Category: Nursing

  • Quality Improvement Project Plan

    Create a quality improvement project plan, which will likely be 6-10 pages in length.

    Introduction:

    For this assessment, you will apply everything that you have learned so far to create your quality improvement plan. Quality improvement is a critical piece of all health care practice and the DNP-prepared nurse is critical in leading and implementing quality improvement initiatives across all types of organizations. By completing this assessment you will demonstrate your competence towards DNP Essential IV: Information Systems/Technology and Patient Care Technology for the Improvement and Transformation of Health Care and how you will be able to apply it in your current and future practice.

    Instructions:

    All of your previous assessments have been built up to complete this one. Now, it is time to create a quality improvement project plan, using data to create a sense of urgency. You should include depictions of pre- and post-implementation workflows and the risk management mitigation plan you developed. Use the to complete this assessment. Remember to use evidence-based practice to support your plan.

    Overall, your assessment will be assessed on the following criteria:

    • Explain the problem, its significance, and its impact on the chosen health care environment.
    • Make sure you use appropriate data from sources like Leapfrog and Medicare Compare to support your explanation.
    • Outline proposed technology/informatics solutions and the plan to implement them within the chosen health care environment.
    • Make sure you address why your plan is relevant to your problem.
    • Explain potential implementation challenges related to the proposed plan.
    • Think about the logistical, personnel, and resources that might be part of the challenges or that could help overcome the challenges.
    • Explain the role of leaders in change management related to the proposed plan.
    • Think about who the relevant leaders would be for implementing your plan and what type of communication plan they should be using to help with implementation.
    • Analyze the workflow related to the technology/informatics, providing visual depictions of the workflow before and after implementing the proposed plan.
    • Make sure to address both pre- and post- implementation workflows, as well as create depictions of each workflow.
    • Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Requirements:

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Length: Submit a completed , which will likely be 610 double-spaced pages, plus your reference list.
    • References: 58 scholarly or professional resources, no more than five years old.
    • APA format: Submission should follow current APA style and formatting. Review the section of the Writing Center for guidance.
    • Competency 1: Defend the selection of a technology to meet the needs of a health care organization.
    • Explain potential implementation challenges related to the proposed plan.
    • Explain the role of leaders in change management related to the proposed plan.
    • Competency 2: Evaluate technology and its effect within a health care organization.
    • Outline proposed technology/informatics solutions and the plan to implement them within the chosen health care environment.
    • Analyze the workflow related to the technology/informatics, providing visual depictions of the workflow before and after implementing the proposed plan.
    • Competency 3: Evaluate and solve ethical and legal issues relating to health care technology.
    • Explain the problem, its significance, and its impact on the chosen health care environment.
    • Competency 4: Address assessment purpose in a well organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): cf_quality_improvement_template.docx, Assignment 5 instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Create a risk mitigation plan and a 2-4 page explanation of…

    Create a risk mitigation plan and a 2-4 page explanation of your plan.

    Introduction:

    As a DNP-prepared nurse, it will be important for you to develop the knowledge and skill necessary to conduct a risk analysis. Understanding risks is important for effective practice, organizational performance, and positive patient safety and outcomes. For this assessment you will use a risk matrix to note the potential occurrence of identified risks (frequent, sometimes, never), and the potential for harm [(patient or organization) (severe, mild, none)]. You will then list what action will be taken to reduce the occurrence and/or severity of the risk, noting the resultant change in occurrence and/or severity. By using the tools and guidance in this assessment you will be able to complete your own risk analysis that is relevant to the health care environment and technology you have been using throughout your work in this course. This in turn will prepare you to carry out such analyses in your current or future practice.

    In the previous assessments, you:

    • Observed opportunities to use technology/informatics to make practice changes.
    • Reviewed organization or provider-type performance.
    • Identified real or potential risks associated with the technology/informatics-driven practice change.

    In this assessment, you will use your SAFER Guides findings and resources to create a risk mitigation plan. You will complete this assessment using the .

    If you are not familiar with risk mitigation planning, the may help you get started.

    Instructions:

    For this assessment:

    • Use the table in the to list the risks identified by the SAFER Guides, the potential occurrence of the risk (frequent, sometimes, never), the potential for harm [(patient or organization) (severe, mild, none)].
    • Additionally, state what action will be taken to reduce the occurrence and/or severity of the risk and identify the resultant change in occurrence and/or severity.
    • Write a 24 page report (below the table in the template) that addresses any ethical or legal issues that could arise from not addressing the identified risks, justify your proposed actions to address the identified risks, and identify change management strategies that could help others implement the proposed actions in their practice.

    Overall, your assessment will be assessed based on the following criteria:

    • Complete all sections of the risk management plan table.
    • Explain any ethical or legal issues that could result from not addressing identified risks.
    • Think about not only what the potential ethical or legal issues, but also the impact on patients, practitioners, and institutions that could result from them.
    • Justify proposed actions to address identified risks.
    • Make sure you support your justification with cited support from peer-reviewed literature or evidence-based practice.
    • Identify change management strategies that could help others implement the proposed actions in their practice.
    • Think about who would be implementing your proposed actions and their relevance to your chosen health care environment when selecting strategies.
    • Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Requirements:

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Length: A completed , plus a 24 double-spaced page APA-formatted paper and reference list.
    • References: 36 scholarly or professional resources, no more than five years old.
    • APA format: Submission should follow current APA style and formatting. Review the section of the Writing Center for guidance.

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

    • Competency 1: Defend the selection of a technology to meet the needs of a health care organization.
    • Justify proposed actions to address identified risks.
    • Identify change management strategies that could help others implement the proposed actions in their practice.
    • Competency 2: Evaluate technology and its effect within a health care organization.
    • Complete all sections of the risk management plan table.
    • Competency 3: Evaluate and solve ethical and legal issues relating to health care technology.
    • Explain any ethical or legal issues that could result from not addressing identified risks.
    • Competency 4: Address assessment purpose in a well organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Assignment 4 instructions.docx, cf_risk_mitigation_plan_template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Writing assignment #2

    I have screenshoted the assignment guidelines
  • SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

    SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

    Write a 4-6 page paper reporting your findings and reflecting on the experience of using the HealthIT SAFER guides to examine performance and risk in your chosen health care setting.

    Introduction:

    DNP-prepared nurses will be expected to lead large scale informatics/technology implementation projects. One of the keys to a successful project is understanding real or potential risks.

    As a DNP-prepared nurse, you may find yourself responsible for helping to ensure the security and integrity of data at your place of practice. With this in mind it is critical that you demonstrate a thorough understanding of HIPAA, privacy, and security rules and best practices. Additionally, for both this assessment and your practice, it will be important to solidify your understanding of the current CURES Act, which impacts the way in which providers and patients access and interact with health information. For this assessment, you will use the HealthIT SAFER Guides to identity not only data security and integrity risks, but all other risks related to the implementation of a technology/informatics solution within your chosen health care context.

    Preparation:

    Note: Remember, the assessments in this course build upon one another. Also, keep in mind that your findings from the SAFER Guides will be used to inform your later assessments.

    In preparation for this assessment, think about the technology/informatics you propose to implement as part of the practice change to address the safety, process, or quality issues identified in the previous assessments. Review the nine with your proposed technology/informatics in mind. You will use the discoveries you uncover by using the SAFER Guides to identity risks, which you will address via the risk mitigation plan you will create in the next assessment, Risk Mitigation.

    If you are not familiar with the SAFER Guides, the may help you get started on this assessment.

    Instructions:

    Write a 46 page APA-formatted paper, discussing your experience using the SAFER Guides and identifying and describing any potential risks uncovered through the completion of such. Make sure to use the literature to support your findings.

    Overall, your assessment will be assessed based on the following criteria:

    • Describe the technology/informatics you propose to implement as part of a practice change to drive improvements in a chosen health care environment.
    • You may wish to refer to your work in the previous assessments to help you compose this section.
    • Explain SAFER Guides findings related to areas where the chosen health care environment is performing well with regard to the proposed technology/informatics.
    • These will likely be areas in which you would have rated your chosen health care environment as “Fully in all areas” on the SAFER Guides.
    • Explain SAFER Guides findings related to risks with regard to the proposed technology/informatics in the context of the chosen health care environment.
    • These will likely be areas in which you would have rated your chosen health care environment as “Not implemented” on the SAFER Guides, but could also include areas you rated “Partially in some areas,” depending on how severe the risks might be.
    • Reflect on the experience of using the SAFER Guides to discover areas of risks and to focus improvement efforts.
    • Think about the process of using the SAFER Guides and how it helped you adopt a different point of view in your evaluation.
    • Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Requirements:

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Length: A 46 double-spaced page paper, not including the title page or reference list.
    • References: 24 scholarly or professional resources, no more than five years old.
    • APA format: Submission should follow current APA style and formatting. Review the section of the Writing Center for guidance.
    • Competency 1: Defend the selection of a technology to meet the needs of a health care organization.
    • Describe the proposed technology/informatics to implement as part of a practice change to drive improvements in a chosen health care environment.
    • Competency 2: Evaluate technology and its effect within a health care organization.
    • Explain SAFER Guides findings related to areas where the chosen health care environment is performing well with regard to the proposed technology/informatics.
    • Competency 3: Evaluate and solve ethical and legal issues relating to health care technology.
    • Explain SAFER Guides findings related to risks with regard to the proposed technology/informatics in the context of the chosen health care environment.
    • Competency 4: Address assessment purpose in a well organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Reflect on the experience of using the SAFER Guides to discover areas of risks and to focus improvement efforts.
    • Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
    • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

    Helpful links:

    HealthIT.gov. (2018). . ;https://www.healthit.gov/topic/safety/safer-guides

    • This website provides information about and links to the SAFER Guides.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Assessment three instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Care coordination in nursing

    ASSESSMENT 2 Introduction This assignment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem. NOTE: You are required to complete this assignment after Assignment 1 is successfully completed. Preparation In this assignment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assignment 1 using best practices found in the literature. To prepare for your assignment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and discuss how the plan includes elements of Healthy People 2030. Instruction Note: You are required to complete Assignment1 before this assignment. For this assignment: Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assignment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan. Document Format and Length Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assignment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA-formatted paper, 57 pages in length, not including title page and reference list. Supporting Evidence Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources. Grading Requirements The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem. Address three health care issues. Design an intervention for each health issue. Identify three community resources for each health intervention. Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions. Consider the practical effects of specific decisions. Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made. Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care. Cite specific health policy provisions. Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice. Clearly explain the need for changes to the plan. Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document. Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices. Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Additional Requirements Before submitting your assignment, proofread your final care coordination plan to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan. Context Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life. Course Competencies By successfully completing this assignment you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors. Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem. Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes. Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice. Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience. Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document. Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing. Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions. Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care. Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care. Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. SCORING GUIDE Criterion 1: Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem. For a distinguished grade be sure to: Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem that includes community resources. Criterion 2: Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions. For a distinguished grade, be sure to: Consider insightful ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions. These decisions are supported by the literature. Criterion 3: Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care. For a distinguished grade, be sure to: Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care, based on precise and accurate interpretations of relevant policy provisions. Makes valid, insightful inferences. Criterion 4: Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice. For a distinguished grade, be sure to: Describes priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice. Clearly explains the need for changes to the plan. Criterion 5: Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document. For a distinguished grade, be sure to: Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document. Clearly explains the need for any revisions. Criterion 6: Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. For a distinguished grade, be sure to: Exhibit strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly. Criterion 7: Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. For a distinguished grade, be sure to: Organize content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): ASSESSMENT 2 INSTRUCTIONS EP.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • leadership theory discussion

    1. Identify a leadership change theory, and describe how a nurse leader in the role you aspire to upon completion of your degree would lead a change project, based on this theory. Include the following in your initial post:
    • Identify the role you have chosen and a potential change in practice that may be needed in your area.
    • Search the literature for leadership theories that nurse leaders may use in effecting a practice change.
    • Identify how you might implement the practice change, based on the components of the leadership theory you have selected.

    this needs to be in psych nursing

  • Environmental Scan and Mental Health Leadership in School Se…

    Your task is to analyze the attached Interview Transcript, Rubric, and Assignment Instructions to create a comprehensive response for the “Environmental Scan” document. Rubric & Instructions: Must be followed strictly to ensure full marks. Interview Transcript: This is your primary source of evidence. 3 AI Drafts: Use these only as a loose reference for structure. Do not copy-paste or plagiarize from these drafts. I require original, high-quality analysis within the page limit. Current Learning Goal: (Provided below for review). The Environmental Scan Please answer every question in the Environmental Scan document using the following format and must be in chronological order: Question [Number]: [Full Question Text] Answer: [Your thorough, detailed response] Content Requirements for the Scan: Depth is Critical: Do not be brief. Even if a question implies brevity, I require maximum detail based on the transcript. Partnerships & Teams: Whenever a program, partnership, or interdisciplinary team is mentioned (e.g., in the transcript), you must detail: Who they are. Why they are at the school. Their specific role for the students and families at St. Dorothy Catholic School. Logic & Flow: Ensure all rationales are sound and the writing flows naturally. Learning Goal & Plan Review my current learning goal below. If it needs refinement to better meet the assignment criteria, please improve it. Current Goal: “Professional Learning Goal: Utilize Standard 5 (Capacity Building) and Standard 4 (Professional Relationships) to facilitate a collaborative mental health leadership framework within Ms. Zuzartes Grade 6 class at St. Dorothy Catholic School, empowering students to identify internal health barriers and mobilize existing community assets to navigate digital and relational stressors.” How to cite information and integrate interview information to answers: It should be written in 1st person, no quotations should be included. Any time you are referring to the interview information just cite it as personal communication [citation: C. Zuzarte (personal communication, January 28, 2026) or (J. Manini, personal communication, January 28, 2026)]. Do not include these references in the body as As mentioned my Manini…; it should be integrated from a first person perspective i.e. like this: After my interview, I realized that/ I understood that, I observed staff were mainly of European origin specifically Italian and British origins with one Asian staff who was a kindergarten helper and, 2 Nigerian staff members one who was a French teacher and another a primary grade student support worker for special needs. And in talking with Dr. Manini they told that this is a systemic issue… and then put the citation of personal communication in parenthesis. C.Zuzarte (Ms. Zuzarte) is the homeroom teacher of the focus group and and Dr. Manini is the principal of St. Dorothy Catholic School.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): final draft of environemntal scan.docx, initial draft of environmental scan.docx, Instructions on how to write.pdf, Focus Group and St Dorothy School Information.pdf, Instructions and Description of Environmental Scan assignment School placements (1).pdf, Rubric for Assignment.pdf, 2nd draft of envir scan.docx, Transcript of the Interview with Manini the Principal of St.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Reflection

    The purpose of this assignment is to identify a poorly designed human-technology interface in your practice setting that could risk patient safety.

    Instructions

    After identifying the issue, comment on the following two questions in a paragraph each (approximately 150-200 words total):

    1. Describe in detail how your identified human technology interface problem could be improved to facilitate the human task requirements and improve patient safety.
    2. Discuss the nurses responsibility in identifying and reporting problems versus creating workarounds.
  • Nursing Question

    Literature Review & Evidence Matrix Assignment


    For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.

    1. Conduct a search of the literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are peer-reviewed articles. Only one opinion article may be included.
    2. Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.
    3. The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area, as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument, but not so much that the result looks padded.
    4. Prepare an Evidence Matrix using the template. e

    Submission Instructions:

    • The introduction is original work and logically organized.
    • The paper is 3-4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.
    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    • Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
    • Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism through Turnitin.

    Requirements: 3-4 pages

  • Organizational Systems and Behaviors Online Discussion

    1. Having read The Essentials: Competencies for Professional Nursing Practice Domain 7 (Systems- Based Practice) prioritize the two (2) areas within that Essential that YOU believe will contribute MOST to your future practice as a doctorally-prepared advanced practice nurse, including a rationale for each. Support your post with scholarly sources as warranted.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): DNP 918 Discussion Rubric-1.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.