Category: Nursing

Objective

• Implement research for your project

Deliverables

• Write a 5-6 page (not including the title and reference pages)
• APA-formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion
• APA headings for each section of the paper
• At least 5 peer-reviewed references

Step 1: Capstone Project

• Write a thorough literature review paper

Step 2: Consider

• Subheadings (Themes Discovered In Review)
• Notice Of Gaps In Knowledge
• At least 5 references within 5 years and peer-reviewed.

Step 3: Write

• Write a paper that addresses the current literature for your project.
• Use the template attached below.

Step 4 Save and Submit

This is my PICOT question

Residents in a long-term care facility (P), does implementing a nurse-led medication safety intervention using barcode medication administration and double check protocols (I), compared to current standard medication administration practices (C), reduce medication errors by at least 30% (O) within 6 months of implementation (T)?

Use of this worksheet template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.

1. Locate the assigned article. The article is available in an announcement posted in preview week and in Week 4. The announcement is titled:

IMPORTANT: Assigned Article for Week 5 Assignment

1. Read the required research article then answer each question in your own words on the Critiquing Evidence worksheet template about the study.
2. Do not copy and paste information from the article into the worksheet.
3. Correctly cite and reference the assigned article when incorporating it to answer questions on the Critiquing Evidence worksheet template. Use complete sentences and do not use quotes or textbooks as references.
4. An additional external scholarly source is required in Section 4 (see below). Scholarly sources used to support answers should be no more than five years old and come from the Chamberlain Library.
5. Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scientific writing.
6. Abide by Chamberlain Universitys academic integrity policy.

Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail.

Section 1: Purpose and Design of the Study

• What is the purpose of the study? Is it clearly stated?
• What is the research design? Is this a quantitative or qualitative study?
• How does the design support the purpose of the study?

Section 2: Sample

• What is the sample size and the population for the study?
• What are the participants key characteristics?
• What sampling technique was used?

Section 3: Data Collection

• What data were collected during the study?
• What data collection technique(s) were used?
• Was this form of data collection reliable and valid?

Section 4: Data Analysis

• What type of data analysis was conducted?
• What have you learned about this form of data analysis?
• Use an external source of evidence to support this discussion and cite appropriately.

Section 5: Limitations and Findings

• What were the limitations of the study, as stated by the authors?
• What were the overall findings?
• What is one interesting detail you learned from reading this study?

Section 6: Application to Practice

• How can you apply these findings to your practice?
• Why is it important for you to read and understand research literature?
• What have you learned from completing the Critiquing Evidence Worksheet?

In your professional life, you will need to find credible evidence to support your decisions and plans of action. You will want to keep abreast of best practices to help your organization adapt to the ever-changing healthcare environment. Being adept at research helps you find the information you need. This assessment gives you practice with that skill by having you research a healthcare problem or issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

You will select a current healthcare problem or issue from the provided options for this assessment. Research your topic, and develop a written assessment, which includes an annotated bibliography to document your resources.

Reminder: You will use your selected problem or issue again in upcoming assessments. The purpose of this assessment is to ensure you know how to research topics and find credible references to use in your assessments. Part of the assessment is an annotated bibliography. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of research references, along with key information about each; the detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about your chosen problem or issue.

Conduct research in the Capella library to find a total of three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles in relation to a selected healthcare problem or issue presented in the

resource. You must select your healthcare-related issue or problem from the topic areas presented in this resource.

Important Note: Review the for assistance. Be sure to review journal articles published within the past three to five years.

Write a 3 page paper in which you include the following:

Topic Identification

Select one of the healthcare problems or issues presented in the

resource. Write a brief overview of the healthcare problem or issue. In your overview:

• Summarize the healthcare problem or issue, including describing its professional relevance.
• Describe your interest in the problem or issue.
• Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

Discussion of Research

Discuss your research and selection process for each of the three journal articles you have chosen to include in your annotated bibliography.

• Describe your process of applying library research skills to identify the journal articles relevant to the healthcare problem or issue you are researching.
• Identify the keywords you used to select the articles.
• Describe the criteria you used to select the resources, including the names of the databases you used.
• What was the process like to locate relevant articles?
• Assess the credibility of the information sources.
• Determine whether each resource is from an academic, peer-reviewed journal.
• Determine whether the publication is current (published within the last 35 years).
• Determine whether information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.
• Assess the relevance of the information sources.
• Explain how the healthcare problem or issue is addressed in each source.
• Discuss what kind of contribution each resource provides.

Annotated Bibliography

Summarize each of the three current academic, peer-reviewed journal articles you chose, using the annotated bibliography organizational format. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:

• List each full reference in APA format, followed immediately by its annotation.
• Present your three current, annotated references in alphabetical order, according to the reference citation.
• Double-space each reference and format it with a hanging indent.
• Provide the full APA reference citation, including the author, date, title, publisher or publication, and any additional information required by APA style.
• Write the annotation (summary) for each citation in paragraph form, using approximately 150 words (or 13 paragraphs) for each citation. Make sure to cite the article in your summary. Include the following components for each annotation:
• Identify the purpose of the article.
• Summarize the article.
• Include the conclusions and findings of the article.

Summary

In a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper, summarize what you learned from the process of developing the annotated bibliography.

Your academic writing is expected to conform to the following requirements:

• Writing: Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
• Sources: Integrate into text appropriate use of current scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. Use the guidelines provided. Cite the reference in its summary.
• Formatting: Include a title page and reference page, Times New Roman, 12 point.
• Length: Complete no more than 35 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.
• References: Although you are citing your three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles within the Annotated Bibliography section of this paper, be sure to also list your citations on a reference page at the end of your paper, along with any other resources you may have included.

Example assessment: You may use the to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Submit your paper as an attached Microsoft Word document.

Assessment 4: Capella flex path RN-BSN NURS-FPX4005 , 2 part assignment .This assessment consists of two interconnected parts that must be submitted together. Part 1: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Template) Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX], create a comprehensive plan that addresses an organizational or patient care issue through an interdisciplinary team approach. Template Completion Guidelines: Complete each section of the template thoroughly and concisely. Apply APA format to all in-text citations for evidence and best practices that inform your plan. Include an APA-formatted reference list at the end of the template. A title page is optional since you are using a template. Your plan proposal should address: The specific organizational or patient issue requiring attention. Why an interdisciplinary team approach is most appropriate for this issue. Evidence-based strategies and interventions to address the issue. Implementation considerations and resource requirements. Evaluation criteria and success metrics. Part 2: Stakeholder Presentation (PowerPoint) Create an 812 slide PowerPoint presentation designed to generate interest and buy-in from stakeholder or leadership groups for your interdisciplinary plan proposal. Presentation Structure: Your presentation should include the following components (use one or two slides per section as needed): Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue Explain the issue you are trying to solve or improve. Articulate why the audience should care about addressing this issue. Describe how a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach Justify why using an interdisciplinary team is relevant or the best approach. Explain how this approach will help achieve improved outcomes or reach the goal. Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary Summarize your evidence-based interdisciplinary plan. State the objective clearly. Discuss the likelihood of success. Describe what the interdisciplinary team will do. Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented. Describe how human and financial resources would be managed. Explain how the plan ensures effective use of resources and prevents waste. Justify the resource expenditure. Part 5: Evaluation Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project achieves the improvement goal. Describe what a successful outcome would look like. Explain how these criteria could measure and demonstrate the degree of success. Part 6: References Include a final reference slide in APA format. Presentation Development Guidelines: Create slides that are easy to read, visually appealing, and error-free. Use concise talking points on slides (bullet points, not full sentences). Include detailed speaker notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide. Remember that another person may ultimately deliver this presentation, so your speaker notes should be comprehensive. Organize content with clear purpose and goals. Support your content with relevant, evidence-based sources. Tailor language and messaging to your specific stakeholder audience. Both parts must be submitted together: Submit your completed Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template AND your PowerPoint Presentation. PowerPoint Specifications: Slide count: 812 content slides (not including title and reference slides). Speaker notes: Include thorough speaker notes for each content slide. Visual design: Follow Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations. Technical assistance: If needed, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations. Source Requirements: Minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence. Sources must be published within the past 5 years. See the Bachelor of Nursing (BSN) Program Library Guide for assistance. APA Formatting: Apply current APA style to in-text citations on slides and in speaker notes. Include an APA-formatted reference list on the final slide of your presentation. Include an APA-formatted reference list at the end of your template. See the APA Module for formatting guidance.

look at details, rubric upload, and requirements

look at details, rubric upload, and requirements

1. Perform a literature search for the PICOT question identified from your assignment that you completed for Module 1. Use Chapter 3 and the PubMed Search Example document as a guide to conduct your search.

a) Complete the Search Strategy Development Worksheet and submit it with this assignment.

b) List the names of the databases you used to perform your literature search.

c) Provide a list of 7-8 references related/relevant to your PICOT question.

2. Create and complete an Evaluation Table (as presented in Appendix D Evaluation Table Template of your textbook) for the 7-8 references selected. In a separate column in your table, rate the level of evidence (LOE) for each reference and provide a rationale for the rating you chose. Use a specific evidence rating scale. See the following example:

https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford

Note. The resources in Appendix C (Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists) of your textbook may be helpful.

3. In 500-750 words, summarize the evidence found in the literature related to your topic. Your reflection should address the patterns/trends in the findings, what answered questions remain in the evidence that is currently available, a critique of the overall quality (LOE) of the evidence found, and implications for practice, policy, or future quality improvement projects.

i am also including a sample assignment for guidance/reference

Module 1, Part 1: 10-slide PowerPoint Presentation with Voiceover Choose an example of an emerging healthcare technology that may improve patient access to care (i.e., telehealth, nanotechnology, genetics, genomics, software/hardware, robotics). Note: EHR and bar code scanning are NOT examples of emerging technology. Introduce and describe the new tool of your choice. Explain how this tool is an example of an emerging technology. Describe the target population. Analyze the social, ethical, and legal ramifications of the tool. Discuss the applicability of this new technology to nursing practice (i.e., patient safety, cost-effectiveness, health outcomes). Module 2, Part 2: Decision Support Tools Module 2 Performance Task Submission Template. What did you learn from the interactive case study? When using various technologies, what steps should nurses take to validate the data from tools such as an electronic blood pressure machine? In this case study, was the nurse able to use clinical judgment to correlate her clinical assessment with the data provided by the fetal monitoring technology? Why or why not? What are the safety implications for the mom and her unborn child? How does artificial intelligence (driven digital health technologies) impact nurses clinical judgment and safety of patient care? Be specific and provide examples.