Bright Academic Experts

Category: Nursing

  • Technology Proposal Project

    The purpose of this assignment is to creatively express a proposal of how you could improve a manual process in your work environment with technology. You will submit this proposal in a video format using a creative electronic media reflecting the information from your Week 3 poster.

    Choose a creative electronic media outlet to express your technology.

    1. You will need to include a written or audio narrative to explain the issue and the proposed solution.
    2. Here are a few suggestions. Do not be bound by this list; be as creative as you can be with electronic media:
    • Create a moving collage or video of still photographs with music.
    • You CANNOT take a picture of any patient or nurse in the workplace (remember your privacy and security training).
    • Do not refer to a product’s brand name.
    • You may use the images from last weeks poster presentation.
    • Create a poem or song and video of yourself reciting or singing your original work.
    • Create a piece of art and record yourself creating it using electronic media.
    • Create a digital story of the issue and proposed solution.
    1. You have the choice to use any electronic media tool EXCEPT PowerPoint. You are responsible for establishing proficiency in its use (search how-to videos on YouTube or Google).
    2. All projects must be submitted through the designated assignment section as a URL (link). If you use Adobe Spark to create your video, submit the published URL (link). If you use any other electronic media, you will need to upload your project to YouTube (unlisted, instead of private) and then submit the YouTube video URL (link). The following electronic media tools are easily uploaded to YouTube:
    • iMovie
    • Moviemaker 2
    • Animoto
    • Microsoft Photo Story 3
    • Powtoon
    • Adobe spiv

    Be creative and have fun!! The URL (Adobe or YouTube) must be submitted in the assignment section.

    If you could please just do a text for me and i will do the movie. Thank you

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Nursing Informatics.pdf, poster.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Population-Based Research Article

    General Instructions

    Locate a scholarly article describing population-based research using a case-control or cohort study design. Provide a detailed critique of the selected article, addressing the questions below.

    Include the following sections:

    1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
    • What is the study design (case-control or cohort study)? Briefly describe the key features of the chosen study design. Discuss any strengths or limitations associated with the chosen study design.
    • Describe the sampling method employed in the study. Was it representative of the target population? Discuss any potential sources of selection bias.
    • Assess the quality of data collection methods. Were the measures used valid and reliable? Discuss any challenges or limitations associated with data collection in the study.
    • Summarize the main findings of the study.
    • Describe how you may apply these findings to your practice as an advanced practice nurse.
    1. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by
    3. :
    • Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
    • Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
    • Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
    • Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
    • Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
    1. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
    • Peer Response: Respond to at least one peer.
    • Faculty Response: Respond to at least one faculty post.
    • Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.
    1. Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
    2. Reference Citation: Use current APA format to format citations and references free of errors.
    3. Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provide a substantive response to the graded discussion topic (not a response to a peer or faculty) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
    4. Total Participation Requirement: Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.

  • Evidence-based practice and statistical analysis in nursing

    No instructions provided

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): NU504M2 Examining Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 5 child assessment

    You will complete a comprehensive psychiatric mental health assessment of a child/adolescent.

    This should NOT be a patient you have encountered in your work but, instead, should be a family member or friend (who gives consent) or preferably a patient in clinical. You should note that all information will be confidential and that their private information will NOT be shared as part of this assignment.

    Requirements

    • Your assessment should be comprehensive, and you should refer to course texts to inform items for inclusion in your assessment.
    • Keep in mind that you will be responsible for covering those areas addressed in the reading assignments up to this point.
    • The documentation should remain HIPAA-compliant even though this is not a real patient.
    • DO NOT USE REAL PATIENT IDENTIFIERS.
    • Be sure to include birth and developmental information as well as school and behavior information for the child.
    • Consider cultural, gender, ethnicity, spiritual, and social competencies needed to formulate the best care plan for the patient.

    The patient will be referred to as Jane Doe or Jack Doe.

  • 1. Following the PICOT format. PLEASE DONT USE PLAGIO

    1. Following the PICOT format, please write a possible practice problem for your DNP practicum project.

    2. Which nursing theory do you feel could support your practice problem change project?

    3. How can this theory apply to your topic?

    4. Describe your practice problem within the context of nursings meta-paradigm and the theoretical insights

    Participation Requirements

    The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor.

    The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Thursday and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s). The answers to classmates must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm Eastern Time. We expect each student to participate in the discussion board in a respectful manner.

    Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points.

    Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

    Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

    Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

    Inclusion of DNP essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

    Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

    Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

    Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)

    Requirements:

  • Journal Entry

    Critical reflection on your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting helps you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your strengths and successes. Use this Journal to reflect on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement, the progress you made, and what insights you will carry forward into your next practicum. To Prepare Refer to the Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies found in the Week 1 Learning Resources and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced nursing practice nurses must possess in your specialty of interest. Refer to your Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement. Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek and consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences. In 450500 words, address the following: Learning From Experiences Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience. Reflect on the three most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each? What did you learn from this experience? What resources were available? What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients? What would you do differently? How are you managing patient flow and volume? Communicating and Feedback Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge and how to communicate those efforts to your Preceptor. Answer the questions: How am I doing? What is missing? Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 1 Core Competencies.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • clinical case

    Answer the questions below based on the following case study.

    A 26-year-old woman presented to the clinic after her cleaning rituals had so exhausted her that she had given up and could now enter only two of the five rooms in her home. For more than a year she has worried that if her house is not sufficiently clean, her 3-year-old son will become ill and could die. Having touched a surface she has to disinfect it repeatedly a procedure performed in a particular way and taking several hours. In addition, she repetitively washes her hands and sterilizes all the crockery and cutlery before eating. She realizes that she is going over the top, but she cannot stop thinking that items may have germs on them. This leads to disabling anxiety and fear for her sons health, which she can only resolve by cleaning. This helps temporarily, but soon the thoughts return again.

    1. Summarize the clinical case.
    2. What is the DSM 5-TR diagnosis based on the information provided in the case? Include any labs you would want ordered to rule out medical cause.
    3. Which pharmacological treatment would you prescribe including the name, dose, route and frequency of the drug in accordance with the clinical guidelines? Include the rationale for this treatment.
    4. Which non-pharmacological treatment would you prescribe according to the clinical guidelines? Include the rationale for this treatment excluding a psychotherapeutic modality.
    5. Include an assessment of the treatments appropriateness, cost, effectiveness, safety, and potential for patient adherence to the chosen medication. Use a local pharmacy to research the cost of the medication and provide the most cost-effective choice for the patient. Use great detail when answering questions 3-5.

    Be sure to follow the rubric.

    Requirements: 500 words

  • Essential paper

    part 1 of paper only, Domain 10: Personal, Professional, and Leadership Development

  • Nursing Question

    Rubric Details

    • Promptness & Initative

    6.25 possible points (25%)

    Novice

    Did not contribute to the conversation at all or posted after the due date

    1.25

    Competent

    Answered most of the points in the discussion but missed significant clues in diagnosis, differentials and pharmacology based on the information provided

    5

    Proficient

    Answered all required points and discussed important issues related to the diagnosis, differentials and pharmacology based on the information provided

    6.25

    • Mechanics of writing

    6.25 possible points (25%)

    Novice

    Poor spelling and grammar in posts

    3.13

    Competent

    Some errors in spelling and grammar but overall format was clear

    5

    Proficient

    Submissions were grammatically correct with rare misspellings, easy to read, professional delivery

    6.25

    • Clinical reasoning & analysis

    6.25 possible points (25%)

    Novice

    Remarks to discussion were opinion based and not backed up by science or other sources, summarized other posts, did not read the assignments or spent minimal time looking up and answering the discussion. Difficult to understand the diagnosis and differentials

    3.13

    Competent

    Thoughtful response with general references: apparent that the student read and completed assignments and spent time thinking about the question and presentation, offered some new insights but did not provoke significant new thinking and further discussion. Easy to understand the pharmacology

    5

    Proficient

    Thoughtful, comprehensive responses with specific references to concepts in the assignment or outside the assignment. The student completed assigned reading, and PowerPoints, articles and videos related to the concept and context. Responses were thought provoking and creative and stimulated new knowledge in pharmacology

    6.25

    • Peer Responses
    • 6.25 possible points (25%)NoviceResponses to peers were minimal and did not add much to the conversation3.13CompetentMost of the response to peers were thoughtful and added to theconversation5ProficientResponse to peers were thoughtful and added to the conversation; made aconcerted effort to stimulate discussion by asking and answering Socraticquestions
    • Assigment
    • Case One Pt is a 66 yo female who comes to her PCP for c/o nausea, monocular visual loss and dizziness. She has a PMH of HTN, DM2, and HPL. She has had these symptoms for the past few weeks and the episodes come and go but they have occurred more frequently this week. They come on suddenly and disappear within a couple of minutesPSH: Bilateral cataracts 1 year ago with lens implants.Medications: Lisinopril 10 mg po dailyJanumet XR 100/1000mg po dailyCrestor 10mg po dailyDescribe your approach to this patient, questions asked in ROS, focused physical exam highlights, diagnostics ordered.Work through the VINDICATE format and provide your diagnosis and differentials. Explain what abnormal physical assessment signs you will see that support your diagnosis. Please remember to have justification for ROS, focused PE, diagnostic testing ordered and diagnosis and differentials. Please list at least 3 differential diagnoses (top three and your primary diagnosis). You can write this up in an SBAR format.
    • I haveattached a sample copy of how the instructor wants us to do our own. This is anexample of someone assignment. Please just follow the sample and instructionsfrom the rubric. Thank you

    Requirements: 2-3 pages

  • Compassion fatigue/vicarious trauma in nursing

    Create a concept map using your wicked question. Compassion fatigue/vicarious trauma in nursing The main node should be your wicked problem with child nodes including identification of audience, title, executive summary, the rationale for action of the problem, proposed policy options, policy recommendations, sources consulted or recommended, link to original research/analysis, and contact details of teammates. By Sunday of Week 7 Use the concept map to develop each element of your policy brief. You will need to refer to assigned readings as well as external sources of information to develop each element. Identification of Audience and Title: It is important to identify the specific audience for your health policy brief. Your audience should be the people or group that has the power to affect change. Examples of specific audiences could be legislators who sit on committees relevant to your wicked problem or professional organizations that set policies for professions. Your policy brief should be written for your specific audience. With regard to the title, make it memorable and succinct. The executive summary will be written last as it serves as the abstract of your policy brief. The executive summary should include succinct points from each section of your policy brief. If someone did not read beyond the executive summary, would they get the gist of what you are saying? This question should guide how you write the nodes for your executive summary. The rationale for action on the problem is the “So what?” of your policy brief. The work your teams did in Discussion Board #1 regarding why your problem is wicked should be incorporated here. Proposed policy options will require you to go outside of the course readings and look for what has been done or what could be done to address your wicked problem. Don’t try to eat the whole elephant in one bite; you will likely need to select one element of your wicked problem to address in your policy brief. For example, if your wicked problem is urban food deserts, there are hundreds of options for addressing the problem. Your policy brief needs to be BRIEF, so selecting one segment to address is a good strategy, e.g., transportation issues related to obtaining healthy food in urban food deserts. You should present 35 options that address your selected problem and identify the best one with rationale. Your rationale nodes MUST include details related to cost/funding and social determinants of health of your proposed policy options. Policy recommendations are the action plan for how your proposed policy option (the best of the options you presented) should be implemented. You don’t need a TON of detail. This section is more of a strategic vision of HOW your policy option should be implemented and WHO should implement your policy option rather than an operationalized plan. Sources consulted or recommended are essentially your reference list. Your teams are responsible for searching and identifying sources/references that are trustworthy and current. Research articles, position statements, and publications from professional organizations (ANA, AHA, AWHONN, etc), and information from government resources (CDC, AHRQ, etc.) are acceptable sources/references. Choose references that support your recommendations and plan. Each of your sources MUST be cited in another node element. Link to original research/analysis: This section is a “more information can be found at” resource in your policy brief. For example, if your wicked problem is urban food deserts, you could list organizations that provide support for people who live in food deserts (CDC, USDA, etc.). Contact details: Include each teammate, your credentials, and your twu.edu email addresses.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): policy briefs pdf.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.