Category: Nursing

Purpose:

To demonstrate the understanding of key concepts that have been discussed about the role of leadership in effecting positive change

Structure:

You will submit an assignment that critically reflect upon the following statement:

Research suggests that change has both situational and psychological aspects, and ignoring either will result in a non-sustainable situation, wherein the organization is in a constant cycle of change implementation without achieving desired results.

You are required to:

1. Use your preferred GenAI tool, to generate a response that agrees with the above statement
2. Go to the UOW e-library and identify 3 peer-reviewed publications that support the GenAI response
3. Highlight the sections in the 3 publications that support the GenAI response and explain the relationship
4. Repeat the same steps to generate a GenAI response against the above statement.
5. Drawing upon the critical analysis undertaken by completing the above steps develop your argument.

Key Points to Keep in Mind:

1. The x 2 GenAI responses must be included as Appendices in your submission and NOT included in the total word count for your submission.
2. See this link for information on artificial intelligence
3. Your submission needs to be structured as an Academic piece of writing (please refer to the resources available in UOW Learning Co-op)
4. Use examples from your practice experience in the development of your critical analysis
5. Include 6 peer reviewed publications as Appendices
6. Peer reviewed references
7. Vancouver referencing system should be adopted; related information of the Vancouver referencing system can be accessed on the UOW Library website at

Length: 2000 words +/- 10%

Background: Self-care management support programs assume a complex sequence of effects. Developers expect these programs to change patients behavior by increasing the patients self-efficacy and knowledge. Improved behavior is expected to lead to better disease control which should, in turn, lead to better patient outcomes and reduced utilization of health care services, particularly preventable emergency room visits and hospitalizations, and to reduced costs. This sequence of assumptions gives self-management support programs multiple objectives and multiple endpoints for evaluation. The pivotal objective, however, is to change peoples behavior.

In Word, you will create an introductory design of a self-management program with strategies to support improved outcomes in a particular chronic illness. Use the bold topics as level one headings in your paper. You are not to explain what a self-care management program is. You are to create base introductory content for one. Use the required reading as resources.

Self-Care Management Program: The first step in designing a self-management support process is identifying the point of management and its need. Examples could include primary care, inpatient hospital, telemedicine, sleep clinic, community home care, etc. Identify and describe the chronic illness. Include lifespan influences. Address the primary goal and two program goals with an ideal outcome. Include literature support for the benefit of self-management programs related to chronic illness. Self-care management programs provide both coaching and patient education. The provider is involved but not the main focus. The patient is the main focus, and other staff members have specific roles.

Key Resources and Activities: Include the following as level two headings.

1. Staffing: Identify who will be doing the coaching and education as well as other support needed.
2. Content of the Support: Include outside resources.
3. Patient Population Served
4. Information Support
5. Protocols: How staff members are to provide the support.
6. Staff Training
7. Communication With Patients: How this will occur.
8. Team Communication: Between providers and self-management support teams.

Self-Management Action Plan: Address three self-management actions of the patient that they will be taught and the associated goals. Include how clinical decisions will be discussed to facilitate shared decision-making. How does health literacy impact the plan’s development?

Evaluation: Address how the program will be evaluated. Identify at least two specific measures and criteria.

Appendix A: Structure model. Using SmartArt, create a simplistic visual representation of the self-management program with key points and an overview. Research for ideas and examples.

Include 35 pages of content in the paper, including an introduction and conclusion. Ensure the title page, reference page, and Appendix A are also included. These do not count toward the base page count. Be concise vs elaborative.

Writing and Format: The assignment must demonstrate proper APA formatting as directed in the APA Publication Manual, 7th edition, including a title page and reference list, introduction, and conclusion with properly formatted citations in the body of the assignment. You are encouraged to consult the Academic Success Center before submitting your work.

Assignment Requirements:

Before finalizing your work, you should:

• Be sure to read the assignment description carefully (as displayed above).
• Utilize spelling and grammar checks to minimize errors.

Your writing assignment should:

• Follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).
• Be well-ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful.
• Display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics.
• Use APA 7th edition format.

Week 7 Assignment: Outcomes, Approach, and Budget Objective Identify appropriate expected outcomes for your project. Identify the strategies to implement your project. Deliverables Write a 3-4 page (not including the title and reference pages). APA formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion. APA headings for each section of the paper. At least 5 peer-reviewed references. Step 1: Capstone Project Write a paper identifying the Expected Outcomes, Approach, and Budget for your capstone. Step 2: Consider Expected Outcomes at least 5 What specific questions will your project address? How are these questions related to one another? Approach What will you actually do to address the actionable questions? What will you do to create improved outcomes? Budget Step 3: Write Write a paper that addresses the criteria above. Use the template attached below. Step 4 Save and Submit When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to your instructor using Dropbox. Use the template linked below to complete this assignment. 485 Outcomes, Approach, and Budget Template 7th edition Download 485 Outcomes, Approach, and Budget Template 7th edition Rubric Post Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019 Post Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Intentional Learning and Reflection 15 pts Exemplary Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications. 10 pts Accomplished Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the content with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part. Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and/or implications are not as thoroughly explored 5 pts Developing Identifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper. Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions. 0 pts Unsatisfactory – Beginning Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the paper lacks focus throughout. Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Decision Making and Clinical Reasoning 15 pts Exemplary Provides compelling and accurate evidence to support in-depth analysis to the central position beyond the required (2) research sources with at least 1 source from a periodical database. Research sources are highly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable and add to the strength of the content. 10 pts Accomplished Provides essential, accurate evidence to support the central position with the required (2) research sources including 1 source from a periodical database that are mostly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable. 5 pts Developing Provides some evidence to support the central position with less than 2 acceptable research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable, greater than 5 years old and may not be from scholarly sources. 0 pts Unsatisfactory – Beginning Lacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization & Presentation 15 pts Exemplary Content is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing 10 pts Accomplished Content is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components of an introduction, body, and conclusion. For a slide presentation, one or more components of the design, font size, style, and spacing may be less than ideal for audience viewing. 5 pts Developing Content is somewhat organized. For a paper, occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and/or components may be less than complete. For a slide presentation, multiple aspects of the design require further development for optimal audience viewing. 0 pts Unsatisfactory – Beginning Content lacks logical organization and impedes readers comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and/or the paper is missing multiple required components. For a slide presentation, the design lacks clarity for optimal viewing by an audience. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing and APA Formatting 15 pts Exemplary Content is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly. 10 pts Accomplished Content shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting. APA guidelines for formatting are present. In-text citations are present but may not be complete or correctly formatted. References are written using correct APA format 5 pts Developing Content shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Use of APA guidelines are generally present, however are incorrectly formatted. 0 pts Unsatisfactory – Beginning Content shows a below average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Lacks elements required in writing a formal APA paper: title page, references, in-text citations, headers. 15 pts Total Points: 60

follow the template uploaded and continue on with the project building from benchmark pt 1 and 2 . three credible sources required for this part

No instructions provided

A power point presentation as if training someone new in the CVICU for Care of Clients Post Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. There is an example attached. At least 5 references APA format.

Social economic of nursing