favor of and one paragraph discussing the opposing argument - Conclusion
Expresses your personal opinion regarding the importance of the topic and the strength of the pro and con arguments.
Additionally, you must include:
- Topic Sentences and Paragraph Transitions
Each section of your outline should include topic sentences and paragraph transitions that tie your significant points together. - Detail Sufficient to Evaluate your Thinking
Write complete thoughts. - Quotes and Paraphrases
Include from three outside sources, indicated by APA in-text citations. Sources should be less than five years old unless recent research is not available, and at least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a professional journal. Do not use Wikipedia or an encyclopedia as they are not considered reliable academic sources and will not be accepted. - Proper APA Formatting
Include a Title Page and References. No Abstract is required for this assignment.
Criteria Ratings Pts Content
80 pts
Mechanics and APA Formatting
20 pts
Requirements:
- Technical Aspects
-
Discussion chap 1/2 the expanding circle
linked below is a word document with instructions for assignment. answer 3 of the questions in the format provided. use book -The Expanding Circle, Singer for discussion postAttached Files (PDF/DOCX): Discussion board- chap 12 The Expanding Circle.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
why do you believe it important to understand the details of…
Based on your current and future advanced practice nursing role, why do you believe it important to understand the details of the healthcare delivery system?
Post your initial discussion by 11:59 PM ET on Thursday. Posts are a minimum of 250 words, scholarly written, APA formatted (with some exceptions due to limitations in the D2L editor), and a minimum of 2 references (which may include the course textbook)
Requirements: 250
-
Module 5 Edu
linked below is a word document with the discussion prompt, as well as the rubric. use book Santrock, J. W. (2020). Essentials of Lifespan Development (With Connect) e6. McGraw-Hill to help answer question as sourceAttached Files (PDF/DOCX): Module 5 discussion 2.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Imagine you are a nurse researcher who is interested in studying the effects of incarceration on the mental health of pregnant mothers who are incarcerated. You are preparing the paperwork for the institutional review board (IRB) to conduct the qualitative study. You will have a partner (imaginary, for paperwork purposes) to assist in your investigation. The paperwork needs to be thorough. IRB boards are generally very picky!
Complete the
and submit along with 5 questions you desire to ask the participants and a short abstract (1 page) describing the study you would like permission to perform to the IRB. This abstract is a short description of the study you are seeking to perform, there should not be any results as you have not obtained permission to perform the study. Correct completion of the form (use your imagination) is worth 5 points. The list of questions is worth 5 points and the abstract is worth 10 points. Think about open-ended vs. closed-ended questions and how these can impact your data. Professional writing is important and points will be deducted for grammar, spelling, etc.
-
Health promotion research
Conduct the windshield survey worksheets and research for the health promotion research assessment. -
Continuation of my TOPIC ON HYPERTENSION
We will continue to design the study plan for your MY TOPIC : “(In older adults residing in long-term care facilities, how does implementing a structured medication adherence program, compared to usual care, affect blood pressure control and adherence rates over a three-month period?)” For continuity sake please continue the topic from previous discussions. The three questions you will answer this module will be
1. What is the List of hypotheses to be tested?
2. What key terms and definitions will need to be defined?
3. Describe what your research study design will be and why it fits your hypothesis?