Category: Nursing

Watch video Post a DB response to the video. Include your initial impressions of breaches in safe practice, who worked outside of their designated scope of practice, and where this chain of events could have been stopped. Who would be legally responsible?

Working AheadQualitative Evidence

Nurses are typically less familiar with qualitative studies than quantitative. When doing a thorough literature review to find external evidence, it is important that you consider all points of view. This assignment will provide you with an opportunity to read and appraise a qualitative study and objectively determine its worth to inform your PICOT question.

Tasks:

In this assignment you will use the same clinical scenario from this weeks discussion. Click to review it.

On the basis of your review of the scenario, in a 1- to 2-page APA-formatted paper, respond to the following:

• What is your professional judgment in prescribing a weight loss drug for a patient who is not following dietary recommendations or exercising?

Use the are around Lakeway, TX or near Austin, TX… The instructions are attached.

To allow all members of the class sufficient time to respond to peer’s postings, students must initially post the response to the instructors question by Wednesday 11:59pm of each week. Students must post the responses to peers posts by Sunday 11:59pm of each week. Students are referred to the course syllabus and to the BSN Student Handbook regarding late assignments. You must post at least two different days in the week. You are referred to the syllabus for Guidelines for Discussion Board Posting expectations on critical thinking in discussion questions. In 200 words respond to the following question using two resources. One source may be your text and a minimum of one English peer-reviewed nursing journal article (less than 5 years). Include a Permalink to the references so that faculty can easily access the articles (see library database page). Articles from non-nursing peer-reviewed journals, including those published outside the United States, and websites ending in .gov, .org and .edu may be used as a third resource if published within the last five years. Choose one of the Ethical Scenarios in Chapter 8: 8-1, (p. 118) 8-2, (p.127) Answer the questions in the scenario. Be sure to write the questions in your post. Chapter 8 Ethical Scenario 81 Limitation on Informed Consent Mr. and Mrs. Urkovitsch had their two-year-old daughter admit-ted to the hospital for evaluation of her continuing breathing problems and blue finger-tips. They have recently moved from their native country to the United States and speak limited Eng-lish. After diagnostic tests were completed, a diagnosis of se-vere cardiac cardiomegaly and aortic stenosis has been made. The pediatric cardiologist and the cardiovascular surgeon car-ing for the child feel that the parents do not have the needed education to fully comprehend the severity of the childs diag-nosis, and that only minimal informed consent is needed as they will not understand anyway. Through an interpreter, the two physicians have informed the parents of the fact that the child requires surgery, but that everything will be fine after the surgery. The parents are asking the nursing staff additional questions, such as what type of surgery their daughter is about to have, how long she will be in the hospital, and when she will be able to play with the other children again. Additionally, the parents have told the nursing staff that they understand their daughter is quite ill and are very worried about her future. Discuss the ethical principles underlying this situation, from the aspect of the parents, the nursing staff, and the physicians. Is there a realistic ethical outcome for this situation? Exceptions to Informed Consent The courts recognize the following four exceptions to the need for informed consent in circumstances in which con-sent is still required: 1. Emergency situations 2. Therapeutic privilege 3. Patient waiver 4. Prior patient knowledge From a practitioner standpoint, consent is still needed to prevent charges of battery, but the informed consent requirements are eased. Emergencies give rise to implied consent. Courts in some jurisdictions have recognized that if there is time to give information, a limited disclosure may be valid. If no time exists or the patient is incapable of understanding by virtue of the physical disability, then no information need be given. To bring a successful malpractice suit based on informed consent, the plaintiff must be able to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, all of the following: 1. There was a duty on the part of the health care pro-vider to know of a risk or alternative treatment. 2. There was a duty on the part of the health care pro-vider to disclose the risk or alternative treatment. 3. There was a breach of the duty to disclose. 4. If the health care occurs in a state where the reason-able patient standard is used, a reasonable person in the plaintiffs position would not have consented to the treatment if he or she had known of the outstanding risk. 5. The undisclosed risk caused the harm, or the harm would not have occurred if an alternative treatment plan was selected. 6. The plaintiff suffered injuries for which damages can be assessed. EXERCISE 81 Explore your own state requirements for standards of informed consent. How did you go about discovering these standards? Do elective procedures and emergency situations use the same standard of informed consent? Are ethical principles evident in these standards for informed consent? Which of the standards gives the most ethical rights to patients? Therapeutic privilege, sometimes referred to as ther-apeutic exception, has its origins in the common-law defense of necessity. Therapeutic privilege allows primary health care providers to withhold information based on sound medical judgment that the patient is too emotionally or mentally unable to fully understand and that revealing the information would potentially harm the individual. The detrimental nature of the information must be more than fear that the information would lead to the patients refusal. The disclosure of the information should pose seri-ous and immediate harm to the patient, such as prompting suicidal behavior (van den Heever, 2005, p. 420). In using this defense, the primary health care provider justifies its use based on actual danger or patient incompetence, not merely on the principle of beneficence. Therapeutic privilege is not favored by the courts, as it is a form of intentional nondisclosure. Courts have held that a relative must concur with the decision to intervene medically and that this relative must be given full disclo-sure, whereas other courts have held that no relative need give concurrent consent. Once the risks of patient harm have abated, the primary health care provider must then fully disclose the previously withheld information to the patient. The patient may also agree to a waiver of the right to full disclosure and still consent to the procedure. The caveat to be avoided in this instance is that the health care provider cannot suggest such a waiver. The waiver, to be valid, must be initiated by the patient. Such a waiver may be seen when patients tell the primary health care provider that they do not want to know the potential risks or com-plications associated with a specific procedure. Prior patient knowledge involves the patient to whom the risks and benefits were fully explained the first time the patient consented to the procedure. Liability does not exist for nondisclosure of risks that are public or common knowledge or that the patient had previously experienced. Often prior patient knowledge is encountered in patients

Consider the following hypothetical scenario:

You have been chosen as your nursing units representative for a quality review team at your healthcare system. The team has been asked to review technology used at the hospital in a protocol or process to improve patient outcomes (for example: catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), fall prevention, etc.). When choosing a protocol, think about the types of technologies used to implement and/or perform the protocol. For this assignment, you have been tasked with completing a review of the technologies used within one protocol. You will need to create a PowerPoint presentation describing the results of your critique and recommendations to the group.

• Describe and critique a protocol used on your healthcare unit using the guidelines listed below. Describe the purpose and significance of the protocol and the technologies used. Determine if the technologies used in the protocol communicate. Identify any gaps noted and provide recommendations. Identify other stakeholders within the organization who should receive this feedback.

Please note: If you do not work in a healthcare facility, work remotely, or are a home health nurse, consider a process that you carry out to ensure patient safety. What technology do you use to perform this process? Create the PowerPoint presentation based on the technology you use and follow the guidelines listed below.

The following are best practices in preparing for this project:

• Provide a professional and engaging presentation
• Keep slide wording to a minimum focusing on bullet point structure
• Utilize speaker notes for the bulk of the content and for any in-text citations. Speaker notes should follow APA formatting guidelines
• Cite all sources within the slide show speaker notes as well as in the reference slide
• Review directions thoroughly
• Proofread prior to final submission
• Abide by the GCON academic integrity policy

PowerPoint Guidelines:

• Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint 2007 or versions after 2007 (no XP)
• Length: No more than 15 slides in length (not including the title slide and reference list slide)
• Technical writing: APA format is required
• Submission: Save the assignment and submit via the drop box: Technology used in Protocol by 11:59 PM on Sunday of Week 5.
• Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions
• Tutorial: If needed, Microsoft Office has many templates and tutorials to help you get started

Assignment Instructions:

1. Include a title slide (not included in slide length)
2. Include an introduction briefly describing the purpose for this presentation while establishing a professional tone. Identify a protocol used in the healthcare setting you normally practice (if currently not practicing, find a protocol used in a healthcare setting near you)
3. Discuss the following features of the protocol:
4. Provide a general description and significance of the protocol
5. Use 2-3 scholarly articles that support/refute actions identified in the protocol and describe how the protocol aligns with evidence-based practice from the literature review
6. Identify any technologies currently used by the healthcare system to complete the actions in the protocols
7. Provide a brief description of each technology used in the protocol
8. Describe the purpose for the technology use (e.g. communication, assess information, etc.)
9. Describe if and how the technologies communicate among each other.
10. Describe how the nurse is able to access the information needed to applycomplete the protocol.
11. What gaps in technology communicating with technology are noted after reviewing this information?
12. Summarize the analysis and offer recommendations to achieve better protocol results and improve the use of technology within the protocol (e.g. what would one recommend to refine the protocol?)
13. What is the process to provide feedback of the recommendations in addition to your supervisor? (e.g. practice committee, supervisor/manager, etc.)
14. Include a reference slide (not included in slide length)

Important note to students: Pay close attention not only to the details of this assignment but also to the spelling, grammar, and syntax of your work. You are encouraged to use your Galen resources such as Academic Writer, etc to complete this assignment.

Objectives

• Identify key components of your project.

Deliverables

• Complete the Work Plan Template Assignment attached below.

Save and submit

When you have completed your template, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to your instructor using the dropbox

As a DNP-prepared nurse, you are searching for evidence to translate into practice. In your review of evidence, you locate a randomized control research study and a correlational study as possible evidence to support a practice change. Reflect upon the case studies, choose one, and answer the questions to address the following.

Case Study One

Persons with Type II diabetes have long-term effects that are greatly underestimated because the patients may not follow recommended treatments. A randomized control trial was done to identify if an intervention group adhered to taking medications versus the control group. There were 40 participants in each group. The research data from the two groups is parametric data and is not normally distributed, and the researcher is using a student t-test to measure the differences between the two groups.

1) Support the use of this statistical method to measure this data 2) Analyze what results you would expect to find to be considered a statistically significant research study 3) Do these findings impact your decision about whether to use this evidence to inform practice change? Why or why not?

Case Study Two

A non-experimental, correlational study was conducted about medical adherence amongst cardiovascular patients over a 6-month period of time. The aim of the research was to correlate cultural characteristics with medication fill rates. The data does not have a normal distribution; there are no significant outliers and there is a linear association between the variables.

1) Support the use of an appropriate correlational statistical method to measure this data 2) Analyze the results, sharing your interpretation of correlation outcomes and the use of correlational findings to support a DNP project 3) Do these findings impact your decision about whether to use this evidence to inform practice change? Why or why not?

15 math problems have show your work how you solved problems: and in case study give example of drug in small case study

Answer questions as if on a commitee examining the overuse of tests and procedures of healthcare.

Write a paper of 57 pages (not including the title page and reference page) that discusses the following 3 elements:

• Provide an overview of how healthcare in the United States has evolved since the post-industrial period.
• How has the evolution of medical technology, graduate medical education, and the professionalization of medical and nursing staff affected the delivery of care?
• Why has the United States been unsuccessful in evolving the current healthcare system into a national healthcare system?

Note: Use APA style, and cite at least 3 scholarly references published within the last 5 years.