Category: Nursing

In Module 1, we looked at the Complexity Theory and its influence on Nursing Leadership. In Module 2 we looked at how organizational structure influences nursing leadership in complex health care environments. Building on this previous content, in this major assignment you will apply both the Complexity theory and MagnetTM principles to impact sustained change in complex healthcare environments. Choose a prompt below and in your own words, write a 5-6 paged paper answering the questions provided. Papers must be essay style using APA format, including Title Page and references. In addition to your textbook and the ANCC Magnet Model, use at least one other relevant source, less than five years old for this major assignment. The use of I is allowed. Post your work to the DropBox by the date listed in the Course Calendar.

Select a prompt below:

You are the nurse manager in a large urban hospital with a highly diverse patient population. Currently, your units are experiencing high readmission rates, medication errors and staff burnout. Pick one of these issues and analyze it using the questions below.

OR

You are the nurse manager of a large urban hospital-affiliated outpatient oncology clinical with a highly diverse patient population. Currently, your clinic is experiencing long wait times, inconsistent patient education, and sub-optimal follow-up on treatment plans. Pick one of these issues and analyze it using the questions below.

Answer the following questions:

Using your own words provide a thorough explanation of the Complexity theory. How does interaction influence behavior, process, and outcomes in the ever-changing complex health care environment.

In your own words explain the MagnetTM framework? Pick three forces of magnetism that could assist in the issue you selected. How do these three forces support change in a health care system?

Does the Complexity theory compliment the MagnetTM framework? If so, how do they complement one another? If not, how are they different?

How does integrating either the Magnet TM framework or the Complexity theory assist the nurse in disseminating new ideas related to the issue you selected in the healthcare environment?

What strategies can be implemented to encourage sustained change? What realistic methods can be used to engage all areas of nursing in the change?

Identify and discuss three strategies that would support implementation of new ideas and for each strategy propose detailed and effective methods to engage nursing.

TOPIC

Moral distress in nursing practice in LTC

Health Teaching Plan

Case Study 9 – grp_9

Health Teaching – Case Study 9

Patient Profile:

• Name: Ms. Leena Sharma
• Age: 42 years old
• Diagnosis: Post-Total Knee Replacement Surgery
• Setting: Discharge planning after inpatient recovery

Scenario

Ms. Leena Sharma underwent a right total knee replacement 5 days ago due to severe osteoarthritis. Her recovery has been stable, and she is preparing for discharge in two days. She has a surgical incision with staples on her right knee that will require daily inspection and dressing changes until her follow-up appointment in 10 days.

Leena lives in a two-story home with her teenage daughter and works as a cashier at a grocery store. She expresses concern about managing stairs and the possibility of wound infection. She has also reported difficulty sleeping because of post-operative pain.

Her mobility has improved with physiotherapy, but she still requires a walker for short distances. She is motivated to return to work but is unsure how long recovery will take.

No instructions provided

One research question must engage with humans, must be original, cannot be asked and answered, can not be normative (what’s the best /worst…;should..), cannot be subjective (how can,,,’could). This is only one sentence

.1. It must be original and something that has not been done before. You need to know what has already been studied so that my research can add original contributions to the field

2. If you want to do a question on something that someone else has studied, you may evaluate if there is new data that would add to that field and subject. need 10 annotated bibliography that will also be in the reflection

Answer the questions in the attached file

research reflection paper must be 6 pages excluding annotated bib

I Chose Virgina Henderson as the theorist to write about but the paper also needs a a discussion of the history of nursing and the evolution of nursing theory as described below. Our textbook is Nursing Theorists and Their Work by Martha Ralie Alligood 10th edition. Here are the specific instructions. It needs to be in APA format no abstract but it does require an introduction. I included the first three slides of the presentation that I started but I have not started the actual paper.

NURS 3113 The Science of Nursing

Theorist Paper | Week 4

Page 1 of 2

Created FA17, Last Updated FA20

INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDELINES

Selection of your Nursing Theorist took place in Week 2.

This is a scholarly paper and should be written as such. Proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence

structure, and use of APA formatting is required and part of the grading criteria. The final paper should be

approximately 7-8 pages in length including the title and reference page.

You may only use 3 short quotes (less than 40 words) or 1 long quote (more than 40 words) in this paper. Use

of more than the allotted number of quotes will result in you needing to resubmit your paper and receive a 10%-

point deduction for each resubmission due to overuse of quotes.

When your paper is turned into the assignment tab, it will automatically be submitted to Turn-It-In. Turn-It-In

is a program designed to assist a student with possible concerns regarding plagiarism. Once Turn-It-In

examines your paper, you will receive a score next to your assignment submission. Any papers that are

over 30% matching will not be graded and will receive a grade of zero. Students can have multiple

submissions and are highly encouraged to review submissions and re-submit.

The paper is worth 200 points or 30% of the course grade and is due during Week 4, on Sunday by 11:59 P.M.

Late papers will not be accepted.

REQUIREMENTS

Please see the Theorist Paper Template for assistance with formatting your title page, header, and headings.

TITLE PAGE: 5 points

The title page should be formatted according to APA formatting guidelines. Please refer to your APA resources.

INTRODUCTION: 10 points

The introduction provides an overview of the paper. The reader should have a clear idea of the purpose and

topic(s) of the paper after reading the introduction. General facts and supportive information should be

included.

BODY OF THE PAPER: Each heading is worth 35 points

Use the following four subheadings to organize the content of your paper:

History of Nursing: Discuss and describe the history of nursing. Include a definition of nursing.

Include 3 major influences on the profession and describe how these influences impact current nursing

practice.

Evolution of Nursing Theory: Discuss the evolution of Nursing Theory. Describe how theory began

and its application to past and present nursing practice. Define the 4 major concepts (person, health,

environment, nursing) related to nursing theory.

Theorist Choice: Identify a theorist to review. Include a discussion of the theorists background. This

should include a discussion of the theorists personal and family life, education and professional

backgrounds, contributions to nursing, and influencing factors related to the development of the theory.

NURS 3113 The Science of Nursing

Theorist Paper | Week 4

Page 2 of 2

Created FA17, Last Updated FA20

Theory: Identify and discuss the theory developed by your chosen theorist. Include a brief overview of

how the theory relates to the 4 major nursing theory concepts. Further theory information will be

completed in your course project.

CONCLUSION: 10 points

The conclusion of the paper should be concise and reiterate the main topic(s). Do not introduce new material in

the conclusion of the paper.

HEADINGS: 5 points

Each subheading or section listed above should be used as the Level One headings for the paper and formatted

according to APA guidelines. Please refer to your APA resources for assistance.

REFERENCE PAGE: 10 points

The reference page should be formatted according to APA formatting guidelines. Please refer to your APA

resources. Use a minimum of 3 scholarly and current (less than five years) sources. One of the sources can be

the textbook assigned for the course. Peer-reviewed journals are recommended for the other two sources. Peer-

reviewed journals are accessible through the McKee Library. Library staff are available to assist with searches

for information if this is a new skill. Points will be reduced if less than 3 scholarly and current references are

used.

IN-TEXT CITATIONS: 10 points

APA papers require the use of in-text citations to validate the information in your paper. In-text citations must

be used after sentences that are not your own thought or idea. Utilize your APA resources to assist in proper

formatting.

SPELLING AND GRAMMAR: 10 points

Proper spelling and grammar usage is required. It is recommended that you utilize tutor.com located in course

resources to assist you with this section.

complete this assignment as a new nurse interested in Icu. if you need any info feel free to reach out

For this assessment, you will continue your survey of ethical principles in health care. Especially in our contemporary world, where needs for health care outstrip available resources, we regularly face decisions about who should get which resources. There is a serious shortage of donor organs. Need vastly outstrips supply, due not only to medical advances related to organ transplantation, but also because not enough people consent to be cadaveric donors (an organ donor who has already died). Munson (2014) points out that in the United States, approximately 10,000 patients die each year because an organ donor was not available, which is three times the number of people killed in the terrorist attacks on 9/11. But what is an efficient and morally sound solution to this problem? The policy of presumed consent, where enacted, has scarcely increased supply, and other alternatives, such as allowing donors to sell their organs, raise strong moral objections. In light of this, some have advocated for a policy of conscription of cadaveric organs (Spital & Erin, 2002). This involves removing organs from the recently deceased without first obtaining consent of the donor or his or her family. Proponents of this policy argue that conscription would not only vastly increase the number of available organs, and hence save many lives, but that it is also more efficient and less costly than policies requiring prior consent. Finally, because with a conscription policy all people would share the burden of providing organs after death and all would stand to benefit should the need arise, the policy is fair and just. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care. Articulate the moral concerns surrounding a policy of organ conscription. Articulate questions about the fairness and justness of organ conscription policy. Explain the relevance and significance of the concept of consent as it pertains to organ donation. Evaluate alternative policies for increasing available donor organs. Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals. Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills. References Munson, R. (2014). Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in bioethics (concise ed.). Wadsworth. Spital, A., & Erin, C. (2002). Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: Let’s at least talk about it. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 39(3), 611615. Instructions Do you consider the policy of organ conscription to be morally sound? Write a paper that answers this question, defending that answer with cogent moral reasoning and supporting your view with ethical theories or moral principles you take to be most relevant to the issue. In addition to reviewing the suggested resources, you are encouraged to locate additional resources in the Capella University Library, your public library, or authoritative online sites to provide additional support for your viewpoint. Be sure to weave and cite the resources throughout your work. In your paper, address the following: On what grounds could one argue that consent is not ethically required for conscription of cadaveric organs? And on what grounds could one argue that consent is required? Is the policy truly just and fair, as supporters claim? Explain. Do you consider one of the alternative policies for increasing available donor organs that Munson discusses to be preferable to conscription? Explain why or why not.