Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PICOT Worksheet.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PICOT Worksheet.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
A. Discuss how two of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) advanced-level Domain 3 competencies guide the advanced professional nurse to improve population health. Include one example for each competency in the discussion.
B. Based on the results of the interprofessional professionalism assessment in the course, provide a summary of each of the six categories. Include one strength and one opportunity for improvement for each of the six categories.
Note: Refer to the “” that you completed in Unit 4 (page 34) of the course.
C. For each of the five stages of interprofessional team development, describe a strategy the advanced professional nurse could implement to develop the interprofessional advocacy team in population health.
Note: Refer to Chapter 6 in DeNisco, S. M. (2024).
D. Summarize each of the five social determinants of health (SDOH). (suggested length of 35 sentences for each summary)
1. For each SDOH, describe one possible policy, program, or initiative that could improve that SDOH.
Note: Be sure to refer to the sources within the course to respond to part D and D1.
E. Discuss two examples using two different sources (one source per example) of how health equity was addressed in a local, state, or national health policy, program, or initiative.
F. Using published data (e.g., .gov, County Health Rankings and Roadmaps, CDC, health department site) discuss one health issue, concern, or behavior affecting the population in a specific, identified U.S. city, county, or state of your choice.
G. Discuss an evidence-based policy, program, or initiative recommendation to improve the identified population health issue, concern, or behavior in part F. Support the discussion with at least two sources.
Note: The policy/program/initiative you recommend must be one that is not currently in place in your chosen city/county/state.
H. Identify one public leader with the authority or influence to facilitate the implementation of the policy, program, or initiative recommendation from part G including the following details:
name of the leader
title of the leader
position responsibility of the leader
1. Explain why the public leader you chose in part H would be selected to facilitate the implementation of the policy, program, or initiative recommendation from part G.
I. Create an ISBAR summary of the policy, program, or initiative recommendation from part G including the public leader from part H using the attached ISBAR Summary Template. Save and submit your ISBAR summary as a separate .pdf or .docx document.
Note: Refer to the article titled Using SBAR to Communicate with Policymakers found in Unit 3 of the course.
J. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
K. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): AWM3 Task Template.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): week 3.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Instructions
Paper Requirements:
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Stafford APA_Template_7th_ed_student_papers (1) (1).docx, rubric 28.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Quality I1mprovement Policies and Processes in Nursing Practice.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
In this weeks journal entry, you will evaluate how cultural, socioeconomic, and environmental factors influence access to care and shape health outcomes across diverse populations. Reflect on how your own assumptions, values, or potential biases may affect your understanding of equity, affordability, and accessibility in the healthcare system. Consider a current or past experience, whether clinical, educational, or personal, where disparities or systemic barriers affected a patient or communitys ability to receive equitable care.
You will also explore the ethical responsibilities of nurses in advocating for fair policies and promoting population health. Identify a policy, law, or healthcare practice that you believe either promotes or inhibits health equity. Propose at least one evidence-based recommendation or public health initiative that could help mitigate disparities or improve outcomes for a marginalized or underserved population.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 2 Bias Awareness and Action Plan Journal New.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
This assignment challenges you, as a licensed RN, to apply professional nursing judgment, cultural competence, and evidence-based reasoning to real-world case study scenarios. Each scenario presents a patient and/or community situation with proposed interventions or remedies. You will critically evaluate these scenarios, agree or disagree with the remedy, and design an inclusive plan of care that addresses health equity, social determinants of health (SDOH), and health disparities.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Case Study Plan of Care 1.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): N3220 Template for Interview-Health History-Review of Systems and Mental Status Exam.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Paper needs proofread put into apa format and 2 citations paper is written but feel free to change if needed
Mini Case 6
Prepared by: Raquel Facey, RJ Jackson, Chelsea Jeffers, Zamia Keys, and Jah-Phia Lee
A manager oversees a newly established project management team consisting of three employees: two recently hired Level 1 Project Managers and one Level 3 Project Manager with a long tenure with the company. The two new hires have expertise in different aspects of the expected projects. The team will be assigned projects going forward with the expectations that members will rely on one anothers expertise and recognize who has specific knowledge as needed in the group.
If using AI, include the use of written memos from Exhibit 6-7 in your answer to Question 2.
The manager is considering enrolling the team in a week-long training course designed to enhance project management skills and introduce new models. The course is offered on multiple dates and at different locations, allowing the manager autonomy with deciding where and when the team should attend. Given the teams experience, collaborative nature, and reliance on shared knowledge, the manager must decide whether the employees should attend the training together or separately, as well as how to ensure that the information learned is effectively retained and applied once they return to work.
Question 1: So that the employees get the most out of this training, how should the manager assign the employees to attend this training? (see p.142-148)
Question 2: Based on the models presented in the assigned chapter (see pp. 141-160), which learning and transfer models would best support the team in retaining and applying information from the training described in the mini case? Please use at least two specific models from the chapter, and explain how each could be applied as a solution to improve knowledge retention.