Category: Nursing

  • power point

    Health Policy Critique Summary (20%; 2 @ 10 points each):

    Students will summarize and critique two newspaper articles during the semester. Articles must be selected from any national or international newspapers (e.g., New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, London Times).

    The article must be current and in the same year as the course semester.

    The article must relate to some aspect of health policy or a health care issue that can influence health policy. Only the article selected for Critique 2 will be taken from the Business section of the newspaper (Topical outline will inform you when to select an article from the Business section). Students will summarize the article using an electronic slide format (e.g., PowerPoint). The article posted must be cited in APA format (see APA Style Manual 7th edition for citing newspaper articles).

    The grading rubric describes the information required on each slide. The summary will include a brief description of the issue or issues presented in the article. Students will identify the key stakeholders (e.g., the public, nurses, advocacy organizations such as NYSNA, AMA, particular groups, etc.) and briefly analyze the article by answering the following questions (must answer all of the questions below and follow the format listed in the grading rubric):

    1) Title (1 slide): Name of the article, your name, and Mercy University (Do not list the author)

    2) Summary (1 slide): Description of the issue or issues presented in the article

    3) Stakeholders (1 slide):

    a. Identify key stakeholders (e.g., nurses such as RNs, NPs, advocacy organizations such as NYSNA, AMA, particular groups, etc.) who may have proposed the issue, may be affected by the issue, or proposed a specific policy – be specific.

    b. Provide detailed explanations about how the issue will impact specific stakeholder(s) listed.

    4) Analysis (2-3 slides):

    a. What point is the author(s) making? Briefly analyze the article, including evidence/statistics from the article. by answering the following questions

    b. Answer the following questions:

    i. Does this issue affect the work you currently do? If yes, how so? If no, why not?

    ii. How does this issue affect your patients? If yes, how so? If no, why not?

    5) References (1 slide)

    The only reference is the newspaper article DO NOT USE ADDITIONAL REFERENCES.

  • Library assignment

    Library Assignment Instructions for Nursing Students Purpose: The purpose of this library assignment is to help nursing students to develop their research skills and to become familiar with different credible data sources available through the Library page at the FNU.edu website. In addition, this assignment will help students to apply the PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time) question format to develop a research question and to locate and evaluate scholarly sources. Instructions: Topic Selection: Select a nursing theorist of choice and research him/her. Include a summary of your research and how it correlates to the subject you are studying. Identify their key contribution to nursing and explain its importance in healthcare. Your topic should be broad enough to allow for an in-depth exploration but narrow enough to be manageable within the scope of an 250-500-word (1 page) research paper. Searching for Literature: Use the Library page at the FNU.edu website to search for scholarly sources related to your topic. You must utilize at least 3 scholarly sources that have been published within the last 5 years. You may use databases such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinical Key, The Cochrane Library. Be sure to use appropriate keywords and to apply search filters to limit your search to scholarly, peer-reviewed articles. Evaluating Sources: Once you have identified potential sources, use the CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose) to evaluate their credibility and relevance to your research question. Be sure to select sources that are relevant to your topic, written by credible authors, and based on rigorous research methods. Writing the Paper: Your research paper should follow APA 7 guidelines and include the following sections: Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Be sure to use in-text citations and to include a reference list at the end of your paper. Please keep in mind that the paper will be checked for plagiarism, and similarity above 25% will not be accepted for submission. Grading Criteria: DUE WEEK 6 (10/9) Your research paper will be graded based on the following criteria: PICOT question format (10 points) Use of at least 3 scholarly sources published within the last 5 years (10 points) Credibility and relevance of sources (10 points) APA 7 formatting, including in-text citations and reference list (10 points) Introduction (10 points) Literature Review (20 points) Methodology (10 points) Results (10 points) Discussion (10 points) Conclusion (10 points) Plagiarism (10 points) Total points: 100
  • Discussion

    Discuss how novice thinkers and expert thinkers differ. Using a specific example, contrast how this difference manifests in the approach to nursing care in the clinical setting and identify the key elements of critical thinking employed by the expert nurse. Per the Rubric, you are required to use Scholarly article(s) to answer the question, such as journal articles. The textbook is NOT a “scholarly article.” Sources used must be cited and referenced per APA guidelines. You must also submit ONE document that includes a screenshot of the FIRST PAGE of EACH SOURCE USED. Sources listed without a corresponding screenshot will earn a zero in that part of the Rubric.
  • Power point

    Make a Presentation – create a 5-7 slide presentation. You may use Google Slides, PowerPoint, or Prezi for example.

    The topic: The advantages of Telemedicine

    In the slide-show, please be sure to include outside information and an APA reference page at the end.

    Requirements: 5-7 slides

  • Disseminate an Innovate Proposal

    Scenario

    At work in the medical-surgical post-operative unit and frustrated with the flow of client information before discharge, you state, I wish I did not have to wait for a physician to call to get discharge orders for a patient. Often, the client has to sit in the unit all day waiting to go home until a physician rounds. Then the client is usually leaving around the change of shift, creating a backlog of discharges and admits, increasing the chance for errors as information is missed.

    You have an innovative idea of how to solve this communication issue. The Nurse Manager asks you to prepare a presentation and share your idea with the nursing team in one week at the monthly staff meeting.

    Instructions

    Record a presentation in screencast-O-Matic and summarize the key components of your proposed innovative idea. The purpose of this presentation is to convince the nursing staff your innovative idea is relevant. Submit both the PowerPoint Presentation and recording that includes the following:

    • Title of the proposed innovative idea
    • Description of the innovative idea
    • In the notes, include the need the innovation is meeting, the purpose of the innovation, and a description of how you envision the innovation functioning with support from credible resources
    • The relevance of the innovative idea
    • In the notes, include a description of the possible impacts of this innovative idea relevant to the proposed setting with support from credible resources
    • At least one reference from original research or evidence-based findings supporting your idea
  • Patients at the Core of Technology Innovations

    Scenario

    You are a nursing supervisor at a private, critical access hospital offering a variety of clinical care and hospital services to the community. As part of this role, you conduct weekly patient satisfaction phone calls and create patient satisfaction improvement plans for the weekly leadership meetings for any patient concerns. You just completed a disheartening phone call with a geriatric patient, named Mabel, who had a six-day hospital stay following a diagnosis of pneumonia. Mabel started the call sharing that fifteen years ago, she was hospitalized with pneumonia at your hospital but was very pleased with her first stay.

    Unfortunately, this hospital stay presented a lot of challenges for her. She shared she had to stay an extra night because the doctor never showed to sign discharge papers, the pharmacy was closed overnight so her prescriptions werent ready, and she still has not received a bill which had to be mailed because the computer system was shut down for maintenance when she called to inquire. She continued to share that she was provided access instructions for an online portal to view her records, but the link does not work and the user ID and password she was promised would be in the discharge paperwork was nowhere to be found. You are preparing for the weekly leadership meeting and have a patient satisfaction improvement plan share in response to Mabels feedback about her hospital stay. In addition, each leader has to come prepared to discuss two innovative technologies they feel would improve patient safety. They are looking at the next fiscal year and want to budget for the integration of two new innovations.

    Instructions

    Create an improvement plan including an outline for two proposed innovative healthcare technologies on a Word document including:

    • Identify all of Mabels hospital stay concerns and describe how the failure of technology impacted Mabels healthcare delivery.
    • Describe two innovative technologies you would recommend improving client experience, such as Mabels, and describe how you would evaluate the impact of these technologies.
    • Identify evidence from the literature to support how each technology had a positive impact on client safety.
  • Family Medicine 17: 55-year-old postmenopausal patient with…

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Ruberic week 8.pdf, case_summary_FamilyMedicine17_55-y.pdf, Aquifer Essay Outline (6).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • week 4 assignment annotated bibliography

    For your Signature Assignment for this course, you will submit a written or video response to a case study, incorporating at least three scholarly sources including your textbook.

    This week, you will prepare for the Signature Assignment by creating an annotated bibliography.

    1. Review the . The Signature Assignment is due in Week 8.
    2. Watch the
    3. Read details about the case study below.
    4. Locate four (4) scholarly resources to be used as you complete the Signature Assignment.

    For each source:

    • List the source in APA Style. The references should be organized alphabetically by the author on the References list.
    • Follow the source with a brief annotation that summarizes the source information (approximately 35 sentences). You may quote briefly from the source, but do not copy and paste from the abstract. Include internal citations as needed
    • In 1 or 2 sentences, explain and evaluate the sources relevance and significance to your thesis. Does the information from this source support or discredit your thesis?
    • Use an academic tone and style.

    Case Study Details (read after viewing the case study video):

    Neuroscience: Sarah’s difficulties in language acquisition, social communication, and attention, alongside abnormalities in brain development, particularly in areas associated with language processing, attention, and emotional regulation, suggest underlying neurobiological factors. The decreased activity in the prefrontal cortex points to deficits in executive functioning and cognitive control. These findings highlight the intricate interplay between brain regions and their effect on cognitive and behavioral functioning.

    Consciousness and Cognitive Functioning: Sarah’s level of consciousness appears intact, but her cognitive abilities are significantly affected. Her awareness may be compromised in social contexts due to difficulties in social communication. Attentional deficits and executive dysfunction likely contribute to her challenges in maintaining focus and expressing thoughts verbally. These factors collectively influence her level of consciousness and cognitive processing.

    Thinking and Learning: Sarah’s cognitive processes are impaired, particularly in abstract thinking, problem-solving, and academic performance. These challenges align with the characteristics of neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder (ASD), affecting her ability to navigate academic tasks and everyday problem-solving situations effectively.

    Development and Memory: Sarah’s developmental milestones are delayed, and it’s evident in her struggles with language acquisition and social communication skills since early childhood. Her memory processes may also be affected with weaknesses in encoding, storage, and retrieval of information. However, she may possess strengths in certain mnemonic abilities, which could be explored further to support her learning and development.

    Psychological Disorders: Based on Sarah’s presentation and assessments, she meets the criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This diagnosis encompasses her difficulties in social communication, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors. The effects of ASD on Sarah’s psychological well-being underscores the importance of early intervention and comprehensive support to address her complex needs effectively.

    Motivation and Emotion: Sarah’s motivation levels appear low, possibly influenced by her difficulties in social interaction and academic performance. Additionally, her challenges with emotional regulation contribute to her withdrawn behavior and overall adjustment. Understanding these factors is crucial in developing tailored interventions to enhance her motivation and emotional well-being.

    Visit these sources to learn more about the annotated bibliography:

    • (This is a link to the library.)

    Visit the Writing Resources link under the Student Resources Tab to learn more about annotated bibliographies.

    Rubric

    PSYC_160_OL – Annotated Bibliography

    PSYC_160_OL – Annotated Bibliography

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Annotated Bibliography

    20 to >17.33 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Sources are highly relevant to the topic and add greatly to research potential. Few, if any, additional sources are needed. All sources are from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. All main/critical points of the research study are included for each annotation. Annotations succinctly and comprehensively describe the source material.

    17.33 to >15.8 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Some sources are relevant to the topic. May require additional sources. Most sources are from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Main/critical points of the research study are included but may be lacking in detail for each annotation. Most annotations are succinct and generally describe the source material.

    15.8 to >11.8 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    Few sources are relevant to the topic. Requires additional sources. Some sources are from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Main/critical points of the research study are lacking in detail for each annotation. Some annotations are succinct and generally describe the source material.

    11.8 to >0 pts

    Not Meeting Expectations

    Sources are not relevant to the topic. Extensive additional research is needed. Sources lack credibility. Main/critical points of the research study are absent or significantly lacking in detail for each annotation and/or some annotations may be missing.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Review/ Critique of Scholarly Research

    20 to >17.33 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Fully answers all questions posed and demonstrates a sophisticated ability to critically think about and evaluate scholarly research. Provides substantial, relevant, and clear explanations that are insightful and well-supported.

    17.33 to >15.8 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Answers all questions posed and demonstrates ability to critically think about and evaluate scholarly research. Provides explanations that are well-supported.

    15.8 to >11.8 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    Answers most questions posed and demonstrates some ability to critically think about and evaluate scholarly research.

    11.8 to >0 pts

    Not Meeting Expectations

    Most questions posed are not answered. Work does not demonstrate the student’s ability to critically think about and evaluate scholarly research.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    APA Style

    5 to >4.5 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    The assignment accurately and consistently follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

    4.5 to >3.95 pts

    Meets Expectations

    The assignment consistently follows current APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

    3.95 to >2.95 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    The assignment has numerous errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

    2.95 to >0 pts

    Not Meeting Expectations

    The assignment has significant errors in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Writing Mechanics

    5 to >4.5 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    The writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.

    4.5 to >3.95 pts

    Meets Expectations

    The writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.

    3.95 to >2.95 pts

    Approaches Expectations

    Writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.

    2.95 to >0 pts

    Not Meeting Expectations

    The writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.

    5 pts

    Total Points: 50

  • CrossPost

    Discussion One- Initial Post: Project Idea AI Driven Brainstorming

    Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were designed to improve care quality, optimize workflows, and support seamless documentation. However, nursing documentation and workflows in family practice facilities often remain fragmented and inefficient. This discussion examines how artificial intelligence (AI) can help generate strategies to streamline clinical documentation. These strategies must prioritize nurses’ input, as their firsthand experience is essential to effective change (Johnson et al., 2025). Standardized processes and organizational tools, such as visual flowcharts, can help nurse leaders identify failures early, enhance risk mitigation, and prevent adverse patient outcomes (Roussel et al., 2023).

    Current Practice

    As a nurse leader in a family practice facility, implementing workflow improvement projects, forming EHR optimization committees, and reducing nurse burnout are crucial strategies for addressing persistent gaps in healthcare. Gaps are evident in several areas, including documentation processes that are often time-consuming and repetitive, and a focus on completing mandatory fields rather than capturing clinically meaningful information. By targeting these areas through focused initiatives, healthcare organizations can address gaps and inefficiencies in documentation (Demsash et al., 2023).

    Mission and Values

    To guide these efforts, the following PICO question can be used: Among registered nurses providing direct patient care in a family practice clinic, how does implementing streamlined, standardized, workflow-aligned electronic documentation practices, compared with current documentation processes, affect documentation time, perceived documentation burden, and documentation quality? Prioritizing quality through documentation ensures this family practice facility delivers safe, evidence-based care, underscoring the importance of its mission and values. Efficient documentation is directly linked to these values by improving accuracy and timeliness, supporting compliance, and helping staff track care outcomes.

    Aim and Organizational Improvement

    The project’s purpose is to improve nursing documentation by making it more efficient, clear, and clinically valuable by reducing unnecessary and repetitive charting tasks. The specific aim is to reduce documentation time by 20% and reduce duplicate or unnecessary charting fields by 30% within six months, while maintaining or improving documentation quality and compliance. Streamlining these processes is intended to enhance patient-centered care and reduce documentation burden. Key strategies for this process include removing or merging duplicate documentation, using smart phrases and auto-populated fields, and adopting evidence-based templates for consistency. Making critical information, such as allergies and fall risk, highly visible supports safety. Role-specific EHR training and assigned superusers can improve proficiency and satisfaction. Engaging frontline staff in redesigning documentation and piloting changes ensures practical solutions. Finally, ongoing metric tracking and consistent feedback support continuous quality improvement (Johnson et al., 2025).

    Reflection

    Utilizing artificial intelligence during the brainstorming phase of this quality improvement (QI) project helped transform broad concerns into more focused, actionable ideas by creating potential problem areas, contributing factors, and possible interventions. The AI-generated PICO question provided a structured framework for evaluating the impact of documentation improvement initiatives and aligns with the goal of reducing inefficiencies and enhancing the value of clinical records. Additionally, AI has enabled an innovative range of solutions; however, it does not fully understand the unique culture of a family practice facility. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and refine the ideas presented to include clinical judgment.

    References

    Demsash, A. W., Kassie, S. Y., Dubale, A. T., Chereka, A. A., Ngusie, H. S., Hunde, M. K., Emanu, M. D., Shibabaw, A. A., & Walle, A. D. (2023). Health professionals routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 30(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100699

    Johnson, L. G., Macieira, T. G. R., Madandola, O. O., Priola, K. J. B., & Keenan, G. M. (2025). Charting the path forward: Nursing perspectives on documentation and change. Nursing Outlook, 73(4), 102463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102463

    Roussel, L., Harris, J. L., & Thomas, P. L. (2023). Management and leadership for nurse administrators (9th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    CrossPost #2

    Initial Post Quality Improvement Project

    Topic Ideation and Final Project Selection

    To help narrow my focus, I used ChatGPT to brainstorm a few potential quality improvement ideas relevant to USA Children’s and Women’s surgical services department. The main options included improving first-case on-time starts, strengthening surgical site infection prevention practices, and addressing inconsistent operating room (OR) block time utilization and scheduling. All were relevant, but block utilization stood out as the most practical and highest impact because it affects staffing, overtime, delays, and overall workflow every day. For that reason, I chose to focus this project on improving OR block time use and creating more consistent weekly caseloads.

    Practice Concern

    In surgical services, the OR volume varies significantly from day to day and week to week. Some days rooms go unused and staff are sent home, while other days feel overloaded with delays and overtime. This inconsistency creates stress for staff, drives up costs, and can affect patient flow and safety. As one of the most resource-intensive areas of the hospital, the OR benefits significantly from better block time use, which supports USA Healths mission to help people lead longer, better lives by reducing delays, improving patient flow, and promoting safe, reliable care.

    Right now, block time is largely based on historical patterns and provider preference rather than actual utilization data. Unused time is often released too late or not advertised enough to fill, and non-emergent add-on cases tend to pile onto already busy days. Research supports that more intentional block planning helps balance workloads and keeps downstream areas running more smoothly (Heider et al., 2022). Other healthcare scheduling studies show similar improvements in efficiency and patient flow when decisions are guided by data (Abdalkareem et al., 2021). Together, this suggests that inconsistent block use is something we can improve with better processes, not just something we have to accept.

    Proposed Changes and Evaluation

    This project will focus on reviewing historical utilization patterns, creating clearer expectations for early block release and sharing available openings, exploring a shared flex block process, and using simple dashboards to make utilization more visible to service lines. The goal is to create a steadier daily schedule and better match staffing to demand. If successful, we would expect to see fewer delays, less overtime, and more consistent room use. These ideas are supported by evidence showing that structured scheduling practices improve OR efficiency and utilization (Soh et al., 2022). Similar quality improvement approaches that standardize processes and address common causes of delays have reduced operational waste in surgical settings without adding cost (Robson Chase et al., 2025).

    AI Reflection

    ChatGPT was helpful for organizing my thinking and narrowing the focus of the project. It helped me compare several options, introduced a few approaches I had not initially considered, and structured the idea using a simple PICO framework that made the literature search more focused and useful for identifying evidence-based scheduling improvement strategies. Overall, the tool made the planning process much more efficient while still allowing me to tailor the project to specific departmental needs.

    References

    Abdalkareem, Z. A., Amir, A., Al-Betar, M. A., Ekhan, P., & Hammouri, A. I. (2021). Healthcare scheduling in Optimization Context: A Review. Health and Technology, 11(3), 445469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00547-5

    Heider, S., Schoenfelder, J., Koperna, T., & Brunner, J. O. (2022). Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for Recovery Units. Health Care Management Science, 25(2), 311332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-021-09588-8

    OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/

    Robson Chase, M. E., Anderson, M. J., Stephens, W. A., Levy, B. E., Lantz, S., Goforth, J., Newcomb, M. R., & Harris, A. M. (2025). Utilizing quality improvement methodology to decrease surgical delays. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 51(78), 474485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.04.004

    Soh, K. W., Walker, C., OSullivan, M., & Wallace, J. (2022). Innovative operating room scheduling metric for creating surgical lists with desirable room utilization rates. Operations Management Research, 17(2), 544567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00313-4

  • Mental health Process recording/interview

    Interview with a mental health patient who appeared happy and eager to talk. Responds well to questions. States she hears voices telling her to come to the new heaven which is above, its a peaceful place and they would take her there secretly and you dont have to die to go there. Patient refused talking about reason for admission cause it might hinder her leaving the hospital to a nursing home. Patient states she misses her older daughter and her grandkids. Talked about substance abuse, use of cigarettes, cigars, marijuana and coke. Patient states cocaine helps keep her calm and reliefs her anxiety. Doesnt take alcohol but drinks sweet wine. She smokes cigarettes more 2packs a day

    This is a summary of my interview with the patient, you can add more to make up but it should align with my interview. I attached the template/guidelines and also a sample of the process recording. Please follow instructions properly especially the APA format for reference and double spacing

    Requirements: Long as possible