Category: Nursing

After conducting your Key Informant Interview, create a pamphlet or a one page plan that outlines the SMART goal for the pediatric home health setting. Be sure to include your references for the SMART goal from slides 14-17 of your presentation .

RUBRIC AND CRITERIA

Content Information in the assignment is accurate, relevant to the assigned topic/question, and demonstrates student learning with Direct Clinical.

On Slide 18 from the Module A Community Survey PPT- After conducting the Key Informant Interview, you will create either a pamphlet or a one-page plan that outlines the SMART goal for the pediatric home health setting. ( Community Health Proposal). Include your references for the SMART goals from slides 14-17. Once your plan is finalized, present it to your Key Informant and request that they complete the Community Health Proposal Evaluation Template provided in the module to assess its effectiveness. You will also reflect on this evaluation. Follow the template/instructions on the evaluation. The pamphlet or one-page plan and the completed evaluation should be submitted to the assignment tab.

Note: This is your Required Direct Clinical requirement.

Student Reflection (required) at the bottom of the evaluation:

Briefly explain how you met the Direct Clinical requirement by assessing the community, developing a SMART goal plan, and presenting it to your Key Informant. Include one improvement you would make based on their feedback.

Expert

Has a detailed pamphlet or one page plan using the SMART goal method detailing the SMART goal for the pediatric home health setting. Includes references used for the SMART goals from slides 14-17. Includes color and graphicsno spelling or grammar errors. The pamphlet or- two-page plan was presented to their Key Informant. A completed Community Health Proposal Evaluation Template for the Key Informant. There is a well-thought-out reflection. The pamphlet or one-page plan and the Community Health Proposal Evaluation are turned in to the assignment tab

For the title page, follow the guidelines below. Information without brackets should remain as written. The learner should replace the information within the brackets with the requested information, and all prior information and brackets should be removed.

Literature Review

[Remove brackets & insert Your Full Name Here]

College

[Remove brackets & insert Your Course Number, Section &Course Title]

[Remove brackets & insert Your instructors name using Professor or Dr. ________]

[Remove brackets & insert Month, Day, Year this is the date the assignment is due, not the date it is submitted]

Prior to submitting your paper, make sure to remove all instructions in brackets on the following pages.

Literature Review

[The introduction to the paper must be at least 5 sentences with 1 in-text citation, a fully stated purpose statement, and PICOT Question. In this section, introduce the topic to the reader. Indicate why the selected topic is important and why it is important to conduct a literature review as part of the project. Make sure the PICOT question is written as a quality improvement question, not a research question and that it contains all components of PICOT. End this section stating, “The purpose of this paper is … “]

Project Proposal Topic

[The project proposal section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, present an overview of the topic by discussing the topic in general. Consider providing some background information and describing the gap (current practice versus best practice) in nursing practice that was identified. Consider using statistics here to reinforce the point.]

Methods of Searching

[This section must be at least 1 fully formed paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length).This section should describe how the literature search was conducted. For example: A literature review was conducted using both electronic and manual resources… Describe how the search for literature was conducted by explaining what databases or search engines wereused to find the peer-reviewed articles. Describe what keywords were used; what date range was used to obtain the most current information (remember they must be less than 5 years old); what things were excluded (example: blogs, websites with biased information, etc).]

Review of the Literature

[There must be at least 5 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with 5 in-text citations that correlate with the current, peer-reviewed references used.This will be the bulk of the review. Organization of the material here is important. In one paragraph for each of the 5 current, peer-reviewed articles, elaborate on the relation to the project topic/PICOT question, as well as what best practices were identified. Integrate key details of each article, demonstrating a clear understanding of the content reviewed. Consider the main takeaways after reading each article as they relate to the projectproject/intervention. This section should outline details of each article and also include the learners insight as they relate to the project and PICOT. Also include any other pertinent information about the topic that was discussed in the articles chosen.]

Findings

[This section must be at least 2 fully formed paragraphs (at least 5 sentences in length) with in-text citations. In this section, provide a summary of the most significant findings found in the Review of the Literature section. Identify strengths and weaknesses of the literature (for example, small sample sizes that limit the validity of the findings or conclusions that you disagree with as an evaluator); and identify any gaps in the literature found. Begin with The literature has shown…]

Conclusion

[The section should be at least 1 paragraph (at least 5 sentences in length), summarize at least 3 key points, and contain at least 1 in-text citation. Provide a thorough summary with at least 3 key points. Although not required, it is suggested learners restate the PICOT question in this section, so the reader is drawn to refocus on the topic/question.]

References

[There must be at least 5 current (within the last 5 years), peer-reviewed references. Use APA-7 formatting specific toreference type, including (but not limited to) alphabetical order and hanging indent. Specific reference examples have been discussed in the webinars.]

This is my PICOT question- roposal Plan

What is the project question (PICOT)? In other

words what are you ultimately trying to figure

out? Address in P-I-C-O-T format first; then a

narrative description.

P (Population): Post-operative patients in the

Sutter PACU

I (Intervention): Teaching nurses proper wound

care techniques

C (Comparison): Current wound care practices

O (Outcome): Reduction in post-operative

infection rates by 30%

T (Time): Within six months

Narrative description: In post-op patients at

Sutter PACU, will teaching nurses proper wound

care compare to current practice result in a

reduction of infection rates by 30% within six

months? I need to still find 5 scholarly article within the past Five years on this topic to help complete this assignment

Purpose:

A philosophy of nursing reflects a nurses core values, ethical principles, and professional beliefs, shaping their approach to education, practice, and patient care. This paper invites you to articulate your personal nursing philosophy in a concise, scholarly manner, supported by evidence from the literature.

Assignment Requirements:

• Length: 1-2 pages (excluding title page and references)
• Format: Scholarly writing, APA 7th edition formatting (including in-text citations and reference list)
• Content:

1. Introduction: Briefly introduce the concept of a nursing philosophy and its significance.
2. Personal Philosophy:

• Describe your core values and beliefs about nursing.
• Explain how these beliefs influence your approach to education, clinical practice, and patient care ethics.

1. Evidence-Based Support:

• Integrate relevant literature (e.g., nursing theories, ethical frameworks, or empirical research) to substantiate your perspective.

1. Conclusion: Summarize key points and reflect on how this philosophy guides your professional growth.

Evaluation Criteria:

• Clarity and coherence of personal philosophy
• Integration of scholarly sources (minimum of 2-3 references)
• Adherence to APA formatting and academic writing standards

Tips for Success:

• Be reflective yet professionalthis is both a personal and scholarly exercise.
• Use nursing theories (e.g., Watsons Theory of Caring, Nightingales Environmental Theory) to frame your discussion if applicable.
• Proofread for conciseness; avoid vague statements by providing specific examples or rationale.

my professor would like us to use our books if you need pages or a link to pages please let me know and I can provide it. she would also like one outside resources.

The topic is Smart Infusion Pumps.

Follow these directions: I. Post answers to the following: Share the area of practice that is of interest to you and amenable for a potential evidence-based improvement project. Identify a real or potential clinical/health care problem. Briefly describe the problem. The problem can be real or hypothetical. Briefly describe what outcomes you could use to identify the problem (INTERNAL DATA) and then how you would measure these outcomes to determine if there was improvement. Provide an applicable reference (i.e., an article that discusses your outcome(s) and a measurement tool). Formulate a searchable, answerable clinical question (PICOT [or a PPCO questions see the Waldrop article]) about your identified problem and to guide a potential improvement project. Write your clinical question in the PICOT (or PPCO) format that will yield the most relevant and best evidence relative to the problem. Don’t forget about the “T,” time. Think about this as the time you are evaluating the effect of the intervention on the patient, not the time that you intend to collect data for all patients. For instance, if you are comparing blood pressure medicine effects for Drug A and guided imagery, then the comparison time frame would be the duration of action of the drug. For example: “in patients age 60+ with a diagnosis of hypertension, does the administration of Drug A compared to the use of guided imagery, produce a lower systolic blood pressure for 12hours?” You might be collecting data for 12 months, but your time frame for each patient will be shorter, even if you look at BP measurements every day for 12 months. Identify keywords (at least five) from your PICOT (or PPCO) question to use in a future electronic database search. These five keywords MUST be derived from the National Library of Medicine’s Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms. &feature=youtu.be Please follow these instructions: Include at least three references (one of which may from an assigned textbook). Please note that you should be using at least some empirical literature to support your project proposal – i.e., articles that discuss an EBP project and include the methods and results from this project (and not an SLR, scoping review, or guidelines’ article that may review a number of other studies). Please use headings for the various components of your main discussion board post. In other words, I want to clearly see that you have responded to each question/component within the instructions.

The purpose of this assignment is to apply opiate prescribing guidelines in individual nursing practice. You are required to interview a pharmacist to complete Part Three of this paper. Write a 1,500-2,000-word paper that addresses the following:

Part One

Using the “CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain – United States, 2022,” located in the topic Resources, and guidelines from the state in which you reside to complete this portion of the assignment, explain how you would incorporate the prescription guidelines into your practice when caring for patients, communities, and populations. In your explanation, include a patient scenario for the following:

• Summary guidelines for the treatment of acute pain versus chronic pain
• Elaborated guidelines for the treatment of acute pain and chronic pain

Part Two

Using the “CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain – United States, 2022,” located in the topic Resources, and guidelines from the state in which you reside, explain how you would implement the guidelines into your clinical practice. In your explanation include a patient scenario that addresses how to practice the following:

• Implement these guidelines into clinical flow.
• Evaluate if an “inherited patient” is on an appropriate opioid therapy.
• Manage an “inherited patient” on an excessive opioid therapy.
• Connect patients with medication-assisted treatment.
• Approach an opioid exit strategy.
• Manage pain and opioids in special populations.
• Connect with local and national resources.
• Through collaboration, correct clinical misperceptions by providers, patients, and the public about opioids.

Part Three

Interview an outpatient pharmacist, and if possible, shadow the pharmacist. Describe the exchange in Part Three of your paper. Use the prompts listed below during your interview and consider asking follow-up questions to gain deeper insights.

• How do you make opioid therapy a positive experience?
• What key elements must be included in a prescription for scheduled medications?
• Do you treat Schedule II in the manner as Schedule III-V? What is the difference between Schedule II-V drugs?
• What are the main issues you see with problematic opioid prescriptions that could have been prevented by the prescriber? What issues do you find yourself calling the provider for?
• What are the barriers or issues that would prevent patients from receiving their opioid prescription?
• In your opinion, how can the opioid prescription process between the provider, pharmacy, and patient be improved?
• How does a pharmacist incorporate a prescription monitoring program (PMP) in their daily practice?
• Describe the components of the PMP, including milligram morphine equivalent (MME).
• Create two additional questions that will enrich your interview and include the discussion in your paper.

General Requirements

Prepare this paper according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

for this assignment can you please do thorough research and give detailed information from atleast 5 or more scholar reviewed resources. Write atleast 5 pages for case study analysis and 3 pages for care plan .And 3rd question is care plan i attached format follow exact patter reference style , only thing diagnosis should be psychosocial (using NANDA LIST) And follow each part from given rubric . Use simple language and APA format with proper page numbering( no running head) and proper citation including intext citation (including first page) .and for rationale please provide scholar reviewed article. please only accept if you can follow each and every detail

Instructions:

1. Select a SMART technology product that enhances the delivery of patient care by improving safety, efficiency or quality of care. Examples of SMART technology can include patient monitoring devices, mobile applications, medication administration products, patient documentation tools, and clinical decision support systems.

Create a professional PowerPoint presentation. Guidelines for PowerPoint presentation design:

• Present key points on each slide – no more than 6 bullet points and no more than 6-10 words per line/bullet point. Okay to use phrases, but avoid paragraphs.
• Font type and size are appropriate for audience view.
• Slide design and background are appealing but do not distract from the information being presented.
• Animations, graphics, or sounds are used to emphasize important points but do not distract from the information being presented. **For images, make sure to use stock photos and follow copyright law as necessary.
• Include SPEAKER NOTES on each slide. You will need sufficient writing in the speaker notes to explain the points made on the slides. Refer to the rubric to ensure all areas are discussed. Notes should have appropriate citations to sources using APA 7th ed. formatting guidelines.
• Title slide: Title of presentation, full name, course number, and name, and month/year.
• Introduction slide: State the purpose and main topics you will cover in your presentation.
• Conclusion/Summary: Highlight/Summarize the key points of your presentation. Provide key takeaways for the audience.
• Reference list slide – Use APA (7th ed.) format and guidelines.

3. The final PowerPoint presentation should be 10-12 slides in length, including the title and reference slides.

• Introduction: Provide a brief description of the patient care technology/system you have chosen.
• Describe how this SMART technology product improves the safety, efficiency, and/or quality of patient care.
• Discuss the benefits of of this patient care technology/system. Include perspectives from the patient, care provider, and healthcare organization.
• Discuss potential barriers to implementing this patient care technology/system. Include perspectives from the patient, care provider and healthcare organization.
• Identify what current or developing technology could potentially/eventually replace this SMART technology. How would this “newer” technology impact patient care delivery?
• Conclusion/Summary : Provide a conclusion/summary of the key points highlighting the patient care technology/system you presented on your powerpoint

3. Include a minimum of 3 references to research journal articles. Resources must be published in the last 5 years. You may include more resources such as professional websites and patient care technology/system product website.

4. Use of the APA (7th ed.) format and style are expected in preparing your slides and speaker notes.