Category: Nursing

  • case stdy

    M5 Case Study

    • Points 76
    • CHIEF COMPLAINT: Sudden onset left-sided weakness.

    HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS

    Sixty-six-year-old male who was at home when he suddenly developed left-sided weakness, slurred speech, and facial weakness at 7:00 PM. 911 was called and the patient was transported to the ED by the emergency medical service (EMS). Stroke pager activated at 7:44 PM and patient triaged at 7:51 PM. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale (NIHSS) upon admission was 15. Head computed tomographic (CT) scan showed early right MCA infarct and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) was given at 8:34PM. The patient was then taken to angiogram for evaluation of endovascular tPA but unsuccessful. The patient was intubated prior to angiogram secondary to airway protection.

    PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: Hypertension treated with omlesartan (dose unknown by family).

    CURRENT HOSPITAL MEDICATIONS

    Atorvastatin 80 mg via nasogastric tube (NGT) daily.

    Pantoprazole 40 mg via NGT daily.

    Docusate sodium 100 mg via NGT twice daily.

    Albuterol/ipratroprium/mucomyst nebulizer treatment every 6 hours.

    Fentanyl intravenous (IV) administration 25mcg/hr.

    Norepinephrine infusion 0.08 mcg/kg/min.

    3% saline infusion at 30 mL/h.

    Normal saline (0.9%) infusion at 75 mL/h.

    Hydralazine HCL 10 mg IV every hour as needed for systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 185 mm Hg.

    Labetalol 10 mg IV every 15 minutes as needed SBP >185 mm Hg.

    Acetaminophen 325 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for temperature > 101.5F.

    Potassium replacement per intensive care unit (ICU) protocol.

    Regular insulin subcutaneously per ICU sliding scale protocol.

    ALLERGIES: No known medication or food allergies.

    SOCIAL HISTORY: Divorced. The patient has 2 daughters and 1 son. Support system also includes ex-wife; retired teacher.

    BEHAVIORAL: The patient smokes 2 packs cigarettes per day; drinks 2 bottles of wine.

    REVIEW OF SYSTEMS

    Head: Denies any trauma, headache, or history of seizures.

    Eyes: No visual field changes or blurred vision.

    Chest: Positive for productive cough and shortness of breath prior to admission and during initial exam.

    Heart: Denies any chest pain or chest pressure.

    Circulation: Positive for numbness to left upper and lower extremities.

    Abdomen: Denies abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting.

    Neurological: Positive for weakness and numbness to left side, positive for slurred speech, and facial drooping prior to admission.

    General/Constitutional: In usual state of health prior to sudden onset of left-sided weakness, slurred speech, and facial drooping; currently denies pain.

    Note: Intubated, unable to obtain full review of systems from patient. Parts of history and review of systems obtained from medical record and patient’s response on day of initial encounter.

    PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

    Vital signs: Temperature 99.2F oral, heart rate 70 beats per minute, blood pressure 110/70 mm Hg, mean arterial pressure 82 mmHg on norepinephrine at 0.08mcg/kg/min, respiratory rate 24 breaths per minute, O2 saturation 99% on 50% FIO2; height 170 cm, and weight 95.3 kg.

    General: Overweight, orally intubated on mechanical ventilation, and in no acute distress.

    Skin: Warm, dry, and both lower extremities cool.

    Head, eyes, ears, nose, throat: Pupils 2 mm and equal, orally intubated, and bilateral scleral edema.

    Chest: Bilateral expiratory wheezes and rhonchi left > right, copious yellow secretions, intubated on assist control rate of 12 breaths per minute, tidal volume 750 mL, positive end expiratory pressure 5, and FIO2 50%.

    Heart: Regular, S1S2, no murmurs, clicks, or rubs.

    Abdomen: Large, soft, bowel sounds active all 4 quadrants.

    Extremities: Upper extremities warm, 2+ palpable radial pulses, both lower extremities cool, Doppler pulses only to right and left posterior tibial, no edema noted, left radial arterial line, right forearm peripheral IV, and right femoral sheath.

    Musculoskeletal strength: right upper extremity 5/5, left upper extremity 1/5, right lower extremity 4/5, and left lower extremity 1/5.

    Musculoskeletal tone: Normal in right upper extremity and right lower extremity, flaccid to left upper extremity, and increased tone to left lower extremity.

    Neurological: Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale negative 1 (1), drowsy, oriented 3, follows command to right side only, NIHSS 14, moderate sensory loss to left side, partial extinction to left, left facial weakness, visual fields intact, extraocular movements intact, and Glasgow Coma Scale 14.

    Genitourinary: Foley catheter, urine output approximately 50 mL/hour, fluid balance +2647 mL, and nurse reports leakage of urine around Foley catheter.

    DIAGNOSTICS

    Laboratory Findings:

    Week 5 Case Study Lab Image

    Computed tomography of head (day of admission): Dense right MCA and possible early obscuration of the gray-white interface in the anterior right temporal lobe consistent with right MCA stroke.

    Cerebral angiogram post IV tPA: Endovascular manipulation with no revasculariation and persistent right M1 occlusion.

    Chest radiograph (morning of first encounter): Bilateral atelectasis.

    Electrocardiogram: Normal sinus rhythm.

    Based on the main diagnosis of this patient you, the nurse practitioner identify, you will submit your case study completed in the sections identified below:

    1. Definition of diagnosis you suspect in this patient

    2. Epidemiology

    3. Etiology/Classification

    4. Risk Factors of the diagnosis – emphasize with an asterisk (*) the risk factors this patient exhibits

    5. Pathophysiology

    6. Clinical Presentation (including History and Physical Exam pertinent findings of the typical presentation of this diagnosis)

    7. Diagnosis (including criteria, laboratory findings, imaging)

    8. Management of the disease

    9. Prevention of recurrence

    10. Complications and Prognosis

    Bonus- Differential Diagnoses. If you accurately list the pertinent differential diagnoses for this patient, you will be awarded bonus points per the rubric.

    Note: Use 3 or more references. List your content in sections denoting the headings 1-10 and in the order listed above. Bonus differential diagnoses can be included at the end of your submitted case study

    Rubric

    Case Study Rubric Week 5 (1)

    Case Study Rubric Week 5 (1)

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEpidemiology, Etiology/Classification & Risk Factors

    16 ptsExcellentComplete inclusion of epidemiology, etiology/classification data, and pertient risk factors12.44 ptsGoodIncomplete inclusion of epidemiology, etiology/classification data, and pertient risk factors. Missing 1-4 data points.

    8.89 ptsFairIncomplete inclusion of epidemiology, etiology/classification data, and pertient risk factors. Missing 5 or more data points.0 ptsNo MarksNo inclusion of content for this topic

    16 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePathophysiolgy

    21 ptsExcellentComplete inclusion of pathophysiology content16.5 ptsVery GoodIncomplete inclusion of pathophysiology content. Missing 1-2 data points.

    10.5 ptsGoodIncomplete inclusion of pathophysiology content. Missing 3-4 data points.6 ptsFairIncomplete inclusion of pathophysiology content. Missing 5 or more data points.0 ptsNo MarksNo inclusion of content for this topic

    21 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Presentation & DiagnosisClinical Presentation (including History and Physical Exam pertinent findings), Diagnosis (including criteria, laboratory findings, imaging)

    19 ptsExcellentComplete inclusion of clinical presentation & diagnosis criteria. Missing no more than 1 data points.15.83 ptsGoodIncomplete inclusion of clinical presentation & diagnosis criteria. Missing 2-4 data points.

    11.08 ptsFairIncomplete inclusion of clinical presentation & diagnosis criteria. Missing 5 or more data points.0 ptsNo MarksNo inclusion of content for this topic.

    19 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement of the Disease, Prevention of Recurrence & Complications and Prognosis

    16 ptsExcellentComplete inclusion of management of the disease, prevention of recurrence & complications and prognosis data points. Missing no more than 1 data points.12.44 ptsGoodIncomplete inclusion of management of the disease, prevention of recurrence & complications and prognosis data points. Missing 2-4 data points.

    8.89 ptsFairIncomplete inclusion of management of the disease, prevention of recurrence & complications and prognosis data points. Missing 5 or more data points.0 ptsNo MarksNo inclusion of content for this topic.

    16 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBonus: Differential Diagnosis

    0 ptsFull Marks3 Bonus Points Possible: Accurately list the 3-4 most PERTINENT differential diagnoses for this patient in order to receive points.0 ptsNo MarksNo partial points will be awarded.

    0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences3 or more references listed in APA format.

    4 to >0.8 ptsExcellent3 references. Correctly cited. Appropriate quality resources.0.8 to >0 ptsNo Marks

    4 pts

    Total Points: 76

    Requirements: as required

  • Nurse-led motivational interviewing combined with traditiona…

    In adults with obesity, does nurse-led motivational interviewing combined with traditional health education, compared with traditional health education alone, improve treatment adherence? here is pico above. please include factors contributing to lack of adherence. low motivation, mental health as well as in other findings you feel associated with. attatched are references of peer reviewed information to source from. ive also attached rubric for additional instruction for assignment.

  • DB Reflection

    7th edition APA style – Please Three References in APA STYLE – 7th Review Chapter 6 and 10 only.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HAMRIC AND HANSONS ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING – an — Mary Fran Tracy Eileen T OGrady Susanne J Phillips — ( WeLiborg ).pdf, HAMRIC AND HANSONS ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING – an — Mary Fran Tracy Eileen T OGrady Susanne J Phillips — ( WeLiborg ).pdf, Write Up2.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Nursing Question

    This assignment will focus on the following course student learning outcomes:

    1. Evaluate the concepts of cellular biology and altered cellular and tissue biology for their implications to disease management
    2. Distinguish knowledge of normal physiology and pathologic alterations across the lifespan that are expressed as diseases of organs and systems.
    3. Analyze current research findings with evidence-based guidelines for the management of selected diseases
    4. Instructions: you are to write a three-to-five-page paper in APA format 7th edition with the following sections and level 2 headings about major depression STROKE

    Requirements: 5 pages

  • Painter and Poet

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Lysistrata28Aristophanes29.pdf, GRADINGRUBRIC.docx, Christine28King29.pdf, Long20Essay20232pdf.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 4 Assignment – Leadership, Inclusive Excellence, and So…

    The purpose of this assignment is to assist you in meeting the following unit objectives:

    • Develop a foundational understanding of effective healthcare leadership and communication by applying diversity, equity, inclusion, and cultural competencies. (CLO 4)
    • Demonstrate the ability to use complexity science and systems theory in designing, delivering, and evaluating healthcare. (CLO 5)
    • Design and implement systems change strategies that improve the care environment. (CLO 5)

    Instructions:

    Step 1: Consider your future career path; your position’s role in addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion; belonging; and the Social Determinants of Health.

    • Analyze the structural and social drivers of health (Wilensky & Teitelbaum, p. 140) and the Social Determinants of Health categories (pictured below) as they apply to this role.

    Step 2: Using two of Deloittes Six Signature Traits of Inclusive Leadership (Helm-Murtagh & Erwin, p. 230), align a key Social Determinant of Health (SDOH) topic with each selected leadership trait. The same SDOH topic should be used across all three traits to demonstrate how different leadership approaches can address the issue from various perspectives.

    • At least one of the selected traits must be Cognizance of Bias.
    • Each trait section should be supported by a scholarly, peer-reviewed source relevant to the SDOH topic.

    Step 3: Now, reflect on your approved policy topic from Week 2. Conduct brief research to identify potential allies who could help drive change related to your topic.

    • Describe a key stakeholder or policymakerby name and positionwho has the ability to influence change at the local, regional, state, or federal level.
    • Then, analyze which of Deloittes Traits of Inclusive Leadership this individual demonstrates that could help move your policy topic forward.

    Submission Outline (Include Headers in Paper)

    • Title Page
    • Introduction
    • Step 1 Inclusive Excellence
    • Step 2 Deloittes Traits
    • Step 3 Stakeholder Identification
    • Conclusion
    • References

    Additional sources can be used besides scholarly peer-reviewed sources.

    • Scholarly, peer-reviewed sources should be within five years of publication.
    • Include an APA-style formatted reference list of your sources.
    • At least one of the traits should be cognizance of bias.
    • Submit in an APA-style formatted paper. The paper should be 5-7 pages long, excluding the title/reference page.
    • Use headers in the paper to identify the leadership traits addressed.

    Other Sources:

    • Wilensky & Teitelbaum, pp. 141-142
    • Types of Social Drivers of Health (similar to SDOH)
    • Helm-Murtagh & Erwin, p. 230
    • Deloitte’s Six Signature Traits of Inclusive Leadership
    • Dillon, B., & Bourke, J. (2016, April 13). . Deloitte University Press. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/six-signature-traits-of-inclusive-leadership.html

    Social Determinants of Health

    Source: Ndugga, N., & Artiga, S. (2023, May 24). Disparities in health and health care: 5 key questions and answers. KFF. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/disparities-in-health-and-health-care-5-key-question-and-answers/

    Deloittes Six Signature Traits of an Inclusive Leader

    Source: Dillon, B., & Bourke, J. (2016). The six signature traits of inclusive leadership: Thriving in a diverse new world. Deloitte University Press.

    maternal mortality nurse practitioner student

  • Ley Nm. 9-1987 (antigua) vs Ley Nm. 254-2015 (vigente)

    Module #2 Ethical and Legal Aspects Related to the Transition

    Instructions / Evaluative Activity

    Part A Legal Comparison (Table)

    Create a comparative table that includes:

    • Law No. 9 of 1987 (former law) vs. Law No. 254 of 2015 (current law)
    • Purpose
    • Structure
    • Professional categories
    • Licenses / recertification
    • Role of the Board
    • Sanctions, among other relevant aspects

    Part B Short Essay (23 pages)

    Write an analysis in which you:

    • Explain the categories of practice according to Law 254 and what the professional transition (ADNBSN) entails.
    • Describe the continuing education requirements and the recertification/registration process every three (3) years, citing the corresponding regulation.
    • Integrate at least two patient safety goals (for example: patient identifiers, medication safety, communication, etc.) using current references such as Healthy People 2030 and The Joint Commission.

    Part C Presentation of the Assignment

    The paper must include:

    • Cover page
    • Introduction
    • Table (Part A)
    • Development / Analysis (Part B)
    • Conclusion
    • References (APA format)

    Recommended Official Sources (for your bibliography)

    • Law No. 254 of 2015 (revised/compiled version by OGP, Rev. April 15, 2024).
    • General Regulation No. 9104 (2019) Department of State (Online Regulations).
    • Continuing Education Regulation for Recertification (DS/ORCPS).
    • Law No. 11 of 1976 (OGP).
    • Healthy People 2030 (HHS).
    • Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals 2026.

    Requirements:

  • CARE OF PLAN TOPIC- Iron Deficiency Anemia

    any questions please ask me

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Nursing Care Plan-5.pdf, CARE OF PLAN TOPIC- Iron Deficiency Anemia.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Course Project: Thesis Statement and Annotated Bibliography

    This week, you will submit a thesis statement and an annotated bibliography of at least five sources that you will use in your paper, as well as a brief statement explaining how the source supports your argument.

    Your topic for this Assignment is ” Should nurse practitioners be able to practice independently of and without the supervision of physicians?”My Argument for this paper is that “Nurse Practitioners should practice under the supervision of physicians”

    Your paper should include the following:

    Part 1: A thesis statement stating your opinion/conclusion on your topic, the supporting points you will offer, and at least one relevant opposing view you will address.

    Part 2: An annotated bibliography with an evaluation of at least five (5) sources you intend to use in your final paper to support your claim.

    The annotation will include the following:

    1) Full citation in APA format,

    2) a brief description of the content of the source, and .

    3) a brief statement of how the source supports your argument. These sources should provide evidence to support the idea that your claim should be accepted by the reader.

    Scholarly sources are preferred and should be used when available; due to the nature of some of the topics, authoritative articles in very high-quality substantive journals may also be acceptable. A brief statement of how the source supports your argument.

    Writing Requirements Length:

    100150 words for the Thesis Statement in Part 1;

    In Part 2, in addition to the APA citation, 5080 words per source are used for a brief description of the source’s content, and 5080 words are used to describe how you will use the source in your essay. 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page

    I HAVE UPLOADED A SCREENSHOT OF THE SAMPLE PAPER

  • Ethical paper

    follow the following introduction and for each outline create a page Ethical dilemmas are common occurrences in healthcare settings and often arise when ethical principles conflict with one another. Nurses are particularly vulnerable to such dilemmas due to their close involvement in patient care and their responsibility to advocate for patients while collaborating with families and interdisciplinary teams. Nursing ethical decision-making involves careful consideration of professional standards, patient rights, moral obligations, and ethical principles (Butts & Rich, 2022). A common ethical dilemma in nursing practice occurs in end-of-life care when a patients wishes conflict with those of family members or healthcare providers. This paper presents an ethical dilemma involving patient autonomy and beneficence, highlighting the challenges nurses face when honoring patient preferences while striving to act in the patients best interest. Outline I. Introduction Principles of ethical dilemmas in healthcare The role of ethical decision-making within nursing practice Identification of the ethical dilemma involving end-of-life care II. Case Scenario Description of the patients medical condition Patients expressed wishes regarding treatment Opposition from family members The role of the healthcare team III. Ethical Principles Adopted Autonomy: Advocating for patients right to make informed decisions (American Nurses Association [ANA], (2015) Beneficence: Taking action in the patients best interest Nonmaleficence: Avoiding harm Justice: The provision of fair and equitable care IV. Ethical Conflict Challenge of patient autonomy versus family wishes Challenges the nurse faces on emotional and professional levels V. Possible Courses of Action Respect the wishes laid out by the patient Complying with family demands Consulting the ethics committee VI. Conclusion The role of ethical frameworks in nursing practice The nurse as patient advocate