Bright Academic Experts

Category: Nursing

  • Clinical Judgement Plan on a patient

    Hi! I have a clinical judgment plan that needs to be completed. The patient information is attached here in a Word document as well as the CJP template is also attached. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY: The template contains embedded rubric criteria within each section, and these guidelines MUST be followed strictly, as grading will be based directly on them. The rubric information in each section specifies whether evidence-based information is required; when indicated, in-text citations must be included. Additionally, instructional text is provided in red within the template to explain how each section should be completed, and these directions are essential and must be carefully followed. Responses do not need to be lengthy but must be concise, specific, and clearly written. Scholarly sources should be used as required and cited in APA format, with all references listed in the reference section at the bottom of the template. Thank you

    Requirements:

  • ethical theories

    Discussion Board Ethical Theories and Principles

    Answer the following questions from your knowledge acquired from Chapters 1 – 2 of your textbook and any other resources you would like to use. Please refer to each question for the minimum requirements for the answer. You must support your answers with at least 1 reference (less than 5 years old) in APA format at the end of the post. Review the examples I have provided for you in Module 2 on how to cite your references in APA format if you are unsure how to do this. Answer each question in complete sentences, using correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Refer to the rubric for specific grading details.

    (60 points)

    1. Is virtue ethics the best model for people who work in healthcare professions? Why or why not? Use the information from Chapter 1 and any other resources to support your position. You must have a minimum of 5 sentences for your response. (12.5 points)

    2. How does utilitarianism affect healthcare decision making? Explain your answer in detail using information in Chapter 1 of your textbook and any other resources. You must have a minimum of 5 sentences for your response. (12.5 points)

    3. Why should clinicians be able to understand and use the principles of ethics? Use the information from Chapter 2 and any other resources to provide rationale for your answer. You must have a minimum of 5 sentences for your response. (12.5 points)

    4. Given the changes that are part of todays healthcare systems, why might respect for autonomy be more challenging in the future? Using your textbook and any other resources, explain your answer in detail. You must have a minimum of 5 sentences for your response. (12.5 points)

  • Mental health Activity 1

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Activity 1 Student Workbook.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Nursing Question

    Introduction & PICOT Question Assignment

    For this assignment, you will write an introduction.

    Your Introduction must include:

    • Your PICOT question.
    • Purpose of or rationale for the scholarly project:
      • Provide an evidence-based explanation of why it is necessary to complete your scholarly project and what benefit will be gained (health promotion, fiscal, and efficiency).
    • Background on the problem or population of interest:
      • Using primary sources, provide data on your topic.
      • Providing the background will demonstrate the focused need for your project.
    • Significance of the problem to nursing and health care:
      • State how your problem or population of interest aligns with the larger interest of health care in the community.
      • Create a context to why your topic is important.
    • Benefit of the project to nursing practice:
      • State what will be gained from your project.
      • Describe the expected outcomes of your project to practice within your population and setting.
      • Relate the outcomes to evidence-based guidelines and outcomes.
      • Describe how your project may influence other populations or settings.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The introduction is original work and logically organized.
    • The paper is 2-3 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.
    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current within the last 5 years (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    • Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
    • Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.

    Requirements: 2-3 pages

  • nursing discussion

    Differentiating Between Qualitative & Quantitative

    What is the difference between qualitative and quantitative research methods? Give an example of each.

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within the last 5 years

    Requirements: 500 words

  • The Evolution of Population

    Distinguish genetic drift from genetic flow in terms of (a)- how they occur and (b)- their implications for future genetic variations in a population.

  • Nursing Advocacy Letter

    Nurse Advocacy Letter Draft Assignment

    Course: Professional Nursing Practice (RNBSN)

    Total Points: 50

    Purpose

    The purpose of this assignment is for students to identify a nursing-related advocacy topic and develop a draft of a Nurse Advocacy Letter addressed to an elected official or another influential individual who has the ability to impact the selected issue. This activity will allow students to demonstrate professional communication skills, apply evidence-based reasoning, and align nursing advocacy with health policy priorities.

    Students will submit the final version of the Nurse Advocacy Letter after revisions are made based off of instructor feedback provided within the draft version of the Nurse Advocacy Letter.

    Assignment Overview

    Students will:

    1. Select a timely and relevant policy issue that has a significant impact on nursing practice, patient outcomes, or public health.
    2. Conduct evidence-based research to support the advocacy position.
    3. Draft a persuasive and professional advocacy letter addressed to a policymaker or influential stakeholder, clearly stating the issue, its importance, and a specific call to action.
    4. Demonstrate audience awareness, using respectful and professional tone tailored to the recipient.
    5. Follow correct block letter format and ensure the letter is free from grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
    6. Include a reference page in correct APA 7th edition format listing all scholarly and credible sources cited.

    Instructions

    1. Choose Your Topic
    • Review examples of nursing advocacy topics provided in the provided by your instructor or select your own topic with approval.
    • Ensure the topic is relevant, current, and aligned with nursing priorities.
    1. Research Your Issue
    • Locate current, scholarly, and evidence-based credible sources to support your position.
    • Include policy context, relevant data, and perspectives from professional organizations (e.g., ANA, state nursing associations).
    1. Write Your Advocacy Letter
    • Address the letter to a specific policymaker or stakeholder.
    • Clearly describe the issue, its significance, and how it impacts nursing and patient care.
    • Include a clear call to action specifying what you want the recipient to do.
    • Maintain a professional tone throughout, using language appropriate for the audience.
    1. Format & References
    • Use professional block letter format.
    • Proofread to eliminate spelling, grammar, and formatting errors.
    • Provide a separate reference page in APA 7th edition format.

    Evaluation

    Your work will be graded using the Final Nurse Advocacy Assignment Rubric, which assesses:

    1. Understanding of Policy Issue (20 points)
    2. Evidence-Based Support (20 points)
    3. Advocacy Message & Call to Action (20 points)
    4. Audience Awareness & Professional Tone (15 points)
    5. Letter Structure, Formatting, & Grammar (15 points)
    6. Reference Page (APA 7th ed.) (10 points)

  • Neurologic & Musculoskeletal

    Instructions:

    Mrs. J. is a 65-year-old woman who presents with bilateral knee pain that has gradually worsened over the past three years. She reports stiffness in the morning lasting about 20 minutes and has difficulty walking long distances. Physical examination reveals crepitus, mild swelling, and limited range of motion in both knees. Her BMI is 31. No erythema or warmth is noted.

    • Identify the most likely musculoskeletal disorder and discuss the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms.
    • Explain the diagnostic tests and imaging that would confirm your suspected diagnosis.
    • Summarize evidence-based treatment options, including both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic strategies.
    • Discuss patient education and lifestyle modifications that would optimize outcomes and prevent disease progres

  • Critique

    Critique the article attached below using the

    . Attach a narrative of your rationale for each answer provided on the form. It is very important that you include sufficient detail of your rationales. The grading of this assignment has more to do with your rationales for each answer rather than whether you select Y, N, Unclear, or NA.

    Submit your completed appraisal tool as well as your narrative of rationales

    Hidayat, J., Chen, M.Y., Liu, C.Y., Liu, W.I., Chen, K.M., Chiou, P.Y., & Pfeiffer, S. (2026).

    The Journal of Nursing Research, 00(00), Article e000. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000719

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): exploring_the_effects_of_a_yoga_intervention_on184 (1).pdf, Appendix E2_Single Study Evidence Appraisal Tool_2025.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Recognize Ethical Dilemmas

    For this assignment, students will select an ethical dilemma in healthcare and propose evidence-based intervention(s) for the identified problem. The paper should be a minimum of four to five paragraphs, 500- 800 words in length, and no more than four pages, not including the title and reference pages.

    Assignment Details:

    Perform the following tasks:

    1. Conduct a literature review to identify an ethical dilemma and explore opposing viewpoints.
    2. Write an engaging and informative paper that would be helpful for someone in the discipline wanting to learn about ethical dilemmas in healthcare
    3. Use the following as a checklist for the scholarly paper:
    4. Include the following elements:
    5. Title page (APA formatted title page).
    6. Introduction
    7. Background knowledge-brief summary of current knowledge of ethical dilemma being addressed
    8. Discuss the opposing viewpoints
    9. Challenges imposed in practice
    10. Intext citation present and appropriate
    11. Literature Review
    12. Literature searches for the topic on the web and in databases are limited to peer-reviewed professional nursing and medical journals, texts, and writings (no older than 5 years).
    13. Uses literature to support claims, facts, and statistics.
    14. Intext Citation present and appropriate.
    15. Proposed Intervention
    16. Clearly state proposed intervention(s)
    17. Define the ethical considerations or issues relevant to proposed intervention
    18. State why the intervention(s) were chosen
    19. Describe the implications of the proposed intervention to nursing education and practice.
    20. Discussion/Implications/Conclusion
    21. All work should have appropriate citations and reference lists.
    22. Use Times New Roman, 12 pt. font; 1-inch margins; double-spaced.
    23. Consists of 500 to 800 words in length (four to five paragraphs)
    24. Citation and references are to follow the APA manual format
    25. References should be no more than 5 years old
    26. Sources:
    27. Wikipedia (or similar sites) is not to be used as a reference
    28. Tabers and/or other medical dictionaries or encyclopedias are not to be used as references.
    29. Proofread and edit the paper carefully, following the assignment rubric.