Category: Nursing

  • Critique

    Read the assigned research article by Aslan, et al., 2025), below. Using the Nieswiadomy textbook and additional sources, follow the rubric provided in the syllabus to write a critique of the article. Please reference Nieswiadomy, Ch. 20 as a guide for your critique. Using the assigned article, write a critique using the rubric provided in the syllabus. Submission Instructions:The paper must be in APA 7 format (title page, body with subheadings and reference page) and have 450-500 words. Focus on reviewing the article, NOT on what you think of it. Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric within the guideline .

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): The effect of laughter yogas on perceived stress and anxiety levels in nursing students_ Randomized controlled trial copy.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Course work

    Page 1 answers are in the attachment

    Case Study: Risk Stratification for Complex Patient in Case Management

    Patient Overview:

    • Name: Mrs. Evelyn Thompson
    • Age: 68 years old
    • Gender: Female
    • Medical History:
    • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (diagnosed 12 years ago)
    • Hypertension (diagnosed 10 years ago)
    • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (diagnosed 5 years ago)
    • History of ischemic stroke (3 years ago, with mild residual right-sided weakness)
    • Obesity (BMI = 34)
    • Depression (diagnosed 2 years ago)
    • Current Medications:
    • Metformin 500 mg twice daily
    • Lisinopril 20 mg daily
    • Albuterol inhaler (prn)
    • Fluoxetine 20 mg daily
    • Aspirin 81 mg daily
    • Primary Care Physician: Dr. Sandra Hayes
    • Current Situation:
    • Mrs. Thompson is hospitalized due to a recent exacerbation of COPD, which has led to difficulty breathing and increased use of her rescue inhaler. She also reports fatigue, weight gain over the past few months, and difficulty managing her blood sugar levels.
    • Her hospital discharge is planned for tomorrow, and she has expressed a desire to return home, but she requires follow-up care to prevent further complications and re-hospitalization.

    Clinical Information:

    • Vitals on Admission:
    • Temperature: 98.4F (normal)
    • Blood Pressure: 150/92 mmHg (elevated)
    • Heart Rate: 92 bpm (slightly elevated)
    • Respiratory Rate: 20 bpm (within normal limits)
    • Oxygen Saturation: 94% on room air (mild hypoxia)
    • Laboratory Results:
    • A1C: 8.7% (above target of <7%)
    • Serum Creatinine: 1.2 mg/dL (within normal limits)
    • Potassium: 3.8 mmol/L (normal)
    • BNP: 300 pg/mL (elevated, possibly indicating heart failure exacerbation)
    • Functional Status:
    • Mrs. Thompson uses a walker for mobility but has difficulty walking more than short distances.
    • She lives alone and has limited social support, with only a son who lives out of state.
    • She struggles with managing her medications, particularly her diabetes management and inhaler use, and she has missed several follow-up appointments due to transportation issues and depression.

    Nursing Considerations:

    • Mrs. Thompson’s COPD exacerbation is currently stable, but she remains at risk for future exacerbations due to her non-compliance with maintenance therapy and poor self-management.
    • Her diabetes is poorly controlled, contributing to her fatigue and overall decline in functional status. She is at risk for diabetic complications such as neuropathy and retinopathy.
    • Mrs. Thompsons depression may impact her ability to engage in self-care, and her social isolation is a contributing factor.
    • She has hypertension, which is not well controlled, putting her at risk for cardiovascular events such as stroke or heart failure.

    Assignment Details:

    You are a case manager assigned to coordinate care for Mrs. Evelyn Thompson upon her discharge from the hospital. Your task is to conduct a comprehensive risk stratification and critically think and discuss the following:

    1. Clinical Risk Factors:
    • Analyze Mrs. Thompsons medical history and current health status. Is she at risk for acute and/or Chronic complications?
    • Are there any potential gaps in her care or medication management that you think needs addressed?
    • Risk Stratification:
    • Using the clinical data provided and the AAFP Risk stratification tool, classify Mrs. Thompson into a risk category for case management (e.g., high risk, moderate risk, low risk AND Levels 1-6) and explain why you have placed her in that risk category. IMPORTANT: Include your rating for both step 1 and step 2 and explain why you gave them that level.
    • Identify the most critical factors contributing to her overall health risks.
    • Psychosocial and Functional Assessment:
    • Evaluate Mrs. Thompsons emotional and mental health status. Does her depression and social isolation affect her ability to engage in her care plan?
    • Are there any other factors that might play a role in her successfully following the care plan?

    Page 2

    Target Population

    Select one potential at-risk community or population that you are familiar with and is local for you, such as:

    • Older adults
    • Families with young children
    • Rural communities
    • Individuals with disabilities
    • Individuals experiencing homelessness
    • School-aged children

    Infographic Requirements

    • One-page infographic
    • Audience-appropriate language (plain language, culturally sensitive)
    • Visual format (Canva is recommended)
    • May include icons, images, charts, or diagrams

    Required Content

    Your infographic must include:

    1. Type of Emergency or Disaster that is at risk in your area
    • Natural (e.g., floods, hurricanes, wildfires)
    • Public health (e.g., pandemic, heat emergencies)
    • Community-specific risks
    1. Why This Population Is at Risk
    • Social determinants of health
    • Access, mobility, or resource limitations
    1. Preparedness Strategies
    • Prevention and readiness actions
    • Emergency supply recommendations
    1. Local Response Guidance
    • What to do during an emergency
    • When, where, and how to seek help must be specific and include real places in your local area
    1. Nurses Role
    • Education, advocacy, triage, coordination, or support
    1. National Resources
    • Emergency contacts, hotlines, websites, or agencies

    Evidence & References

    • Minimum of at least 2 credible sources, that will be checked for reference
    • Sources should include CDC, FEMA, WHO, Red Cross, state or local health departments
    • References must be listed in APA 7th edition (small font acceptable at bottom)
    • Evidence accuracy is essential

    Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    • AI tools may be used for idea generation or wording
    • All information must be accurate and evidence-based
    • AI-generated or fabricated references are not permitted
  • Discuss 3

    In your reading this week, the authors highlighted the importance of identifying various perspectives and worldviews regarding the care and management of patients across the lifespan. For example, both the medical and nursing perspectives have something unique to contribute to health care and the achievement of positive patient outcomes. That said, examine components of the medical perspective and the advanced practice nursing perspective. What are the similarities? What are the differences? How can both professions improve communication and collaboration to enhance patient outcomes? Please include research studies and/or reliable electronic sources to support your arguments.

    Discussion 3 Prompt 2

    Identify two reliable and credible electronic sources (i.e., websites) for relevant evidence-based practice guidelines on a topic of your choice. For example, you may be interested in the management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 or Generalized Anxiety Disorder, to name a few.

    Once you identify two sources, compare and contrast the differences in grading methods for the guidelines and the feasibility of implementing these guidelines in clinical practice. In other words, how was the evidence appraised and evaluated? Is there evidence of a strategic approach for evaluation purposes? Please cite your references in APA format.

  • Assignment – Week 3: Are you a domino?

    The purpose of this assignment is to assist you in meeting the following unit objectives:

    • Develop a foundational understanding of effective healthcare leadership and communication by applying diversity, equity, inclusion, and cultural competencies. (CLO 4)
    • Demonstrate the ability to use complexity science and systems theory in the design, delivery, and evaluation of healthcare. (CLO 6)
    • Design and implement systems change strategies that improve the care environment. (CLO 7)

    Instructions:

    1- Utilize Your Approved Health Policy Topic (Week 2)

    2- Use the health policy topic you previously selected and received approval for earlier in the term.

    3- Review Leadership Readings

    4- Examine this weeks leadership readings, focusing on dialogue, moral courage and ethics, and systems theory.

    5- Apply One Leadership Concept

    • Choose one of these leadership concepts (dialogue, moral courage, or systems theory) and apply it to your health policy topic. Your analysis should address:
    1. How this leadership concept strengthens the case for change related to your policy topic.
    2. How you, as a healthcare leader, can act as a domino in the change process (reference the TED Talk resource provided in the assignment below).

    7- Develop Your Written Analysis

    • Length: 34 pages (excluding title page and references).
    • Content:
    • Brief overview of your health policy topic.
    • Explanation of the chosen leadership concept and its relevance to your policy issue.
    • Analysis of your role as a Domino in initiating or supporting change using this concept.
    • Sources: Minimum of 3 timely peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
    • Format: APA 7th edition.

    Additional Resources:

    Are you a domino: Get comfortable with being uncomfortable (10:54)

    (Are you a Domino) TED. (2018, January 2). Get comfortable with being uncomfortable Luvvie Ajay Jones [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QijH4UAqGD8

    Please note – Use of Augmented Technologies:

    Students must complete all written assignments using their own original work. Augmented technologies, including but not limited to AI-generated text, automated writing tools, or any software that produces content on the students behalf, may not be used to author or revise assignment submissions. All work must accurately reflect the students knowledge, critical thinking, and academic integrity expectations for graduate study.

    Submission

    Text Editor

    make about Maternal Mortality and Moral Courage in Advanced Practice Nursing Leadership

  • Week 6 Discussion

    Instructions:

    This week you will be learning about safety in the geriatric population. Did you know…

    • 1 out of 4 older adults falls each year.
    • 1 out of 5 falls ends with a serious injury (broken bones/head injury).
    • Over 800,00 patients are hospitalized per year for a fall related injury.
    • In 2015, $50 billion was spent of medical cost related to falls. (CDC, 2017).

    Reference: CDC. (2017).

    . CDC. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/falls/adultfalls.html

    Initial Post Requirements:

    Please critically evaluate the subjective and objective information provided to you in the attached file below, and use the SOAP template as a reference.

    1? The first part of the discussion board is to identify all pertinent positive and, negative information and list missing information. Then create a differential diagnosis list with at least 3 possibly actual diagnosis based on your findings. Here are the headings you should use:

    • Pertinent positives
    • Pertinent negatives
    • Missing information
    • Differential diagnoses

    2? The second part is to create a plan utilizing clinical practice guidelines for the priority diagnosis. Here are the headings you should use:

    • Diagnostics
    • Therapeutics
    • Educational
    • Consultation/Referrals

    Be sure to utilize the template, in-text citations and provide full reference citation at the end of the discussion.

    Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

    Your initial response is due by Wednesday at 11:59 pm CT.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): NU627 Unit 6 Discussion Case.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Comprehensive PowerPoint presentation in Nursing – 20 pages

    The learning resources in the unit provided an overview of the impact of nurses’ practice environment on patient outcomes, as well as, professional autonomy and role satisfaction.

    The resource articles provide illustrations of how a practice environment analysis has been applied in tertiary and ambulatory care settings.

    Using the 7 domains of analysis noted in Figure 2 of the Pursio et al. (2024) article and the TOP10 items (Extracted of PES-NWI) from the right-hand side of Table 5 of the Martinez-Riera et al. (2020) article develop a professional presentation that aligns with the requirements noted below.

    Include the following in your presentation:

    1. A title slide
    2. A minimum of four slides for each of the 7 domains of analysis from the Pursio et al. (2024) article (total of 28 slides for this element of the presentation)
    • first slide for each domain of analysis – Title of the Domain (from the Pursio et al. article)
    • second slide – correlate that domain with what you perceive to be the appropriate PES-NWI item(s) noted in the right-hand side of Table 5 of the Martinez-Riera et al. (2020) article
    • third slide for each domain of analysis – provide a discussion of your observations and thoughts about the strengths and opportunities in your current practice environment with the PES-NWI items you have correlated with this domain; this discussion may require more than a single slide
    • fourth slide for each domain of analysis – identify one nursing leadership strategy you would deploy to either bolster the strength OR address the opportunity you identified on the preceding slide; be sure to include a resource/reference to support your selected strategy
    1. Summary slide – discuss how the practice environment analysis framework aligns with contemporary leadership theories in nursing
    2. References slide within 5 years

    Please reach out for ay questions

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Items TOP10 (Extracted of PES-NWI).docx, Qualitative Analysis by Experts of the Essential Elements of the Nursing Practice Environments Propo.pdf, Organizational characteristics of nursing practice environments related to registered nurses profes.pdf, Figure 2 Organizational characteristics of nursing practice environments related to registered nur.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Case study 2

    Read the case study provided and answer the questions in a Microsoft Word document. Each response should be a minimum of 5 sentences in length, clear and concise, and use correct grammar.

    Case Study

    Meet Mark.

    Mark is excited to begin training as an emergency department nurse. On his first day, the nurse training him makes multiple negative remarks about the physician on duty. Dont ever make a suggestion, or shell ream you out. You have to walk on eggshells around her. Later, another nurse is showing Mark where the supplies are kept. She tells him, If you cant find things, dont call Central Supply because theyll get on your back about wasting resources. Its better to keep a few key things like IV start kits hidden so you can grab them when you need them.

    Edit

    Toward the end of his shift, a nurse assistant tells Mark a patient is vomiting violently in one of the examination rooms. However, Mark walks in to find the patient sitting up smiling and only a small amount of emesis in the basin. He hears muffled laughter coming from the hallway. Later in the shift, the nurse who is training Mark comments, Hope you dont mind a little kidding around. This job can get to you, and its good to laugh when we can.

    The remainder of his training is free of other incidents and, overall, goes well.

    Case Study Questions

    1. What kind of culture best describes this department based on the scenario? Support your reasoning.
    2. What appears to be the implicit rules of the emergency department of this organization?
    3. Mark used respectful communication to optimize his relationships with the Central Supply staff, the nurse assistants, and the nurse training him. What barriers might exist in building respectful dialogue?
    4. In what ways are you like Mark? In what ways are you different?

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Submit your Microsoft Word document with the questions clearly listed and answered. All of the questions MUST be answered in your document.
    • It is expected that your answers are free of grammatical errors and in complete sentences, where appropriate.
    • Turnitin is enabled for this assignment.
    • Review the Case Study Rubric for grading criteria.
    • This activity is worth 100 points.

    Rubric

    NUR 218 – Case Study Rubric

    NUR 218 – Case Study Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections

    70 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking and provides rationale, as well as examples and specific details.50 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details, mostly specific.

    30 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details but usually of a generalized nature.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.0 ptsUnacceptableIdea presence is limited and not supported.

    70 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

    15 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.12 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well developed.

    8 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.4 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language

    5 ptsOutstandingExcellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.4 ptsGoodGood use and control of language. Minor (<2) errors with use of style with some variety provided. Professional tone maintained throughout.

    3 ptsProficientAverage use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors or misuse of style with minimal variety. Professional tone maintained throughout.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average use and control of language. Significant (>5) errors or misuses of style with no variety. Professional tone not maintained throughout assignment.0 ptsUnacceptableSignificant issues with use and control of language. Style and variety unable to be determined with no professional tone.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting

    5 ptsOutstandingFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) used with no errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with no errors.4 ptsGoodFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) with minimal (<2) errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with minimal (<2) errors.

    3 ptsProficientFormatting mostly follows assignment directions (APA as required) with some (3-5) errors. Citations (if necessary) provided with some (3-5) errors.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementFormatting (APA as required) errors (>5) make following the assignment difficult. Citations (if necessary) mostly provided with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsUnacceptableFormatting does not follow assignment directions. Significant errors make formatting illegible. Citations (if necessary) do not follow APA format.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly/Professional Composition

    5 ptsOutstandingExpert level of writing with little to no errors.4 ptsGoodGood level of writing with minimal (<2) errors.

    3 ptsProficientAverage level of writing with some (3-5) errors.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average level of writing with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsUnacceptableLevel of writing is far below what is expected for scholarly/professional composition.

    5 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Requirements: as stated

  • Case study 2

    Read the case study provided and answer the questions in a Microsoft Word document. Each response should be a minimum of 5 sentences in length, clear and concise, and use correct grammar.

    Case Study

    Meet Mark.

    Mark is excited to begin training as an emergency department nurse. On his first day, the nurse training him makes multiple negative remarks about the physician on duty. Dont ever make a suggestion, or shell ream you out. You have to walk on eggshells around her. Later, another nurse is showing Mark where the supplies are kept. She tells him, If you cant find things, dont call Central Supply because theyll get on your back about wasting resources. Its better to keep a few key things like IV start kits hidden so you can grab them when you need them.

    Edit

    Toward the end of his shift, a nurse assistant tells Mark a patient is vomiting violently in one of the examination rooms. However, Mark walks in to find the patient sitting up smiling and only a small amount of emesis in the basin. He hears muffled laughter coming from the hallway. Later in the shift, the nurse who is training Mark comments, Hope you dont mind a little kidding around. This job can get to you, and its good to laugh when we can.

    The remainder of his training is free of other incidents and, overall, goes well.

    Case Study Questions

    1. What kind of culture best describes this department based on the scenario? Support your reasoning.
    2. What appears to be the implicit rules of the emergency department of this organization?
    3. Mark used respectful communication to optimize his relationships with the Central Supply staff, the nurse assistants, and the nurse training him. What barriers might exist in building respectful dialogue?
    4. In what ways are you like Mark? In what ways are you different?

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Submit your Microsoft Word document with the questions clearly listed and answered. All of the questions MUST be answered in your document.
    • It is expected that your answers are free of grammatical errors and in complete sentences, where appropriate.
    • Turnitin is enabled for this assignment.
    • Review the Case Study Rubric for grading criteria.
    • This activity is worth 100 points.

    Rubric

    NUR 218 – Case Study Rubric

    NUR 218 – Case Study Rubric

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections

    70 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking and provides rationale, as well as examples and specific details.50 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details, mostly specific.

    30 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details but usually of a generalized nature.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.0 ptsUnacceptableIdea presence is limited and not supported.

    70 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

    15 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.12 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well developed.

    8 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.4 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language

    5 ptsOutstandingExcellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.4 ptsGoodGood use and control of language. Minor (<2) errors with use of style with some variety provided. Professional tone maintained throughout.

    3 ptsProficientAverage use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors or misuse of style with minimal variety. Professional tone maintained throughout.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average use and control of language. Significant (>5) errors or misuses of style with no variety. Professional tone not maintained throughout assignment.0 ptsUnacceptableSignificant issues with use and control of language. Style and variety unable to be determined with no professional tone.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting

    5 ptsOutstandingFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) used with no errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with no errors.4 ptsGoodFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) with minimal (<2) errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with minimal (<2) errors.

    3 ptsProficientFormatting mostly follows assignment directions (APA as required) with some (3-5) errors. Citations (if necessary) provided with some (3-5) errors.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementFormatting (APA as required) errors (>5) make following the assignment difficult. Citations (if necessary) mostly provided with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsUnacceptableFormatting does not follow assignment directions. Significant errors make formatting illegible. Citations (if necessary) do not follow APA format.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly/Professional Composition

    5 ptsOutstandingExpert level of writing with little to no errors.4 ptsGoodGood level of writing with minimal (<2) errors.

    3 ptsProficientAverage level of writing with some (3-5) errors.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average level of writing with significant (>5) errors.0 ptsUnacceptableLevel of writing is far below what is expected for scholarly/professional composition.

    5 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Requirements: Each response should be a minimum of 5 sentences in length

  • Case study Justin

    Client Information

    Meet your client, Justin Jones.

    Justin Jones has just been admitted to an orthopedic unit after an automobile accident in which he was driving. He is 80 years old and has been living at home alone. Justin Jones has a history of Type 2 DM and osteoarthritis. He has casts and traction on both legs and a cast on one arm. He is receiving morphine sulfate intravenously via PCA pump. The admitting nurse wrote the following diagnoses and goals on the plan of care.

    The nursing diagnosis is acute pain secondary to musculoskeletal trauma (arms, legs, body) and muscle spasmsrisk for Peripheral Neurovascular Dysfunction secondary to casts/traction.

    GOALS/EXPECTED OUTCOMES

    • Demonstrates correct use of PCA pump
    • Rates pain not higher than 4 on a scale of 1 to 10 at all times
    • Peripheral pulses palpable
    • Fingers and toes warm
    • Fingers and toes without pallor or cyanosis
    • No edema of fingers and toes
    • Capillary refill less than 3 seconds

    Critical Thinking Questions

    1. What general knowledge will you need to care for this client?
    2. What is one thing you could do to ensure Justin Jones safety while managing his acute pain? List two more things you need to know about Mr. Jones to begin his discharge planning.
    3. What is another nursing diagnosis you might want to include for Justin Jones?
    4. Rewrite the goals/expected outcomes for Acute Pain so that they will have all the required components. Assume that todays date is November 10.
    5. What beliefs, values, biases, or emotional responses might interfere with your ability to provide the best care to Justin Jones?

    Submission and Assessment Guidelines

    • Submit your Microsoft Word document with the questions clearly listed and answered.
    • Each response should be clear, concise, and use correct grammar. All of the questions MUST be answered in your document.
    • Turnitin is enabled for this assignment.
    • Review the Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric for grading criteria.
    • This activity is worth 60 points.

    Rubric

    NUR 211 – Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric (4)

    NUR 211 – Full-Spectrum Nursing Rubric (4)

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections

    45 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking, provides rationale, as well as examples and specific details.35 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details, mostly specific.

    25 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details, but usually of a generalized nature.15 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.0 ptsUnacceptableIdea presence is limited and not supported.

    45 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

    15 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.12 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well-developed.

    8 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.4 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Outcome 2Apply the clinical judgement model

    threshold: 3.0 pts

    4 ptsExceeds Mastery3 ptsMastery

    2 ptsNear Mastery1 ptsBelow Mastery0 ptsNo Evidence

    Total Points: 60

    Requirements: complete sentences 3 sentences for each question

  • discussion post

    Scenario

    Mr. Johnson is a 70-year-old male complaining of shortness of breath for the past three weeks. Mr. Johnson is complaining that he has chest pain, and this pain increases when he coughs. He also reports thick green/yellow sputum for the past week. His current weight was stable at 100 kg from his previous visit six months ago. He admits to occasionally smoking cigarettes.

    Mr. Johnsons assessment is as follows:

    • Inspection upper respiratory system: Nasal and mouth mucosa is pink; no bleeding, masses, or deformities are noted in the upper respiratory system.
    • Inspection lower respiratory system: The client has a respiratory rate of 20 with even and unlabored respirations.
    • During the history, the client is speaking freely and does not report any shortness of breath while talking.
    • The client has skin appropriate for his ethnic background, with no skin integrity issues noted during the inspection.
    • Palpation: No masses, deformities, or crepitus are noted. Trachea is midline and nontender.
    • The client has equal lung expansion anterior and posterior; the client reports pain that increases with inspiration.
    • Percussion: Dullness over right lower lobe, otherwise hyper resonance.
    • Auscultation: Fine crackles in the right lower lobe with inspiration and expiratory wheezes and diminished breath sounds noted throughout.
    • Vital signs: Temperature: 100F (38C); Respiratory rate: 22; Pulse oximetry on room air: 91% to 93%; Heart rate: 90 bpm; and Blood pressure: 130/80 mm Hg

    As the nurse, you have determined the priority problem is impaired gas exchange related to the mucus collection in the airways, as evidenced by fine crackles in the right lower lobe.

    Instructions

    Using the assessment and nursing diagnosis provided in the scenario, write 200250 words identifying goals for Mr. Johnson in your initial post. Then, respond to at least two of your peers posts.

    Discussion Prompts

    • Identify two measurable short-term goals for Mr. Johnson. Explain why you chose these goals.
    • Consider what possible outcomes would change the priority problem.
    • Define one of these possible outcomes and explain how (and why) it would change the priority problem. Then, identify at least one new measurable goal related to the newly identified problem.

    Requirements: 200 words minimum