Category: Nursing

  • Lifestyle Risk Assessment and Reduction Plan: PART I

    Lifestyle Risk Assessment and Reduction Plan: PART I

    Due: Sun Feb 8, 2026 11:59pm

    Due: Sun Feb 8, 2026 11:59pm

    Ungraded, 100 Possible Points

    100 Points Possible

    Attempt

    In Progress

    NEXT UP: Submit Assignment

    Unlimited Attempts Allowed

    Lifestyle Risk Assessment Assignment Overview

    In this assignment, you will use free Health Risk Assessments provided through MyMichigan Health to evaluate the health status of a family member or friend. You will complete three assessments with them, review their results, analyze areas of concern, evaluate readiness to change, and compare findings to Healthy People 2030 (HP2030) objectives.

    Purpose

    This assignment helps you:

    • Understand health risks faced by someone close to you using evidence-based assessment tools.
    • Connect their assessment findings to national health priorities outlined in HP2030.
    • Reflect on lifestyle factors and potential areas for improvement.

    Instructions

    Step 1: Access the Health Assessments

    Go to

    .

    You will see the following assessments:

    • Heart Health Assessment
    • Joint Pain Assessment
    • Weight Loss Assessment
    • Depression Assessment
    • Stroke Risk Assessment

    Step 2: Complete Assessments

    Complete any THREE of the assessments for a family member or friend. Work with them to answer all questions accurately.

    Step 3: Save Their Reports

    At the end of each assessment, a personalized report will be generated summarizing your family members or friends health risks. Print or save each report for your records. You do not need to submit these reports.

    Step 4: Identify Additional Areas of Concern

    Using the assessment resultsand your knowledge of this personidentify additional concerns related to:

    • Their personal health perceptions
    • Past or current medical conditions
    • Medications
    • Family history
    • Other lifestyle or behavioral risk factors

    Step 5: Evaluate Readiness to Change

    Review the following article on the Stages of Change Model:

    Determine your family members/friends readiness to change in the areas you identified.

    Step 6: Compare to Healthy People 2030 Goals

    Review national objectives listed in Healthy People 2030 and compare your family member or friends health concerns to relevant national priority areas.

    Part I: Initial Development of the Health Plan

    Your written submission (23 pages) should include:

    1. Summary of the Health Risk Assessment Results
    • Briefly summarize results from all three assessments.
    1. Areas Needing Change (35 items)
    • Identify specific health risks or behavioral concerns
    1. Readiness to Change
    • Determine their stage of change according to the Stages of Change model.
    1. Comparison to Healthy People 2030
    • Explain how the identified health issues align with HP2030 objectives.
    1. Plan of Action (4+ weeks)
    • Provide a concrete, realistic plan including measurable steps.
    1. Facilitators, Barriers, and Challenges
    • Identify what may support or hinder progress.

    Formatting Requirements

    • The written paper should be 23 pages.
    • APA 7th edition formatting and citations are required.
    • Do not submit the risk assessment reports.
    • Confidentiality must be maintaineduse initials or pseudonyms, not full names.

    Rubric :

    Lifestyle Risk Assessment Part 1CriteriaRatingsPts

    Completion of risk assessment data, identification of areas of concern, and readiness to change (20%)

    20 pts

    Exemplary

    20 points: Clear explanation of findings from personal lifestyle risk assessment, AND thorough identification of at least 3 areas of concern AND discussion of ones readiness to change for at least one area of concern

    16 pts

    Developing

    16 points: Explanation of personal lifestyle risk assessment findings, but lacking detail OR identification of only 1-2 areas of concern OR omission of ones readiness to change for at least one area of concern

    10 pts

    Acceptable

    10 points: Personal lifestyle risk assessment findings minimally reviewed, OR identification of only one area of concern AND omission of ones readiness to change

    0 pts

    Unacceptable

    0 points: No risk assessment findings discussed AND no area of concern discussed. Readiness to change not discussed

    / 20 pts

    Relationship to priorities of Healthy People 2030 (10%)

    10 pts

    Exemplary

    10 points: Clear discussion of ones own need to change/health priority, and correlation of this area of concern to a relevant HP2030 goal, AND discussion of HP2030 data surrounding the prevalence of the health concern

    7 pts

    Developing

    7 points: Discussion of ones need to change/health priority, AND correlation to a relevant HP2030, BUT discussion lacking depth or data to support the relationship

    5 pts

    Acceptable

    5 points: Brief mention of a related HP2030 goal, but no discussion of how this relates to ones own health priority

    0 pts

    Unacceptable

    0 points: No discussion of HP2030 priorities or goals

    / 10 pts

    Plan for Change (40%)

    40 pts

    Exemplary

    40 points: Thorough explanation of at least 3 identified areas for change AND planned interventions discussed in detail for each area of change AND SMART goals used in developing plan

    30 pts

    Developing

    30 points: Explanation of at least 3 identified areas of change BUT lacking detail specific to planned interventions for each, OR no inclusion of SMART goals in plan. OR Thorough explanation of areas for change BUT less than 3 discussed.

    20 pts

    Acceptable

    20 points: Explanation of only 2 identified areas of change, but lacking detail OR lacking significant detail specific to planned interventions AND no use of SMART goal in intervention.

    10 pts

    Unacceptable

    10 points: Explanation of only 1 identified area of change, OR no identified area of change, AND lacking planned intervention and SMART goals

    / 40 pts

    Identification of expected facilitators, barriers, challenges (20%)

    20 pts

    Exemplary

    20 points: Detailed explanation of expected facilitators, AND barriers AND challenges anticipated. AND how you will attempt to mitigate these barriers and challenges

    15 pts

    Developing

    15 points: Explanation of expected facilitators, barriers and challenges, but lacking detail. OR no discussion of how to mitigate the anticipated barriers and challenges OR Missing one of the three (facilitators, barriers, challenges)

    10 pts

    Acceptable

    10 points: Minimal discussion of expected facilitators, barriers and challenges, OR Missing two of the three (facilitators, barriers, challenges)

    0 pts

    Unacceptable

    0 points: No discussion of expected facilitators, barriers and challenges.

    / 20 pts

    APA formatting (7th Edition: title page, in-text citations, reference list), and spelling, grammar (10%)

    10 pts

    Exemplary

    10 points: 0-1 APA errors and spelling errors

    7 pts

    Developing

    7 points: 2-4 APA and spelling errors

    5 pts

    Acceptable

    5 points: 5-9 APA and spelling errors

    0 pts

    Unacceptable

    0 points: 10 or more APA and spelling errors

    / 10 pts

    Total Points: 0

  • Priority healthcare issue in nursing

    In this assignment we will examine how priority healthcare issues should be examined by nursing. We will select a key healthcare priority issue and a population. You will find articles that describe nursing interventions designed to improve patient outcomes for your population and healthcare priority issue. Finally, you will discuss why Quality Improvement is important for patients and then you will describe how nursing values can be used to help improve patient care. A minimum of three scholarly references will be required. Access the Healthy People 2030 Objectives. Select ONE objective (priority healthcare issue) and identify a population you would like to explore. Conduct research to locate information to write about the following: Specifically, the submission should include the following components: Health Care Objective Identifies a healthcare objective. Describes the healthcare objective, the population it involves, and significance of the healthcare issue by using specific facts and details. Ends with a clearly worded purpose statement. Rationale and Importance to Nursing Discuss the rationale for choosing the healthcare objective and describe why this issue is important to nursing. Provides details. Nursing Interventions and Outcomes Clearly identify two nursing actions or interventions designed to improve care that is measured in patient outcomes. From two nursing articles, select a total of two (no more or less than two) key nursing interventions that improved patient outcomes and explain how the nursing interventions improved each of the two patient outcomes. Provide details. Quality Improvement Initiative and Patient Care Using the interventions from the articles/studies, describe how you would recommend a Quality Initiative (QI) to improve patient care within a healthcare facility (hospital) and explain why this QI would be important to implement for patients. Provides details. Nursing, Quality, and Outcomes Discuss why it is important for nursing to be involved in quality initiatives and explain how two professional nursing values can help to improve patient care. Provides details Conclusion Summarize key points in the submission. Additional Instructions: All submissions should have a title page and reference page. Utilize a minimum of three scholarly resources. Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria. Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.
  • Internet Search Paper

    Read the following about integrating emotional intelligence (EI) and Crucial Conversations into Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies for licensed practical nurses (LPN) students. Follow the writing prompt and grading rubric to complete the assignment.

    Integrating Emotional Intelligence and Crucial Conversations into QSEN Competencies for LPN Students

    Licensed practical nurses (LPNs) are essential members of the healthcare team who must deliver safe, effective, patient-centered care in fast-paced and often emotionally charged environments. As LPN students prepare to enter the workforce, they must develop both technical and interpersonal skills to meet the challenges of modern nursing. The Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN; 2020) initiative identifies six core competenciespatient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, evidence-based practice, quality improvement, safety, and informaticsthat are essential for ensuring quality healthcare. Integrating emotional intelligence (EI) and skills for engaging in crucial conversations enhances LPN students ability to embody these QSEN competencies, improving patient outcomes, fostering collaboration, and reducing workplace conflict.

    Emotional Intelligence and Its Relevance to Nursing

    Emotional intelligence refers to the ability to recognize, understand, and manage ones own emotions while also being sensitive to the emotions of others (Goleman, 2006). In nursing, EI supports compassionate communication, de-escalation of tense situations, and decision-making under stress. Research indicates that nurses with high emotional intelligence are more likely to provide patient-centered care, experience lower levels of burnout, and demonstrate greater empathy and ethical sensitivity (Codier et al., 2010). For LPN students, developing EI is foundational to cultivating professional relationships with patients, families, and interdisciplinary teams.

    Crucial Conversations and Communication in Nursing Practice

    Crucial conversations are discussions where stakes are high, opinions vary, and emotions run strong (Patterson et al., 2012). Examples in nursing include reporting medication errors, addressing safety concerns, or advocating for patients whose needs are being overlooked. LPN students who are trained to navigate these interactions with clarity, confidence, and respect are more likely to promote safe, transparent healthcare environments. Developing these skills aligns directly with the QSEN competencies of teamwork and collaboration, safety, and patient-centered care.

    QSEN Competencies and the Integration of Emotional Intelligence and Crucial Conversations

    Patient-Centered Care

    LPN students who practice emotional intelligence can recognize verbal and nonverbal cues from patients, enabling them to respond to physical and emotional needs more effectively. Engaging in crucial conversations with patients and families helps ensure that care is aligned with patient values, beliefs, and preferences. For instance, an LPN with strong EI can recognize a patient’s anxiety about a procedure and initiate a compassionate discussion to address concerns, reinforcing the QSEN goal of individualized, respectful care.

    Teamwork and Collaboration

    QSEN emphasizes open communication and mutual respect within healthcare teams. Emotional intelligence enhances teamwork by promoting self-regulation, active listening, and conflict resolution. When crucial conversations are neededsuch as addressing miscommunication with a peer or reporting unprofessional behaviorLPNs who are equipped with EI skills can speak up respectfully and effectively, maintaining team cohesion and patient safety.

    Evidence-Based Practice

    Although evidence-based practice (EBP) primarily focuses on the integration of clinical evidence, patient preferences, and clinical expertise, the process of discussing research findings and implementing changes often involves emotionally charged conversations. EI helps LPNs manage resistance or skepticism when introducing new practices. A student nurse who understands the emotional impact of change can better facilitate dialogue that bridges the gap between research and real-world application.

    Quality Improvement

    Engaging in quality improvement often involves identifying and discussing systems issues or errors. Emotional intelligence allows LPNs to address these situations constructively without blame. For example, initiating a crucial conversation about an unsafe workflow practice requires both courage and sensitivity. LPN students with EI skills are more likely to be proactive participants in safety initiatives and continuous improvement.

    Safety

    Creating a culture of safety requires open communication about errors, near misses, and risky behaviors. EI supports a non-punitive approach to error reporting, while crucial conversation skills enable LPNs to escalate safety concerns even in hierarchical environments. A student nurse who practices EI may recognize a preceptors frustration and approach a safety concern in a way that encourages collaboration rather than defensiveness.

    Informatics

    While informatics may seem primarily technical, EI and communication play key roles in patient education and interdisciplinary communication using electronic health records. For example, when documenting sensitive patient information or responding to electronic alerts, EI can guide a nurse’s tone and decision-making. Likewise, difficult electronic messagessuch as clarifying physician orderscan benefit from principles of crucial conversations to maintain professional clarity and tone.

    Conclusion

    As LPN students transition into professional practice, integrating emotional intelligence and crucial conversations into the QSEN competencies prepares them to navigate the complexities of healthcare with professionalism, empathy, and effectiveness. These interpersonal skills do more than enhance communicationthey reinforce the values of safety, quality, and patient-centered care at every level. Nurse educators and students alike should prioritize the development of EI and communication skills as essential components of nursing competence and patient safety.

    References

    Codier, E., Muneno, L., Franey, K., & Matsuura, F. (2010). Is emotional intelligence an important concept for nursing practice? Nursing Administration Quarterly, 34(1), 8799.

    Goleman, D. (2006). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.

    Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2012). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

    Quality and Safety Education for Nurses. (2020). QSEN competencies.

    Writing Prompt

    Assignment Instructions: In a well-organized essay of approximately 500 words, reflect on how the development of emotional intelligence and crucial conversation skills can enhance your ability to meet the QSEN competencies as an LPN student and future nurse.

    Your essay should follow APA format and include the following elements:

    Title Page

    Introduction:

    Briefly describe the QSEN competencies and explain why they are important for LPN practice. Introduce the concepts of emotional intelligence and crucial conversations and how they relate to the QSEN framework.

    Body Paragraphs:

    Discuss how emotional intelligence and crucial conversations help nurses:

    • Provide patient-centered care
    • Maintain empathy and professionalism in emotionally charged situations
    • Engage in crucial conversations to support teamwork, collaboration, and safety
    • Support participation in evidence-based practice and quality improvement, particularly in situations involving resistance or change
    • Use informatics responsibly, especially when interacting with physicians and team members through electronic communications.

    Include an example or scenario to illustrate your point(s), and reflect on a situation (real or hypothetical) where clear, respectful communication guided by emotional intelligence could prevent a problem or improve outcomes.

    Conclusion:

    Summarize how emotional intelligence and crucial conversation skills are not just soft skills but essential tools for achieving the goals of QSEN. Describe how you plan to develop and apply these skills during your nursing education and clinical practice.

    Writing Requirements:

    Length: 500 words

    Format: Microsoft Word documents ONLY! Typed, double-spaced, 12-point font, Times New Roman

    Citation: If you refer to outside sources (such as Goleman, Codier et al., or QSEN.org), use APA format for in-text citations and reference list

  • Clinical Exercise #2

    rubric attached

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): clinical exercise 2.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Clinical Exercise #2

    rubric attached

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): clinical exercise 2.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Patient assessment and clinical documentation

    Identifying Data: Age, Gender, Occupation, and Marital Status Source and Reliability: Subjective Chief complaint or appropriate health screening visit: The one or more symptoms or concerns causing the patient to seek care. Need not be the patients complete statement may be a brief summary of reason patient wanted to be seen for this visit HPI: Complete subjective description of problem, including OLDCARTS findings or similar, including location, quality severity, duration, timing, context, modifying factors, associated signs/symptoms, relieving and aggravating factors, related systems. Medications, including OTC and Herbals Preparation Past Medical History: Allergies medications, food, environmental or seasonal Childhood Illnesses Chicken pox, Rheumatic fever, Rubella, Measles, and Mumps Adult Illnesses Injuries Surgeries Hospitalizations Obstetric/Gynecologic Psychiatric Health Maintenance Immunization status DPT, MMR, Influenza, Hepatitis, Polio, and Pneumovax Dental Exams (frequency and treatment) Last eye exam (include results) SBE/Pap/GYN (include results) Testicular/rectal exam (include results) Family History: Include presence or absence of specific illnesses in family such as hypertension, diabetes, or cancer Personal and Social History: Educational level Personal interests Lifestyle exercise and diet Older Adults ADLs and iADLs Review of Systems: Pertinent positives and negatives in the differential diagnosis Objective Vital Signs Blood Pressure Temperature Pulse Respirations Height Weight BMI including normal, overweight, obese, morbidly obese Physical Examination specific systems as appropriate Assessment and Plan (This section should process for the reader, should be based on current literature/guidelines. This should be organized and succinct.) Differential diagnoses including ICD 10 and Rationale: List the other diagnoses that should be considered in light of the history and physical findings. Rationale: Articulate a rationale for the most likely diagnosis and for each differential diagnosis. In this discussion, include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives which help to rule out or rule in each diagnosis. Most likely diagnosis: (if more than one diagnosis, number each in order of priority) Include: Pathophysiology of the problem Explanation of the diagnosis Diagnostic Testing Lab testing Radiology testing Cardiac or Neurologic testing Evaluations Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, or Mental Health Evaluations Medications and Treatments pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Should include at least 2 evidenced based references Motivational Interviewing
  • Training Brief

    Prepare training material for a new assistant nurse manager that the nurse leader will use as part of the mentoring process. Use your assigned readings and the literature related to budgeting for nurse managers to prepare the educational material. Compare & contrast incremental budget, zero-based budget, and performance budgets as related to healthcare departments/units Explain the revenue budget, the operating budget, and how staff can affect both. Describe the type of budgeting used in your nursing setting or unit. Explain how a nurse manager should monitor for budgeting issues or concerns with this type of budgeting. Objectives: Students will compare and contrast three types of budgets. Students will explain staff effects on budgeting Students will describe ways a nurse manager should monitor for issues or potential problems with budgeting.
  • Applying the PICOT process

    PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

    It stands for:

    • P Patient/population/problem.
    • I Intervention.
    • C Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).
    • O Outcomes.
    • T Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

    The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell & Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are beginning to apply an evidence-based model. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. When applying the PICO(T) approach, the nurse can isolate the interventions of interest and compare to other existing interventions for the evidenced impact on the outcome of the concern.

    Reference

    Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2015). Introduction to nursing research. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, healthcare systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

    PICO(T) is a framework that can help you structure your definition of the issue, potential approach that you are going to use, and your predictions related to the issue. Word choice is important in the PICO(T) process because different word choices for similar concepts will lead you toward different existing evidence and research studies that would help inform the development of your initial question. When writing a PICO(T)-formatted research question, you want to focus on the impact of the intervention and the comparison on the outcome you desire.

    For this assessment, please use the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments.

    After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

    Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

    If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICO(T) Question and Library Search template (accessible from the page) might be helpful.

    In your submission, make sure you address the following:

    • Review the PICO(T) process.
    • Explain your diagnosis from Assessment 1 in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications. In your explanation, be sure to include the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities and the impact of those disparities.
    • Consider your diagnosis from Assessment 1. Develop a research question using the PICO(T) process to address an issue of your choosing related to your diagnosis.
    • Properly format your PICO(T) question to guide your search of the literature.
    • Describe your search of the literature, noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.
    • Locate evidence that explores your intervention and comparison of your PICO(T) question with an emphasis on your specific outcome (at least three diagnosis-issue-specific sources of evidence (scholarly articles)).
    • Explain the content of each of your scholarly articles.
    • Explain the credibility and relevance of each of the articles you chose to your diagnosis issue.
    • Analyze the evidence. Determine the answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of the evidence.

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Length of submission: Create a 35-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.
    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
    • APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
      • Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.
    • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
      • Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.
      • Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.
    • Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
      • Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.
      • Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.
    • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
      • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
      • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

    Scoring Guide

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, including the risks and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    Distinguished

    Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities. Provides examples.

    Proficient

    Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    Basic

    Explains a diagnosis, but may not fully cover outcomes, risks, and complications in the explanation, including those for vulnerable populations.

    Non Performance

    Does not explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks and complications, including the risks, and complications for vulnerable populations or those affected by healthcare disparities, and the impact of those disparities.

    Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    Distinguished

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis, and identifies how the question meets each of the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

    Proficient

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    Basic

    Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process, though the question may not be specific enough to address all the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

    Non Performance

    Does not describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

    Describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    Distinguished

    Describes a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors, and how the search process was refined to yield the best results.

    Proficient

    Describes a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    Basic

    Describes a search of the literature, though the description may not fully include search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    Non Performance

    Does not describe a search of the literature noting search engines, key words, and credibility factors.

    Explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    Distinguished

    Explains the content of more than three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    Proficient

    Explains the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    Basic

    Explains the content of at least three sources of evidence, though not the credibility and relevance.

    Non Performance

    Does not explain the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

    Analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    Distinguished

    Analyzes evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question, identifying assumptions on which the analysis is based.

    Proficient

    Analyzes evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    Basic

    Analyzes evidence without explaining the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    Non Performance

    Does not analyze evidence to explain the answer to a PICO(T) question.

    Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    Distinguished

    Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

    Proficient

    Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    Basic

    Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    Non Performance

    Does not organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains many errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

    Distinguished

    Exhibits adherence to most aspects of APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Correctly uses quotes and paraphrasing.

    Proficient

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

    Basic

    Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings, and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeable from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes, and/or paraphrasing.

    Non Performance

    Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

    Requirements: as instructed

  • Ethical Dilemma

    this essay has to be about an ethical dilemma I have encountered personally. as an OR nurse I would like you to make it about the dilemma we face whenever we are to perform surgery on a patient with problems such as dementia and they dont have a power of attorney. Family and surgeon agrees to the surgery and so dos the patient but without an actual power of attorney it is complicated for us as nurses to proceed legally. we need to advocate for our patients and if the patient is not capable of making their own sane decisions there has to be a power of attorney or someone legally in charge of their decisions. I also sent the rest of the instructions attached as documents.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Copy of Fast Food Restaurant Marketing Plan by Slidesgopdf.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Ethical Dilemma

    this essay has to be about an ethical dilemma I have encountered personally. as an OR nurse I would like you to make it about the dilemma we face whenever we are to perform surgery on a patient with problems such as dementia and they dont have a power of attorney. Family and surgeon agrees to the surgery and so dos the patient but without an actual power of attorney it is complicated for us as nurses to proceed legally. we need to advocate for our patients and if the patient is not capable of making their own sane decisions there has to be a power of attorney or someone legally in charge of their decisions. I also sent the rest of the instructions attached as documents.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Copy of Fast Food Restaurant Marketing Plan by Slidesgopdf.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.